Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T02:26:25.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraints on the social meaning of released /t/: A production and perception study of U.S. politicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

Robert J. Podesva ,
Jermay Reynolds ,
Patrick Callier  and
Jessica Baptiste
Robert J. Podesva
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Jermay Reynolds
Affiliation:
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Patrick Callier
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Jessica Baptiste
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies on released /t/ collectively suggest that the linguistic feature is associated with intelligence and education, social meanings that can be recruited in constructing articulate personas. This study examines the production of released /t/ by six prominent U.S. political figures, as well as the social meanings listeners attribute to the variant. Employing a matched guise technique facilitated by digital stimulus manipulation, we find that the social meanings associated with released /t/ are constrained by linguistic and social factors. Regarding the former, word-medial /t/ releases carry stronger social meanings than those appearing word-finally. With respect to social factors, listener interpretations vary according to the identity of the speaker and knowledge of how frequently particular speakers produce /t/ releases. Thus, even though conventionalized associations between linguistic forms and meanings can be drawn upon to construct articulate personas, not all speakers can do so with equal effectiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 59 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackman, Dan, & Povich, Elaine S. (2006). President Hillary Clinton? Available at: http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/06/leadership-pink-clinton-cx_ag_0906clinton.html. Accessed November 24, 2014.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23:231–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, H. Samy, & Smitherman, Geneva. (2012). Articulate while black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the U.S. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barras, Claude, Geoffrois, Edouard, Wu, Zhibiao, & Liberman, Mark. (2001). Transcriber: Development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production. Speech Communication 33(1–2):5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benor, Sarah. (2001). The learned /t/: Phonological variation in Orthodox Jewish English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics (Selected Papers from New Ways of Analyzing Variation 29) 7:1–16.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah. (2004). Talmid chachams and tsedeykeses: Language, learnedness, and masculinity among Orthodox Jews. Jewish Social Studies 11:147–170.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5:341–345.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. (2001). The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11:84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. (2011). White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. (1992a). A note on English sentence-final stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 81:37–38.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. (1992b). Sex, dialects, and reduction. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 81:149–164.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82.1:32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2008). I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37:637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2009). The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21:135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86:52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavuto, Neil. (2007). Interview with George W. Bush. Your World, Fox News Channel. Aired January 31.Google Scholar
Cohen Priva, Uriel. (2008). Using information content to predict phone deletion. In Abner, N. & Bishop, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. 90–98.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1981). The relation between black and white speech in the South. American Speech 56:163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul. (2010). Exploring social-indexical knowledge: A long past but a short history. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 1:5–39.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, & Docherty, Gerard. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34:409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. (2008). Regional differences in perceiving vowel tokens on Southernness, education, and pleasantness ratings. Language Variation and Change 20:67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1996). Form and function in linguistic variation. In Guy, G. R., Feagin, C., Schiffrin, D., & Baugh, J. (eds.), Towards a social science of language, I: Variation and change in language and society. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory, & Boyd, Sally. (1990). The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change 2:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, & Drager, Katie. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34:458–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, & Kiesling, Scott. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Fosler-Lussier, Daniel, Girand, Cynthia, & Raymond, William D. (1998). Reduction of English function words in Switchboard. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 7:3111–3114.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle, & Raymond, William D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. (2003). Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20:219–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (2006 [1966]). The social stratification of English in New York City. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej, & Nagy, Naomi. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:431–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez. (2006). Mosaic identity and style: Phonological variation among Reform American Jews. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez. (2011). Teasing apart to bring together: Gender and sexuality in variationist research. American Speech 86:69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. (2007). Sociolinguistic extensions of exemplar theory: Comments on Flege, Khattab, and Darcy, Peperkamp, and Dupoux. In Cole, J. & Hualde, J. I. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 443–454.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1987 [1980]). Language and social networks. 2nd ed.Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moore, Emma. (2004). Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for shared identity creation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 49:375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Emma, & Podesva, Robert J. (2009). Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38:447–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton, Jane. (1979). Final stop consonant release. In Leon, P. R. and Martin, P. J. (eds.), Toronto English: Studies in phonetics to honour C. D. Rouillard. Toronto: Didier. 89–95.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartɫomiej, & Preston, Dennis R. (2005). The /ay/s have it: The perception of /ay/ as a North-South stereotype in United States English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37:107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2006). Phonetic detail in sociolinguistic variation: Its linguistic significance and role in the construction of social meaning. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:478–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2011a). The California vowel shift and gay identity. American Speech 86:32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2011b). Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39:233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J., & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2001). Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. In Campbell-Kibler, K., Podesva, R., Roberts, S., & Wong, A. (eds.), Language and sexuality: Contesting meaning in theory and practice. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 175–189.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2006). Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. In Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. (eds.), The language and sexuality reader. London: Routledge. 141–150.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Hall-Lew, Lauren, Brenier, Jason, Lewis, Stacy, & Starr, Rebecca. (2012). Condoleezza Rice and the sociophonetic construction of identity. In Hernandez-Campoy, J. M. & Cutillas-Espinosa, J. A. (eds.), Style-shifting in public: New perspectives on stylistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, William D., Dautricourt, Robin, & Hume, Elizabeth. (2006). Word-internal /t, d/ deletion in spontaneous speech: Modeling the effects of extra-linguistic, lexical, and phonological factors. Language Variation and Change 18:55–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. (1986). The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language & Communication 6:215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Joel. (2007). Rove: Obama “articulate” but inexperienced. Available at: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rove-obama-articulate-but-inexperienced/. Accessed November 24, 2014.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Smith, Eric. (2005). Goldvarb X. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer. (2009). Martha Stewart behaving badly: Parody and the symbolic meaning of style. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:613–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, Elizabeth. (2001). To “errrr” is human: Ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31:153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23:193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Vol. 5. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., & Steriade, D. (eds.), Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qing. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34:431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qing (2007). Cosmopolitanism and linguistic capital in China: Language, gender and the transition to a globalized market economy in Beijing. In McElhinny, B. S. (ed.), Words, worlds, and material girls: Language, gender, globalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qing (2008). Rhotacization and the “Beijing Smooth Operator”: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar