Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T21:49:24.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prosody and ideologies of embodiment: Variation in the use of pitch and articulation rate among fitness instructors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2020

Lewis Esposito Open the ORCID record for Lewis Esposito [Opens in a new window]  and
Chantal Gratton
Lewis Esposito*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, USA
Chantal Gratton
Affiliation:
Stanford University, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Lewis Esposito Department of Linguistics Stanford University Margaret Jacks Hall, Building 460 Stanford, CA94305, USAlesposi1@stanford.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses semiotic connections among linguistic prosody, the body, and forms of physical activity. A quantitative study of the instructional styles of bodybuilding and yoga instructors on YouTube shows that bodybuilding instructors employ faster articulation rates and higher pitch (F0) than yoga instructors. We argue that articulation rate and pitch become semiotically linked to notions of energy, and the differences in the instructors’ styles are rooted in differences in levels of embodied energy that bodybuilding and yoga are assumed to require. Instructors employ linguistic features that reflect these ideologies of their activities, and in doing so, present themselves as embodied instantiations of their respective practices. This study shows that ideologies of the body as a physically active doer of things provide an important source for the generation of iconic, energy-related meanings. Crucially, we show that ideological notions of energy and embodied iconicity can drive group-level patterns of linguistic variation. (Prosody, iconicity, style, embodiment, social meaning, ideology)*

Type
Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 211 - 236
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This project grew out of discussions we had with Penny Eckert, and we are incredibly grateful for the support and insight she offered along the way. We are also grateful to Rob Podesva, Qing Zhang, members of Stanford's SocioLunch, the audience at NWAV 47, and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions. Any and all errors remain our own.

References

REFERENCES

Aslan, Erhan, & Vásquez, Camilla (2018). ‘Cash me outside’: A citizen sociolinguistic analysis of online metalinguistic commentary. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22:406–31.10.1111/josl.12303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
@StarSumiaki (2016). Everybody has that higher-pitch-high-energy voice they use with babies and puppies. Twitter. Online: https://twitter.com/StarSumiaki/status/697422007923683328.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas; Maechler, Martin; Bolker, Ben; & Walker, Steve (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 173–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara (2014). The social motivations of reversal: Raised BOUGHT in New York City English. Language in Society 43:395–420.10.1017/S0047404514000372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Jeremy (2019). The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society 48:31–64.10.1017/S004740451800115XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Jeremy, & Popova, Dash (2013). Dimensions of rhythm: The multi-layered nature of rhythmic style. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20:11–19.Google Scholar
Caldwell, David; Walsh, John; Vine, Elaine; & Jureidini, Jon (eds.) (2018). The discourse of sport: Analysis from social linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86:52–68.10.1215/00031283-1277510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campione, Estelle, & Véronis, Jean (2002). A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. In Bel, Bernard & Marlien, Isabelle (eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, 199–202. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia, & Smiljanic, Rajka (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics 37:237–45.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Daniel (2019). The role of gesture in the English ish-construction. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 4:1–12.10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19:31–39.10.1111/josl.12115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette, & Benheim, Jaime (2020). Contextualizing reversal: Local dynamics of the Northern Cities Shift in a Chicago community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1–23. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12398.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–76.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2010). Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15:70–80.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2017). The most perfect of signs: Iconicity in variation. Linguistics 55:1197–1207.10.1515/ling-2017-0025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2019). Meaning and linguistic variation: The third-wave in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Vanessa (n.d.). How to make your voice sound better. Online: https://www.scienceofpeople.com/how-to-make-your-voice-sound-better/.Google Scholar
Emery, Michael (2014). Men’s bodybuilding: A short history. Online: Bodybuildingreviews.net.Google Scholar
Esposito, Lewis (2020). Linking gender, sexuality, and affect: The linguistic and social patterning of phrase-final posttonic lengthening. Language Variation and Change, to appear.10.1017/S0954394520000095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan (2013). Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs. Anthropological Theory 31:31–48.10.1177/1463499613483396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudio, Rudolf (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69:30–57.10.2307/455948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginty, Molly M. (2017). Empower your voice. yoga journal. Online: https://www.yogajournal.com/teach/empower-your-voice.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, & Low, Ee Ling (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, 515–46. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gratton, Chantal (2017). Non-binary identity construction and gender identity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America. Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Hamano, Shoko (1994). Palatalization in Japanese sound symbolism. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, & Ohala, James (eds.), Sound symbolism, 148–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16:248–67.10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith (2001). ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith, & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2016). Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:632–43.10.1111/lnc3.12210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa; Fox, Robert A.; O'Neill, Caitlin; & Salmons, Joseph (2009). Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change 21:233–56.10.1017/S0954394509990093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeong, Sunwoo (2017). Iconization of sociolinguistic variables: The case of archetypal female characters in classic Hollywood cinema. In Zirker, Angelika, Bauer, Matthias, Fischer, Olga, & Ljungberg, Christina (eds.), Dimensions of iconicity, 263–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler (2009). Speech rate, pause, and linguistic variation: An examination through the sociolinguistic archive and analysis project. Durham, NC: Duke University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler, & Wolfram, Walt (2009). Local and external language standards in African American English. Journal of English Linguistics 37:5–30.10.1177/0075424209339281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra; Brockhoff, Per B.; & Christensen, Rune H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82:1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1969). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273–309.10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1962). The savage mind. Paris: Librarie Plon.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez (2006). Hearing ‘gay’: Prosody, interpretation, and the affective judgment of men's speech. American Speech 81(1):56–78.10.1215/00031283-2006-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez (2009). Dimensions of style: context, politics, and motivation in gay Israeli speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:29–58.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00396.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez (2011). Teasing apart to bring together: Gender and sexuality in variationist research. American Speech 86:69–84.10.1215/00031283-1277519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez (2016). Conflicted selves: Language, sexuality, and religion in Israel. In Levon, Erez & Mendes, Ronald (eds.), Language, sexuality and power: Studies in intersectional sociolinguistics, 215–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Neil (2004). Sustainable adventure: Embodied experiences and ecological practices within British climbing. In Wheaton, 70–93.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai (2015). Fighters, girls, and other identities: Sociolinguistics in a martial arts club. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783093991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuliffe, Michael; Socolof, Michaela; Mihuc, Sarah; Wagner, Michael; & Sonderegger, Morgan (2017). Montreal forced aligner: Trainable text-speech alignment using Kaldi. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (2011). The semiotic hitchhiker’s guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21:261–80.10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01110.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma, & Jannedy, Stephanie (2011). Semiotic layering through gesture and intonation: A case study of complementary and supplementary multimodality in political speech. Journal of English Linguistics 39:265–99.10.1177/0075424211405941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Emma, & Podesva, Robert J. (2009). Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38:447–85.10.1017/S0047404509990224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John (1994). The frequency codes underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, & Ohala, James (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pell, Marc D., & Kotz, Sonja (2011). On the time course of vocal emotion recognition. PLoS One 6:e27256.10.1371/journal.pone.0027256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, Elizabeth (2019). Learning how to control a fast rate of speech. Online: https://www.speechandvoice.com/member/accent-reduction-program/learning-how-to-control-a-fast-rate-of-speech/.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:478–504.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2011). The California Vowel Shift and gay identity. American Speech 86:32–51.10.1215/00031283-1277501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2013). Gender and the social meaning of non-modal phonation types. Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 37:427–48.10.3765/bls.v37i1.832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2018). The affective roots of gender patterns in the use of creaky voice. Paper presented at Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Prosody 4, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., & Callier, Patrick (2015). Voice quality and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35:173–94.10.1017/S0267190514000270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J.; Callier, Patrick; Voigt, Rob; & Jurafsky, Dan (2015). The connection between smiling and GOAT smiling: Embodied affect and sociophonetic variation. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa (2017). The use of embodied creak by young men in an arts high school. Paper presented at NWAV45, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa (2018). Affective sociolinguistic style: An ethnography of embodied linguistic variation in an arts high school. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa (2019). Embodying ‘tech’: Articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics Early View:1–22. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12369.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa, & D'Onofrio, Annette (2017). Jaw setting and the California Vowel Shift in parodic performance. Language in Society 46:283–312.10.1017/S0047404517000227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Sravana, & Stanford, James (2015). A web application for automated dialect analysis. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2015, 71–75. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Online: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N15-3015.pdf.Google Scholar
Reiman, Tonya (2010). The yes factor: Get what you want. Say what you mean. New York: Hudsen Street Press.Google Scholar
Reeser, Todd, & Gottzén, Lucas (2018). Masculinity and affect: New possibilities, new agendas. NORMA: International Journal of Masculinity Studies 13:145–57.10.1080/18902138.2018.1528722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John, & McNair-Knox, Faye (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward (eds.), Perspectives on register: Situating register variation within sociolinguistics, 235–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seppala, Emma (2017). Does your voice reveal more emotion than your face? Greater Good Magazine. Online: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/does_your_voice_reveal_more_emotion_than_your_face.Google Scholar
Steck, Jenni (2017). ‘I think my voice sounds too high.’ Voice Speech and Coaching. Online: http://jennisteck.com/blog/i-think-my-voice-sounds-too-high/.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1994). Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, & Ohala, James (eds.), Sound symbolism, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23:193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobe, Tyanna (2018). Style, stance, and social meaning in mock white girl. Language in Society 47:541–67.10.1017/S004740451800060XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surrenda, David (2012). The purpose of yoga. The New York Times. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/01/12/is-yoga-for-narcissists/the-purpose-of-yoga.Google Scholar
Tilin, Andrew (2007). Yoga for men: Why more men should be practicing yoga. yoga journal. Online: https://www.yogajournal.com/practice/where-are-all-the-men.Google Scholar
International, Toastmasters (2011). You're talking voice. Online: https://www.toastmasters.org/~/media/B7D5C3F93FC3439589BCBF5DBF521132.ashx.Google Scholar
Voigt, Rob; Podesva, Robert J.; & Jurafsky, Dan (2014). Speaker movement correlates with prosodic indicators of engagement. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7. Online: https://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/speechprosody_voigt.pdf.Google Scholar
Voigt, Rob; Eckert, Penelope; Jurafsky, Dan; & Podesva, Robert J. (2016). Cans and cants: Computational potentials for multimodality with a case study in head position. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:677–711.10.1111/josl.12216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, Belinda (ed.) (2004). Understanding lifestyle sport: Consumption, identity, and difference. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203646069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Nick (2017). The portable locker room: Language, space, and place in rugby pre-match interaction. Communication & Sport 6:547–69.10.1177/2167479517734849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Julia (2017). The science behind hating someone for their voice. Rice Media. Online: https://www.ricemedia.co/the-science-behind-hating-someone-for-their-voice/.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34:431–66.10.1017/S0047404505050153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2017a). Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society 46:339–70.10.1017/S0047404517000070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2017b). Operationalizing stance: Affective stance in a pervasively creaky transgender speaker. Paper presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston, MA.Google Scholar