Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:40:41.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formulaic language in learners and native speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Alison Wray
Alison Wray
Affiliation:
Centre for Language & Communication Research, Cardiff University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Survey Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , October 1999 , pp. 213 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational routines in English. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Alajouanine, T. (1956). Verbal realization in aphasia. Brain, 79, 1, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, B. (1990). Speech as linear composition. In Caie, G., Haastrup, K., Jakobsen, A. L., Nielsen, J. E., Sevaldsen, J., Specht, H., & Zettersten, A. (eds.), Proceedings from the fourth Nordic conference for English studies, vol. 1. Copenhagen: Department of English, University of Copenhagen, 133–43.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: the evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Cowie, A. P. (ed.), 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, B. & Eeg-Olofsson, M. (1990). Phraseology in spoken English: presentation of a project. In Aarts, J., & Meijs, W. (eds.), Tlieory and practice in corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1–26.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (ed.) (1984). Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P. J. L. & Bejoint, H. (eds.) (1992). Vocabulary and applied linguistics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahns, J., Burmeister, H. & Vogel, T. (1986). The pragmatics of formulas in L2 learner speech: use and development. Journal of Pragmatics 10, 693–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, M. E. & Tomasello, M. (1994). The rest of the family: the role of fathers and siblings in early language development. In Gallaway, C. & Richards, B.J., Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Dale, P. S. & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. & Macwhinney, B. (eds.), 96–151.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Reilly, J. & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. In Perera, K., Collis, G., & Richards, B. (eds.) Crowing points in child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–123.Google Scholar
Becker, J. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. Bolt Beranek & Newman Report no.3081,AI Report no.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A. L. & Joynt, R. J. (1960). Early descriptions of aphasia. Archives of Neurology 3, 109–26/205–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blskup, D. (1992). LI influence on learners' renderings of English collocations: a Polish/German empirical study. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Béjoint, H. (eds.), 85–93.Google Scholar
Blanken, G. & Marini, V. (1997). Where do lexical speech automatisms come from? Journal of Neurolinguistics 10, 1, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanken, G., Wallesch, C. W. & Papagno, C. (1990). Dissociations of language functions in aphasics with speech automatisms (recurring utterances). Cortex 26, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohn, O-S. (1986). Formulas, frame structures, and stereotypes in early syntactic development: some new evidence from L2 acquisition. Linguistics 24, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolander, M. (1989). Prefabs, patterns and rules in interaction? Formulaic speech in adult learners' L2 Swedish. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. K. (eds.), 73–86.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1976). Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., McNew, S., Snyder, L. & Bates, E. (1983). Individual differences at 20 months: analytic and holistic strategies in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley, 11–53.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: learning to use language. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Burling, R. (1959/1978). Language development of a Garo and English-speaking child. Word 15, 45–68; reprinted in Hatch, E. M. (ed.) (1978), 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. S. (1997). Repeated word combinations in spoken and written text: some implications for Functional Grammar. In Buder, C. S., Connolly, J. H., Gatward, R. A. & Vismans, R. M. (eds.), A fund of ideas: recent developments in functional grammar. Amsterdam: IFOTT, University of Amsterdam, 60–77.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (forthcoming). The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistics Society 34.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1988). Units of oral expression and language learning. Applied Linguistics 9, 1, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C. & Levorato, M. C. (1989). How children under-stand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language 16, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. (1987). Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1984). The acquisition of German word order: a test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development. In Andersen, R.W. (ed.), 219–42.Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1974). Performing without competence. Journal of Child Language 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, C. (1982). Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterances in aphasia. Cortex 18, 141–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Code, C. (1987). Language, aphasia, and the right hemisphere. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Code, C. (1994). Speech automatism production in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 8, 2, 135–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1979). On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3, 239–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (1992). Multiword lexical units and communicative language teaching. In Arnaud, P. J. L., & Bejoint, H., (eds.), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (1994). Phraseology. In Asher, R. E., (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 3168–3171.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (ed.) (1998). Phraseology: theory, analysis and applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, M. (1970). Aphasiology and other aspects of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Decock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. & McEnery, T. (1998). An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners. In Granger, S. (ed.), Learner English on computer. London & New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 67–79.Google Scholar
Dlttmar, N. (1984). Semantic features of pidginized learner varieties of German. In Andersen, R. W. (ed.), 243–70.Google Scholar
Drummond, S. S. & Simmons, T. P. (1995). Linguistic performance of female aphasics during group interaction. Journal of Neurolinguistics 9, 1, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1984) Formulaic speech in early classroom second language development. In Handscombe, J., Orem, R. A., & Taylor, B. P. (eds.), On TESOL '83. Washington DC: TESOL, 53–65.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, R., Gleason, J. B. (1995). Socialization across contexts. In Fletcher, P. & Macwhinney, B. (eds.), 251–70.Google Scholar
Espir, M. L. E. & Rose, F. C. (1970). The basic neurology of speech. Oxford & Edinburgh: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society 5, 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, P. M. (1980). Conversational insecurity. In Giles, H., Robinson, W. P. & Smith, P.M. (eds.), 127–32.Google Scholar
Flavell, L. & Flavell, R. (1992). Dictionary of idioms. London: Kyle Cathie.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. & Macwhinney, B. (eds.) (1995). The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foster, S. H. (1990). The communicative competence of young children. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Brownell, H. H., Wapner, W. & Michelow, D. (1983). Missing the point: the role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In Perecman, E. (ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere. New York: Academic Press, 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. (1996). Prosody's role in language acquisition and adult parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25, 2, 345–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R.W. (1987). Linguistic factors in children's understanding of idioms. Journal of Child Language 14, 569–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R.W. (1991). Semantic analyzability in children's under-standing of idioms. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 34, 613–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, G., Robinson, W. P. & Smith, P. M. (eds.) (1980). Language: social psychological perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. (1998). The stylistic potential of phraseological units in the light of genre analysis. In Cowie, A. P. (ed.), 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. B. & Weintraub, S. (1976). The acquisition routines in child language. Language in Society 5, 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and language disturbances. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. & Hlrsh-Pasek, K. (1995). Reinterpreting children's sentence comprehension: toward a new framework. In Fletcher, P. & Macwhinney, B. (eds.), 430–61.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae. In Cowie, A. P. (ed.), 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 24, 287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. (1975). Learning how to mean: explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanania, E. A. S., Gradman, H. L. (1977). Acquisition of English structures: a case study of an adult native speaker of Arabic in an English-speaking environment. Language Learning 27, 1, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. M. (ed.) (1978). Second language acquisition: a book of readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hatch, E., Peck, S. & Wagner-Gough, J. (1979). A look at process in child second-language acquisition. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 269–78.Google Scholar
Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred speech disorders, Vols. I & II. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, T. (1993). Identifying formulas in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 20, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinnenkamp, V. (1980).The refusal of second language learning in interethnic context. In Giles, H., Robinson, W. P. & Smith, P. M. (eds.), 179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlrsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, P. (1998a). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 19, 1, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, P. (1998b). The phraseology of learners' academic writing. In Cowie, A. P. (ed.), 161–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. & Hatch, E. M. (1978). A Chinese child's acquisition of English. In Hatch, E.M. (ed.), 118–31.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (1998). Perspectives on fixedness: applied and theoretical. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, Mich: Karoma.Google Scholar
Hughlings Jackson, J. (1866/1958). Notes on the physiology and pathology of language. In Taylor, J. (ed.), 121–28.Google Scholar
Hughlings Jackson, J. (1874/1958). On the nature of the duality of the brain. In Taylor, J. (ed.), 129–45.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. K. (eds.) (1989). Bilingualism across the lifespan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1968). The ethnography of speaking. In Fishman, J. A. (ed.) Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton, 99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, H. & Hatch, E. (1978). Second language acquisition: a case study. In Hatch, E. M. (ed.), 76–88.Google Scholar
Joanette, Y.Goulet, P. & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamhi, A. G. (1986). The elusive first word: the importance of the naming insight for the development of referential speech. Journal of Child Language 13, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karniol, R. (1990). Second language acquisition via immersion in daycare. Journal of Child Language 17, 147–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, W. & Perdue, C. (1992). Utterance structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. & Scarcella, R. (1978). On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance. Language Learning 28, 2, 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K. & Haggo, D. (1984). Livestock auctions, oral poetry, and ordinary language. Language in Society 13, 205–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattey, E. (1986). Pragmatic classification of idioms as an aid for the language learner. IRAL 24, 3, 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levorato, M. C. & Cacciari, C. (1992). Children's comprehension and production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language 19, 415–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, E.V. (1978). Conversations between mothers and young children: individual differences and their possible implication for the study of language learning. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds.), The development of communication. Chichester: Wiley, 173–87.Google Scholar
Lieven, E.V., Pine, J. M. & Barnes, H. D. (1992). Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction. Journal of Child Language 19, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linnakylä, P. (1980). Hi superman: what is most function English for a Finnish 5-year-old. Journal of Pragmatics 4,367–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1993). The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1995). Development of the capacity for spoken language. In Fletcher, P. & Macwhinney, B. (eds.), 278–302.Google Scholar
McCrone, J. (1999) States of mind. New Scientist 2178, 30–33.Google Scholar
McElduff, K. & Drummond, S. S. (1991). Communicative functions of automatic speech in non-fluent dysphasia. Aphasiology 5, 3, 265–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miesel, J. M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3, 2, 109–35.Google Scholar
Moon, R. (1992). Textual aspects of fixed expression in learners' dictionaries. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Béjoint, H. (eds.), 13–27.Google Scholar
Moon, R. (1998a). Fixed expressions and Idioms in English. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Moon, R. (1998b). Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English. In Cowie, A. P. (ed.), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, E, Hooper, J. & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning 48, 3, 323–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, E, Mitchell, R. & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2: a basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 1, 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. R. & Decarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1975). The nominal shift in semantic-syntactic development. Cognitive Psychology 7, 461–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1981). Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology 17, 2, 170–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, I. & Opie, P. (1959). The lore and language of schoolchildren. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R.W. (eds.), Language and Communication. New York: Longman, 191–226.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. (in preparation). The one clause at a time hypothesis. In Riggenbach, H. (ed.), Perspectives onfluency.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (ed.) (1984). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: a field manual. European Science Foundation. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (ed.) (1993). Adult language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. II: the results. European Science Foundation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1977). Language learning strategies: does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 53, 3, 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). Units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1985). Language segmentation: operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1029–1067.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1995). Strategies in the acquisition of syntax. In Fletcher, P. & Macwhinney, B. (eds.), 462–82.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K., (1993). Lexical segmentation and vocabulary growth in early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 20, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raichle, M. E. (1998). The neural correlates of consciousness: an analysis of cognitive skill learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 353, 1889–1901.Google ScholarPubMed
Rampton, B. (1987). Stylistic variability and not speaking ‘normal’ English: some post-Labovian approaches and their implications for the study of interlanguage. In Ellis, R. (ed.), Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 47–58.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. (1984). Formulae in second language speech production. In Dechert, H. W., Möhle, D., & Raupach, M., (eds), Second language production.Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 114–37.Google Scholar
Rehbein, J. (1987). Multiple formulae: aspects of Turkish migrant workers' German in intercultural communication. In Knapp, K., Enninger, W. & Knapp-Potthoff, A. (eds.) Analysing intercultural communication. Berlin: Mouton, 215–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. R. & Espir, M. L. E. (1961). Traumatic aphasia: a study of aphasia in war wounds of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916/1966). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. (1979). ‘Watch up!’: a study of verbal routines in adults' second language performance. Working Papers in Bilingualism 19,79–88.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.W. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: a case study of an adult. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E., (eds.), Sodolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, M.A.: Newbury House, 137–74.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1978a) The pidginization process: a model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1978b). Second language acquisition: the pidginization hypothesis. In Hatch, E. M. (ed.), 256–71.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Groot, A. M. B. De & Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 85–112.Google Scholar
Shapira, R. G. (1978). The non-learning of English: case study of an adult. In Hatch, E. M. (ed.), 246–55.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1981). The uses of imitation. Journal of Child Language 8, 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevick, E. W. (1989). Success with foreign languages. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and cultural connotations of common words. Linguistics & Education 7, 4, 379–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1997). Eine Sprache idiomatisch sprechen: Computer, Korpora, kommunikative Kompetenz und Kultur. In Mattheier, K. J. (ed.), Norm und Variation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 151–67.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (ed.) (1958). Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson, vol 2. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Brooks, P. J. (forthcoming). Early syntactic development: a construction grammar approach. In Barrett, M. (ed.), Language development. Hove: Psychology Press, chapter 7.Google Scholar
Tuggy, D. (1996). The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is is why?. In Casad, E. H. (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 713–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, D. R. (1987). Nonpropositional speech: neurolinguistic studies. In Ellis, A.W. (ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 49–118.Google Scholar
Van Lancker, D. R. & Kempler, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain & Language 32, 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verstraten, L. (1992). Fixed phrases in monolingual learners' dictionaries. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Béjoint, H. (eds.), 28–40.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1982a). Formulas in first and second language acquisition. In Obler, L. K. & Menn, L. (eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics. New York: Academic Press, 261–84.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1982b). The acquisition of morphology by a bilingual child: a whole-word approach. Applied Psycho-linguistics 3, 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner-Gough, J. (1978). Comparative studies in second language learning. In Hatch, E. M. (ed.), 155–71.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: a review. Applied Linguistics 16, 2, 180–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics 10, 2, 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: an ethno-graphic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly 29, 3, 473–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. (1998). Prefabricated chunks in the teaching of the language of negotiations. Unpublished M.Ed dissertation, Centre for English Language Studies in Education, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Winner, E. & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain 100, 717–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong Flllmore, L. (1976). The second time around: cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wong Flllmore, L. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Fillmore, C. J., Kempler, D., & Wang, S-Y. W., (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press, 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (1992). The focusing hypothesis: the theory of left hemisphere lateralised language re-examined. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (1998). Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Language & Communication 18, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (forthcoming, a). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: horses for courses. Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (forthcoming, b). Holistic utterances in protolanguage: the link from primates to humans. In Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Hurford, J., (eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language. Stanford, CA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (I'M preparation, a). Understanding the learner's ‘task’ in Task Based Learning: the significance of formulaic language.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (in preparation, b). Formulaically speaking. Stanford, CA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A. & Perkins, M. R. (forthcoming). The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language & Communication 20, 1, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorio, C. A. (1980). Conventionalized language forms and the development of communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly 14, 4, 433–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorio, C. A. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. K. (eds.), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar