Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T08:26:16.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reporter's test as a sociolinguistic tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Martin J. Ball
Martin J. Ball
Affiliation:
School of Speech Therapy, South Glamorgan Institute of Higher Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The problem confronted by many sociolinguists of assuring sufficient examples of a particular variable in their data is discussed, and a pilot study using various different data elicitation techniques is described. The most useful of these appears to be the reporter's test, which is described in detail. A further study is described, which, like the first, is on features of Welsh, and this supports the previous findings. From these studies we have evidence that the reporter's test not only has great predictive capacity, but also appears to produce casual styles of speech. The value of this for sociolinguists is clear. (Data collection, Welsh)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 375 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Awbery, G. M. (1975). Welsh mutations: Syntax or phonology? Archivum Linguisticum (New Series) 6:14–25.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. (1984). Phonetics for phonology. In Ball, M. J. & Jones, G. E. (eds.), Welsh phonology. selected readings. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, J. P., & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. H. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 407–34.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982). Variation in an English dialect: A sociolinguistic study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeRenzi, E., & Faglioni, D. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the token test. Cortex 14:41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRenzi, E., & Ferrari, C. (1978). The reporter's test: A sensitive test to detect expressive disturbance in aphasics. Cortex 14:279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRenzi, E. & Vignolo, L. A. (1962). The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbance in aphasics. Brain 85:665–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J. (1966). Speech variation in a piedmont community: Postvocalic r. In Lieberson, S. (ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller, D., Munro, S., & Code, C. (1981). Language assessment and remediation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W., & Fasold, R. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar