Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-z4vvc Total loading time: 2.077 Render date: 2021-02-26T02:13:39.884Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Language in Society Language in Society

Article contents

Diglossia: A bibliographic review1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Alan Hudson
Alan Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of New MexicoAlbuquerque, NM 87131-1196
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bibliography following the body of this paper contains a total of 1,092 entries on the subject of diglossia. Entries dealing with diglossia in the classical sense of Ferguson (1959) and in the sense of functional compartmentalization of distinct languages are represented approximately equally. Scholarly publication in the area of diglossia continues unabated as indicated by the fact that approximately one-half of the entries in the bibliography were published between 1983 and 1992. However, there remains a need for a comprehensive integration, comparative analysis, and socioevolutionary interpretation of diglossia research. (Bilingualism, diglossia, functional variation, literary languages, registers, standard languages, standardization)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 611 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., & Mattheier, K. (eds.). (1987). Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barnouw, E. (ed.).(1989). International encyclopedia of communications. 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, R. (1976). Sociolinguistics: Goals, approaches and problems. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (1979). La sociolingüística. Trans. by Mastrángelo, S.. México, D.F.: Nueva Imagen.Google Scholar
Bolan¯o, S. (1982). Introducción a la teoría y práctica de la sociolingüística. México, D.F.: Editorial Trillas.Google Scholar
Booth, B. (ed.). (1986). Thesaurus of sociological indexing terms. San Diego: Sociological Abstracts.Google Scholar
Bright, W. (ed.). (1992). International encyclopedia of linguistics. 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaika, E. (1989). Language: The social mirror. 2nd ed.New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. (1976). A critical survey of Sociolinguistics: Theory and application. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Downes, W. (1984). Language and society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (1976). Language in culture and class. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C., & Gumperz, J. (eds.). (1960). Linguistic diversity in South Asia: Studies in regional, social and functional variation. (Publication 13, Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) International Journal of American Linguistics 26(3, Pt. 3). Whole issue.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1991). Putting the “socio” back into the sociolinguistic enterprise. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92: 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, J. (ed.). (1990). Thesaurus of ERIC descriptors, 12th ed.Phoenix: Oryx.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (in press). Diglossia. In Asher, R. et al. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 10 vols. Oxford and Aberdeen: Pergamon Press and Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. In J. Macnamara (ed.), Problems of bilingualism [Special Issue]. Journal of Social Issues 23(2):8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1984). Sociolinguistics: Stability and consolidation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 45: 39–45.Google Scholar
Malmkjær, K. (ed.). (1991). The linguistics encyclopedia. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (ed.). (1988). Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. 4. Language: The socio-cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peñalosa, F. (1980). Chicana sociolinguislics: A brief introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Peñalosa, F. (1981). Introduction to the sociology of language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1975). The social significance of speech: An introduction to and workbook in sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1972). Language use in multilingual societies: Some alternative approaches. In Pride, J. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin. 33–51.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1988). Bilingualism. In Newmeyer (1988). 100–18.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1983). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language in society. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Woodworth, E., & Di Pietro, R. (eds.). (1963). Report of the Thirteenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 15.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Abbi, A., & Hasnain, S. (1986, May). Lexical modernization and its socio-linguistic effects: A case from Indian Urdu. Paper presented at the Colloquium on the Modernization of Languages and Literatures, South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable, Urbana, IL. (ERIC document no. ED286375)Google Scholar
Abboud, P. (1968). The teaching of Arabic in the United States: The state of the art. (ERIC document no. ED024051)Google Scholar
Abboud, P. (1970). Spoken Arabic. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 6. Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa. The Hague: Mouton. 439–66.Google Scholar
Abd-el-Jawad, H. (1987). Cross-dialectal variation in Arabic: Competing prestigious forms. Language in Society 16: 359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel-Malek, Z. (1972). The influence of diglossia on the novels of Yuusif Al-Sibaa'i. Journal of Arabic Literature 3: 132–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdulaziz, M. (1982). Patterns of language acquisition and use in Kenya: Rural-urban differences. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 34: 95–120.Google Scholar
Abdulaziz, M. (1986). Factors in the development of modern Arabic usage. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 62: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdulaziz Mkilifi, M. (1972). Triglossia and Swahili-English bilingualism in Tanzania. Language in Society 1: 197–213. Reprinted in J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in the study of societal multilingualism. The Hague: Mouton, 1978. 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abou, S. (1972). Le problème de la diglossie. Cahiers d'Histoire Mondiale 14: 833–43.Google Scholar
Abou-Seida, A. (1971). Diglossia in Egyptian Arabic: Prolegomena to a pan-Arabic socio-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Dissertation Abstracts International 33(2):739A.Google Scholar
Abrahams, R. (1972). The training of the man of words in talking sweet. Language in Society 1: 15–29. Reprinted in R. Bauman (ed.), Verbal art as performance. Rowley: Newbury House, 1977. 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahams, R., & Bauman, R. (1971). Sense and nonsense in St. Vincent: Speech behavior and decorum in a Caribbean community. American Anthropologist 73: 762–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Absi, S. (1981). Language in education in the Arab Middle East. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Absi, S. (1986). The modernization of Arabic: Problems and prospects. Anthropological Linguistics 28: 337–48.Google Scholar
Abu-Absi, S. (1990). A characterization of the language of Iftah ya Simsim: Sociolinguistic and educational implications for Arabic. Language Problems and Language Planning 14: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Haidar, F. (1989). Are Iraqi women more prestige conscious than men? Sex differentiation in Baghdadi Arabic. Language in Society 18: 471–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afolayan, A. (1988). Bilingualism and bilingual education in Nigeria. In Paulston, C. (ed.), International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education. Westport, CT: Greenwood. 345–58.Google Scholar
Ager, D. (1990). Sociolinguistics and contemporary French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8–9, 45–7.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguirre, A. (1985). An experimental study of code-switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 53: 59–81.Google Scholar
Aikio, M. (1986). Some issues in the study of language shift in the Northern Calotte. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 7: 361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ait-Oumeziane, R. (1986). Le statut de la fonction “sujet” dans deux parlers arabes: Constantine et Tripoli. La Linguistique 22(1):81–92.Google Scholar
Akinnaso, F. (1982). The literate writes and the nonliterate chants: Written language and ritual communication in sociolinguistic perspective. In Frawley, W. (ed.), Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum. 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinnaso, F. (1985). On the similarities between spoken and written language. Language and Speech 28: 323–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinnaso, F. (1989) One nation, four hundred languages: Unity and diversity in Nigeria's language policy. Language Problems and Language Planning 13: 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinnaso, F. (1992). Schooling, language, and knowledge in literate and nonliterate societies. Comparative Studies in Society and History 34: 68–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinnaso, F., & Ogunbiyi, I. (1990). The place of Arabic in language education and language planning in Nigeria. Language Problems and Language Planning 14: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Abed Al-Haq, F. (1985). A case study of language planning in Jordan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Dissertation Abstracts International 47(3):884A.Google Scholar
Alatis, J. (1979). The evolving language policy in Greece: An introductory note. In Alatis, J. & Richard Tucker, G. (eds.), Language in public life. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1979. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 76–77.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. (1978). Semantičeskie “sniženie” kak otraženie social'noj struktury v russkom jazyke XVIII veka [Semantic “depreciation” as a reflection of social structure in 18th-century Russia]. Russian Linguistics 4: 3–12.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. (1986). Počemu v Drevnej Rusi ne bylo diglossii [Why there was no diglossia in ancient Russian]. In Kolesov, V. et al. (eds.), Literaturnyj jazyk Drevnej Rusi [The literary language of ancient Russia]. (Problemy istoričeskogo jazykoznanija, 3.) Leningrad: Leningrad University Press. 3–11.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. (1987). Puti stabilizacii jazykovoj normy v Rossii XI-XVI vv [Means of stabilizing the standard language in Russia from the 11th to the 16th century]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 36(2):34–46.Google Scholar
Alexandre, P. (1971). Multilingualism. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 7. Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Hague: Mouton. 654–63.Google Scholar
Alexiou, M. (1982). Diglossia in Greece. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard languages: Spoken and written. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 156–92.Google Scholar
Alrabaa, S. (1986). Diglossia in the classroom: The Arabic case. In B. Jernudd & M. Ibrahim (eds.), Issues in Arabic sociolinguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 28: 73–79.Google Scholar
Altoma, S. (1969). The problem of diglossia in Arabic: A comparative study of Classical and Iraqi Arabic. (Harvard University Middle Eastern Monograph Series, 21.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reviewed by W. Bishai, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1972. 3:226–28.Google Scholar
Altoma, S. (1970). Language education in Arab countries and the role of the academies. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 6. Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa. The Hague: Mouton. 690–720. Reprinted in J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in language planning. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. 279–313.Google Scholar
Alvarez Cáccamo, C. (1991). Language revival, code manipulation and social power in Galiza: Off-record uses of Spanish in formal communicative events. In Klee, C. & Ramos-García, L. (eds.), Sociolinguistics of the Spanish-speaking world: Iberia, Latin America, United States. Tempe, AZ: Bilingual Press. 41–73.Google Scholar
Ammon, U. (1979). Regiondialekte und Einheitssprache in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (BRD). International Journal of the Sociology of Language 21: 25–40.Google Scholar
Ammon, U. (1989). Towards a descriptive framework for the status/function (social position) of a language within a country. In Ammon, U. (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 21–106. [50–55.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. (1990). Comparative analysis of language minorities: A sociopolitical framework. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11: 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andres, F. (1990). Language situations in multilingual Switzerland. Multilingua 9: 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angle, J., & Hessebib, S. (1981). Gender and prestige preference in language. Sex Roles 7(4): 449–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annamalai, E. (1979). Movement for linguistic purism: The case of Tamil. In Annamalai, E. (ed.), Language movements in India. Manasagangotri, Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages. 35–59.Google Scholar
Annamalai, E. (1986). Some syntactic differences between spoken and written Tamil. In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 289–93.Google Scholar
Annamalai, E. (1989). The linguistic and social dimensions of purism. In Jernudd, B. & Shapiro, M. (eds.), The politics of language purism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 225–31.Google Scholar
Appel, R., & Muysken, P. (1987). Language contact and bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold. [24–26]Google Scholar
Apte, M. (1970). Some sociolinguistic aspects of interlingual communication in India. Anthropological Linguistics 12: 63–82.Google Scholar
Arellano, J. (1982). Bilinguisme et diglossie. Unpublished manuscript, Université Laval, Québec, Département d'anthropologie.Google Scholar
Armand, A., & Baggioni, D. (1982). Études linguistiques et légitimité d'un droit: A propos d'une grammaire comparée du français et du créole réunionnais. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5:7–22.Google Scholar
Arnold, M., Rosado, J. Jr., & Penfield, D. (1979). Language choice by bilingual Puerto Rican children on a picture labeling task. Modern Language Journal 63: 349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arokianathan, S. (1982). Language use in mass media with special reference to Tamil radio programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington. Dissertation Abstracts International 43(3):784A.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1965). Literary language and its public in late Latin antiquity and in the Middle Ages. (Bollingen Series, 74.) New York: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
Azevedo, M. (1984). The reestablishment of Catalan as a language of culture. Hispanic Linguistics 1: 305–30.Google Scholar
Babiniotis, G. (1979). A linguistic approach to the “language question” in Greece. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 5: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baca, M. (1983). Language use in Guamote: Implications for literacy in the Central Highlands of Ecuador. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico. Dissertation Abstracts International 45(6):1668A.Google Scholar
Badia, A. (1977). Lenguas en contacto: Bilingüismo, diglosia, lenguas en convivencia. In Lapesa, R. (ed.), Comunicación y lenguaje. Madrid: Karpos. 109–33.Google Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1980). Bilingualism in Belgium. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 1: 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1982). Bilingualism: Basic principles. Clevedon, England: Tieto.Google Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1983a). Le réalignement sociolinguistique des sociétés plurilingues. Recherches Sociologiques 14(1):45–58.Google Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1983b). Substratum, adstratum and residual bilingualism in Brussels. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 4: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1984). Une approche intégrée du phénomène de bilinguisme résiduel à Bruxelles. In Hamers, J., Gendron, J.-D., & Vigneault, R. (eds.), Du disciplinaire vers l'interdisciplinaire dans l'ètude du contact des langues. Actes du colloque conjoint tenu à Québec (Canada) du 22 au 25 mai 1983. Quebec: International Center for Research on Bilingualism. 71–83.Google Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H., & Van De Craen, P. (1979). The development of triglossia in Flemish Belgium. In Van de Velde, M. & Vandeweghe, W. (eds.), Sprachstrucktur, Individuum und Gesellschaft: Akten des 13. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Gent, 1978. Vol. 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 191–200.Google Scholar
Baggioni, D., & de Robillard, D. (1990). Répertoire linguistique et représentations chez le francophones de l'lle Maurice. Présence Francophone 37: 37–65.Google Scholar
Bakalla, M. (1984). Arabic culture through its language and literature. Boston: Kegan Paul International. [Chapter 11, “Diglossia in Arabic,” 85–88.] Reviewed by A.-K. Bouzida, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1985, 6:427–30.Google Scholar
Bakir, M. (1986). Sex differences in the approximation to Standard Arabic: A case study. Anthropological Linguistics 28: 3–9.Google Scholar
Ballón, E. (1983). Multiglosia y poder de expresión en la sociedad Peruana. In Corbera, A. (ed.), Educación y lingüística en la Amazonía Peruana. Lima: Centro Amazónico de Antropología y Aplicación Práctica. 17–27.Google Scholar
Bandelier, A. (1989). Statut des langues, minorisation et interaction au tournant du XIXe siècle. In Py, B. & Jeanneret, R. (eds.), Minorisation linguistique et interaction. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel, Faculté des Lettres. 207–15.Google Scholar
Barbot, M. (1983). Réflexions sur les réformes modernes de l'arabe littéral. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Buske. 126–54.Google Scholar
Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Buske. 126–54.Google Scholar
Barbour, S., & Stevenson, P. (1990). Variation in German: A critical approach to German sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Section 7.5, Linguistic pluralism in Switzerland, 204–12; Section 7.6, Diglossia and the status of Swiss German, 212–17.]Google Scholar
Barca Lozano, A., González Cabanach, R., Núñez Pérez, J., Santorum Paz, R., & Porto Rioboo, A. (1990). La estructura cognitiva de los niños bilingües y no bilingües: Un estudio diferencial. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada 43(1):97–104.Google Scholar
Barnes, D. (1982). Nationalism and the Mandarin movement: The first half-century. In Cooper, R. (ed.), Language spread: Studies in diffusion and social change. Bloomington & Washington, DC: Indiana University Press & Center for Applied Linguistics. 260–90.Google Scholar
Barrios, M. et al. , (1977). The greater Manila speech community: Bilingual or diglossic? In Pascasio, E. (ed.), The Filipino bilingual: Studies on Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press. 83–90.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. (1985). The influence of language standardization on linguistic norms. Studia Linguistica 39: 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, R. (1989). A normtheoretical approach to functional and status types of language. In Ammon, U. (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 197–215.Google Scholar
Baslis, Y. (1981). A study of linguistic differences. Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora 8(1–2):75–80.Google Scholar
Baudewijn, M. (1988). Language usage of the Dutch-speaking immigrants in the Brussels agglomeration. Europa Ethnica 45(2–3):70–83.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. (1984). The Hong Kong Cantonese speech community. Language Learning and Communication 3: 289–315.Google Scholar
Baur, A. (1987). Svisgermana diglosio. Language Problems and Language Planning 11: 350–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazalgues, G. (1982a). Diglossie et littérature populaire à Sète. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5 :78–87.Google Scholar
Bazalgues, G. (1982b). Identité, diglossie et provincialisme dans 1' œuvre de Claude Peyrot (1709–1795). Revue des Langues Romanes 86: 75–84.Google Scholar
Becker, V. (1964). A transfer grammar of the verb structures of Modern Literary Arabic and Lebanese Colloquial Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University. [Linguistics, 1966, 20:85–86.]Google Scholar
Bedford, D. (1979). French and creole in Guadeloupe. In Hancock, I., Polomé, E., Goodman, M., & Heine, B. (eds.), Readings in creole studies. Ghent: Story-Scientia. 253–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeston, A. (1970). The Arabic language today. New York: Hillary House. Reviewed by W. Bishai, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1972, 3:226–28.Google Scholar
Behares, L. (1984). Diglosia en la sociedad escolar de la frontera uruguaya con Brasil: Matriz social del bilingüismo. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 6: 228–34.Google Scholar
Behares, L. (1989). Diglosia escolar: Aspectos descriptivos y sociopedagógicos. Trabalhos em Lingüística Aplicada 14(07–12): 147–54.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensoussan, M., & Rosenhouse, J. (1987). Discourse analysis in diagnosing difficulty in EFL comprehension. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 8: 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentahila, A. (1983). Language attitudes among Arabic-French bilinguals in Morocco. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. Reviewed by P. Stevens, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1985, 4:73–76.Google Scholar
Bentahila, A. (1988). Aspects of bilingualism in Morocco. In Paulston, C. (ed.), International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education. Westport, CT: Greenwood. 329–43.Google Scholar
Bentolila, A. (1986). Oral languages and modernity: The emergences of new forms of communication in creole. In Fishman, J., Tabouret-Keller, A., Clyne, M., Krishnamurti, Bh., & Abdulaziz, M. (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 207–16.Google Scholar
Bentolila, A., & Gani, L. (1981). Langues et problèmes d'éducation en Haïti. Langages 61: 117–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentolila, A., & Gani, L. (1982). Haïti: Les nouvelles ėmergences de la communication en créole. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5:41–49.Google Scholar
Berger, M. (1990). Diglossia within a general theoretical perspective: Charles Ferguson's concept 30 years later. Multilingua 9: 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernabé, J. (1978). Contribution à l'étude de la diglossie littéraire: Le cas de “Gouverneurs de la Rosé.” Textes, Études et Documents 2: 103–30.Google Scholar
Bernabé, J. (1982). Contribution à une approche glottocritique de l'espace littéraire antillais. La Linguistique 18(1):85–109.Google Scholar
Bernardo, D. (1974). Problématique d'une recherche sur la diglossie: Propositions de travail. Cahiers du Groupe de Recherches sur la Diglossie 1: 1–6.Google Scholar
Bernardo, D. (1977). Enquête et diglossie en Catalogne-Nord. In Akten des Deutschen Romanistentages. Giesen. [From Kremnitz 1979:225.]Google Scholar
Bernardo, D. (1982). Multinationalisation et nouvelle configuration triadique des conflits linguistiques. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5:157–62.Google Scholar
Bernardó, D., & Rieu, B. (1977). Diglòssia a Catalunya-Nord. Treballs de Sociolingüística Catalana 1: 55–62.Google Scholar
Berque, J. (1978). Cultural expression in Arab society today. Stookey, R. (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. Reviewed by R. Hussein, Language Problems and Language Planning, 1980, 4:178–81.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (1987). Lingua, dialetto, diglossia, dilalìa. In Holtus, G. & Kramer, J. (eds.), Romania et Slavia Adriatica: Festschrift für žarko Muljaičić. Hamburg: Buske. 57–81.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (1989a). Main topics and findings in Italian sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 76: 7–30.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (1989b). On the typology of linguistic repertoires. In Ammon, U. (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 552–69.Google Scholar
Berry, P. (1975). Literacy and the question of creole. In Rubin, V. & Schaedel, R. (eds.), The Haitian potential: Research and resources of Haiti. New York: Teachers College Press. 83–113.Google Scholar
Bierbach, C., & Neu-Altenheimer, I. (1982). Méthodes d'enquête [Report of round table discussion]. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5:108–55.Google Scholar
Besch, W. (ed.). (1975). Gegenwärtige Probleme der Diglossie in germanisch-romanische Uber-gangsräumen. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: NCDN.Google Scholar
Billiez, J. (1985). Les jeunes issus de l'immigration algérienne et espagnole á Grenoble: Quelques aspects sociolinguistiques. international Journal of the Sociology of Language 54: 41–56.Google Scholar
Bishai, W. (1966). Modern Inter-Arabic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 86: 319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bixler-Márquez, D. (1985a). The mass media and the retention of Spanish by Chicanos. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 53: 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bixler-Márquez, D. (1965b). Spanish mass media in the United States: Dialectal implications. Language Problems and Language Planning 9: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, H. (1964a). Notes on the literary idiom of the Baghdadi Jews. In Dawidowicz, L. S., Erlich, A., Erlich, J., & Fishman, J. (eds.), For Max Weinreich on his seventieth birthday: Studies in Jewish language, literature, and society. The Hague: Mouton. 18–30.Google Scholar
Blanc, H. (1964b). Style variation in spoken Arabic: A sample of interdialectal educated conversation. In Ferguson, C. (ed.), Contributions to Arabic linguistics. (Harvard Middle Eastern Monographs, 3.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Center for Middle Eastern Studies. 79–161.Google Scholar
Blau, J. (1977). The beginnings of the Arabic diglossia: A study of the origins of Neoarabic. Afroasiatic Linguistics 4(4):1–28.Google Scholar
Bochman, K. (1988). Italienisch: Diglossie und polyglossie/Diglossia e poliglossia. In Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M., & Schmitt, C. (eds.), Lexicon der romanistischen linguistik: Vol. 4. Italienisch, Korsisch, Sardisch/Italiano, corso, sardo. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 269–86.Google Scholar
Böhler, M. (1989). Swiss literary culture since 1945: Productive antagonisms and conflicting identities. The German Quarterly 62: 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonelli, G. (1989). Lingua e identità dei Greci nel divenire storico. Le Lingue del Mondo 54(1):5–11.Google Scholar
Bouamrane, A. (1986). Aspects of the sociolinguistic situation in Algeria. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aberdeen. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1989, 49(11):3407A.Google Scholar
Boucherit, A. (1991). Convergence et résistance des hommes et des langues. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 87: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudou, F. (1976). Enquêtes sur les performances diglossiques. Lengas 4: 6–11.Google Scholar
Boulton, J. (1975). Word-borrowing and word-making in modern South Asian languages: Oriya and Bengali. South Asian Digest of Regional Writing 4: 63–85. Reprinted in I. Fodor & C. Hagège (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Buske. 239–56.Google Scholar
Bourdet, Y. (1982). Matériaux pour une théorie de la diglossie. Lengas 12: 1–12.Google Scholar
Boyer, H. (1986). “Diglossie”: Un concept à l'épreuve du terrain. L'élaboration d'une sociolin-guistique du conflit en domaines catalan et occitan. Lengas 20.Google Scholar
Boyer, H. (1987). Sociolinguistique et politique linguistique: L'exemple catalan. Études de Linguistique Appliquée 65: 69–88.Google Scholar
Boyer, H. (1990). Matériaux pour une approche des représentations sociolinguistiques: Éléments de définition et parcours documentaire en diglossie. Langue Française 85: 102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, G. (1983). Comment [on Breitborde 1983]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 39: 45–55.Google Scholar
Brann, C. (1979). A typology of language education in Nigeria. In McCormack, W. & Wurm, S. (eds.), Language and society: Anthropological issues. The Hague: Mouton. 463–507.Google Scholar
Brann, C. (1986). Triglossia in Nigerian education. NABE Journal 10(2):169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brann, C. (1989a). The terminology of Babel: A suggestion. The Journal of West African Languages 19(2):125–27.Google Scholar
Brann, C. (1989b). The terminology of Babel. Sociolinguistics 18: 85–89. [See Brann 1989b; Kelkar 1989; Khubchandani 1989b.]Google Scholar
Brann, C. (1989c). The terminology of Babel: Answers to questions by Professors Lachman Khubchandani and Ashok Kelkar. Sociolinguistics 18: 97–98. [See Brann 1989b; Kelkar 1989; Khubchandani 1989b.]Google Scholar
Brann, C. (1990). Pour une métalangue du multilinguisme. La Linguistique 26(1):43–51.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K. (1980). Formen der Mehrsprachigkeit in Skandinavien. In Nelde, P. (ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 32: 319–24. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Breitborde, L. (1983). Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation: Bilingual code switching, social relations, and domain theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 39: 5–43.Google Scholar
Breton, R. (1991). Géographie du plurilinguisme. Le Français dans le Monde Special issue: 30–32.Google Scholar
Bright, W. (1960). Linguistic change in some Indian caste dialects. In Ferguson, C. & Gumperz, J. (eds.), Linguistic diversity in South Asia: Studies in regional, social and functional variation. (Publication 13, Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) International Journal of American Linguistics 26(3, Pt. 3): 19–26.Google Scholar
Bright, W. (1970). Phonological rules in literary and colloquial Kannada. Journal of the American Oriental Society 90(1):140–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, W. (1988). Written and spoken language in South Asia. In Duncan-Rose, C. & Vennemann, T. (eds.), On language: Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica. A festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell. London: Routledge. 22–38. Reprinted in W. Bright, Language variation in South Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. 130–47.Google Scholar
Bright, W., & Ramanujan, A. K. (1964). Sociolinguistic variation and language change. In Lunt, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton. 1107–13. Reprinted in J. Pride & J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1972. 157–66. Also in W. Bright, Variation and change in language: Essays by William Bright. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1976. 47–56.Google Scholar
Britto, F. (1985). Diglossia: A study of the theory with application to Tamil. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University. Dissertation Abstracts International 47(5):1713A.Google Scholar
Britto, F. (1986). Diglossia: A study of the theory with application to Tamil. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Reviewed by F. Coulmas, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1988, 74:148–53; A. Hudson-Edwards, American Anthropologist, 1988, 90:431; S. Steever, Language, 1988, 64:152–55.Google Scholar
Britto, F. (1988). A diglossic typology. Sophia Linguistica: Working Papers in Linguistics 23–24:253–62.Google Scholar
Britto, F. (1991). Tamil diglossia: An interpretation. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):60–84.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. (1987). The development and structure of writing in the Slavic languages. Slovene Studies 9(1–2):57–62.Google Scholar
Browning, R. (1982). Greek diglossia yesterday and today. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 35: 49–68.Google Scholar
Bruni, F. (1981–1982). Italiano comune e italiano regionale nella scuola: Riflessioni in forma di lettera al comitato editoriale RID. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia: Scuola Società Territorio 5–6:319–26.Google Scholar
Cadiot, P. (1989). On language mixtures. In Ammon, U. (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 570–80.Google Scholar
Cadora, F. (1965). The teaching of spoken and written Arabic. Language Learning 15: 133–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadora, F. (1970). Some linguistic concomitants of contactual factors of urbanization. Anthropological Linguistics 12: 10–19.Google Scholar
Cadora, F. (1985). Who are the Arabs: A sociolinguistic view. Inaugural Lectures 1984–1985, The Ohio State University, The College of Humanities. 67–80.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, H., & Tuson, A. (1984). Use of languages and code switching in groups of youths in a barri of Barcelona: Communicative norms in spontaneous speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 47: 105–21.Google Scholar
Carayol, M., & Chaudenson, R. (1978). Diglossie et continuum linguistique à la Réunion. In Gueunier, N., Genouvrier, E., & Khomsi, A. (eds.), Les français devant la norme: Contribution à une étude de la norme du français parlé. Paris: Éditions Honoré Champion. 175–90, 196–200.Google Scholar
Cardinale, U. (1976). Lingua, dialetti, alloglotte: Alcuni problemi e prospettive nel dibattito socio-linguistico e psico-pedagogico. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 5(1–2):253–76.Google Scholar
Carrington, L. (1976). Determining language education policy in Caribbean sociolinguistic complexes. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 8: 27–43.Google Scholar
Cartier, A. (1980). L'indonésien formel et le jakartanais: Une approche sociolinguistique. In Cartier, A. (ed.), Langue formelle - langue quotidienne: Quelques langues d'Asie. (Journée d'Études, 3.) Paris: Université René Descartes, Sorbonne, U.E.R. de Linguistique Générale et Appliquée. 15–36.Google Scholar
Casanova, J.-Y. (1987). L'Amort de la langue. Revue des Langues Romanes 91(2):213–23.Google Scholar
Casanova, J.-Y. (1989). Allégeance diglossique au XVIème siècle: Texte politique et langue occitane en Provence (1583–1610). Cahiers Critiques du Patrimoine 4: 71–97.Google Scholar
Castellani, A. (1984). Capitoli d'un'introduzione alla grammatica storica italiana: I. Latino volgare e latino classico. Studi Linguistici Italiani 10: 3–28.Google Scholar
Caton, S. (1991). Diglossia in North Yemen: A case of competing linguistic communities. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):143–59.Google Scholar
Cellier, P. (1982). Analyse contrastive et analyse des erreurs en situation de diglossie. Réponses 6.Google Scholar
Cellier, P. (1989). Une situation de diglossie: Le français langue seconde à la Réunion. Le Français dans le Monde 02–03 (supplement):84–90.Google Scholar
Centro di Studio per la Dialletologia Italiana, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. (1973). Bilinguismo e diglossia in Italia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, R. (1989). Language policy in Peru: A historical overview. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 77: 11–33.Google Scholar
Chantefort, P. (1970). Diglossie au Québec: Limites et tendances actuelles. Québec: Université Laval, Centre International de Recherches sur le Bilinguisme.Google Scholar
Chantefort, P. (1976). Diglossie au Québec: Limites et tendances actuelles. Langue Française 31: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charpentier, J.-M. (1982). Quand et où parler de bilinguisme et de diglossie? Le problème des pidgins et des patois quasi assimilés dans le cas du bichelamar de Vanuatu (ex-Nouvelles-Hébrides) et du patois francisé du Poitou. La Linguistique 18(1):65–84.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. (1963). A study of different levels of Bengali. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hartford Seminar Foundation.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. (1986). Diglossia in Bengali. In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 294–303.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., & Chatterjee, S. (1979). Standardization of Bengali in the social perspective. In Annamalai, E. (ed.), Language movements in India. Manasagangotri, Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages. 25–34.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, R. (1979). Les parlers créoles et l'enseignement du français. Le Français dans le Monde 19(146):12–17.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, R. (1984). Diglossie créole, diglossie coloniale. Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 9(3–4): 19–29.Google Scholar
Chejne, A. (1958). The role of Arabic in present-day Arabic society. The Islamic Literature 10(4): 15–54.Google Scholar
Chejne, A. (1969). The Arabic language: Its role in history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Reviewed by W. Bishai, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1972, 3:226–28; C. Ferguson, American Anthropologist, 1973, 75:498–99.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y.-S. (1984). The uses of English and Chinese languages in Hong Kong. Language Learning and Communication 3: 273–87.Google Scholar
Chiarelli, E., & Lico, A. (1978). The phenomenon of communitarian bilingualism with diglossia: A descriptive analysis of verbal behavior in a small halo-American community (pilot study). Lingua e Contesto 4: 35–119.Google Scholar
Chini, M. (1989). Italiano e tedesco a contatto in Ticino: 11 caso delle famiglie bilingui. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia: Scuola Società Territorio 13(1):101–34.Google Scholar
Chloupek, J. (1987). The changing dichotomy between informal and formal utterances. In Chloupek, J., Nekvapil, J. et al. , (eds.), Reader in Czech sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, M. (1960). The language problem in East Pakistan. In Ferguson, C. & Gumperz, J. (eds.), Linguistic diversity in South Asia: Studies in regional, social and functional variation. (Publication 13, Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) international Journal of American Linguistics 26(3, Pt. 3):64–78.Google Scholar
Christen, H. (1988). Sprachliche Variation in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 58. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Cichon, P. (1988). Spracherziehung in der Diglossiesituation: Zum Sprachgewusstsein von Ok-zilanischlehrern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Clairis, C. (1980). Au-delà de la “diglossie” et des nouvelles tendances normatives. In Communications au IVe Colloque des Néohellénistes des universitaires de langue française. Geneva.Google Scholar
Clairis, C. (1983). Le cas du grec. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Buske. 350–62.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1984). Language and society in the German-speaking countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1988). The German-Australian speech community: Ethnic core values and language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 72: 67–83.Google Scholar
Coates, W. (1966). The description of language use. Word 22: 243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobarrubias, J. (1986). Status de las lenguas minorizadas. In Ruiz Olabuenaga, J. & Ozamiz, J. (eds.), Sociología de las lenguas minorizadas. Martutate, Euskadi: Ttarttalo. 185–90.Google Scholar
Collis, D.-R., & Dorais, L.-J. (1984). Le bilinguisme et la diglossie inuit. In Hamers, J., Gendron, J.-D., & Vigneault, R. (eds.), Du disciplinaire vers l'interdisciplinaire dans l'étude du contact des langues: Actes du colloque intern ational conjoint tenu à Québec (Canada) du 22 au 25 mai 1983. Quebec: Laval University, International Center for Research on Bilingualism. 153–64.Google Scholar
Collis, D.-R., & Dorais, L.-J. (1987). Une étude interdisciplinaire des problèmes linguistiques des inuits: Le bilinguisme et la diglossie. In Prujiner, A. (éd.), L'interdisciplinarité en sciences sociales pour l'étude du contact des langues. Quebec: Laval University, International Center for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Collovà, P., & Petrini, D. (1981–1982). Lingua, dialetto e commutazione di codice: Interazioni verbali in un negozio del luganese. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia: Scuola Societè Territorio 5–6:257–93.Google Scholar
Gaeilge, Comhairle na. (1972a). Implementing a language policy. Dublin: The Stationery Office. Reprinted in J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in language planning. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. 527–53.Google Scholar
Gaeilge, Comhairle na. (1972b). Towards a language policy. Dublin: The Stationery Office. Reprinted in J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in language planning. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. 519–26.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1991). Diglossia in the Old Russian period. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):160–72.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1978). The spread of Amharic in Ethiopia. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Advances in the study of societal multilingualism. The Hague: Mouton. 459–76.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., & Fishman, J. (1974). The study of language attitudes. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 3: 5–19.Google Scholar
Cordey, L., & Gabbiani, B. (1989). Estrategías ortográficas de niños bilingües. Trabalhos em Lingüiítica Aplicada 14 (07–12): 171–80.Google Scholar
Corriente, F. (1975). Marginalia on Arabic diglossia and evidence thereof in the Kitab al-Agani. Journal of Semitic Studies 20: 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corriente, F. (1976). From Old Arabic to Classical Arabic through the pre-Islamic koine: Some notes on the native grammarians' sources, attitudes, and goals. Journal of Semitic Studies 21: 62–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corvalán, G. (1988). Bilingualism in Paraguay. In Paulston, C. (ed.), International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education. Westport, CT: Greenwood. 359–77.Google Scholar
Costello, J. (1986). Diglossia at twilight: German and Pennsylvania “Dutch” in the mid-nineteenth century. In W. Enninger (ed.), Studies on the languages and the verbal behavior of the Pennsylvania Germans. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 51: 1–24.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1987). What writing can do to language: Some preliminary remarks. In Battestini, S. (ed.), Developments in linguistics and semiotics, language teaching and learning, communication across cultures. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 1986. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 107–29.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1988). What is a national language good for? In Coulmas, F. (ed.), With forked tongues: What are national languages good for? Ann Arbor: Karoma. 1–24.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1989a). Democracy and the crisis of normative linguistics. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Language adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 177–93.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1989b). Function and status of written language in East Asia. In Ammon, U. (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 216–42.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1989c). Language adaptation. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Language adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–25.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1989d). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [194–200, 249–50.]Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1990a). Language adaptation in Meiji Japan. In Weinstein, B. (ed.), Language policy and political development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 69–86.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1990b). Overcoming diglossia: The rapprochement of written and spoken Japanese in the 19th century. In Catach, N. (ed.), Pour une théorie de la langue écrite. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. 191–201.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1991). Does the notion of diglossia apply to Japanese? Some thoughts and some documentation. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):125–42.Google Scholar
Cowan, W. (1968). Notes toward a definition of Modern Standard Arabic. Language Learning 18: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, D. (1985). The sociology of language learning and teaching in a creole situation. In Wolfson, N. & Manes, J. (eds.), Language of inequality. Berlin: Mouton. 273–84.Google Scholar
Dagut, M. (1985). The revival of Hebrew and language planning. In Douglas Woods, J. (ed.), Language standards and their codification: Process and application. (Exeter Linguistic Studies, 9.) Exeter: University of Exeter. 65–75.Google Scholar
Dahlstedt, K.-H. (1976). Societal ideology and language cultivation: The case of Swedish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 10: 17–50.Google Scholar
Dale, I. (1980). Digraphia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 26:5–13. Journal issue reviewed by G. Williams, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1981, 2:219–25.Google Scholar
Dalglish, J. (1985). Sociolinguistics in Cesare Pavese's Ciau Masino. Italica 62(3):230–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daltas, P. (1980). The concept of diglossia from a variationist point of view with reference to Greek. Archivum Linguisticum 11: 65–88.Google Scholar
Danet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review 14: 445–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta, J., & Gumperz, J. (1968). Language, communication and control in North India. In Fishman, J., Ferguson, C., & Das Gupta, J. (eds.), Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley. 151–66.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1971). Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. New York: Cambridge University Press. 349–70.Google Scholar
DeCicco, G., & Maring, J. (1983). Diglossia, regionalism, and national language policy: A comparison of Spain and the Philippines. In Miracle, A. Jr (ed.), Bilingualism: Social issues and policy implications. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. 38–53.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, J. (1984). Digraphia. Word 35: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Greve, M. (1990). The necessity of dialogue. New Language Planning Newsletter 4(3): 1–6.Google Scholar
De Haan, G. (1990). Grammatical borrowing and language change: The Dutchification of Frisian. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deivasundaram, N. (1980). Can we measure the distance between the written and spoken forms in Tamil? In Agesthialingom, S. & Karunakaran, K. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and dialectology. Annamalainagar, India: Annamalai University, Department of Linguistics. 56–65.Google Scholar
DeJean, Y. (1983). Diglossia revisited: French and Creole in Haiti. Word 34: 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJean, Y. (1987). Diglossia in Haiti. In Levitt, J., Ashley, L., & Rogers, K. (eds.), Geolinguistic perspectives. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. 293–300.Google Scholar
del Castillo Mathieu, N. (1984). El léxico negro-africano de San Basilio de Palenque. Thesaurus 39: 80–169.Google Scholar
Denison, N. (1971). Some observations on language variety and plurilingualism. In Ardener, E. (ed.), Social anthropology and language. New York: Tavistock. 157–83. Excerpted in J. Pride & J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1972. 65–77.Google Scholar
Denison, N. (1979). Zur Triglossie in der Zahre. In Ureland, P. (ed.), Standardsprache und Dialekte in mehrsprachigen Gebieten Europas. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 27–37.Google Scholar
Denison, N. (1984). Language acquisition in a plurilingual environment. Grazer Linguistische Studien 21: 35–64.Google Scholar
Denison, N. (1990). A note on compound ethnicity. Innovation 3: 399–405.Google Scholar
Deshpande, M. (1986). Sanskrit grammarians on diglossia. In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 312–21.Google Scholar
Deshpande, M. (1991). Conceptions of diglossia in the writings of the Sanskrit grammarians. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):23–40.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1967). Effects of purism on the evolution of the written language: Case history of the situation in Sinhalese. Linguistics 36: 5–17.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1970). Some linguistic peculiarities of Sinhalese poetry. Linguistics 60: 5–26.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1974). Convergence in diglossia: The Sinhalese situation. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 3(1):60–91.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1976a). Diglossia and literacy. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1976b). Verbal aspects of politeness expression in Sinhalese with reference to asking, telling, requesting, and ordering. Anthropological Linguistics 18: 360–70.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1982). Some consequences of diglossia. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard languages: Spoken and written. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 94–122.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1986). Typology of diglossia and its implications for literacy. In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 304–11.Google Scholar
Désirat, M. (1980). Formes populaires et savantes dans quelques dialectes chinois. In Cartier, A. (ed.), Langue formelle – langue quotidienne: Quelques langues d'Asie. (Journée d'Études, 3.) Paris: Université René Descartes, Sorbonne, U.E.R. de Linguistique Générale et Appliquée. 37–49.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1977). Sign language diglossia in a British deaf community. Sign Language Studies 17: 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1978a). Diglossia and British Sign Language. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, 46. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1978b). Diglossia in British Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979, 39:5481–82A. Also Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1984.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M. (1984). British Sign Language. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Deutsch als Muttersprache in Belgien. (1979). Deutsche Sprache in Europa und Ubersee 5: 1–288.Google Scholar
Devonish, H. (1986). Language and liberation: Creole language politics in the Caribbean. London: Karia. Reviewed by M. Görlach, English World-Wide, 1987, 8:316–19.Google Scholar
Dharmadasa, K. (1977). Nativism, diglossia and the Sinhalese identity in the language problem in Sri Lanka. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 13: 21–32.Google Scholar
Diaz López, C. (1980). Diglossia and social cleavage: The case of Galicia. In Nelde, P. (ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 32: 225–31. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Diem, W. (1974). Hochsprache und Dialekt im Arabischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Dietze, J. (1978). Phonetische Slawismen in der Synodalhandschrift der ersten Novgoroder Chronik. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 23: 586–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dil, A. (1986). Diglossia in Bangla: A study of shifts in the verbal repertoire of the educated classes in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In Fishman, J., Tabouret-Keller, A., Clyne, M., Krishnamurti, Bh., & Abdulaziz, M. (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 451–65.Google Scholar
Diller, A. (1976). Toward a model of Southern Thai diglossic speech variation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 38:4135A.Google Scholar
Diller, A. (1983 [1987]). Reflections on Tai diglossic mixing. Orbis 32(1–2):146–66.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G. (1989). On language death in eastern Africa. In Dorian, N. (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, E. (1960). Literary and colloquial Bengali in modern Bengali prose. In Ferguson, C. & Gumperz, J. (eds.), Linguistic diversity in South Asia: Studies in regional, social and functional variation. (Publication 13, Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) International Journal of American Linguistics 26 (3, Pt. 3):43–63.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, R. (1970a). Bilingualism and bidialectalism. (ERIC document no. ED061824)Google Scholar
Di Pietro, R. (1970b). The discovery of universals in multilingualism. In Alatis, J. (ed.), Bilingualism and language contact: Anthropological, linguistic, psychological, and sociological aspects. Report of the Twenty-first Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 23.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 12–23.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, R., & Selim, G. (1976). The language situation in Arab Sicily. In Stuart, D. (ed.), Linguistic studies in memory of Richard Slade Harrell. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 19–35.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, W. (1989). Purism, language, and creativity: The Sri Lankan experience. In Jer-nudd, B. & Shapiro, M. (eds.), The politics of language purism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 185–96.Google Scholar
Dodson, C. (1986). Bilingualism and a sense of “peopleness.” In Fishman, J., Tabouret-Keller, A., Clyne, M., Krishnamurti, Bh., & Abdulaziz, M. (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 387–93.Google Scholar
Domašnev, A. (1989). Nacional'nyj jazyk i ego sociofunkcional'naja stratifikacija: Na materiale stran nemeckoj reči [The functional and social stratification of a national language: The case of German-speaking countries], Izvestija Akademii nauk SSSR, Serijo literatury i jazyka 48(2): 126–36.Google Scholar
Domašnev, A., & Pomazan, H. (1983). Aktual'nye problemy svejcarskoj germanistiki [Current problems in the study of the German-speaking area of Switzerland]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 32(3):30–38.Google Scholar
Dorais, L.-J. (1979). Diglossie et lutte de classes au Vietnam. Anthropologie et Sociétés 3(3):35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorais, L.-J. (1980). Diglossie, bilinguisme et classes sociales en Louisiane. Pluriel Débat 22: 57–91.Google Scholar
Dorais, L.-J. (1989). Bilingualism and diglossia in the Canadian eastern Arctic. Arctic 42: 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorais, L.-J., & Collis, D. (1987). Inuit bilingualism and diglossia. Unpublished manuscript, Laval University, International Centre for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Dorovský, I. (1987). Bilingvismus, diglosie a tzv. mikrojazyky na Balkáně [Bilingualism, diglossia, and so-called microlanguages in the Balkans]. Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské, A: Řada Jazykovědná. A–35: 35–43.Google Scholar
Dow, J. (1988). Toward an understanding of some subtle stresses on language maintenance among the Old Order Amish of Iowa. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 69: 19–31.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1982). Acceleration, retardation, and reversal in language decay? In Cooper, R. (ed.), Language spread: Studies in diffusion and social change. Bloomlngton & Washington, DC: Indiana University Press & Center for Applied Linguistics. 321–36.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., & Wodak-Leodolter, R. (1977). Introduction [to Language Death]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12: 5–11.Google Scholar
Drettas, G. (1981). La diglossie: Un pèlerinage aux sources. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 76(1):61–98.Google Scholar
Drettas, G. (1986). Les mots savants ont une histoire … La Linguistique 22(1):137–42.Google Scholar
D'souza, J. (1986). Language modernization in a sociolinguistic area. Anthropological Linguistics 28: 455–71.Google Scholar
D'souza, J. (1987). South Asia as a sociolinguistic area. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Dissertation Abstracts International 48(7):1753A.Google Scholar
D'souza, J. (1988). Diglossia in the South Asian sociolinguistic area. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics 79–80:25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duval-Valentin, M. (1983). La situation linguistique en Suisse. In Fodor, I. & Hagége, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Buske. 463–544.Google Scholar
Eastman, C. (1981). Kiswahili diglossia in Kenya: Implications for language policy. Studies in African Linguistics 8(12, supplement):20–21.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H., & Hessmann, J. (1986). Sign language interpreting in a diglossic context. Sign Language Studies 53: 377–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (1980). Diglossia: Separate and unequal. Linguistics 18: 1053–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (1981). L'imposition de la diglossie. Lengas 9: 1–8.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1983). The paradox of national language movements. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 4: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eid, M. (1982). The non-randomness of diglossic variation in Arabic. Glossa 16(1):54–84.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (1988). Principles for code-switching between standard and Egyptian Arabic. Al-cArabiyya 21(1–2):51–79.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1990). Arabic linguistics: The current scene. In Eid, M. (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics I: Papers from the First Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–37.Google Scholar
Elbiad, M. (1985). A sociolinguistic study of the Arabization process and its conditioning factors in Morocco. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo. Dissertation Abstracts International 46(11):3334A.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1991). The role of some population sectors in the progress of Arabization in Morocco. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 87: 27–44.Google Scholar
El-Dash, L., & Richard, Tucker G.. (1975). Subjective reactions to various speech styles in Egypt. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6: 33–54.Google Scholar
Elgibali, A. (1985). Towards a sociolinguistic analysis of language variation in Arabic: Cairene and Kuwaiti dialects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Dissertation Abstracts International 47(5):1713A.Google Scholar
El-Hassan, S. (1977[1978]). Educated spoken Arabic in Egypt and the Levant: A critical review of diglossia and related concepts. Archivum Linguisticum 8: 112–32.Google Scholar
Elizaincín, A. (1976). The emergence of bilingual dialects on the Brazilian-Uruguayan border. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9: 123–34.Google Scholar
El-Yasin, M. (1985). Basic word order in Classical Arabic and Jordanian Arabic. Lingua 65(1–2): 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, G., & Ortiz, L. (1983). Guaraní literacy in Paraguay. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 42: 53–67.Google Scholar
Ennaji, M. (1988). Language planning in Morocco and changes in Arabic. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 74: 9–39.Google Scholar
Ennaji, M. (1991). Aspects of multilingualism in the Maghreb. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 87: 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enninger, W. (1979). Language convergence in a stable triglossia plus trilingualism situation. In Freese, P. et al. (eds.), Anglistik: Beitráge zur Fachwissenschaft und Fachdidaktik. Münster. 43–63.Google Scholar
Enninger, W. (1980). Syntactic convergence in a stable triglossia plus trilingualism situation in Kent County, Delaware, U.S. In P. Nelde (ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 32: 343–50.Google Scholar
Enninger, W. (1986a). Structural aspects of Amish High German. In W. Enninger (ed.), Studies on the languages and the verbal behavior of the Pennsylvania Germans. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 51: 61–105.Google Scholar
Enninger, W. (1986b). The theme of ethnicity in the literature of the Old Order Amish. In W. Enninger (ed.), Studies on the languages and the verbal behavior of the Pennsylvania Germans. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 51: 111–36.Google Scholar
Enninger, W. (1988). Zur Erhaltung deutscher Sprachvarietäten unter den Altamischen. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 69: 33–57.Google Scholar
Epstein, I. (1915). La pensée et la polyglossie: Essai psychologique et didactique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Erdmann, U. (1989). Language maintenance versus assimilation: A study of the fate of Low German in northeast Lower Saxony since World War II. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990, 50(8):2471A.Google Scholar
Errington, J. (1986). Continuity and change in Indonesian language development. Journal of Asian Studies 45: 329–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errington, J. (1991). A muddle for the model: Diglossia and the case of Javanese. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):189–213.Google Scholar
Erting, C., & Woodward, J. (1979). Sign language and the Deaf community: A sociolinguistic profile. Discourse Processes 2: 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euskaltzaindia. Real Academia de la Lengua Vasca. (1979). Conflicto lingüístico en Euskadi. San Sebastián: Author. Reviewed by M. Hardman-de-Bautista, Language Problems and Language Planning, 1984, 8:346–47.Google Scholar
Evans, W. (1981). Dialect and diglossia in George Washington Cable's “Belles Demoiselles plantation.” Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest 4: 254–59.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, I. (1970). Lebirur mahutah vetifkudah šel lešon hasifrut hajafa badiglosija [The nature and functionalization of the language of literature under diglossia]. Hasifrut 2(2):286–302, 443–46.Google Scholar
Famiglietti, M. (1977). Bilinguismo e diglossia nelle comunità italo-albanesi. Quaderni per la promozione del bilinguismo 15–16:1–24.Google Scholar
Farris, A. (1975). Diglossia in Arabic speech communities: The Classical language compared with the Syrian vernacular. (ERIC document no. 117975)Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1984). The sociolinguistics of society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Reviewed by F. Anshen, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1986, 57:107–11; A. Bell, Language in Society, 1989, 18:262–67; S. Clarke, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 1985, 30:189–93.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1973a). Concerning the “revival” of the Hebrew language. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 250–57.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1973b). Sociolinguistic problems in the Middle Eastern Arab world: An overview. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 24–32.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1975a). On “diglossia.” Language Sciences 34: 38–39.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1975b). The resolution of diglossia in an African setting: The Ethiopian case. La Monda Lingvo-Problemo 5: 178–83.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1975c). A sociolinguistic comparison of two modern Semitic languages: Hebrew and Amharic. Anthropological Linguistics 17: 15–18.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1976). On the revival of the Hebrew language. Language Sciences 43:17.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1977). Diglossia: The Hebrew case. La Monda Lingvo-Problemo 6: 107–11.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1982a [1985]). Sociolinguistic notes on some Hamito-Semitic languages. Orbis 31(1–2):213–25.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1982b). Sociolinguistic similarities between two modern Semitic languages: Hebrew and Maltese. Anthropos 77: 895–96.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1983 [1987]). Linguistic anti-Semitism. Orbis 32(1–2):291–92.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. (1985). A sociolinguistic perspective on the history of Hebrew. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of Jewish languages. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 27–34.Google Scholar
Ferenczi, V. (1977). Parole et écriture. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée 44: 225–39.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15: 325–40. Reprinted in D. Hymes (ed.), Language in culture and society. New York: Harper & Row, 1964. 429–39. Also in P. Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1972. 232–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1962a). Background to second language problems. In Rice, F. (ed.), Study of the role of second languages in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. 1–7.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1962b). The language factor in national development. Anthropological Linguistics 4(1):23–27. Reprinted in F. Rice (ed.), Study of the role of second languages in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1962. 8–14.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1963a). Introduction [to National Languages and Diglossia]. In Woodworth, E. & Di Pietro, R. (eds.), Report of the Thirteenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 15.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 163.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1963b). Problems of teaching languages with diglossia. In Woodworth, E. & Di Pietro, R. (eds.), Report of the Thirteenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. (Monograph series on Languages and Linguistics, 15.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 165–77.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (ed.). (1964). Contributions to Arabic linguistics. (Harvard Middle Eastern Monographs, 3.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1968). Language development. In Fishman, J., Ferguson, C., & Das Gupta, J. (eds.), Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley. 27–35.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1970). Regional language issues and studies: An overview. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 6. Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa. The Hague: Mouton. 665–68.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1973). Language problems of variation and repertoire. Daedalus 102(3):37–46.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1978a). Multilingualism as object of linguistic description. In B. Kachru (ed.), Linguistics in the seventies: Directions and prospects. Forum lectures presented at the 1978 Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8(2):97–105.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1978b). Patterns of literacy in multilingual situations. In Alatis, J. (ed.), International dimensions of bilingual education. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1978. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 582–90.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1988). Standardization as a form of language spread. In Lowenberg, P. (ed.), Language spread and language policy: Issues, implications, and case studies. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1987. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 119–32.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1990). “Come forth with a Surah like it”: Arabic as a measure of Arabic society. In Eid, M. (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics I: Papers from the First Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1991). Diglossia revisited. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1):214–34.Google Scholar
Fernandes, J. (1983). Sign language and picture-talk: An experimental learning approach. Communication Education 32(2):197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, C. (1977). English and Sinhala bilingualism in Sri Lanka. Language in Society 6: 341–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, T. (1980). The sociolinguistic situation of modern Occitan. The French Review 54(1):37–46.Google Scholar
Field, T. (1981). Language survival in a European context: The future of Occitan. Language Problems and Language Planning 5: 251–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fife, J. (1986). Literary vs. colloquial Welsh: Problems of definition. Word 37: 141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filičeva, N. (1985). Jazykovaja obščnost' kak lingvističeskoe ponjatie [The language community as a linguistic concept]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 6: 55–62.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1967). Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23(2):29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1968a). Nationality-nationalism and nation-nationism. In Fishman, J., Ferguson, C., & Das Gupta, J. (eds.), Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley. 39–51.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1968b). Sociolinguistic perspective on the study of bilingualism. Linguistics 39: 21–49. Reprinted, with minor revisions, in J. Fishman, R. Cooper, R. Ma, et al., Bilingualism in the barrio. (Language Science Monographs, 7.) Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center for the Language Sciences, 1971. 557–82.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1969). National languages and languages of wider communication in the developing nations. Anthropological Linguistics 11: 111–35. Reprinted in J. Fishman, Language in sociocultural change. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1972. 191–223.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1970). Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. [73–89.]Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1971). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Advances in the sociology of language. Vol. 1. The Hague: Mouton. 317–404.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1972a). Societal bilingualism: Stable and transitional. In Fishman, J., Language in sociocultural change. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 135–52.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1972b). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. [91–106.]Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1973). Language modernization and planning in comparison with other types of national modernization and planning. Language in Society 2: 23–43. Reprinted in J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in language planning. The Hague: Mouton. 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1976). Yiddish and Loshn Koydesh in traditional Ashkenaz: The problem of societal allocation of macro-functions. In Verdoodt, A. & Kjolseth, R. (eds.), Language in sociology. Louvain: Éditions Peelers. 39–47.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1980a). Attracting a following to high-culture functions for a language of everyday life: The role of the Tshernovits Language Conference in the “rise of Yiddish.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 24: 43–73. Also in J. Fishman (ed. ), Never say die!: A thousand years of Yiddish in Jewish life and letters. The Hague: Mouton, 1981. 369–94. Also in R. Cooper (ed.), Language spread: Studies in diffusion and social change. Bloomington & Washington, DC: Indiana University Press & Center for Applied Linguistics, 1982. 291–320.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1980b). Bilingualism and biculturism as individual and as societal phenomena. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 1: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1980c). Language maintenance. In Thernstrom, S. (ed.), Harvard encyclopedia of American ethnic groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 629–38.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1982). Bilingualism and biculturism as individual and as societal phenomena. In Fishman, J. & Keller, G. (eds.), Bilingual education for Hispanic students in the United States. New York: Teachers College Press. 23–36.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1983). Epistemology, methodology, and ideology in the sociolinguistic enterprise. Language Learning 33: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1985a). Bilingualism and biculturism as individual and as societsl phenomena. In Fishman, J., Gertner, M., Lowy, E., & Milán, W. (eds.), The rise and fall of the ethnic revival: Perspectives on language and ethnicity. Berlin: Mouton. 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1985b). The sociology of Jewish languages from a general sociolinguistic point of view: A preliminary reconnaissance. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of Jewish languages. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 3–21.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1988). Language spread and language policy for endsngered languages. In Lowenberg, P. (ed.), Language spread and language policy: Issues, implications, and case studies. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1987. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 1–15.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1989). Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. [Chapter 5, “Bilingualism and Biculturism as Individual and as Societal Phenomena,” 181–201, and passim.]Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, J., Gertner, M., Lowy, E., & Milán, W. (1982). Maintien de langues, “renouveau ethnique,” et diglossie aux États-Unis. La Linguistique 18(1):45–64.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. (1978). Kinship, locality and language use. In Spencer, A. & Tovey, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the First and Fourth Annual Conferences of the Sociological Association of Ireland. Belfast: The Queen's University of Belfast, Department of Social Studies. 8–12.Google Scholar
Fleischmann, U. (1984). Language, literacy, and underdevelopment. In Foster, C. & Valdman, A. (eds.), Haiti – Today and tomorrow: An interdisciplinary study. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. 101–17.Google Scholar
Flint, E. (1979). Stable diglossia in Norfolk Island. In Mackey, W. & Ornstein, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistic studies in language contact: Methods and cases. The Hague: Mouton. 295–333.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1984). Variation in present Norfolk Island speech: A study of stability and instability in diglossia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
Flores, J., & López, G. (1989). A sociolinguistic perspective on Mexican multilingualism. Sociolinguistics 18: 33–40.Google Scholar
Foarţā, M. (1989). Bilinguisme ou diglossie dans le style épistolaire à l'époque de la Révolution de 1848. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 34(3):253–59.Google Scholar
Forbes, O. (1987). Recreolización y decreolización en el habla de San Andrés y Providencia. Glotta: Organo de Difusión Linguistica 2(2): 13–17.Google Scholar
Fought, J. (1985). Patterns of sociolinguistic inequality in Mesoamerica. In Wolfson, N. & Manes, J. (eds.), Language of inequality. Berlin: Mouton. 21–39.Google Scholar
Francard, M. (1989a). Insécurité linguistique en situation de diglossie: Le cas de l'Ardenne belge. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 8(2): 133–63.Google Scholar
Francard, M. (1989b). La vitalité du français en Ardenne belge: Étude sociolinguistique du village de Lutrebois. Présence Francophone 33: 79–104.Google Scholar
Francard, M. (1990). Fragments du discours épilinguistique sur la diglossie franco-wallonne. Présence Francophone 37: 67–79.Google Scholar
Francescato, G. (1973). Sull'indagine sociolinguistica delle situazioni bilingui in Italia e in particolare nel Friuli. In Centro di Studio per la Dialettologia Italiana, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bilinguismo e diglossia in Italia. Pisa: Pacini. 83–90.Google Scholar
Francescato, G. (1976). A sociolinguistic survey of Friulian as a “minor language.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9: 97–121.Google Scholar
Francescato, G. (1982). Bilinguismo e diglossia in Friuli: Una situazione complessa. Quaderni per la Promozione del Bilinguismo 31–32:1–27.Google Scholar
Francescato, G. (1986). Bilingualism and diglossia in their mutual relationship. In Fishman, J., Tabouret-Keller, A., Clyne, M., Krishnamurti, Bh., & Abdulaziz, M. (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: in honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 395–401.Google Scholar
Francescato, G., & Kodrič, M. (1978). La comunità Slovena in Italia: Aspetti di una situazione bilingue. Quaderni per la Promozione del Bilinguismo 21–22:1–38.Google Scholar
Franceschini, R., & Matthey, M. (1989). Migration interne en Suisse: Premiers constats et hypothèses. In Py, B. & Jeanneret, R. (eds.), Minorisation linguistique et interaction. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel, Faculté des Lettres. 97–108.Google Scholar
Franceschini, R., Müller, M., & Schmid, S. (1984). Comportamento linguistico e competenza dell'italiano in immigrati di seconda generazione: Un'indagine a Zurigo. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia: Scuola Società Territorio 8(1):41–72.Google Scholar
François, D., & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1982). Bilinguisme et diglossie: Les avatars d'une dichotomie ambiguë. La Linguistique 18(1):1.Google Scholar
Franolić, B. (1983). The development of literary Croatian and Serbian. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Buske. 85–112.Google Scholar
Freddi, G. (ed). (1983). L'Italia plurilingüe. Bergamo: Minerva Italica. Reviewed by R. Hall, Jr., Language Problems and Language Planning, 1986, 10:300–03.Google Scholar
Friedhof, G. (1984). Problems of glossality in newly translated parts of the Gennadius and Ostroy bibles of 1499 and 1580–81. California Slavic Studies 12: 343–64.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. (1985). The sociolinguistics of literary Macedonian. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 52: 31–57.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. (1988). Review article: Four meanings of “critical.” [Review of M. Herzfeld, Anthropology through the looking glass: Critical ethnography on the margins of Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).] Anthropological Quarterly 61: 187–98.Google Scholar
Gage, W. (1971). The African language picture. Linguistic Reporter 13(3):15–27.Google Scholar
Gair, J. (1963). Sinhalese diglossia. Anthropological Linguistics 10(8):1–15.Google Scholar
Gair, J. (1983). Sinhala and English: The effects of a language act. Language Problems and Language Planning 7: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gair, J. (1986). Sinhala diglossia revisited or Diglossia dies hard. In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 322–36.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. (1968). North African problems and prospects: Language and identity. In Fishman, J., Ferguson, C., & Das Gupta, J. (eds.), Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley. 129–50.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. (1971). Language reform and social modernization in Turkey. In Rubin, J. & Jernudd, B. (eds.), Can language be planned? Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developing nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii. 159–78.Google Scholar
Gambhir, S. (1981). The East Indian speech community in Guyana: A Sociolinguistic study with special reference to koine formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Dissertation Abstracts International 42(11):4815A.Google Scholar
Gambhir, S. (1983). Diglossia in dying languages: A case study of Guyanese Bhojpuri and Standard Hindi. Anthropological Linguistics 25: 28–38.Google Scholar
Garavini, F., & Gardy, P. (1985). Une littérature en situation de diglossie: La littérature occitane. In Bertrand, M. (ed.), Popular traditions and learned culture in France: From the sixteenth to the twentieth century. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri. 255–74.Google Scholar
García, S. (1983). Sociolinguistics and language planning in bilingual education for Hispanics in the United States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 44: 43–54.Google Scholar
Gardes-Madray, F., & Gardy, P. (1982). Enquêtes sur l'occitan en milieu urbain: Le statut de la langue dominée vu par des habitants de Montpellier (Quartier Sainte-Anne). Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5:62–77.Google Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1983). Hans im Schnockeloch: Language in Alsace. Modem Languages 64(1):35–41.Google Scholar
Gardy, P., & Lafont, R. (1981). La diglossie comme conflit: L'exemple occitan. Langages 61: 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatt-Rutter, J. (1988). Language futures. Babel 23(2):11–15.Google Scholar
Georgieva, E., & Lilov, M. (1983). Die bulgarische Literatursprache und die Sprachreform. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Buske. 113–35.Google Scholar
Giacomelli, R. (1983). Graeca Italica: Studi sul bilinguismo-diglossia nell'Italia antica. (Studi grammaticali e linguistici, 15.) Brescia, Italy: Paideia Editrice. Reviewed by C. Ruijgh, Mnemosyne, 1986, 39:507–09.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. (1983). Final consonant clusters in Jamaican Creole: Implications for the teaching and learning of English in Jamaica. In Ingemann, F. (ed.), 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference papers. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Department of Linguistics. 283–93.Google Scholar
Gilhotra, M. (1985). Maintenance of community languages in multicultural Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 6: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, C. (1979). Cameroonian Pidgin English: A Neo-African language. In Hancock, I., Polomé, E., Goodman, M., & Heine, B. (eds.), Readings in creole studies. Ghent: Story-Scientia. 253–57.Google Scholar
Giordan, H., & Ricard, A. (eds.). (1976). Diglossie et littérature. Bordeaux-Talance, France: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. Reviewed by C. Ferguson, Language Problems and Language Planning, 1979, 3:170–71.Google Scholar
Gippius, A., Straxov, A., & Straxova, O. (1988). Teorija cerkovnoslavjanskorusskoj diglossii i ee kritiki [The theory of a Church Slavic – Russian diglossia and its critics]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Filologija 43(9, 5):34–49.Google Scholar
Giraud, M. (1985). Les conflits de langues aux antilles françaises: Fondements historiques et enjeux politiques. Études Polémologiques 34: 45–65.Google Scholar
Glinert, L. (1987). Hebrew-Yiddish diglossia: Type and stereotype implications of the language of Ganzfried's Kitzur. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 67: 39–55.Google Scholar
Glinert, L., & Shilhav, Y. (1991). Holy land, holy language: A study of an Ultraorthodox Jewish ideology. Language in Society 20: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnanasundaram, V. (1980, January). The role of diglossia in the emergence of standard spoken Tamil. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Osmania University, Department of Linguistics, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
Gobard, H. (1976). L'aliénation linguistique: Analyse tétraglossique. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Gobard, H. (1980). Diglossie ou tétraglossie: Tétragenèse du langage. In Gardin, B. & Marcellesi, J.-B. (eds.), Sociolinguistique: Approches, théories, pratiques. 2 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 191–95.Google Scholar
González Pérez, C. (1978). A diglosia na nosa etnografia [Diglossia in our ethnography]. Criai 60: 181–88.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Chapter u, “Language and Writing,” 258–89.]Google Scholar
Gopinadhan, V. (1976). Malayalam diglossia. Unpublished master's thesis, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, India.Google Scholar
Gopinadhan, V. (1980). Diglossie situation in Malayalam. In Agesthialingom, S. & Karunakaran, K. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and dialectology. Annamalainagar, India: Annamalai University, Department of Linguistics. 119–29.Google Scholar
Goshen-Gottstein, M. (1978). The language of Targum Onqelos and the model of literary diglossia in Aramaic. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 37(2):169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandguillaume, G. (1990). Language and legitimacy in the Maghreb. In Weinstein, B. (ed.), Language policy and political development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 150–66.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1986). Were there Egyptian koines? In Fishman, J., Tabouret-Keller, A., Clyne, M., Krishnamurti, Bh., & Abdulaziz, M. (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 271–90.Google Scholar
Griffen, T. (1980). Nationalism and the emergence of a new standard Welsh. Language Problems and Language Planning 4: 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, R. (1989). Dominant languages: Languages and hierarchy in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grosclaude, M. (1989). Langue populaire, langue littéraire et langue administrative en Béarn, du XIIIème siècle à nos jours. Cahiers de l'Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour 15: 11–29.Google Scholar
Grosse, R. (1972). Sprachsoziologische Schichtung im Wortschatz. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 9(5):325–31.Google Scholar
Grygor-Rechziegel, A. (1990). On Czech diglossia. In Mojmir, G. (ed.), Czech studies: Literature, language, culture. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 9–29.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1968). Types of linguistic communities. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton. 460–72. Reprinted from Anthropological Linguistics, 1962, 4(1):28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1969). Sociolinguistics in South Asia. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 5;. Linguistics in South Asia. The Hague: Mouton. 597–606.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1977). The sociolinguistic significance of conversational code-switching. RELC Journal 8(2): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Nairn, C. (1960). Formal and informal standards in the Hindi regional language area. In Ferguson, C. & Gumperz, J. (eds.), Linguistic diversity in South Asia: Studies in regional, social and functional variation. (Publication 13, Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) International Journal of American Linguistics 26(3, Pt. 3):92–118.Google Scholar
Guxman, M. (1977). Formation of the literary norm of the German national language. In Luelsdorff, P. (ed.), Soviet contributions to the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton. 7–30.Google Scholar
Haarmann, H. (1983). Methodologisches zum Begriff der Diglossie und seiner Anwendung. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 15(1):25–43.Google Scholar
Haas, M. (1966). Historical linguistics and the genetic relationship of languages. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 3. Theoretical foundations. The Hague: Mouton. 113–54. Reprinted in M. Haas, Language, culture, and history. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1978. 220–81. [267–68, n. 31.]Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1978). Wider den Nationaldialekt. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 45(1):62–67.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1981). Entre dialecte et language: L'Exemple du Schwyzertütsch. In F. Redard, R. Jeanneret, & J.-P. Métrai (eds.), Le Schwyzertütsch: 5e langue nationale? Actes du colloque de la Commission interuniversitaire suisse de linguistique appliquée. Bulletin CILA 33: 22–41.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1982a). Introduction: On the normative character of language. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard languages: Spoken and written. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (ed.). (1982b). Standard languages: Spoken and written. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Reviewed by H. Kahane, Language Problems and Language Planning, 1986, 10:206–09.Google Scholar
Hadjadj, D. (1981). Étude sociolinguistique des rapports entre patois et français dans deux communautés rurales en 1975. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 29: 71–97.Google Scholar
Haeri, N. (1987). Male/female differences in speech: An alternative interpretation. In Denning, K., Inkelas, S., McNair-Knox, F., & Rickford, J. (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Department of Linguistics. 173–82.Google Scholar
Hagège, C. (1983). Voies et destins de l'action humaine sur les langues. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Buske. 11–68. [15–16.]Google Scholar
Hagège, C., Métailié, G., & Peyraube, A. (1983). Réforme et modernisation de la langue chinoise. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Buske. 189–209.Google Scholar
Hagen, A. (1975). Diglossie in den Niederlanden. In Besch, W. (ed.), Gegenwärtige Probleme der Diglossie in germanisch-romanischen Ubergangsräumen. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: NCDN. 85–97.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (1978). Bi-(Multi-)lingualism and diglossia in Latin and Romance. Forum Linguisticum 3(2): 107–19.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (1986). From bidialectalism to diglossia in early Romance. In Elson, B. (ed.), Language in global perspective: Papers in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Summer Institute of Linguistics 1935–1985. Dallas: The Summer Institute of Linguistics. 213–22.Google Scholar
Hamad, A. (1986). Diglossia in the phonology of second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1987, 47(7): 2563–4A.Google Scholar
Hamel, R. (1984). Socio-cultural conflict and bilingual education: The case of the Otomí Indians in Mexico. International Social Science Journal 36: 113–28.Google Scholar
Hamel, R., & Muñoz Cruz, H. (1981). Bilingüismo, educación indígena y conciencia lingüística en comunidades otomies del Valle del Mezquital, México. Estudios Filológicos 16: 127–62.Google Scholar
Hamel, R., & Muñoz Cruz, H. (1982a). Conflit de diglossie et conscience linguistique dans des communautés indigènes bilingues au Mexique. In Dittmar, N. & Schlieben-Lange, B. (eds.), Die Soziolinguistik in romanischsprachigen Ländern – La sociolinguistique dans les pays de langue romane. Tübingen: Narr. 249–69.Google Scholar
Hamel, R., & Muñoz Cruz, H. (1982b, August). Diglossia and linguistic consciousness within the conflict of Spanish and Otomí in a bilingual Indian area of Mexico. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Mexico City. Sociological Abstracts, 1982, 30(3, Supplement 116):84, no. S13994.Google Scholar
Hamel, R., & Muñoz Cruz, H. (1988). Desplazamiento y resistencia de la lengua otomí: El conflicto lingüístico en las prácticas discursivas y la reflexividad. In Hamel, R., Lastra de Suarez, Y., & Muñoz Cruz, H. (eds.), Sociolingüística latinoamericana. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 101–46.Google Scholar
Hamel, R., & Sierra, M. (1983). Diglosia y conflicto intercultural: La lucha por un concepto O la danza de los significantes. Boletín de Antropología Americana 8: 89–110.Google Scholar
Hamers, J., & Blanc, M. (1989). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, G. (1976). Towards more exhaustive descriptions of languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9: 23–41.Google Scholar
Hanna, H. (1986). Palestinian poetry and diglossia. Al-Karmil: Studies in Arabic language and literature 7: 7–70.Google Scholar
Hannaoui, A. (1987). Diglossia, Medial Arabic, and language policy in Morocco. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Dissertation Abstracts International 48(8):2054–5A.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1968). Colloquial deviations in urban Hindi. Anthropological Linguistics 10(9):25–34.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (1985). The social setting of Norfolk speech. English World-Wide 6: 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart-Gonzalez, L., & Feingold, M. (1990). Retention of Spanish in the home. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 84: 5–34.Google Scholar
Hartular, A. (1987). Bilingualism and diglossia: Terminological aspects. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 32(3):245–47.Google Scholar
Hary, B. (1987). Judéo-Arabie, written and spoken in Egypt in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Dissertation Abstracts International 49(6):1443A.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1963). Schizoglossia and the linguistic norm. In Woodworth, E. & Di Pietro, R. (eds.), Report of the Thirteenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 15.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 63–73.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1971). The ecology of language. Linguistic Reporter 13(1):19–26.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1973). Bilingualism, language contact, and immigrant languages in the United States: A research report 1956–1970. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics: yol. 10. Linguistics in North America. The Hague: Mouton. 505–91. Reprinted in J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in the study of societal multilingualism. The Hague: Mouton, 1978. 1–111. [68–70.]Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1980). Frontier Norwegian in South Dakota. In Schach, P. (ed.), Languages in conflict: Linguistic acculturation on the Great Plains. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 20–28.Google Scholar
Havrànek, B. (1929). Influence de la fonction de la langue littéraire sur la structure phonologique et grammaticale du tchèque littéraire. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 1: 106–20.Google Scholar
Hawking, J. (1983). A re-examination of sign language diglossia. American Annals of the Deaf 128(1):48–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, P. (1979). Greek diglossia and variation theory. General Linguistics 19: 169–87.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. (1980). Greek diglossia and variation theory. Orbis 29: 60–75.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. (1983a). Diglossia revisited. Language and Communication 3: 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, P. (1983b). Diglossia revisited. Language Sciences 5(1):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, L. (1982). Rural and urban groups in Barbados and Guyana: Language attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 34: 67–81.Google Scholar
Hazael-Massieux, G. (1978). Approche sociolinguistique de la situation de diglossie françaiscréole en Guadeloupe. Langue Française 37: 106–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, D. (1992). Fashion, anti-fashion, and heteroglossia in urban Senegal. American Ethnologist 19: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. (1989). From code-switching to borrowing: Foreign and diglossie mixing in Moroccan Arabic. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Héraud, G. (1980). Le statut des langues dans les différents états, et en particulier en Europe. Language Problems and Language Planning 4: 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Héraud, G. (1982). The status of languages in Europe. In Hartford, B., Valdman, A., & Foster, C. (eds.), Issues in international bilingual education: The role of the vernacular. New York: Plenum. 241–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbolich, J. (1979). Attitudes of Egyptians toward various Arabic vernaculars. Lingua 47: 301–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herion, B. (1987). A language attitude study of Old Order Amish in Geauga County, Ohio. Unpublished master's thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Master's Abstracts International 26(2): 186.Google Scholar
Herrey, M. (1985). Language planning in the Greek enlightenment: The issue of a literary standard, 1700–1820. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1985, 46(8):2284A.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (1982). Disemia. In Herzfeld, M. & Lenhart, M. (eds.), Semiotics 1080. New York: Plenum. 205–15.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (1989). Anthropology through the looking glass: Critical ethnography in the margins of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reviewed by P. Friedrich, Anthropological Quarterly, 1988, 61:187–98.Google Scholar
Heye, J. (1978a). Bilingualism and language maintenance among German speaking immigrants in Brazil. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Sociolinguistics. Stuttgart: HochschulVerlag. 93–106.Google Scholar
Heye, J. (1978b). Diglossia and dialect levelling among German speaking immigrants in Brazil. In Dressler, W., Meid, W., Pfeiffer, O., & Herok, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 293–96.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, M. (1986). Language contact, language loyalty, and language prejudice on the Mexican border. Language in Society 15: 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. (1978). Language contact systems and human adaptations. Journal of Anthropological Research 34: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. (1984). Review of R. Cooper (ed.), Language spread: Studies in diffusion and social change (Bloomington: Indiana University Press & Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1982). Language in Society 13: 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, K. (1980). Mixed grammar, purist grammar, and language attitudes in modern Nahuatl. Language in Society 9: 321–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoben, S. (1976). Amhara verbal behavior: A commentary. Anthropological Linguistics 18: 380–86.Google Scholar
Hock, H. (1991). Dialects, diglossia, and diachronic phonology in early Indo-Aryan. In Boltz, W. & Shapiro, M. (eds.), Studies in the historical phonology of Asian languages. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 77.) Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 119–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, H., & Pandharipande, R. (1976). The sociolinguistic position of Sanskrit in pre-Muslim South Asia. Studies in Language Learning 1(2): 105–38.Google Scholar
Hock, H., & Pandharipande, R. (1978). Sanskrit in the pre-Islamic sociolinguistic context of South Asia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 16: 11–25.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F. (1979). Sprachen in Luxemburg: Sprachwissenschaftliche und literarhistorische Beschreibung einer Triglossie-Situation. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. Reviewed by M. Clyne, Language Problems and Language Planning, 1981, 5: 82–84.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F. (1981). Triglossia in Luxemburg. In Haugen, E., McClure, J., & Thomson, D. (eds.), Minority languages today. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 201–07.Google Scholar
Hogg, M., Joyce, N., & Abrams, D. (1984). Diglossia in Switzerland? A social identity analysis of speaker evaluations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3: 185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J. (1983). Review of M. Hartig, Sozialer Wandel und Sprachwandel (Tübingen: Narr, 1981). Language in Society 12: 358–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honna, N. (1980). Cultural pluralism in Japan: A sociolinguistic outline. Japanese Association of Language Teachers Journal 2: 5–29. (ERIC document no. ED201204)Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. (1989). Can Peru's rural schools be agents for Quechua language maintenance? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 10: 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Householder, F. Jr. (1963). Greek diglossia. In Woodworth, E. & Di Pietro, R. (eds.), Report of the Thirteenth A nnual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 15.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 109–32.Google Scholar
Householder, F., & Kazazis, C. (1974). Greek triglossia. Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Huber, G. (1988). Schwizertuuutsch, die neue Sprache Helvetiens? Sprachspiegel: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für die deutsche Muttersprache 44(3): 84–85.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (ed.) (1991a). Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1). Denton: University of North Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (ed.) (1991b). Toward the systematic study of diglossia. In A. Hudson (ed.), Studies in diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Hudson-Edwards, A. (1984). Rediscovering diglossia. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 7: 5–15.Google Scholar
Huffines, M. (1980a). English in contact with Pennsylvania German. The German Quarterly 54: 352–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, M. (1980b). Pennsylvania German: Maintenance and shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 25: 43–57.Google Scholar
Huffines, M. (1986). Strategies of language maintenance and ethnic marking among the Pennsylvania Germans. Language Sciences 8(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hur, S.-C. (1988). Language shift and bilingualism in the Soviet Union: Language aspects of ethnic relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1989, 49(8): 2205A.Google Scholar
Hurreiz, S. (1975). Arabic in the Sudan: Current problems and future needs. Language Planning Newsletter 1(4): 3–4.Google Scholar
Hussein, R. (1980). The case for triglossia in Arabic (with special emphasis on Jordan). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo. Dissertation Abstracts International 42(1): 194A.Google Scholar
Hüttl-Folter, G. (1978). Diglossija v Drevnej Rusi [Diglossia in ancient Russia]. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 24: 108–23.Google Scholar
Hvitfeldt, C. (1978, August). The diglossic use of English within a Zambian speech community. Paper presented at the 9th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Uppsala, Sweden. Sociological Abstracts 1978, 26(6, Supplement 82–11): 2256–57, no. 78S09800.Google Scholar
Iancu, V. (1989). Din consecinţele diglosiei [On the consequences of diglossia]. Limba Romana 38(5): 459–62.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. (1977). Diglossia and foreign language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 15(2): 158–63.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. (1983). Linguistic distance and literacy in Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, M. (1986). Standard and prestige language: A problem in Arabic sociolinguistics. In B. Jennudd & M. Ibrahim (eds.), Issues in Arabic sociolinguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 28: 115–26.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. (1989). Communicating in Arabic: Problems and prospects. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Language adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 39–59.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M., & Jernudd, B. (1986). Introduction [to Aspects of Arabic sociolinguistics]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 61: 5–6.Google Scholar
Imberger, B. H. (1979). Language and language maintenance in a small German religious community: A study of trilingualism and triglossia in the Temple Society, with special reference to “mixed marriages.” Unpublished B.A. (Hons.) thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1985). Status and style in language. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, R. (1975). Language planning in Bangladesh. Indian Linguistics 36: 186–90.Google Scholar
Issatschenko, A. (1980). Russian. In Schenker, A. & Stankiewicz, E. (eds.), The Slavic literary languages: Formation and development. New Haven: Yale Concilium on International and Area Studies. 119–42.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, M. (1976). Diglossia and bilingualism among two minorities in Sweden. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 10: 67–84.Google Scholar
Jabbra, N. (1980). Sex roles and language in Lebanon. Ethnology 19: 459–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, N. (1981). Sprachplanung in einer komplexen Diglossiesituation dargestellt Beispiel Luxemburg. Language Problems and Language Planning 5: 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. (1977). Welsh bilingualism: Fact and friction. Language Problems and Language Planning 1: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquith, J. (1976). Digraphia in advertising: The public as guinea pig. Visible Language 10: 295–308.Google Scholar
Jardel, J.-P. (1979). De quelques usages des concepts de “bilinguisme” et de “diglossie.” In Manessy, G. & Wald, P. (eds.), Plurilinguisme: Normes, situations, stratégies: Études sociolinguistiques. Paris: Éditions l'Harmattan. 25–38.Google Scholar
Jardel, J.-P. (1982). Le concept de “diglossie” de Psichari à Ferguson. Lengas 6(11): 5–15.Google Scholar
Jarzeva, V. (1969). Social changes and function of the literary languages. In International days of sociolinguistics. Second International Congress of Social Sciences of the Luigi Sturzo Institute. Rome: Palazzo Baldassini. 227–41.Google Scholar
Jaspaert, K., & Kroon, S. (1991). Social determinants of language shift by Italians in the Netherlands and Flanders. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 90: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeremiás, É. (1984). Diglossia in Persian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 34 (3–4): 271–87.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. (1971). Social change and aboriginal speech variation in Australia. Anthropological Linguistics 13: 16–32.Google Scholar
Jimenez, J. (1984–1985). De la sociolingüística. Yelmo 62–63: 19–23.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1975a). More on diglossia. Language Sciences 37: 37–38.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1975b). Stable triglossia at Larteh, Ghana. In R. Herbert (ed.), Patterns in language, culture, and society: Sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the Symposium on African Language, Culture and Society, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, April n, 1975. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 19: 93–102.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1978). Stable triglossia at Larteh, Ghana. West African Journal of Modern Languages 3: 128–36.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1986). Diglossia in Africa. In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 337–49.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. (1987). Greek. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The world's major languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 410–39.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. (1983). Model-rejection as an impediment to creole standardization. In Ingemann, F. (ed.), 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference papers. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Department of Linguistics. 308–16.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. (1985). “Superposed” languages and standardization. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 14(1–3): 35–52.Google Scholar
Jouana, F. (1976). Norme et diglossie dans la société catalane d'aujourd'hui. Lengas 4: 27–30.Google Scholar
Justus, J. (1978). Language and national integration: The Jamaican case. Ethnology 17: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. (1978). Toward structuring code-mixing: An Indian perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 16: 27–46.Google Scholar
Kahane, H. (1986). A typology of the prestige language. Language 62: 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, H., & Kahane, R. (1979). Decline and survival of Western prestige languages. Language 55: 183–98.Google Scholar
Kahane, H., & Kahane, R. (1988). Language spread and language policy: The prototype of Greek and Latin. In Lowenberg, P. (ed.), Language spread and language policy: Issues, implications, and case studies. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1987. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 16–24.Google Scholar
Kandiah, T. (1978). Standard language and socio-historical parameters: Standard Lankan Tamil. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 16: 59–75.Google Scholar
Kandiah, T., & Sivasegaram, S. (1984). The Tamil script: Characteristics and problems, and a proposal for its reform. Indian Linguistics 45(1–4): 55–101.Google Scholar
Kang, D. (1984). A comparative study of the historical development of the genitive plural of nouns in the Russian and Polish literary languages from the 16th century to the 20th. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Dissertation Abstracts International 45(11): 3360A.Google Scholar
Kapanga, K. (1989). La francophonie en situation de polyglossie ou les variations linguistiques du français du Zaïre. Journal of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association 3–5: 85–105.Google Scholar
Karam, F. (1979). Processes of increasing mutual intelligibility between language varieties. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 22: 115–37.Google Scholar
Karanikolas, A. (1979). The evolution of the Greek language and its present form. In Alatis, J. & Tucker, G. Richard (eds.), Language in public life. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1979. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 78–85.Google Scholar
Karimi-Hakkak, A. (1989). Language reform movement and its language: The case of Persian. In Jernudd, B. & Shapiro, M. (eds.), The politics of language purism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 81–104.Google Scholar
Karunakaran, K. (1974). Accessibility between Literary and Colloquial Tamil. Indian Linguistics 35: 55–59.Google Scholar
Kay, P. (1977). Language evolution and speech style. In Blount, B. & Sanches, M. (eds.), Socio-cultural dimensions of language change. New York: Academic. 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, A. (1970). Modern Standard Arabic and the colloquials. Lingua 24: 374–91, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, A. (1972). Remarks on diglossia in Arabic: Well-defined vs. ill-defined. Linguistics 81: 32–48.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. (1975). More on diglossia in Arabic. International Journal of Middle East Studies 6: 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, A. (1990a). Arabic. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The world's major languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 664–85.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. (1990b). Evidence for diglossia in English: The sociolectology of “whom.” California Linguistic Newsletter 20(3): 19–20.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. (1991). Is English diglossic? English Today 7(4): 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, A. (1992). Formal vs. informal in Arabic: Diglossia, triglossia, quadriglossia, etc. Polyglossia-multiglossia viewed as a continuum. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kazazis, K. (1976). A superficially unusual feature of Greek diglossia. In Mufwene, S., Walker, C., & Steever, S. (eds.), Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 369–75.Google Scholar
Kazazis, K. (1989). Dismantling Greek diglossia. Paper presented at the University of Chicago Colloquium on Communicative Behavior. [Cited in Friedrich 1988.]Google Scholar
Kelkar, A. (1989). The Babel of terminology. Sociolinguistics 18: 93–96. [See Brann 1989b, 1989c; Khubchandani 1989b.]Google Scholar
Keller, R. (1982). Diglossia in German-speaking Switzerland. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard languages: Spoken and written. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 70–93.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. (ed.). (1967). The description and measurement of bilingualism: An international seminar, University of Moncton, June 6–14, 1967. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kernish, R. (1972, August). The uses of diglossia: A contribution to political linguistics. Paper presented at the 6?th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New Orleans. Sociological Abstracts 1972, 20(7, Supplement 28):1845, no. G0200.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. (1979). A demographic typology for Hindi, Urdu, Panjabi speakers in South Asia. In McCormack, W. & Wurm, S. (eds.), Language and society: Anthropological issues. The Hague: Mouton. 183–94.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. (1984a). Language modernization in the developing world. International Social Science Journal 36(1): 169–88.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. (1984b). Sociolinguistics in India: The decade past, the decade to come. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 45: 47–64.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. (1985). Diglossia revisited. In Acson, V. & Leed, R. (eds.), For Gordon H. Fairbanks. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, 20.) Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii. 199–211.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. (1989a). Diglossia and functional heterogeneity. In Ammon, U. (ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 593–607.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. (1989b). Terminological relevance. Sociolinguistics 18: 90–92. [See Brann 1989b, 1989c; Kelkar 1989.]Google Scholar
Killean, C. (1970). Classical Arabic. In Sebeok, T. (ed.). Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 6. Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa. The Hague: Mouton. 413–38.Google Scholar
Kitis, E. (1990). Hellas: Dialect and school. Language International 2(1): 15–17.Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. (1987). Bengali. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The world's major languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 490–513.Google Scholar
Klarberg, M. (1983). Diglossic education: The Jewish tradition, some Australian manifestations and their implications. Journal of Intercultural Studies 4(2): 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarberg, M. (1987). Aaron ben Samuel and his “Lovely Prayerbook” revisited. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 67: 27–37.Google Scholar
Klimenko, L. (1986). Istorija russkogo literaturnogo jszyka s točki zrenija teorii diglossii [History of the Russisn literary langusge in the light of the theory of diglossia]. In Kolesov, V. et al. (eds.), Literaturnyj jazyk Drevnej Rusi [The literary language of ancient Russia]. (Problemy istorčeskogo jazykoznanija, 3.) Leningrad: Leningrad University Press. 11–22.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1967a). “Abstsnd” languages and “ausbau” langusges. Anthropological Linguistics 9(7): 29–41.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1967b). Bilinguslism and nationalism. In J. Macnamara (ed.), Problems of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23(2): 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloss, H. (1969). Types of multilingual communities: A discussion of ten variables. In Lieberson, S. (ed.), Explorations in Sociolinguistics. (Publication 44.) Bloomington: Indisna University, Research Center for the Language Sciences. 7–17.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1976). Über “diglossie.” Deutsche Sprache 4: 313–23.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. (1980). Multilingualism in Luxembourg. In P. Nelde (ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 32: 355–61.Google Scholar
Kolde, G. (1988). Language contact and bilingualism in Switzerland. In Paulston, C. (ed.), International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education. Westport, CT: Greenwood. 515–37.Google Scholar
Kolesov, V. (1986). Kritičeskie zametki o “drevnerusskoj diglossii” [Critical remarks on “Old Russian diglossia”]. In Kolesov, V. et al. (eds.), Literaturnyj jazyk Drevnej Rusi [The literary language of ancient Russia]. (Problemy istoričeskogo jazykoznanija, 3.) Leningrad: Leningrad University Press. 22–41.Google Scholar
Kolesov, V. et al. , (eds.). (1986). Literaturnyj jazyk Drevnej Rusi [The literary language of ancient Russia]. (Problemy istoričeskogo jazykoznanija, 3.) Leningrad: Leningrad University Press.Google Scholar
Koliqi, E. (1965). Fenomeno della diglossia sessuale nella lingua e nella letteratura albanese. In Pop, S. (ed.), Communications et rapports du Premier Congrès International de Dialectologie Générale (Louvain du 21 au 25 août, Bruxelles les 26 et 27 août 1960). Louvain: Centre International de Dialectologie Générale de l'Université Catholique de Louvain. 320–26.Google Scholar
Konrad, N. (1977). On the literary language in China and Japan. In Luelsdorff, P. (ed.), Soviet contributions to the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton. 31–73.Google Scholar
Kotkov, S. (1986). Istočnikovedčeskie voprosy istorii russkogo jazyka [Problems of source materials for the study of the history of Russian]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 35(4): 60–69.Google Scholar
Kramer, J. (1983). Language planning in Italy. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Buske. 301–16.Google Scholar
Kraus, J. (1990). Do pytannja pro dynamiku komponentiv čes'koji movnoji sytuacii [The dynamics of the relations between languages in Czechoslovakia]. Movoznavstvo 24(2, 140): 11–16.Google Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (ed.). (1979). Sprachen im Konflikt: Theorie und Praxis der katalanischen Sozi-olinguisten. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (1980). Démarche et particularités de la sociolinguistique Catalane. In Gardin, G. & Marcellesi, J.-B. (eds.), Sociolinguistique: Approches, théories, pratiques. 2 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 21–33.Google Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (1981). Du “bilinguisme” au “conflit linguistique”: Cheminement de termes et de concepts. Langages 61: 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (1982). Sur quelques niveaux sociaux des conflits linguistiques. Lengas 12: 25–35.Google Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (1987a). Diglossie/Polyglossie. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., & Mattheier, K. (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Vol. 1. New York: Walter de Gruyter. 208–18.Google Scholar
Kremnitz, G. (1987b). Diglossie: Possibilités et limites d'un terme. Lengas 22: 199–213.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. (1975). Language varieties and problems of standardization of Indian languages. Indian Linguistics 36: 191–96.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. (1979a). Classical or modern: A controversy of styles in education in Telugu. In Annamalai, E. (ed.), Language movements in India. Manasagangotri, Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages. 1–24.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. (1979b). Problems of language standardization in India. In McCormack, W. & Wurm, S. (eds.), Language and society: Anthropological issues. The Hague: Mouton. 673–92.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. (1986). Comments on “Diglossia” (Part III). In Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. xvii–xxii.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh., Masica, C., & Sinha, A. (eds.). (1986). South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Reviewed by K. Jayaseelan & R. Amritavalli, Linguistics, 1990, 28: 561–65.Google Scholar
Kristophson, J. (1989). Taugt der Terminus “Diglossie” zur Beschreibung der Sprachsituation in der alten Rus'? Die Slawischen Sprachen 19: 63–72.Google Scholar
Krumbacher, K. (1902). Das Problem der neugriechischen Schriftsprache. München: Königliche Bayerische Akademie.Google Scholar
Krysin, L. (1979). Command of various language subsystems as a diglossie phenomenon. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 21: 141–51.Google Scholar
Kureleć, V. (1988). Aktualni problemi standardizacije u novogrckom i njihovi povijesni korijeni [Origin and current status of problems in the standardization of Modern Greek]. Lingvisticki Casopis 3(1, 6, supplement): 53–63.Google Scholar
Labrie, N., & Deshaies, D. (1989). Diglossie et alternance de code: Un examen des concepts en fonction des comportements bilingues. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 8(2): 57–72.Google Scholar
Lacerte, L. (1991). Bilinguisme et diglossie chez les sourds. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 10(1): 141–55.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1971). Un problème de culpabilité sociologique: La diglossie franco-occitane. Langue Française 9: 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, R. (1976a). Le texte littéraire en situation diglossique. Lengas 4: 12–20.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1976b). Sur le procès du “patoisement.” In Verdoodt, A. & Kjolseth, R. (eds.), Language in sociology. Louvain: Éditions Peeters. 125–33.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1977). A propos de l'enquête sur la diglossie: L'Intercesseur de la norme. Lengas 1:31–40.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1979). La diglossie en pays occitan, ou le réel occulte. Bildung und Ausbildung in der Romania: Band 2. Sprach wissenschaft und Landeskunde. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1982a, August). La double résistance à la vérité sur la diglossie. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Mexico City. Sociological Abstracts, 1982, 30(3, Supplement 116):105, no. S14144.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1982b). Le discours idéologique dans l'enquête sur la diglossie. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale 4–5: 88–97.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1983). Problèmes de normalisation dans l'espace occitan. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language reform: History and future. Vol. 2. Hamburg: Buske. 357–70.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1984). Les performances effectives en situation de diglossie et l'idéologie du locuteur. In Bouvier, J.-C. (ed.), Sociolinguistique des langues romanes. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence. 299–306.Google Scholar
Lafont, R. (1990). Codeswitching et production du sens. In Jacobson, R.