Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Language style as audience design*

  • Allan Bell (a1)

Abstract

The style dimension of language variation has not been adequately explained in sociolinguistic theory. Stylistic or intraspeaker variation derives from and mirrors interspeaker variation. Style is essentially speakers' response to their audience. In audience design, speakers accommodate primarily to their addressee. Third persons – auditors and overhearers – affect style to a lesser but regular degree. Audience design also accounts for bilingual or bidialectal code choices. Nonaudience factors like topic and setting derive their effect by association with addressee types. These style shifts are mainly responsive – caused by a situational change. Speakers can also use style as initiative, to redefine the existing situation. Initiative style is primarily referee design: divergence from the addressee and towards an absent reference group. Referee design is especially prevalent in mass communication. (Sociolinguistic variation, code-switching. bilingualism, accommodation theory, ethnography of communication, mass communication)

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bailey, C.-J.N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington. Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Beebe, L.M. (1981). Social and situational factors affecting comtnunicative strategy of dialect code. switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 32: 139–49.
Beeman, W.O. (1977). The bows and whys of Persian style: A pragmatic approach. In Fasold, R.W. & Shuy, R.W. (eds.). Studies in language variation. Washington. D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 269–82.
Bell., A. (1977). The language of radio news in Auckland: A sociolinguistic study of style, audience, and subediting variation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Auckland. New Zealand. (Ann Arbor. Mich.: University Microfilms. 1979).
Bell., A. (1982a). One rule of news English: Geographical, social, and historical spread. Paper presented to the Spring Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, Reading, England.
Bell., A.(1982b). Radio: The style of news language. Journal of Comnmunication 32: 150–64.
Bell., A.(1982c). This isn't the BBC: Colonialism in New Zealand English. Applied Linguistics 3: 246–58.
Bell., A.(1984). Good copy – bad news: The syntax and semantics of news editing. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Applied sociolinguistics. London: Academic Press. 73116.
Bickerton., D. (1980). What happens when we switch? York Papers in Linguistics 9: 4156.
Blom, J-P.. & Gumperz., J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 407–34.
Bourhis, R.Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (ed). Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press. 119–35.
Breitborde, L. B. (1983). Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 39: 543.
Brown, P., & Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In Scherer, K.R. & Giles, H.(eds.). Social markers in speech. Cambridge University Press. 3362.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E.N. (ed). Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interantion. Cambridge University Press. 56289.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1979). Social structure, groups, and interaction. In Scherer, K.R. & Giles, H. (eds.). Social markers in speech. Cambridge University Press. 291341.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Seheok, T.A (ed). Style in language. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press. 253–76.
Callary, R.E. (1975). Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois. Language in Society 4: 155–69.
Chambers, J. K. (1981). The Americanization of Canadian raising. In Masek, C. S.. Hendrick, R. A.. & Miller, M. F. (eds.). Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago. III.: Chicago Linguistic Society. 2035.
Chambers, J.K., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialeciologv. Cambridge University Press.
Cheshire, J. (1982). Linguistic variation and social function. In Romaine, S. (ed). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 153–66.
Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language 58: 332–73.
Coupland, N. (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9: 112.
Coupland, N. (1981). The social differentiation of functional language use: A sociolinguistic investigation of travel agency talk. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff.
Coupland, N. (1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 115.
Dorian, N. C. (1981). Language death. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Douglas-Cowie, E. (1978). Linguistic code-switching in a Northern Irish village: Social interaction and social ambition. In Trudgill, P. (ed). Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold. 3751.
Dressler, W. (1974). Desaktivierung und phonologische Nachlässigkeit. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 6: 2028.
Dressler, W., & Wodak-Leodolter, R. (1977). Language preservation and language death in Brittany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12: 3344.
Ervin-Tripp, S.M. (1973). Language acquisition and commumcative choice. Stanford, Culif.: Stanford University Press.
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15: 325–40.
Ferguson, C. A., & Gumperz, J. J. (eds.) (1960). “Linguistic diversity in South Asia” (International Journal of American Linguistics 26/3 part 3). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Domains and the relationship between micro- and macrosociolinguistics. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.). Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 435–53.
Fishman, J. A., Cooper, R. L., Ma, R. et al. , (1971). Bilingualism in the barrio, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Friedrich, P. (1972). Social context and semantic feature: The Russian pronominal usage. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hyrnes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 270300.
Gal, S. (1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic chang in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.
Giles, H. (ed.) (1977). Language. ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Giles, H. (1980). Accommodation theory: Some new directions. York Papers in Linguistics 9: 105–36.
Giles, H. (ed.) (1984). “The dynamics of speech accommodation” (special issue of the International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46).
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
