Skip to main content Accessibility help

Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist

  • Josef Fruehwald (a1)


This paper is equal parts methodological recommendation and an empirical investigation of the time dimensions of linguistic change. It is increasingly common in the sociolinguistic literature for researchers to utilize speech data that was collected over the course of many decades. These kinds of datasets contain three different time dimensions that researchers can utilize to investigate language change: (i) the speakers’ dates of birth, (ii) the speakers’ ages at the time of the recording, and (iii) the date of the recording. Proper investigation of all three time dimensions is crucial for a theoretical understanding of the dynamics of language change. I recommend utilizing two-dimensional tensor product smooths, fit over speakers’ date of birth and the year of the recording, to analyze the contribution of these three time dimensions to linguistic changes. I apply this method to five language changes, based on data drawn from the Philadelphia Neighborhood Corpus. I find relatively weak evidence for lifespan effects in these changes, robust generational effects, and in one case, evidence of a zeitgeist effect.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist
      Available formats



Hide All
Acton, Eric K. (2011). On gender differences in the distribution of um and uh. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(2):19.
Arnold, Jennifer E., Fagnano, Maria, & Tanenhaus, Michael K. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(1):2536. doi:10.1023/A:1021980931292.
Baayen, R. Harald, van Rij, Jacolien, de Cat, Cecile, & Wood, Simon N. (2016). Autocorrelated errors in experimental data in the language sciences: Some solutions offered by Generalized Additive Mixed Models., January. Available at: Accessed October 5, 2016.
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):148. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bowie, David. (2005). Language change over the lifespan: A test of the apparent time construct. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11(2):4558.
Calamai, Silvia. (2011). Ordinare archivi sonori: Il progetto Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 35:135164.
Carter, Phillip. (2007). Phonetic variation and speaker agency: Mexicana identity in a North Carolina middle school. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. 13(2):114.
Chambers, Jack K. (1992). Dialect acquisition. Language 68(4):673705. doi:10.1353/lan.1992.0060.
Clark, Herbert H., & Fox Tree, Jean E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84(1):73111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3.
Corley, Martin, MacGregor, Lucy J., & Donaldson, David I. (2007). It's the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition 105(3):658668. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010.
Corrigan, Karen P., Buchstaller, Isabelle, Mearns, Adam, & Moisl, Hermann. (2012). The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE) and the talk of the toon. Newcastle University. Available at: Accessed October 5, 2016.
Davidson, Lisa. (2006). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(1):407415. doi:10.1121/1.2205133.
De Decker, Paul. (2006). A real-time investigation of social and phonetic changes in post-adolescence. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2):6576.
Dinkin, Aaron J. (2008). The real effect of word frequency on phonetic variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(1):97106.
Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. The phonological influence on phonetic change . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Fruehwald, Josef (2016). The early influence of phonology on a phonetic change. Language 92(2):376410. doi:10.1353/lan.2016.0041.
Gordon, Elizabeth, Maclagan, Margaret, & Hay, Jennifer. (2007). The ONZE corpus. In Beal, J., Corrigan, K., & Moisl, H. (eds.) Creating and digitizing language corpora. Vol. 2. Diachronic databases. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 82104. doi: 10.1057/9780230223202_4.
Gregersen, Frans, Maegaard, Marie, & Pharao, Nicolai. (2009). The long and short of (æ)-variation in Danish: A panel study of short (æ)-variants in Danish in real time. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41(1):6482. doi:10.1080/03740460903364086.
Harrington, John, Palethorpe, Sallyanne, & Watson, Catherine I. (2000). Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? Nature 408(6815):927928. doi:10.1038/35050160.
Hay, Jennifer B., Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Walker, Abby J., & LaShell, Patrick. (2015). Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change. Cognition 139:8391. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.012.
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. (2016). LIA. UiO Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies. Available at: Accessed October 5, 2016.
Kendall, Tyler. (2013). Speech rate, pause and sociolinguistic variation. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137291448.
Labov, William. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1(1):8597. doi:10.1017/S0954394500000120.
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2. Social factors. Language in Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2):344387. doi:10.1353/lan.2007.0082.
Labov, William, Graff, David, & Harris, Wendell A. (1986). Testing listeners’ reactions to phonological markers. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 4558.
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid, & Fruehwald, Josef. (2013). One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1):3065. doi:10.1353/lan.2013.0015.
Laserna, Charlyn M., Seih, Yi.-Tai, & Pennebaker, James W. (2014). Um … who like says you know: Filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33(3):328338. doi:10.1177/0261927X14526993.
MacKenzie, Laurel. (2014). Testing the predictions of usage-based models on language change across the lifespan. Paper Presented at NWAV 43, Chicago, October 26.
MacKenzie, Laurel, & Sankoff, Gillian. (2010). A quantitative analysis of diphthongization in Montreal French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2):91100.
Nycz, Jennifer. (2013). New contrast acquisition: Methodological issues and theoretical implications. English Language and Linguistics 17(2):325–57. doi:10.1017/S1360674313000051.
Nycz, Jennifer, & De Decker, Paul. (2006). A new way of analyzing vowels: Comparing formant contours using smoothing spline ANOVA. Poster presented at NWAV 35, Columbus, November 10.
Rickford, John, & Price, Mackenzie. (2013). Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2):143179. doi:10.1111/josl.12017.
Roberts, Julie. (1997). Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t, d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24(2):351372.
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Josef, Evanini, Keelan, Seyfarth, Scott, Gorman, Kyle, Prichard, Hilary, & Yuan, Jiahong. (2015). FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) 1.2.2. Zenodo. Available at: Accessed October 5, 2016.
Sankoff, Gillian. (2004). Adolescents, young adults, and the critical period: Two case studies from ‘Seven Up’. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 121139.
Sankoff, Gillian (2006). Age: Apparent time and real time. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. 110116. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6.
Sankoff, Gillian (2013). Longitudinal studies. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R., & Lucas, C., (eds.), Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0013.
Sankoff, Gillian, & Blondeau, Hélène. (2007). Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montral French. Language 83(3):560588. doi: 10.1353/lan.2007.0106.
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Fortune, Liane. (2007). ‘Mam, my trousers is fa'in doon!’: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1):6399. doi: 10.1017/S0954394507070044.
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Fortune, Liane. (2009). Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21(1):6995. doi:10.1017/S0954394509000039.
Tagliamonte, Sali, & D'Arcy, Alexandra. (2009). Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1):58108. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0084.
Tottie, Gunnel. (2011). Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2):173197. doi:10.1075/ijcl.16.2.02tot.
Van Hofwegen, Janneke, & Wolfram, Walt. (2010). Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(4):427455. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00452.x.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. (2012a). Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Linguistics and Language Compass 6(6):371382. doi:10.1002/lnc3.343.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. (2012b). Real-time evidence for age grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 24(2):179202. doi:10.1017/S0954394512000099.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, & Sankoff, Gillian. (2011). Age grading in the Montréal French inflected future. Language Variation and Change 23(3):275313. doi:10.1017/S0954394511000111.
Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wieling, Martijn, Grieve, Jack, Bouma, Gosse, Fruehwald, Josef, Coleman, John, & Liberman, Mark. (2016). Variation and change in the use of hesitation markers in Germanic languages. Language Dynamics and Change 6(2):199234. doi: 10.1163/22105832-00602001.
Wieling, Martijn, Nerbonne, John, & Baayen, R Harald. (2011). Quantitative social dialectology: Explaining linguistic variation geographically and socially. PLoS One 6(9):e23613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023613.
Wood, Simon N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. London: Chapman & Hall.
Wood, Simon, & Scheipl, Fabian. (2014). gamm4: Generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. Available at: Accessed October 5, 2016.
Zellou, Georgia, & Tamminga, Meredith. (2014). Nasal coarticulation changes over time in Philadelphia English. Journal of Phonetics 47:1835. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2014.09.002.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed