Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T02:28:16.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expletives of lower working-class women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Susan E. Hughes
Susan E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages, University of Solford, Greater Manchester MiO OSU, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For many decades, women's speech has been seen as being very different from that used by men. Stereotyped as swearing less, using less slang, and as aiming for more standard speech style, women were judged according to their sex rather than other aspects of their lives, such as class and economic situation. With many critics now challenging these ideas, this article sets out to look at the reality of the swearing used by a group of women from a deprived inner-city area. Their constant use of strong expletives flies in the face of the theories proffered of the “correctness” of the language of women. (Expletives, taboo words, working-class women, female speech, female group, social networks, sociolinguistics, inner-city England)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 291 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chaika, E. (1982). Language: The social mirror. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (1986). Women, men and language: A sociolingusitic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coates, J., & Cameron, D. (eds.). (1988). Women in their speech communities. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Conklin, N.F. (1973). Perspectives on the dialects of women. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Gomm, I. (1981). A study of the inferior image of the female use of the English language as compared to that of the male. Unpublished B.A. dissertation, Edge Hill College, Ormskirk.Google Scholar
Hudson, R.A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. (1974). Women's speech: Separate but unequal? Quarterly Journal of Speech 60:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. et al. , (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Cooperative Research Project 3288, vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pahl, R. E. (1975). Whose city? Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Risch, B. (1987). Women's derogatory terms for men: That's right, “dirty” words. Language in Society 16:353–58.Google Scholar
Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (eds.). (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1: 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1983). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. London: Pelican.Google Scholar