Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T04:15:30.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From market to non-market: An autonomous agent approach to central planning1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

DAN GREENWOOD
DAN GREENWOOD
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, 32–38 Wells Street, London W1T 3UW, UK; e-mail: dmgreenwood@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the longstanding debate in political economy about the feasibility of socialism, the Austrian School of Economists have argued that markets are an indispensable means of evaluating goods, hence a prerequisite for productive efficiency. Socialist models for non-market economic calculation have been strongly influenced by the equilibrium model of neoclassical economics. The Austrians contend that these models overlook the essence of the calculation problem by assuming the availability of knowledge that can be acquired only through the market process itself. But the debate in political economy has not yet considered the recent emergence of agent-based systems and their applications to resource allocation problems. Agent-based simulations of market exchange offer a promising approach to fulfilling the dynamic functions of knowledge encapsulation and discovery that the Austrians show to be performed by markets. Further research is needed in order to develop an agent-based approach to the calculation problem, as it is formulated by the Austrians. Given that the macro-level objectives of agent-based systems can be easily engineered, they could even become a desirable alternative to the real markets that the Austrians favour.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 349 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armentano, D. 1969 Resource Allocation Problems Under Socialism. In Snavely, W. P. (ed.), Theory of Economic Systems. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, pp. 127–139.Google Scholar
Bagnall, A. J. and Smith, G. D. 2005 A multi-Agent Model of the UK Market in Electricity Generation. Draft. Accessed 26th August 2007. Available from: www.cems.uwe.ac.uk/lcsg/bagnau.pdfGoogle Scholar
Barone, E. 1935 The ministry of production in the collectivist state. In Hayek, F.A. (ed.), Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge, pp. 245–290.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. 1990 The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. 1993 Why Perestroika Failed. London:Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clearwater, S. (ed.) 1996. Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation. London: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, D. and Bruten, J. 1997 Zero is not enough: on the lower limit of agent intelligence for continuous double auction markets, Technical Report HPL-97-141. Bristol: HP Labs.Google Scholar
Cliff, D. and Bruten, J. 1998 Simple bargaining agents for decentralized market-based control, Technical Report HPL-98-17. Bristol: HP Labs.Google Scholar
Cockshott, W. P. 1990 Application of artificial intelligence techniques to economic planning. Future Computing Systems 2(4), 429–443.Google Scholar
Cockshott, W. P. and Cottrell, A. 1993 Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham: Spokesman.Google Scholar
Common, M. 1995 Sustainability and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, H. D. 1933 Price formation in a socialist community. The Economic Journal 43(170),237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endriss, U. and Maudet, N. 2004 Welfare engineering in multiagent systems. In Engineering Societies in the Agents World IV Lecture Notes in Artifical Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. and Troitzsch, K.G. 2005 Simulation for the Social Scientist, Maidenhead, McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Gjerstad, S and Dickhaut, J, 1998. Price formation in double auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 22, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1949 Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1978 New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1979 Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 3. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jacques, I. 1999 Mathematics for Economics and Business. New York, Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
Kephart, J. O. 2002 Software agents and the route to the information economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99(Suppl 3), 7207–7213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, O. 1937 On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part One. The Review of Economic Studies 4, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, D. 1985 Rivalry and Central Planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. 1990 Computation, Incentives, and discovery: the cognitive function of markets in market socialism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 507, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaître, M. and Verfaillie, G. 1999 Exploiting a common property resource under a fairness contraint: a case study. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 206–211.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. 1966 Input-Output Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luck, M., McBurney, P. and Preist, C. 2003 Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing Agent Technology: A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing. Southampton: AgentLinkII—the European Network of Excellence for Agent-Based Computing.Google Scholar
McBurney, P. 2005 Kurdaitcha Bones—2005. Available from: www.csc.liv.ac.uk/∼peter/this-month/kurdaitcha-2005.html, Accessed 14-Nov-2005.Google Scholar
Miller, M. S. and Drexler, K. E. 1988a Comparative ecology: a computational perspective. In Huberman, B. A. (ed.), The Ecology of Computation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 51–76.Google Scholar
Miller, M. S. and Drexler, K. E. 1988b. Markets and computation: agoric open systems. In Huberman, B. A. (ed.) The Ecology of Computation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 133–176.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von, 1935 Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. In Hayek, F. A. (ed.), Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies On The Possibilities Of Socialism. London, Routledge, pp. 87–130.Google Scholar
Murrell, P. 1983 Did the theory of market socialism answer the challenge of Ludwig von Mises? History of Political Economy 15(1) 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaisen, J., Petrov, V. and Tesfatsion, L. 2001. Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing.Economic Report No.52, Iowa State University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, S., McBurney, P., Parsons, S. and Sklar, E., 2002 Co-evolutionary auction mechanism design: a preliminary report. In Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce IV: Designing Mechanisms and Systems, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
Ramsay-Steele, D. 1992 From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. La Salle, Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Robinson, N. 2002 Evolutionary optimisation of market-based control systems for resource allocation in compute farms, HPL-2002-284. Bristol: Internet Storage and Systems Laboratory, HP Labs.Google Scholar
Rust, J., Miller, H. and Palmer, R. 1993 Behaviour of trading automata in a computerized double auction market. In Friedman, D. and Rust, J. (eds.), The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, pp. 155–199.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. and Nordhaus, W. D. 1995 Economics. New York; London: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1954 History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tesauro, G. and Das, R., 2001 High-Performance Bidding Agents for the Continuous Double Auction. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Tampa, FL: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM EC'01). pp. 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesfatsion, L. 2006 Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory, Vol. 2. In Amman, H. M., Kendrick, D. A. and Rust, J. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics. Amsterdam; Oxford. Elsevier, pp. 831–880.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. I. 1980 Economic calculation under socialism: the austrian contribution. Economic Inquiry, 18(4), 534–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virginas, B., Voudouris, C., Owusu, G. and Anim-Ansah, G. 2003 ARMS collaborator—intelligent agents using markets to organise resourcing in modern enterprises. BT Technology Journal, 21(4) 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar