Alderson, J. C. (1990). Testing reading comprehension skills (part one). Reading in a Foreign Language, 6, 2, 425–38.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. (1986a). A case for field experimentation in program evaluation. Language Learning, 36, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beretta, A. (1986b). Towards a methodology of ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beretta, A. (1986c). Program-fair language teaching evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 3, 431–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beretta, A. (1989). Who should evaluate L2 programs? In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), 155–60.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. (1990). The program evaluator: the ESL researcher without portfolio. Applied Linguistics, II, 1, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beretta, A. (1992). Evaluation of language education: an overview. In Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. (1993). The role of test-taker feedback in the test development process: test-takers reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese. Language Testing, 10, 1, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J. D. (1990). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.) (1989). Research in the language classroom. ELT Documents 133. Modern English Publications in association with The British Council.Google Scholar

Carlsson, I. (1969). Implicit and explicit: an experiment in applied psycholinguistics, assessing different methods of teaching grammatical structures in English as a foreign language. GUME Report, 2, Gothenburg School of Education.Google Scholar

Chastain, K. D. & Woerdehofp, F.J. (1968). A methodological study comparing the audio-lingual habit theory and the cognitive code-learning theory. Modern Language Journal 52, 268–79.Google Scholar

Chastain, K. D. (1970). A methodological study comparing the audio-lingual habit theory and cognitive code-learning theory - a continuation. Modern Language Journal, 54, 257–66.Google Scholar

Clark, J. L. D. (1969). The Pennsylvania and the ‘audiolingual vs. traditional’ question. Modern Language Journal, 53, 388–96.Google Scholar

Clegg, J. (February 1993). Course evaluation in the School of ELT. Seminar for the School of ELT, Thames Valley University, London.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14, 2, 130–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, A. (1991). Language testing and evaluation. In Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. (eds.), Introduction to applied linguistics, 125–39. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Davies, A. (1992). Review of Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.). Language Testing, 2, 2, 207–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faerch, C. & Kaspar, G. (1987). Introspection in second language research. Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar

Fairfax, O. & Green, M. (1989). Introspection, language learning and curriculum. System, 17, 1, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldmann, U. & Stemmer, B. (1987). Thin_____aloud a_____retrospective da_____in C-te_____taking: diffe_____languages - diff_____learners - sa_____approaches ? In Faerch, C. & Kaspar, G. (eds.), 251–67.Google Scholar

Hagel, Jacobsen P. (1982). Using evaluation to improve foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 66, 284–91.Google Scholar

Hatch, E. & Lazarton, A. (1991). The research manual. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publications.Google Scholar

Harris, J. (1990). The second language programme-evaluation literature: accommodating experimental and multifaceted approaches. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 3, 1, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, C. & Jarvis, J. (eds.) (1991). Ideas and issues in primary ELT. Nelson, in association with the Centre for British Teachers.Google Scholar

Khan, J. (1991). Lessons worth remembering - from primary French in Britain. In Kennedy, J. & Jarvis, J. (eds.), 22–9.Google Scholar

Laskaridou, D. (January 1990). Job analysis and the design of pre-service teacher training courses. In Roberts, J. (ed.), 7–34.Google Scholar

Levin, L. & Olsson, M. (1971). Learning grammar: an experiment in applied psycholinguistics, assessing three different methods of teaching grammatical structures in English as foreign language. The GUME Project, Gothenburg School of Education, Research Bulletin, 7.Google Scholar

Lindblad, T. (1969). Implicit and explicit: an experiment in applied psycholinguistics, assessing different methods of teaching grammatical structures in English as a Foreign Language. GUME Report, No 1. Gothenburg School of Education.Google Scholar

Low, G. (1991). Talking to questionnaires: pragmatic models in questionnaire design. In Adams, P., Heaton, B. & Howarth, P. (eds.), Sociocultural issues in English for academic purposes. Review of ELT. Modern English Publications in association with The British Council, 117–33.Google Scholar

Low, G. (1994). ‘Hallelujah, Very!’ Responses to ‘very’ in survey questions. Unpublished paper. University of York: Department of Educational Studies.Google Scholar

Lynch, B. (1992). Evaluating a program inside and out. In Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.), 61–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackay, R. (1991). How program personnel help maximise the utility of language programme evaluation. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 60–71.Google Scholar

Meinke, M. W. (1990). A context-adaptive model of program evaluation. A reader reacts.... TESOL Quarterly, 24, 4, 759–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milanovic, M. & Saville, N. (1993). Handouts on test development, with special reference to the testing of speaking. UCLES: EFL Division.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Parkinson, B. & Johnstone, R. (1981). The foreign language classroom: an observational study. Stirling Educational Monographs, 9. University of Stirling: Department of Education.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. (1990). Evaluation of second language teaching projects and programmes. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 3, 1, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, R. (1991). Evaluation of foreign language teaching projects and programmes. In Bok, K. Dc, Ginsberg, R. B. & Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Mueller, T. H. (1971). The effectiveness of two learning models: the audio-lingual theory and the cognitive-code learning theory. In Pimsleur, P. and Quinn, T. (eds.), The psychology of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1990). Using learner data in curriculum development. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oskarsson, M. (1972). Comparative method studies in foreign language teaching. Moderna Sprak, 66, 4, 350–66.Google Scholar

Oskarsson, M. (1972). Assessing the relative effectiveness of seven methods of teaching English to adults, a replication experiment. IRAL, II, 3, 251–62.Google Scholar

Parkinson, B., Mitchell, R. & Johnstone, R. (1981). Mastery learning in foreign language teaching: a case study. Stirling Educational Monographs, 8. University of Stirling: Department of Education.Google Scholar

Parkinson, B. et al. . (1982). An independent evaluation of the ‘Tour de France’. Stirling Educational Monographs, II. University of Stirling: Department of Education.Google Scholar

Rediguide Series in Educational Research, ed. Youngman, M. B.. Nottingham: School of Education.Google Scholar

Scherer, G. A. C. & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A sociolinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Seliger, H. & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, P. D. (1970). A comparison of the cognitive and audiolingual approaches to foreign language instruction: the Pennsylvania foreign language project. Philadelphia: The Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Somekh, B. (1993). Quality in educational research - the contribution of classroom teachers. In Edge, J. & Richards, K. (eds.), 26–38.Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. (1990). A context-restrictive model for program evaluation? TESOL Quarterly, 24, 4, 761–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ullman, R. (1990). Using complementary approaches to evaluate second language programs. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 3, 1, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: ethnography and second language classroom research. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Von Elek, T. & Oskarsson, M. (1972). An experiment assessing the relative effectiveness of two methods of teaching grammatical structures to adults. IRAL, 10, 1, 60–72.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. & Tilney, G. (1983). The effect of ‘super-learning techniques’ on vocabulary acquisition and alpha brainwave production of language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 1, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, L., Harlow, L., Flint, Smith W., Boyle, T. A. & Walker, J. (1979). An evaluation and placement technique: the branched program achievement test. System, 7, 3, 211–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson-Gegeo, K. (1988). Ethnography in ESL: defining the essentials. TESOLQuarterly, 22, 575–92.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1985). Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, 6, Evaluation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds). (1992). Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, P. & Carroll, S. (1987). Evaluation of classroom processes in a Canadian core French programme. Evaluation and Research in Education, I, 2, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anivan, S. (ed.). (1991). Issues in language programme evaluation in the 1990s. Anthology Series 27. Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39, 121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beretta, A. (1989). Attention to form or meaning? Error treatment in the Bangalore Project. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 2, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. (ed.). (1983). Language teaching projects for the third world. ELT Docs 116. Oxford: BC and Pcrgamon.Google Scholar

Burton, J., Weir, C. & Roberts, J. (forthcoming, 1994). Evaluation of a baseline study: English teaching in Nepal. London: Evaluation Department, Overseas Development Administration.Google Scholar

Candlin, C. N. & Murphy, D. F. (eds.). (1987). Language learning tasks. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, 7. Prentice-Hall International Ltd.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1975). The teaching of French as a foreign language. International Studies in Evaluation V. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar

Celani, M. A., Holmes, J., Ramos, R. & Scott, M. (1988). The Brazilian ESP project: an evaluation. Sao Paolo: EDUC.Google Scholar

C., Criper & Dodd, W. A. (1984). Report on the teaching of the English language and its use as a medium in education in Tanzania. London: ODA.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1981). Age on arrival and immigrant second language learning in Canada: a reassessment. Applied Linguistics, 2, 132–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, J. (1989). Language and literacy acquisition in bilingual contexts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 10, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dipietro, R. J. (1980). Filling the elementary curriculum with languages: what are the effects? Foreign Language Annals, 13, 2, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, K. (1994). The role of testing in the evaluation of a primary education project: the case of Molteno. In Readickins, P. and Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C., Macintyre, P. D. & Lysynchuk, L. M. (1990). The affective dimension in second language programme evaluation. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 3, 1, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnstone, R. (1991). Foreign language in primary schools: evaluating the National Pilot Projects in Scotland. Language Learning Journal, 4, 36–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, C. (1985). Formative evaluation as an indicator of student wants and attitudes. System, 9, 1, 23–8.Google Scholar

Khaniya, T. R. (1990). The washback effect of a textbook-based test. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, I, 25–34.Google Scholar

Kiely, R. & Murkowska, A. (1993). Initiating evaluation activities - insider and outsider perspectives. Paper presented at the Prodess Colloquium, 7–9th November 1993. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar

Lawrence, L. (1994). Using evaluation to improve teacher education programmes. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Mackay, R. (1981). Accountability in ESP programs. ESP Journal, I, 2, 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackay, R. (1991). How program personnel can help maximise the utility of language program evaluation. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 60–71.Google Scholar

Mackay, R. (1993). The two sides of programme evaluation - accountability and improvement. Paper presented at the 2nd Evaluation Colloquium on Issues in Evaluation in TESOL. Atlanta, 27th Annual TESOL Convention.Google Scholar

Mejorada, M. F. & Fonancier, E. (1991). Towards evaluating the writing laboratory: a prototype. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 120–35.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Parkinson, B. & Johnstone, R. (1981). The foreign language classroom: an observational study. Stirling Educational Monographs, 9. University of Stirling.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. (1992). The ‘independent’ evaluation of bilingual primary education. In Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.), 100–40.Google Scholar

Murphy, D. F. (1991). Principles and practice in an evaluation project. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 26–34.Google Scholar

Numi, D. & Lwaitama, A. F. (1994). Tests and decision targeting in ELT: the case of the Communication Skills Unit, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. 6V Germaine, K. (1992). Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.). (1994). Evaluation for development in English language teaching. Review of ELT. Basingstoke: Macmillan (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.) (1990). Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Slimani, A. (1987). The teaching-learning relationship: learning opportunities and learning outcomes: an Algerian case study. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spada, N. (1987). Relationship between instructional differences and learning outcomes: a process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 2, 142–00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Rowen, N. & Hart, D. (1990). The role of mother tongue literacy in third language learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 3, 1, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ullmann, R. & Geva, E. (1984). Approaches to observation in second language classes. Language issues and education policies. ELT Documents, 119. Pergamon Press in association with The British Council.Google Scholar

Wall, D. & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: the Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weir, C. J. & Burton, J. (1994). The role and design of baseline studies in the evaluation of English language teacher training in the case of Guinea. Evaluation Report EV511. London: Overseas Development Administration, Evaluation Department.Google Scholar

Weir, C.J. & Roberts, J. R. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Yalden, J. (1978). A comparison of achievement in four intermediate courses in Spanish. System, 6, 2, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1979). Materials evaluation. Plenary address to 2nd Latin American Regional Esp Conference, Cocoyoc, Mexico.Google Scholar

Allwright, D. (1975). What do we need materials for? ELTJ, 36, 1, 6–9.Google Scholar

Breen, M. P. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In Johnson, R.K. (ed.), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C. N. (1987). Which materials? A consumer's and designer's guide. In Sheldon, L. (ed.), 13–28.Google Scholar

Candlin, C. N. & Breen, M. P. (1979a). Evaluating and designing language teaching materials. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, 2, 172–216.Google Scholar

Candlin, C. N. & Breen, M. P. (1979b). Evaluating, adapting and innovating language teaching materials. In Yoria, C., Perkins, K. & Schachter, J. (eds.), On TESOL 1979, The learner in focus, 86–107. Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar

Clarke, D., Hawkes, H., Pritchard, N. & Smith, B. (1983). The English Language Textbook Project - Somalia. In Brumfit, C.J. (ed.), 49–64.Google Scholar

Coleman, H. (1985). Evaluating teachers' guides: do teachers' guides guide teachers? In Alderson, J. C. (ed.), 83–96.Google Scholar

Crabbe, D. (1991). Bringing evaluation and methodology closer together. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 84–90.Google Scholar

Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting ELT teaching materials. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Cunningsworth, A. & Kusel, P. (1991). Evaluating teachers' guides. ELT Journal, 45, 2, 128–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliman, J. (1981). A model for coursebook evaluation. English for Specific Purposes Newsletter, 46, 1–4.Google Scholar

Ewer, J. R. & Boys, O. (1981). The EST textbook situation: an enquiry. Esp Journal, I, 2, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, T. (1987). What's beneath? An interactive view of materials evaluation. In Sheldon, L. (ed.), 37–44.Google Scholar

Kroes, H. & Walker, G. R. (1988). Comparative evaluation of lower primary English courses in Black education. Consolidated Report. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar

Kyeyune, R. (1993). An evaluation of the teacher's guide to the Integrated English Syllabus for Ugandan secondary schools. Unpublished M.Ed. Tesol Critical Study. University of Leeds: School of Education.Google Scholar

Low, G. (1987). The need for a multi-perspective approach to the evaluation of foreign language teaching materials. Evaluation and Research in Education, I, 1, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT: a teacher's guide. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Moore, J. (1981). Materials development: a case study. In English for specific purposes: an international seminar, 17–22 April 1977. London: The British Council.Google Scholar

Murphy, D. F. (1993). Evaluating language learning tasks in the classroom. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (eds.), Tasks in a pedagogic context, 139–61. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar

O'sullivan, T. (1991). Foreign language coursebooks: ask your pupils. Language Learning Journal, 3, 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rea, P.M. (1987). Communicative curriculum validation: a task-based approach. In Candlin, C. N. & Murphy, D. F. (eds.), 147–65.Google Scholar

Sheldon, L. E. (ed.). (1987). ELT textbooks and materials: problems in evaluation and development. ELT Documents, 126. Oxford: Modern English Publications/The British Council.Google Scholar

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42, 4, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning coursebooks. English Teaching Forum, 13, 3/4, 355–61.Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (1979). Choosing a new EFL course. MexTESOL Journal, 3, 3, 2–14.Google Scholar

West, R. (1987). A consumer's guide to ELT dictionaries. In Sheldon, L. (ed.), 55–75.Google Scholar

Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELTJ, 37, 3, 251–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, R. (1981). A procedure for ESP textbook analysis and evaluation on teacher education courses. ESP Journal, I, 2, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, P. & Harrison, I. (1983). Materials design in Africa with particular reference to the francophone primary school project, Cameroon. In Brumfit, C.J. (ed.), 29–48.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1985). Is there life after the course? In Alderson, J. C. (ed.). Evaluation. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, 6, 129–50.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. & Scott, M. (1992). Insiders, outsiders and participatory evaluation. In Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.), 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. F. (1981). Formative evaluation in specific purpose program development. In Mackay, R. & Palmer, J. D. (eds.).Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. (1989). The development and use of criterion-referenced tests of language ability in language program evaluation. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 242–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beretta, A. & Da, Vies A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39, 2, 121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brindley, G., Neeson, S. & Woods, S. (1989). Indonesia Australia language foundation assessment procedures. Macquarie University: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar

British Council. (1986). Evaluation of English Language Unit Petromin Refinery, Riyadh. London: The British Council.Google Scholar

British Council. (1988). Somalia: report on an evaluation of the technical cooperation training programme. London: Technical Cooperation Training Department, The British Council.Google Scholar

British Council. (September 1989). Final evaluation report, expatriate teachers pilot scheme. Report prepared by The British Council. Hong Kong: The British Council.Google Scholar

British Council. (1993). Managing change and development in ELT in East and Central Europe. Papers presented at the Prodess Colloquium, 7–9th November, 1993. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (1989). Language program evaluation: a synthesis of existing possibilities. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 222–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, J. (1993). The challenges for monitoring and evaluation in the 1990s. Project Appraisal, 8, 2, 91–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centre For Information On Language Teaching (1992). Current research in language teaching and learning. London: CILT.Google Scholar

Chambers, F. & Erith, P. (1990). On justifying and evaluating aid-based ELT. ELT Journal, 44, 2, 138–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, F. (1993). Self-evaluation in private language schools: a process to identify and implement change. ELT Management, Newsletter of the Management Special Interest Group of IATEFL, 13, 14–16.Google Scholar

Chaplen, E. F. (1980). Collecting and analysing student evaluations of a foreign language course. ELT Journal, 34, 3, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Da, Vies A. (1990). Principles of language testing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 84–138.Google Scholar

Davies, A. (1991). An evaluation model for ELT projects in South India. ARAL, 2, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demko, Reynoso W. (1984). A pilot study of the effect of contrastive instruction on the standard English proofreading skills of dialect different students. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 4, 740–2.Google Scholar

Des, Brisay M. & Ready, D. (1991). Defining an appropriate role for language tests in intensive English language programs. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 15–25.Google Scholar

Dickinson, L. (1993). Malaysian teacher training colleges self-access project. Report of a consultancy visit to plan the evaluation of the project, 3–16th April 1993.Google Scholar

Draskau, J. K. (1990). Review of Celani et al. System, 18, 1, 123–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elley, W. B. (1989). Tailoring the evaluation to fit the context. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 270–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English Language Center (1986). Evaluation of the English language course of the Petromin Refinery. Riyadh: The Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar

Fashola, J. B. (1989). Evaluation, feasibility and relevance. System, 8, 1, 65–73.Google Scholar

Ghani, A. A. & Hunt, B. (1991). National level formative evaluation: some first steps. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 35–45.Google Scholar

Gradman, H. L. & Hanania, E. (1991). Program evaluation in light of language learning background, student assessment and TOEFL performance. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 110–19.Google Scholar

Hudson, T. (1989). Mastery decisions in program evaluation. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. K. (ed.) (1989). The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, L. (1990). Language in education: an evaluation of the teaching of structure in Zambian grade 8 classes. Unpublished PhD thesis. Lusaka: University of Zambia.Google Scholar

Loh, Wen Khin. (1994). Formative evaluation at work in Melaka. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Long, M. (1984). Process and product in ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, B. K. (1990). A context-adaptive model for program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 1, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackay, R. & Palmer, J. D. (eds.) (1981). Languages for specific purposes: program design and evaluation. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

Mackay, R. (1994). Undertaking ESL/EFL programme review for accountability and improvement. ELTJ, 48, 2, 142–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makina-Kaunda, L. (1994). Evaluation as a tool for course development: a case study of the language programme for Engineering students at the Malawi Polytechnic. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

McGinley, K. (1986). Coming to terms with evaluation. System, 14, 2, 142–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mcha, Y. Y. & Rea, P. M. (1984). Report on ongoing research in the Communication Skills Unit on the usefulness of course CL100. Communication Skills Unit: University of Dar es Salaam (mimeo).Google Scholar

Murphy, D. F. (1985). Evaluation in language teaching: assessment, accountability, and awareness. In Alderson, J. C. (ed.), 1–17.Google Scholar

Murphy, D. F. (1994). Developing theory and practice in evaluation. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Murphy-O'dwyer, L. (1985). Diary studies as a method for evaluating and training. In Alderson, J. C. (ed.), 97–128.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1978). Towards a collaborative approach to curriculum development: a case study. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 1, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D., Nunan (1991). Second language proficiency assessment and program evaluation. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 46–59.Google Scholar

Nuttall, D. L. (1991). Evaluating the effects of ELT. In The social and economic impact of ELT in development. Dimford House Seminar Report 1991, 11–14. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar

ODA (1988a). Guidelines for the preparation of evaluation studies. London: O.D.A.Google Scholar

ODA (1988b). English for Yemen textbook project, Yemen Arab Republic. Evaluation Report EV403. London: ODA.Google Scholar

ODA (1988c). Egypt English language component of Maharrem Bey technical school project. Evaluation Report EV451. London: ODA.Google Scholar

ODA (July 1993). Catalogue of evaluation studies. London: ODA.Google Scholar

ODA (n.d.). The lessons of experience: evaluation work in ODA. London: ODA.Google Scholar

Outhred, L., Bochner, S. & Cooney, G. (1990). An evaluation of the basic skills testing program in NSW schools in 1989. Final report. Macquarie University: National Centre for ELT and Research.Google Scholar

Palmer, A. (1991). The role of language testing in language program evaluation. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 1–14.Google Scholar

Palmer, A. (1992). Issues in evaluating input-based language teaching programs. In Alderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (eds.), 141–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkinson, B. & Howell-Richardson, C. (1989). Learner diaries. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), 128–40.Google Scholar

Puhl, C. (1990). Up from under: a study of English training in the mines. Per Linguam, 6, 2, 31–51.Google Scholar

Sawyer, M. (1991). EAP program evaluation in an Asian context: a case from Japan. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 152–61.Google Scholar

Sharp, A. (1990). Staff/student participation in course evaluation: a procedure for improving course design. ELTJ, 44, 2, 132–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, J. (1983). Ongoing program evaluation. MIMEO.Google Scholar

St John, M. J. (1994). Evaluation of an interactive component: a case study of a Nigerian Communication Skills Project. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1982). Evaluating bilingual education: a Canadian case study. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar

Thames Valley University And The British Council (1993). PRODESS News. Issues 1 and 2. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar

Thames Valley University And The British Council (1994). PRODESS News. Issue 3. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar

Toweli, R. (1991). Experimenting with an integrated syllabus design in modern languages. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 4, 1, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, M. (1990). Evaluation of the farm schools project. London: ODA.Google Scholar

Wallace, M. & Woolger, D. (1991). Improving the ELT supervisory dialogue: the Sri Lankan experience. ELTJ, 45, 4, 320–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walsh, J., Hammond, J., Brindley, G. & Nunan, D. (1990). Evaluation of the Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program professional development program for primary teachers, focusing on teaching factual writing. Macquarie University: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar

Waters, A. (1987). Participatory course evaluation in ESP. ESP Journal, 6, 1, 3–12.Google Scholar

Wennerstrom, A. K. & Heiser, P. (1992). ESL student bias in instructional evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 2, 271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weslander, D. & Stephany, G. (1983). Evaluation of an English as a second language program for South East Asian students. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 3, 473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weir, C. J. & Roberts, J. (1991). Evaluating a teacher training project in difficult circumstances. In Anivan, S. (ed.), 91–109.Google Scholar

Williams, E. (1994). Report on reading in English in primary schools in Malawi. London: ODA (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Williams, E. (1994). Report on reading in English in primary schools in Zambia. London: ODA (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Assinder, W. (1991). Peer teaching, peer learning: one model. ELTJ, 45, 3, 218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodozscky, C. & Malderez, A. (1993). A new model of teaching practice. Paper presented at the PRODESS Colloquium, 7–9th November 1993. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar

Bowers, R. (1987). Developing perceptions of the classroom: observation and evaluation, training and counselling. In Bowers, R. (ed.), Language teacher education: an integrated programme for EFL teacher training. ELT Documents, 125, 138–79. Oxford: Pergamon Press/Modern English Publications.Google Scholar

Breen, M. P., Candlin, C. N., Dam, L. & Gabrielsen, G. (1989). The evolution of a teacher training programme. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britten, D. (1985). Teacher training in ELT (Part II). Language Teaching 18, 3, 220–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teacher and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, H. T. (1990). An evaluative study of the RSA/UCLES Certificate in TEFLA. In Roberts, J. (ed.), 48–61.Google Scholar

Edge, J. (1992). Co-operative development. ELTJ, 46, 1, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edge, J. & Richards, K. (eds.) (1993). Teachers develop teachers research. East Kilbride: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. & Robinson, B. (1981). A reassessment of lesson evaluation in ELT. System, 9, 1, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, D. (1982). Observing teachers: three approaches to in-service training and development. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 1, 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, D. (1990). Intervening in teaching practice. In Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.), 103–17.Google Scholar

Gaies, S. & Bowers, R. (1990). Clinical supervision of language teaching: the supervisor as trainer and educator. In Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.), 167–81.Google Scholar

Gaies, S. (1991). An approach to the preparation of ELT preparation programs. In Sadtono, E. (ed.), Language teacher education in a fast-changing world, 14–21. Anthology Series 29. Singapore: Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar

Gebhard, J. C. (1984). Models of supervision: choices. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 3, 501–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gebhard, J. G. (1990a). Models of supervision: choices. In Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.), 156–66.Google Scholar

Gebhard, J. G. (1990a). Interaction in a teaching practicum. In Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.), 118–31.Google Scholar

Haughton, G. & Dickinson, L. (1988). Collaborative assessment by Masters candidates in a tutor-based system. Language Testing, 5, 2, 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedge, P. & Rea-Dickins, P. (1991). Evaluation of teacher methodologies. Paper presented at the 26th International TESOL Convention, New York.Google Scholar

Hedge, P. (October, 1992). Interactive procedures for teacher education. Paper presented at the Oxford University Press Symposium, Wadham College, Oxford.Google Scholar

James, G. (1983). Teacher assessment 2: report on the second Exeter seminar. Exeter: The Language Centre, University of Exeter.Google Scholar

Jarvis, J. (1992). Using diaries for teacher reflection on inservice courses. ELT Journal, 46, 2, 133–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, J. (1993). Meeting the needs of teacher trainees on teaching practice. ELTJ, 47, 2, 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackay, A. (1990). The reliability of assessments of teaching performance. In Roberts, J. R. (ed.), 35–47.Google Scholar

McGarvey, B. & Swallow, D. (1986). Microteaching in teacher education and training. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Morrow, K. & Schocker, M. (1993). Process evaluation in an INSET course. ELTJ, 47, 1, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

B., Naidu, K., Neeraja, E., Ramani, J., Shivakumar & V., Viswanatha (1992). Researching homogeneity: an account of teacher-initiated research into large classes. ELT Journal, 46, 3, 252–63.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrot, J. (1993). Tasks for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pennington, M. C. (1989). Faculty development for language programs. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennington, M. C. (1989). Directions for faculty evaluation in language education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2, 3, 167–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennington, M. & Young, A. (1989). Approaches to faculty evaluation for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 4, 619–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennington, M. (1990). Response to Pennycook: the political economy of information in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 3, 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennycook, A. (1990). Comments on Martha C. Pennington and Aileen L. Youngs's ‘Approaches to faculty evaluation for ESL’: a reader reacts. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 3, 555–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peri.berg, A. 6V Theodor, E. (1975). Patterns and styles in the supervision of teachers. British Journal of Teacher Education, I, 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. (1991). Evaluation as a means of teacher development. Unpublished paper presented at ELT Journal 45th anniversary symposium, The British Council, London.Google Scholar

Richards, J. & Nunan, D. (eds.) (1990). Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. R. (ed.) January (1990). Centre for Applied Language Studies Workpapers, I. University of Reading: Centre for Applied Language Studies.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. R. (1993). Evaluating the impacts of teacher research. System, 21, 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royal Society of Arts. (1985). Certificates and diplomas in language teaching. London: RSA.Google Scholar

Sheal, P. (1989). Classroom observation: training the observers. ELT Journal, 43, 2, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tesol, . (1975). Guidelines for the certification and preparation of teachers of English to speakers of other languages in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar

TESOL, . (1984). Statement of core standards for language and professional preparation programs. Washington, D.C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar

TESOL, . (1992). TESOL statement on the preparation of primary and secondary teachers in the United States. TESOL Matters, 2, 1, 5.Google Scholar

Thornbury, S. (1991). Watching the whites of their eyes: the use of teaching practice logs. ELTJ, 45, 2, 140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, M. (1989). A developmental view of classroom observations. ELT Journal, 43, 2, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, T. (1991). Models and metaphors in language teacher training — loop input and other strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yule, G. & Hoffman, R. (1993). Enlisting the help of U.S. undergraduates in evaluating international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 2, 323–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The British Council. (1993). Managing change and development in ELT in East and Central Europe. Prodess Colloquium, 7–9th November, Manchester.Google Scholar

Germaine, K. & Rea-Dickins, P. (1994). Relationships between management, evaluation and development. In Rea-Dickins, P. &' Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Holliday, A. (1992). Tissue rejection and informal orders in ELT projects: collecting the right information. Applied Linguistics, 13, 4, 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holliday, A. (1992). Intercompetence: sources of conflict between local and expatriate ELT personnel. System, 20, 2, 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, C. (1988). Evaluation of the management of change in ELT projects. Applied Linguistics, 9, 4, 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackay, R. (1993). Programme evaluation as a management tool for both accountability and development. ELT Management, Newsletter of the Management Special Interest Group of IATEFL, 12, 2–6.Google Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. (1990). The principles underlying the evaluation of training. In Training for Sustainability of ELT Aid Projects. Dunford House Seminar Report, 41–9. London: The British Council.Google Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. (1992). The politics of evaluation: focus on the external evaluator. Paper presented at the 26th International TESOL Convention, Vancouver.Google Scholar

St John, M. (1994). Evaluation as an interactive component: a case study of a Nigerian communication skills project. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Wellesley, S. (1993). Project based review in practice. ELT Management, Newsletter of the Management Special Interest Group of IATEFL, 13, 4–5.Google Scholar

Westaway, G. (1994). Roles for evaluation in the British Council's management of ODA funded projects in the Kenyan context. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Lwaitama, A. F. (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

White, R. (1988). The ELT curriculum. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Adelman, C. & Alexander, R. (1987). The integrity of evaluation. In Murphy, R. & Torrance, H. (eds.), 294–310.Google Scholar

Atkinson, P. & Delamont, S. (1985). Bread and dreams or bread and circuses? A critique of ‘case study’ research in education. In Hammersley, M. (ed.), Controversies in classroom research. Milton-Keynes: The Open University Press.Google Scholar

Burgess, R. G. (ed.) (1993). Educational research and evaluation for policy and practice. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L.J., (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L.J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F. & Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L.J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Cronbach, C. (1987). Issues in planning evaluations. In Murphy, R. & Torrance, H. (eds.), 4–25.Google Scholar

Eisner, E. W. (1985). The art of educational evaluation. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Ghaye, T. & Wakefield, P. (eds.) (1993). The role of self in action research. CARN. Dorset: Hyde Publications.Google Scholar

Gitlin, A. & Smyth, J. (1989). Teacher evaluation: educative alternatives. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Glass, G. V. & Worthen, B. R. (1971). Evaluation and research: similarities and differences. Curriculum Theory Network, Fall, 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Research, I, 3, 425–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Understanding teacher development. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Hopkins, D. (1985). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Hopkins, D. (1988). Evaluating for development. Evaluation and Research in Education, 2, 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, D. (1989). Evaluation for school development. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

House, E. R. (ed.) (1976). New directions in educational evaluation. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

James, M. (1993). Evaluation for policy: rationality and political reality: the paradigm case of PRAISE? In Burgess, R. G. (ed.), 119–38.Google Scholar

Joint Committee On Standards For Educational Evaluation (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Kemmis, S. (1986). Seven principles for programme evaluation in curriculum development and innovation. In House, E. R. (ed.), 117–40.Google Scholar

Kincheloe, J. L. (1991). Teachers as researchers: qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Louden, W. (1991). Understanding teaching: continuity and change in teachers' knowledge. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Macdonai, D. B. & Parlett, M. (1973). Rethinking evaluation: notes from the Cambridge Conference. Cambridge Journal of Education, 3, 2, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, B. (1987). Evaluation and the control of education. In Murphy, R. & Torrance, H. (eds.), 36–48.Google Scholar

McCabe, C. (1987). The external evaluator, inspector or management consultant? Evaluation and Research in Education, I, 1, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormick, R. (ed.). (1984). Calling education to account. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.Google Scholar

McFee, G. (1993). Reflections on the nature of action-research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 23, 2, 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNiff, J. (1993). Teaching as learning: an action research approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Murphy, R. & Torrance, H. (eds.) (1987). Evaluating education: issues and methods. London: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar

Nevo, D. (1983). The conceptualisation of educational evaluation: an analytical review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 1, 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, J. (1980). Educational research the - state of the art. In Dockrell, W. B. & Hamilton, D. (eds.), Rethinking education research. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Norris, N. (1993). Understanding educational evaluation. London: Kogan Page in association with CARE, School of Education, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, A. N. (1976). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1977). Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovative programmes. In Hamilton, D. et al. . (eds.), Beyond the numbers game. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Parlett, M. (1984). The new evaluation. In McCormick, R. (ed.), Calling education to account, 185–91. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar

Parsons, C. (1984). The new evaluation: a cautionary note. In McCormick, (ed.), 192–210.Google Scholar

Parsons, C. & Davidson, C. (1989). A brief guide to evaluation of college courses. Christ Church College Canterbury: The Evaluation Unit (mimco).Google Scholar

Plummer, G. & Edwards, G. (eds.) (1993). Dimensions of action research: people, practice and power. CARN. Dorset: Hyde Publications.Google Scholar

Popham, J. W. (1975). Educational evaluation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. Perspectives in curriculum evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum development No. 1, 39–89. Stake, R. E. (ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar

Stufflebeam, D. L. et al. . (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Ithaca, Illinois: Peacock.Google Scholar

Stufflebeam, D. L. & Webster, W. J. (1980). An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 3, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Action research: personal renewal and social reconstruction. Educational Action Research, 1/2, 99–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar