Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T21:33:10.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standardization patterns and dialect/standard convergence: A northwestern Italian perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

Massimo Cerruti  and
Riccardo Regis
Massimo Cerruti
Affiliation:
Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, via S. Ottavio 20 I–10124 Torino, Italymassimosimone.cerruti@unito.it
Riccardo Regis
Affiliation:
Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, via S. Ottavio 20 I–10124 Torino, Italyriccardo.regis@unito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is inspired by the typology of “dialect/standard constellations” outlined in Auer (2005, 2011), which aims to detect common dynamics in the current processes of dialect/standard convergence in Europe. The specific sociolinguistic situation addressed in this article involves Italian, Piedmontese, and Occitan in Piedmont, a northwestern region of Italy. We analyze a set of linguistic features with the aim of depicting the dynamics of intralinguistic and interlinguistic convergence as they relate to the ongoing standardization processes in these languages. Some adjustments to the two types of repertoires drawn by Auer (diaglossia and endoglossic medial diglossia) are proposed to better suit them, respectively, to the Italo-Romance continuum between Piedmontese rural dialects and standard Italian (which actually consists of two separate subcontinua with intermediate varieties) and to the relationship between Occitan dialects and their planned standard variety (as well as that between Piedmontese and its “Frenchified” standard variety). (Language standardization, dialect/standard convergence, Italian, Piedmontese, Occitan.)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 83 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ammon, Ulrich (1989). Towards a descriptive framework for the status/function (social position) of a language within a country. In Ammon, Ulrich (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties, 21–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich (2003). On the social forces that determine what is standard in a language and on conditions of successful implementation. Sociolinguistica 17:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter (2005). Europe's sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Delbecque, Nicole, van derAuwera, Johan, & Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, 7–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter (2011). Dialect vs. standard: A typology of scenarios in Europe. In Kortmann, Bernd & van der Auwera, Johan (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 485–500. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, & Hinskens, Frans (1996). The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe: New and not so new developments in an old area. Sociolinguistica 10:1–30.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter , & Spiekermann, Helmut (2011). Demotisation of the standard variety or de-standardisation? The changing status of German in late modernity (with special reference to southwestern Germany). In Kristiansen, Tore & Coupland, Nikolas (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe, 161–76. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Bellmann, Günter (1997). Between base dialect and standard language. Folia Linguistica 32(1–2):23–34.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (1987). Sociolinguistica dell'italiano contemporaneo. Roma: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (1989). On the typology of linguistic repertoires. In Ammon, Ulrich (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties, 552–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (1997). Linguistica del contatto e aspetti dell'italianizzazione dei dialetti: Appunti di creolistica casalinga. In Holtus, Günter, Kramer, Johannes, & Schweickard, Wolfgang (eds.), Italica et Romanica: Festschrift für Max Pfister zum 65. Geburtstag, vol. 3, 13–29. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2001). Dialetti, tetti, coperture: Alcune annotazioni in margine a una metafora sociolinguistica. In Iliescu, Maria, Plangg, Guntram, & Videsott, Paul (eds.), Die vielfältige Romania: Dialekt–Sprache–Überdachungssprache. Gedenkschrift für Heinrich Schmid (1921–1999), 23–40. San Martin de Tor, Vich, & Innsbruck: Istitut Ladin Micurà de Rü, Istitut Cultural Ladin Majon di Fascegn & Institut für Romanistik.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2005a). Intervento alla tavola rotonda. In Piparo, Franco Lo & Ruffino, Giovanni (eds.), Gli italiani e la lingua, 332–42. Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2005b). Dialect/standard convergence, mixing, and models of language contact: The case of Italy. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 81–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2007a). Miserie e grandezze dello standard: Considerazioni sulla nozione di standard in linguistica e sociolinguistica. In Molinelli, Piera (ed.), Standard e non standard tra scelta e norma, 13–41. Roma: il Calamo.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2007b). Sulla vitalità sociolinguistica del dialetto, oggi. In Raimondi, Gianmario & Revelli, Luisa (eds.), La dialectologie aujourd'hui, 133–53. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2009). Lingue minoritarie. In Gregory, Tullio (dir), XXI secolo: Comunicare e rappresentare, 335–46. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2010). Identifying dimensions of linguistic variation in a language space. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1, 226–41. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2011). Italiano lingua pluricentrica? In Overbeck, Anja, Schweickard, Wolfgang, & Volker, Harald (eds), Lexikon, Varietät, Philologie: Romanistische Studien. Günter Holtus zum 65. Geburtstag, 15–26. Tübingen: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano (2012). Sociolinguistica dell'italiano contemporaneo. Nuova edizione. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco; Ebert, Karen H.; & de Groot, Casper (2000). The progressive in Europe. In Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 517–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brero, Camillo (1967). Gramàtica piemontèisa. Torino: Musicalbrandé.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo (2009). Strutture dell'italiano regionale: Morfosintassi di una varietà diatopica in prospettiva sociolinguistica. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo (2011). Regional varieties of Italian in the linguistic repertoire. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 210:9–28.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo (2012). Italiano, dialetti e lingue dell'immigrazione a Torino. Italienisch 67:77–94.Google Scholar
CINLOA (2008) [Comission internazionala per la normalizacion linguística de l'Occitan Alpin.]Nòrmas ortogràficas, chausias morfològicas e vocabolari de l'Occitan Alpin Oriental. Cuneo: Regione Piemonte, Espaci Occitan, & Comunità Montana Valle Maira.Google Scholar
Clivio, Gianrenzo P. (1990). Ël piemontèis parlà, ël piemontèis literari e ’l dissionari stòrich-etimològich ëd la lenga piemontèisa. In Clivio, Gianrenzo P. & Pich, Censin (eds.), VI Rëscontr antërnassional dë studi an sla lenga e la literatura piemontèisa, 175–84. Alba: Famija Albèisa.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael (1992). Pluricentric languages: Introduction. In Clyne, Michael (ed.), Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations, 1–9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coluzzi, Paolo (2007). Minority language planning and micronationalism in Italy. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Cordin, Patrizia (2001). I pronomi riflessivi. In Renzi, Lorenzo (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 1, 607–17. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio (1980). “Historische Sprache” und “Dialekt.” In Göschel, Joachim, Ivić, Pavle, & Kehr, Kurt (eds.), Dialekt und Dialektologie, 106–22. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia, & Iannàccaro, Gabriele (2003). “Qui parliamo tutti uguale, ma diverso”: Repertori complessi e interventi sulle lingue. In Valentini, Ada, Molinelli, Piera, Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, & Bernini, Giuliano (eds.), Ecologia linguistica, 431–50. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio (1970). Storia linguistica dell'Italia unita. 2nd edn.Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana, & Vandenbussche, Wim (2003a). Standard languages: Taxonomies and histories. In Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Germanic standardizations: Past and present, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana, & Vandenbussche, Wim (2003b). Research directions in the study of language standardization. In Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Germanic standardizations: Past and present, 455–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, & Miola, Emanuele (2014). From adverbs to pragmatic markers of repetition: North-western Italian già and più between grammar and discourse. In Molinelli, Piera & Ghezzi, Chiara (eds.), Pragmatic markers from Latin to Romance languages, to appear.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. (1988). Standardization as a form of language spread. In Lowenberg, Peter (ed.), Language spread and language policy, 119–32. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli de’ Paratesi, Nora (1984). Lingua toscana in bocca ambrosiana. Tendenze verso l'italiano standard: un'inchiesta sociolinguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Golovko, Ekaterina (2012). The formation of regional Italian as a consequence of language contact. The Salentino case. Journal of Language Contact 5:117–43.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1986). Were there Egyptian koines? In Fishman, Joshua A., Tabouret-Keller, Andrée, Clyne, Michael, Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju, & Abdulaziz, Mohamed (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson, vol. 1, 271–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar (1966). Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68(4):922–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannàccaro, Gabriele, & Vittorio, Dell'Aquila (2011). Historical linguistic minorities: Suggestions for classification and typology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 210:29–45.Google Scholar
ISTAT (2006). La lingua italiana, i dialetti e le lingue straniere. Roma: Istituto nazionale di statistica.Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl (1982). Dialect, language, and “synecdoche.” Linguistics 20:473–91.Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl (1984). The engineering of a standard language. Multilingua 3(2):87–92.Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl (1987). Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul (2002). Koineization and accomodation. In Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language change and variation, 669–702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz (1967). “Abstand languages” and “Ausbau languages.” Anthropological Linguistics 9(7):29–41.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz (1978). Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B., & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée (1985). Acts of identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio (2002). Mother tongues and other reflections on the Italian language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin, & Parry, Mair M. (eds.) (1997). The dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcato, Carla (2007). Dialetto, dialetti e italiano. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. (1997). Über Destandardisierung, Umstandardisierung und Standardisierung in modernen europäischen Standardsprachen. In Mattheier, Klaus J. & Radtke, Edgar (eds.), Standardisierung und Destandardisierung europäischer Nationalsprachen, 1–11. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. (1996). Varietätenkonvergenz: Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. Sociolinguistica 10:31–52.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno (1963). Storia della lingua italiana. Sansoni: Firenze.Google Scholar
Moseley, Christopher (ed.) (2010). Atlas of the world's languages in danger. 3rd edn.Paris: UNESCO. Online: http://www.unesco.org/culture/en/endangeredlanguages/atlas; accessed July 27, 2012.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Jenny, & Svahn, Margareta (2009). What can the dialect situation in West Sweden tell us about the concept of dialect and dialect change? Paper presented at the 5th international conference of language variation in Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Paulston, Christina Bratt (1987). Catalan and Occitan: Comparative test cases for a theory of language maintenance and shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 63:31–62.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, Giovan Battista (1977). Carta dei dialetti d'Italia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Priest, Kathryn (2008). Oc-lite: Why aren't the Occitans more like the Catalans? Sociolinguistica 22:140–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regis, Riccardo (2010). Provenzale, comunità. In Simone, Raffaele (dir.), Enciclopedia dell'italiano, 1179–82. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
Regis, Riccardo (2012a). Su pianificazione, standardizzazione, polinomia: Due esempi. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 128(1):88–133.Google Scholar
Regis, Riccardo (2012b). Koinè dialettale, dialetto di koinè, processi di koinizzazione. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 35:7–36.Google Scholar
Røyneland, Unn (2010). Vertical convergence of linguistic varieties in a language space. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1, 259–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani (2007). Endangered languages in Europe. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language diversity endangered, 205–32. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo, & Vanelli, Laura (2004). Nuova grammatica italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff (2001). Koine formation and creole genesis. In Smith, Norval & Veenstra, Tonies (eds.), Creolization and contact, 175–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sobrero, Alberto A. (1997). Italianization of the dialects. In Maiden, Martin & Parry, Mair M. (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 412–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario (2011). Between modal particles and discourse markers: North-western Italian già ‘already.’ Paper presented at 12th international pragmatics conference. Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Stewart, William A. (1968). A sociolinguistic typology for describing national multilingualism. In Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, 531–45. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sumien, Domergue (2006). La standardisation pluricentrique de l'occitan: Nouvel enjeu sociolinguistique, développement du lexique et de la morphologie. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosco, Mauro (2008). Introduction: «Ausbau» is everywhere! International Journal of the Sociology of Language 191:1–16.Google Scholar
Tosco, Mauro (2011). Between endangerment and Ausbau. In Miola, Emanuele & Ramat, Paolo (eds.), Language contact and language decay: Socio-political and linguistic perspectives, 227–46. Pavia: IUSS Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2003). UNESCO ad hoc expert group on endangered languages. Language vitality and endangerment. Online: http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00120-EN.pdf; accessed July 27, 2012.Google Scholar
van Marle, Jaap (1997). Dialect versus standard language: Nature versus culture. In Cheshire, Jenny & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Taming the vernacular. From dialect to written standard language, 13–34. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ward, Ida C. (1929). The phonetics of English. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar