Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom

  • Alexander Mchoul (a1)

Abstract

Beginning with a consideration of some commonsense and professional conceptions of what a formal situation might comprise, this paper goes on to ask the question: where along a linear array which has its poles in exemplars of formal and informal speech-exchange systems, can classroom talk be placed? Its answer is given in part in the form of rules for the taking of turns in classrooms, these being modifications of those, already established in the literature, for natural conversation. These rules allow for and require that formal classroom situations be constructed so as to involve differential participation rights for parties to the talk depending on their membership of the social identity-class ‘student/teacher’. The analyses which follow examine some of the applications and violations of these rules found in audio and video recordings of naturally occurring classroom talk (and transcripts thereof) for their orderliness as orientations to these rules. It is argued that the rules provide a systematic basis for the ‘feelings’ of ‘formality’ that researchers and participants have of such situations and that a decision as to the ‘formality’ or otherwise of a social situation can be predicated on the degree of pre-allocation involved in the organization of turns at talk in the situation. (Configuration and distance in interaction, conversational analysis, turn-taking systems, classroom language, sociology of education; British and Australian English).

Copyright

References

Hide All
Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In Harvey, O. J. (ed.), Motivation and social interaction. New York: Ronald. 183238.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Goodwin, C. (1975). The interactive construction of the sentence within the turn at talk in natural conversation. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, 2–6 December.
Hall, E. T. (1964). Silent assumptions in social communication. Research Publications of the Association for Nervous and Mental Disease 42.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Hall, E. T. (1968). Proxemics. Current Anthropology 9, 83108.
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 294338.
Jefferson, G. (1973a). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9 (1). 4796.
Jefferson, G. (1973b) Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter. Unpublished draft manuscript.
Kendon, A. (1973). The role of visible behaviour in the organization of social interaction. In Cranach, M. and Vine, I. (eds), Social Communication and movement. London: Academic Press. 2974.
Kendon, A. (in press). The F-formation system: spatial organization in social encounters. To appear in Kendon, A.Studies in the behavior of face to face interaction. New York: Humanities Press. Citations to draft manuscript.
Postman, N. & Weingartner, C. (1973). Teaching as a subversive activity. London: Penguin.
Sacks, H. (1967). Unpublished lecture notes.
Sacks, H. (1968). Unpublished lecture notes.
Sacks, H. (1969). Unpublished lecture notes.
Sacks, H. (1970). Unpublished lecture notes.
Sacks, H. (1971). Unpublished lecture notes.
Sacks, H. (1972). Unpublished lecture notes.
Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 337–53.
Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone has to lie. In Sanches, M. & Blount, B. G. (eds), Sociocultural dimenions of language use. New York: Academic Press. 5779.
Sacks, H. (forthcoming). Aspects of the sequential organization of conversation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Citations to draft manuscript.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Lg. 50 (4). 696735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70 (6). 10751095.
Also in Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds) (1972), Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston (1972). 346–80.
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 73119.
Schegloff, E. A. (1973). Recycled turn beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organization. Public lecture in the series ‘Language in the context of space, time and society’, Summer Institute of Linguistics, The Linguistic Society of America, University of Michigan.
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8 (4). 289327.
Schenkein, J. N. (1972). Towards an analysis of natural conversation and the sense of Heheh. Semiotica 6 (4). 344–77.

The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom

  • Alexander Mchoul (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed