Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:24:01.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maurice Bloch (ed.), Political language and oratory in traditional society. London: Academic Press, 1975. Pp. x + 240.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

William M. O'Barr
William M. O'Barr
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyDuke UniversityDurham, North Carolina 27706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1977 , pp. 66 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, F. G. (1969). Stratagems and spoils. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. Vols I, II, III. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Devereux, G. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, M. & Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (eds) (1940). African political systems. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1970). Linguistic aspects of comparative political research. In Holt, R. T. and Turner, J. E. (eds), The methodology of comparative research. New York: Free Press. 295–341.Google Scholar
Swartz, M. J., Turner, V. W. & Tuden, A. (eds) (1966). Political anthropology.Google Scholar
Veegelin, C. F. (1960). Casual and noncasual utterances within unified structure. In Sebeek, T. A. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. 57–68.Google Scholar