Giles, H., & Saint-Jacques, B. (eds. ) (1979). Language and ethnic relations. Oxford: Pergamon.
Giles, H., & Smith, P. (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In Giles, H. & St. Clair, R. (eds.). Language and social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell. 4565.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gumperz., J. J. (1967). On the linguistic markers of bilingual communication. Journal of Social Issues 23: 4857.
Hasegawa, N. (1979). Casual speech vs. fast speech. In Clyne, P.R.. Hanks, W.F.. & Hofbauer, C.L. (eds.). Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting. Chicago. III.: Chicago Linguistic Society. 126–37.
Helfrich, H. (1979). Age markers in speech. In Scherer, K. R. & Giles, H. (eds.). Social markers in speech. Cambridge University Press. 63107.
Hindle, D. M. (1979). The social and situational conditioning of phonetic variation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Huygens, I. (1979). Sociolinguistic stereotyping in New Zealand. Master's thesis. University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jahangiri, N. (1980). A sociolinguistic study of Tehrani Persian. Ph.D. dissertation. University of London.
Jahangiri, N., & Hudson, R. A. (1982). Patterns of variation in Tehrani Persian. In Romaine, S. (ed.). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communties. London: Edward Arnold. 4963.
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington.D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Jahangiri, N., & Hudson, R. A. (1972a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jahangiri, N., & Hudson, R. A. (1972b). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1: 97120.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness. or minding your P's and Q's. In Corum, C.. SmithStark, T. C., & Weiser, A. (eds.). Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting. Chicago. III.: Chicago Linguistic Society. 292305.
Lavandera, B. R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7: 171–82.
Le, Page R. B. (1980). Projection. focussing, diffusion. York Papers in Linguistics 9: 931.
Lindvall, T. R. (1980). C. S. Lewis theory of communication. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Mahl, G. F. (1972). People talking when they can't hear their voices. In Siegman, A. W. & Pope, B. (eds.). Studies in dyadic communication. New York: Pergamon. 211–64.
McEntegart, D., & Le, Page R. B. (1982). An appraisal of the statistical techniques used in the Sociolinguistic Survey of Multilingual Communities. In Romaine, S. (ed.). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 105–24.
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1977). Speech and context in an urban setting. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics. 2.
Modaressi-Tehrani, Y. (1978). A sociolinguistic analysis of Modern Persian. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Payne, A. C. (1980). Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In Labov, W. (ed.). Locating language itt time and space. New York: Academic Press. 143–78.
Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1984). Speech convergence miscarried: An investigation into inappropriate accommodation strategies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46.
Purcell, A. K. (1979). Variation in speech by children in Hawaii. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Rickford, J. R. (1979). Variation in a Creole continuum: Quantitative and implicational approaches. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Romaine, S. (1980). Stylistic variation and evaluative reactions to speech. Language and Speech 23: 213–32.
Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge University Press.
Russell, J. (1982). Networks and sociolinguistic variation in an African urban setting. In Romaine, S. (ed), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 125–40.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696735.
Sankoff, G. (1980). The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Scotton, C. M. (1982). The possibility of code-switching. Anthropological Linguistics 24: 432–44.
Selting, M. (1983). Institutionelle Kommunikation: Stilwechsel als Mittel strategischer Interaktion. Linguistische Berichte 86: 2948.
Shockey, L. (1984). All in a flap: Long-term accommodation in phonology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46.
Solomon, M. (1978). Jimmy Carter and Playboy: A sociolinguistic perspective on style. Quarterly Journal of Speech 64: 173–82.
Street, R. L. Jr, (1982). Evaluation of noncontent speech accommodation. Language and Communication 2: 1331.
Tannen, D. (1983). Conversational style. In Dechert, H. & Raupach, M. (eds.). Psycholinguistic models of production. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tarone, E. E. (1982). Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning 32: 6984.
Thakerar, J. N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In Fraser, C. & Scherer, K. R. (eds.). Advances in the social psychology of language. Cambridge University Press. 205–55.
Thelander, M. (1982). A qualitative approach to the quantitative data of speech variation. In Romaine, S. (ed). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 6583.
Traugott, E. C., & Romaine, S. (1983). Style in sociohistorical linguistics. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Poznan. Poland.
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.
Trudgill, P. (1981).Linguistic accommodation: Sociolinguistic observations on a sociopsychological theory. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A.. & Miller, M. F. (eds.). Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago, III.: Chicago Linguistic Society. 218–37.
Trudgill, P. (1983). On dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vanečk, E., & Dressler, W. (1975). Bericht über psycholinguistische Experimente zur Sprechvariation. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 9: 1738.
Winford, D. (1978). Phonological hypercorrection in the process of decreolization – the case of Trinidadian English. Journal of Linguistics 14: 277–91.
Wolfram, W. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Wolfram, W. (1981). On the orderly relationship of Appalachian dialects. Manuscript.
Wolfram, W., & Fasold, R. W. (1974) The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Woods, H. B. (1979). A socio-diaiectology survey of the English spoken in Ottawa: A study of sociological and stylistic variation in Canadian English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

Language style as audience design*

  • Allan Bell (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed