Skip to main content Accessibility help

Correlatives in earlier English: Change and continuity in the expression of interclausal dependencies

  • Meta Links (a1), Ans van Kemenade (a1) and Stefan Grondelaers (a1)


A construction very widely used in Old English and Old Germanic more broadly are correlatives introduced by an adverbial or conditional subclause, as in When you've done your homework, (then) you can come back (Old English: ‘…, then can you come back’). Correlatives originate from a paratactic clause structure, making use of resumptive adverbs such as then belonging to the Old Germanic series of demonstrative adverbs, whose syntactic niche was the clause-initial position, particularly in Verb Second main clauses. Paratactic structure in correlatives is diagnosed by the presence of a resumptive adverb. We show that the correlative use of resumptive adverbs is sensitive to both clause-internal and clause-external variables: mood, subclause-internal particles, negation, subject type, subclause weight, text type, translation. Correlatives decline from late Old English onward. Although it may seem tempting to attribute this to the loss of Verb Second in English, it resulted primarily from the loss of the original Germanic resumptive adverbs.



Hide All
Arnold, Jennifer E., Losongco, Anthony, Wasow, Thomas, & Ginstrom, Ryan. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1):2855.
Auer, Peter, & Lindström, Jan. (2011). Verb-First conditionals in German and Swedish: Convergence in writing, divergence in speaking. In Auer, P. & Pfänder, S. (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 218262.
Baker, Peter S. (2007). Adverbs, conjunctions and prepositions. In Baker, P. S. (ed.), Introduction to Old English. Malden: Blackwell. 96111.
Bayer, Josef, & Obenaurer, Hans-Georg. (2011). Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. Linguistic Review 28:449491.
Bhatt, Rajesh, & Pancheva, Roumyana. (2006). Conditionals. In Everaert, M. & Riemsdijk, H. v. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax. Malden: Blackwell. 638687.
Biberauer, Theresa, & van Kemenade, Ans. (2011). Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10:1769.
Brinton, Laurel J. (1996). “Mystery features” of Old and Middle English. In Brinton, L. J. (ed.), Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalisation and discourse function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 128.
Brinton, Laurel J. (2006). Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English. In Kemenade, A. v. & Los, B. (eds.), The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell. 307334.
Burns, Robert B., & Burns, Richard A. (2008). Logistic regression. In Business research methods and statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE. 568588.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (2011). German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. Linguistic Review 28:493531.
Coniglio, Marco. (2011). Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln. Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Studia grammatica 73 . Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Den Besten, Hans. (1983). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abraham, W. (ed.), On the formal nature of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 47131.
Enkvist, Nils E. (1972). Old English adverbial þa – an action marker? Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73:9096.
Enkvist, Nils E. (1986). More about the textual functions of the Old English adverbial þa . In Kastovsky, D. & Szwedek, A. (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical bounderies: In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occassion of his fiftieth birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 301309.
Field, Andy. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.
Fischer, Olga. (1992). Syntax. In Blake, N. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 2. 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207408.
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem, & van der Wurff, Wim. (2000). The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. (1997). The landscape of polarity items. Groningen: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics.
Grondelaers, Stefan, Geeraerts, Dirk, & Speelman, Dirk. (2007). A case for a cognitive corpus linguistics. In Gonzales-Marques, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., & Spivey, M. J. (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haeberli, Eric. (2002). Inflectional morphology and the loss of verb second in English. In Lightfoot, D. (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 88106.
Haegeman, Liliane. (2003). Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind & Language 18:317339.
Haegeman, Liliane. (2012). Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and composition of the left periphery: The carthograph of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, Clark. (1960). A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinrichs, Lars, & Szmrecsányi, Benedikt. (2007). Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3):437474.
Horst, Joop M. van der. (1981). Kleine Middelnederlandse syntaxis. Amsterdam: Huis aan de drie grachten.
Horst, Joop M. van der. (2008). Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The clause: Adjuncts. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 663784.
Kemenade, Ans van. (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kemenade, Ans van. (1997). Topics in Old and Middle English negative sentences. In Hickey, R. & Puppel, S. (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling: A festschrift for Jaced Fisiak on his 60th birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 293306.
Kemenade, Ans van. (2000). Jespersen's cycle revisited: formal properties of grammaticalization. In Pintzuk, S., Tsoulas, G., & Warner, A. (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 5175.
Kemenade, Ans van. (2002). Word order in Old English prose and poetry: the position of finite verbs and adverbs. In Minkova, D. & Stockwell, R. (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 355373.
Kemenade, Ans van. (2009). Discourse relations and word order change. In Hinterhölzl, R. & Petrova, S. (eds.), Information structure and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 91120.
Kemenade, Ans van. (2012). Rethinking the loss of verb second. In Nevalainen, T. & Traugott, E. C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 822834.
Kemenade, Ans van, & Los, Bettelou. (2006). Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In Kemenade, A. v. & Los, B. (eds.), The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 224248.
Kemenade, Ans van, & Milicev, Tanja. (2011). Syntax and discourse in Old and Middle English word order. In Jonas, D., Whitman, J., & Garrett, A. (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 239254.
Kemenade, Ans van, Milicev, Tanja, & Baayen, Harold. (2008). The balance between discourse and syntax in Old and Middle English. In Gotti, M., Dossena, M., & Dury, R. (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006. Vol. 1. Syntax and morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 322.
Kemenade, Ans van, & Westergaard, Marit. (2012). Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In Meurman-Solin, A., López-Couso, M. J., & Los, B. (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 87118.
Kiparsky, Paul. (1995). Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Battye, A. & Roberts, I. (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 140169.
Kiss, Katelin E. (1995). Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Komen, Erwin R. (2009). CorpusStudio. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
Komen, Erwin R. (2011). Cesax: Coreference editor for syntactically annotated XML corpora. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
Komen, Erwin R. (2012). Coreferenced corpora for information structure research. In Tyrkkö, J., Kilpiö, M., Nevalainen, T., & Rissanen, M. (eds.), Outposts of historical corpus linguistics: From the Helsinki corpus to a proliferation of resources, studies in variation, contacts and change in English. Vol. 10. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Available at: Accessed October 29, 2012.
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice, & Delfs, Lauren. (2004). Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Early Modern English. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics.
Kroch, Anthony, & Taylor, Ann. (2000). Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics.
Lipták, Anikó. (2009). The landscape of correlatives: An empirical and analytical survey. In Lipták, A. (ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 146.
Los, Bettelou. (2009). The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13(1):97125.
Los, Bettelou. (2012). The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Meurman-Solin, A., López-Couso, M. J., & Los, B. (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2146.
Los, Bettelou, & van Kemenade, Ans. (in press). Syntax and the morphology of deixis: The loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking. In Schlachter, E. & Veenstra, T. (eds.), Demonstratives (working title). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mitchell, Bruce. (1985). Subordinate clauses. In Mitchell, B. (ed.), Old English syntax: Subordination, independent elements, and element order. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 289414, 770–867.
Moessner, Lilo. (2006). The subjunctive in Early Modern English adverbial clauses. In Mair, C., Heuberger, R., & Wallmannsberger, J. (eds.), Corpora and the history of English. Papers dedicated to Manfred Markus on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday. Heidelberg: Winter. 249263.
OED. (ND). Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: Accessed August 2014.
OED. (ND). “then, adv. (conj., adj., and n.)”. Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: Accessed August 2014.
Postma, Gertjan J. (2002). Negative polarity and modality in Middle Dutch ghe-particle constructions. In Barbiers, S., Beukema, F., & van der Wurff, W. (eds.), Modality and its interaction with the verbal system. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 205244.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. (1985). Syntactic and semantic functions of subordinate clauses. In Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (eds.), A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman. 10881097.
Rissanen, Matti. (1999). Syntax. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 186331.
Rissanen, Matti. (2011). On the long history of English adverbial subordinators. In Meurman-Solin, A. & Lenker, U. (eds.), Connectives in synchrony and diachrony in European languages, Studies in variation, contacts and change in English, vol. 8. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Available at: Accessed August 25, 2014.
Struckmeier, Volker. (2014). Ja doch wohl C? Modal particles in German as C-related elements. Studia Linguistica 68(1):1648.
Szmrecsányi, Benedikt. (2004). Op operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Purnelle, G., Fairon, C., & Dister, A. (eds.), Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain. 10321039.
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan, & Beths, Frank. (2003). The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose . University of York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (1992). Syntax. In Hogg, R. M. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 1. The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168289.
Van den Nest, Daan. (2010). Should conditionals be emergent … : Asyndetic subordination in German and English as a challenge to grammaticalisation research. In Van Linden, A., Verstraete, J.-C., & Davidse, K. (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 93136.
Warner, Anthony. (2007). Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11(1):81111.
Wårvik, Brita. (2013). Participant continuity and narrative structure: Defining discourse marker functions in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 34:209242.
Wouden, Ton van der. (1997). Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.
Zimmermann, Malte. (2011). Discourse particles. In Portner, P., Maienborn, C., & von Heusinger, K. (eds.), Semantics. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK 33.2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 20112038.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. (2011). The syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Variation and Change
  • ISSN: 0954-3945
  • EISSN: 1469-8021
  • URL: /core/journals/language-variation-and-change
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed