Skip to main content Accessibility help

The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective

  • Kathleen Graves (a1)


This article examines curriculum from a social contextual perspective in which enactment – teaching and learning – is the central process, to which planning and evaluation contribute. It looks at the ways two kinds of contexts, target-language embedded and target-language removed, influence language curriculum planning and enactment. It provides a brief history of syllabus design and a rationale for moving beyond syllabus as the primary construct for curriculum planning. It then explores the classroom as the context of enactment and the role of the teacher as catalyst for curriculum change. It reconceptualizes the classroom as a learning community with potential links with real, virtual and imagined communities. It briefly explores integrated approaches to evaluation and assessment and concludes with examples of promising directions and suggestions for further research. Examples of practice that illustrate concepts are provided throughout the article.



Hide All
de Abreu-e-Lima, D. M., de Oliveira, L. C., Augusto-Navarro, E. H. (2008). Focusing on teaching from the get-go: An experience from Brazil. In Carroll, (ed.), 177–198.
Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research 7.3, 113142.
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal 89.3, 353366.
Allwright, D. & Hanks, J. (in press). The developing language learner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions and directions. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Bainbridge, V. & Oldfield, J. (2007). Sowing the seeds: An innovative gardening project. In Burns & de Silva Joyce (eds.), 15–42.
Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. London: Penguin Books.
Basturkman, H. (2003). Beyond the individual speaker in New Zealand. In Coombe & Hubley (eds.), 91–102.
Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly 30.4, 723738.
Braine, G. (2002). Academic literacy and the non-native speaker graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1, 5968.
Breen, M. P. (1987). Contemporary paradigms in syllabus design. Part 1. Language Teaching 20.1, 8192, Part 2. 20.2, 157174.
Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C. N. (2001). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. In Hall & Hewings (eds.), 9–26.
Breen, M. & Littlejohn, A. (2000). Classroom decision-making: Negotiation and process syllabuses in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A. & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 188228.
Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. & de Silva Joyce, H. (eds.) (2007a). Planning and teaching creatively within a required curriculum for adult learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Burns, A. & de Silva Joyce, H. (2007b). Challenging requirements: How teachers navigate to make changes within required curricula. In Burns & de Silva Joyce (eds.), l–14.
Burns, A., Joyce, H. & Gollin, S. (1996). ‘I see what you mean’. Using spoken discourse in the classroom: A handbook for teachers. Sydney: NCELTR.
Burton, J. & Daroon, Y. (2003). Constructing an English as a foreign language curriculum from learner discourse. In Burton, J. & Clennell, C. (eds.), Interaction and language learning. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, 143160.
Cammerata, L. (2006). Understanding and implementing content-based instruction: An exploration of foreign language teachers' lived experience. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Canagarajah, S. (2006). TESOL at 40: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly 40.1, 934.
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1.1, 147.
Carroll, M. (ed.) (2008a). Developing a new curriculum for adult learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Carroll, M. (2008b). Creating a new curriculum: Leadership and communication. In Carroll, (ed.), 1–10.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Clavijo, A., Hine, N. & Quintero, M. L. (forthcoming). Exploring the EFL curriculum through the use of a virtual forum. In Graves, & Lopriore, (eds.).
Coombe, C. A. & Hubley, N. J. (eds.) (2003). Assessment practices. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dubin, F. & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course design: Developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dupuis, D. (forthcoming). Are you valiant enough for ESL content design? In Graves, & Lopriore, (eds.).
Eisner, E. (1985). The educational imagination (2nd edn.). New York: Macmillan.
Engeström, Y. (1994). Teachers as collaborative thinkers: Activity-theoretical study of an innovative teacher team. In Carlgren, I., Handal, G., Gunnar & Vaage, S. (eds.), Teachers' minds and actions: Research on teachers' thinking and practice. London: The Falmer Press, 4361.
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: NCELTR.
Feez, S. (2001). Curriculum evolution in the Australian adult migrant English program. In Hall & Hewings (eds.), 208–228.
Franson, C. & Vazquez, M. (2006). Adaptation and contingency: teaching history to learners of English as an additional language in the mainstream classroom. In McKay, (ed.), 81–100.
Freeman, D. (2006). Teaching and learning in the ‘age of reform’: The problem of the verb. In Gieve, S. & Miller, I. (eds.), Understanding the language classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 239262.
Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 32.3, 397417.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Georgetown University Department of German (2007). <> accessed 25/09/2007.
Gibbons, P. (2006). Steps for planning an integrated program for ESL learners in mainstream classes. In McKay, (ed.), 215–233.
Goff, K. (1998). Chaos, collaboration and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 14.1, 2942.
Goodman, M. (2003). Cooperative ESP assessment at a Japanese university. In Coombe & Hubley (eds.) 49–59.
Graddol, D. (2005). The future of English next: Envisioning the future world of English language learning. London: British Council.
Graves, K. (ed.) (1996). Teachers as course developers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Graves, K. (2001). A framework of course development processes. In Hall & Hewings (eds.), 178–196.
Graves, K. (2006a). Preface to P. McKay, (ed.), Planning and teaching creatively within a required curriculum for school age learners, Alexandria, VA: TESOL, v–vii.
Graves, K. (2006b). Does teaching hinder learning? Presented at the Thai TESOL convention, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Graves, K. (forthcoming). Curriculum in teacher education. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. (eds.), Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graves, K. & Lopriore, L. (eds.) (forthcoming). Developing a new curriculum for school-age learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Gunn, C. (2003). Exploring second language communicative competence. Language Teaching Research 7.2, 240258.
Hall, D. R. & Hewings, A. (eds.) (2001). Innovation in English language teaching: A reader. London: Routledge.
Hall, J. K. (1998). The communication standards. In Phillips, J. K. & Terry, R. (eds.), Foreign language standards: Linking research, theories and practice. New York: National Textbook Company/ACTFL, 1556.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A., Moore, S. & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hargreaves, P. (1989). DES-IMPL-EVALU-IGN: An evaluator's checklist. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 35–47.
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howatt, A. P. R. (2004). A history of English language teaching (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1986). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, P. W. (ed.) (1992a). Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Jackson, P. W. (1992b). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In Jackson, (ed.), 3–40.
Japan MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology) (2007). <> accessed 18/09/2007.
Johnson, K. (1995). Understanding communication in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, R. K. (ed.) (1989a). The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, R. K. (1989b). A decision-making framework for the coherent language curriculum. In Johnson, R. K.. (ed.), 1–23.
Jordon, D. (2002). The notion of two-ways/both ways schooling. Ngoon-jook 22. 4647.
Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kiely, R. & Rea-Dickins, P.. (eds.) (2005). Program evaluation in language education. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kirkgöz, Y. (2006). Developing a corpus-based academic reading course. In Snow, & Kamhi-Stein, (eds.), 143–165.
Kirkgöz, Y. (2007). Innovation as a curriculum renewal process in a university in Turkey. In Rice, (ed.), 135–160.
Knox, J. (2007). Foreign eyes on Thailand: An ESP project for EFL learners. In Burns & da Silva Joyce (eds.), 119–142.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Freeman, D. (in press). Language moves: The place of languages – foreign and otherwise – in classroom teaching and learning. In Greene, J., Kelly, G. & Luke, A.. (eds.), Review of Research on Education.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Legutke, M. (2001). Redesigning the foreign language classroom: A critical perspective on information technology and educational change. In Davison, C., Crew, V., & Hung, J.. (eds.), Innovation and language education. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, Department of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education, 3551.
Legutke, M. & Thomas, H. (1991). Process and experience in the language classroom. Harlow: Longman.
Lewis, M. (2001). Lexis in the syllabus. In Hall & Hewings (eds.), 46–54.
Li, D. (2001). Teachers' perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. In Hall & Hewings (eds.), 149–165.
Long, M. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lopriore, L. (2004). Portfolio assessment in Italian secondary schools. Presented at TESOL Italy Conference, Rome.
MacKenzie, A. (2002). Changing contexts: Connecting teacher autonomy and institutional development. In Mackenzie, A.. (ed.), Developing autonomy. Proceedings of the JALT CUE SIG Conference 2001. Tokyo: JALT Pan-SIG Committee, 223–232.
Magnan, S. S. (2007). Reconsidering communicative language teaching for national goals. Modern Language Journal 91, 249252.
Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matus, C. & McCarthy, C. (2003). The triumph of multiplicity and the carnival of difference: Curriculum dilemmas in the age of postcolonialisation and globalization. In Pinar (ed.), 73–82.
McAndrew, J. (2007). Responding to learners' language needs in an oral EFL class. In Burns & de Silva Joyce (eds.), 189–204.
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (2001). Designing the discourse syllabus. In Hall & Hewings (eds.), 55–63.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McKay, P.. (ed.) (2006a). Planning and teaching creatively within a required curriculum for school age learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
McKay, P. (2006b). Teachers introducing change in required curricula for school-age English language learners: Influences and processes. In McKay, (ed.), 1–12.
Mok, A., Chow, A. & Wong, W. (2006). Strengthening language arts in English language teaching in Hong Kong. In McKay, (ed.), 59–80.
Moraes, S. E. (2003). In search of a vision: How Brazil is struggling to envision citizenship in its public schools. In Pinar. (ed.), 205–220.
Morrow, K.. (ed.) (2004). Insights from the Common European Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphey, T. (2001). Videoing conversations for self-evaluation in Japan. In Murphy & Byrd (eds.), 179–196.
Murphy, J. & Byrd, P.. (eds.) (2001). Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on English language teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Norton, B. (2000). Non-participation, imagined communities and the language classroom. In Breen, M. P. (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning. London: Longman, 159171.
Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Omaggio-Hadley, A. (2000). Teaching language in context (2nd edn.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Pennington, M. (1998). Designing language programme evaluations for specific purposes. In Li, E. & James, G.. (eds.), Testing and evaluation in second language education. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 199213.
Pinar, W. F. (ed.) (2003). International handbook of curriculum research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Potts, D. & Park, P. (2007). Partnering with students in curriculum change: Students researching students' needs. In Rice, (ed.), 181–202.
Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramanathan, V. & Morgan, B. (2007). TESOL and policy enactments: Perspectives from practice. TESOL Quarterly 41.3, 447464.
Rea-Dickins, P. & Germaine, K. P. (1998). Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching. London: Longman.
Reddy, M. (1978). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A.. (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, A. (ed.) (2007a). Revitalizing an established program for adult learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Rice, A. (2007b). English language programs and change: Be prepared. In Rice, (ed.), 1–14.
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rinner, S. & Weigert, A. (2006). From sports to the EU economy: Integrating curricula through genre-based content courses. In Byrnes, H.Weger-Guntharp, H. & Sprang, K. (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 114.
Sato, K. & Takahashi, K. (2003). Teacher and student learning in the workplace: The impact of performance tests. JALT2000: Towards the new millennium. Proceedings of the 26th JALT International Conference on Language Teaching/Learning. Tokyo: JALT, 325–336.
Sfard, Anna. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27.2, 413.
Sinclair, J. McHardy & Coulthard, M. C. (1975). Towards and analysis of discourse: The English used by teacher and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, D. G. (2003). Curriculum and teaching face globalization. In Pinar (ed.), 35–52.
Snow, M. A. & Brinton, D. (1997). The content-based classroom. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Snow, M. A. & Kamhi-Stein, L., (eds.) (2006a). Developing a new course for adult learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Snow, M. A. & Kamhi-Stein, L. (2006b). Developing a new course for adults: Transforming challenges into solutions. In Snow, & Kamhi-Stein, (eds.), 1–16.
Snyder, J., Bolin, F. & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In Jackson, (ed.), 402–435.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stoller, F. L. (1997). The catalyst for change and innovation. In Christison, M. A. & Stoller, F. L.. (eds.), A handbook for language program administrators. Burlingame, CA: Alta Book Center, 3348.
Stoller, F. L. (2002). Content-based instruction: perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 261283.
Swales, J. (2000). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2005). Young foreign language learners and collaborative group work: A socio-cultural perspective. Colloquium on Sociocultural Perspectives of Learning and Second Language Acquisition. San Antonio, TX. 37th annual TESOL Conference.
van Ek, J. (1975). Threshold level. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In Lantolf, J.. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245260.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell, MA.: Kluwer.
van Lier, L. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning 1.1, 119.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). A perspective on recent trends. In Howatt, A. P. R. with Widdowson, H. G., A history of English language teaching (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 353372.
Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. London: Collins Cobuild.
Woodrow, L. (2006). English in academic setting: A postgraduate course for students from non-English speaking backgrounds. In Snow, & Kamhi-Stein, (eds.), 197–218.
Wu, Z. (2002). Teachers ‘knowledge’ and curriculum change: a critical study of teachers' exploratory discourse in a Chinese university. Ph.D. dissertation. Lancaster University.
Yalden, J. (1987). Principles of course design for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yashima, T. (2007). Autonomy and willingness to communicate. Presented at the Independent Learning Association conference, Chiba, Japan.
Yeh, H. & Cheng, Y., (2006). Learning how to teach creatively: A collaborative action research approach. In McKay, (ed.), 41–58.
Zappa-Holman, S. (2007). EFL in Argentina's schools: Teachers' perspectives on policy changes and instruction. TESOL Quarterly 41.3, 618624.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective

  • Kathleen Graves (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.