Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Software agents: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Hyacinth S. Nwana
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research, Advanced Applications & Technology Department, BT Laboratories, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, Suffolk IP5 7RE, UK (Email: hyacinth@info.bt.co.uk)
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Agent software is a rapidly developing area of research. However, the overuse of the word “agent” has tended to mask the fact that, in reality, there is a truly heterogeneous body of research being carried out under this banner. This overview paper presents a typology of agents. Next, it places agents in context, defines them and then goes on, inter alia, to overview critically the rationales, hypotheses, goals, challenges and state-of-the-art demonstrators of the various agent types in our typology. Hence, it attempts to make explicit much of what is usually implicit in the agents literature. It also proceeds to overview some other general issues which pertain to all the types of agents in the typology. This paper largely reviews software agents, and it also contains some strong opinions that are not necessarily widely accepted by the agent community.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Agre, PE, 1988. The dynamic structure of everyday life, PhD Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Agre, PE and Chapman, D, 1987. “Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity” In: Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, 268272.Google Scholar
Ambros-Ingerson, J and Steel, S, 1988. “Integrating planning, execution and monitoring” In: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-88) St Paul, MN, 8388.Google Scholar
Amstrong, R, Freitag, D, Jopachims, T, and Mitchell, T, 1995. “Webwatcher: a learning apprentice for the World Wide Web” In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Information Gathering from Heterogeneous, Distributed Environments, AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, S and Steward, S, 1994. “Mobile software agents for control in telecommunications networksBT Technological Journal 12 (2) 104113, 04.Google Scholar
Bates, J, 1994. “The role of emotion in believable charactersCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 122125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, AH and Gasser, L, 1988. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Bratman, ME, Israel, DJ and Pollack, ME, 1988. “Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoningComputational Intelligence 4 349355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, RA, 1986. “A robust layered control system for a mobile robotIEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 2 (1) 1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, RA, 1991a. “Elephants don't play chess” In: Maes, P (ed.) Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back The MIT press, 315.Google Scholar
Brooks, RA, 1991b. “Intelligence without representationArtificial Intelligence 47 139159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, RA, 1991c. “Intelligence without reason” In: Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Morgan Kaufmann, 569595.Google Scholar
Caglayan, A, Snorrason, M, Jacoby, J, Mazzu, J and Jones, R, 1996. “Lessons from Open Sesame! a user interface learning agent” In: Proceedings the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-A gent Technology (PAAM '96) London, 222404 6174.Google Scholar
Carver, N and Lesser, V, 1995. “The DRESUN Testbed for research in FA/C distribution situation assessment: extensions to the model of external evidence” In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95) San Francisco, USA, 06 3340.Google Scholar
Carver, N, Cvetanovic, Z and Lesser, V, 1991. “Sophisticated cooperation in distributed problem solving” In: Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Artficial Intelligence 1, Anaheim, 191198.Google Scholar
Chaib-draa, BMoulin, BMandiau, R and Millot, P, 1992. “Trends in distributed artificial intelligenceArtifIcial Intelligence Review 6 3566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D, 1992. Vision, Instruction and Action, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chavez, A and Maes, P, 1996. “Kasbah: An agent marketplace for buying and selling goods” In: Proceedings the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM '96) London, 222404 7590.Google Scholar
Cohen, PR and Levesque, HJ, 1990. “Intention is choice with commitmentArtificial Intelligence 42 213261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connah, D, 1994. “The design of interacting agents for use in interfaces” In: Brouwer-Janse, D and Harringdon, TL (eds), Human-Machine Communication for Educational Systems Design, NATO ASI Series, Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences 129 Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Cutkosky, MR, Engelmore, RS, Fikes, RE, Genesereth, MR, Gruber, TR, Tenenbaum, JM and Weber, JC, 1993. “PACT: An experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systemsIEEE Computer 1, 01 2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, NJ and Weeks, R, 1995. “Jasper: Communicating information agents” In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the World Wide Web Boston, USA, 11.Google Scholar
Davis, R and Smith, RG, 1983. “Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solvingArtificial Intelligence 20 63109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, KS, 1995. “Distributed artificial intelligence testbeds” In: O'Hare, G and Jennings, N (eds.), Foundations of Distributed Artficial Intelligence, Chap 3, Wiley.Google Scholar
Decker, KS and Lesser, VR, 1993 “Designing a family of coordination algorithms” In: Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence Washington, 217224.Google Scholar
Dent, L, Boticario, J, McDermott, J, Mitchell, T and Zabowski, DA, 1992. “A personal learning apprentice” In: Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence San Jose, California, AAAI Press, 96103.Google Scholar
Doran, J, Carvajal, H, Choo, Y and Li, Y, 1991. “The MCS Multi-agent Testbed: developments and experiments” In: Deen, S. (ed.), Cooperating Knowledge based Systems Springer-Verlag, 240251.Google Scholar
Durfee, EH, and Montogomery, TA, 1989. “MICE: A flexible testbed for intelligent coordination experiments” In: Proceedings of the 1989 Distributed Artificial Intelligence Workshop 2540.Google Scholar
Durfee, EH, Lesser, VR and Corkill, D, 1987. “Coherent cooperation among communicating problem solversIEEE Transactions on Computers C-36 (11) 12751291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichmann, DT, 1994a. “The RBSE Spider–balancing effective search against web load” In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the World Wide Web Geneva, Switzerland, 05 2527, 369378.Google Scholar
Eichmann, DT, 1994b. “Ethical web agents” In: Proceedings of the 2nd WWW Conference, http:// ww.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/IT94/.Google Scholar
Etzioni, O, 1993. “Intelligence without robots: a reply to BrooksAI Magazine 14 (4) 713.Google Scholar
Etzioni, O, and Weld, D, 1994. A softbot-based interface to the internetCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 7276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, J, 1994. “Simulating with reactive agents” In: Hillebrand, E and Stender, J (eds.), Many Agent Simulation and Arficial Life lOS Press, 828.Google Scholar
Ferguson, IA, 1992a. “Towards an architecture for adaptive, rational, mobile agents” In: Werner, E and Demazeau, Y (eds.), Decentralized Al 3: Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Worlds (MAAMA W-91) Elsevier, 249262.Google Scholar
Ferguson, IA, 1992b. TouringMachines: An architecture for dynamic, rational, mobile agents. PhD Thesis, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Fikes, RE and Nilsson, NJ, 1971. “STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solvingArtificial Intelligence 2 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finin, T and Wiederhold, G, 1991. “An overview of KQML: A knowledge query and manipulation language” Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fisher, K, Muller, JP and Pischel, M, 1996. “Unifying control in a layered agent architecture” Technical Report TM–94–05, German Research Center for AI-(DFKI GmbH).Google Scholar
Foner, L, 1993. “What's an agent, anyway? A sociological case study” Agents Memo 93–01, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Foner, L, 1996. “A multi-agent referral system for MatchMaking” In: Proceedings the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM ') London, 222404 245262.Google Scholar
Gasser, L, 1991. “Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systemsArtificial Intelligence 47 107138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, L and Huhns, M, 1989. DistributedArtf1cial Intelligence 2 Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Gasser, L, Braganza, C and Herman, N, 1987. “MACE: A flexible testbed for distributed AI research” Huhns, M (ed.), Distributed Artficial Intelligence, Research Notes in Artificial Intelligence Pitman, 119152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, L, Rosenschein, JS and Ephrati, E, 1995. “Introduction to multi-agent systems” Tutorial A Presented at the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems San Francisco CA,, 06.Google Scholar
Georgeff, M, 1996. “Agents with motivation: essential technology for real world applications” In: The First International Conference on the Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology London, UK, 24 04.Google Scholar
Georgeff, MP and Ingrand, FF, 1989. “Decision-making in an embedded reasoning system” In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Arficial Intelligence Detroit, MI. Morgan Kaufmann, 972978.Google Scholar
Genesereth, MR and Ketchpel, SP, 1994. “Software agentsCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 4853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M and Wavish, PR, 1991. “Simulating and implementing agents and multiple agent systems” In: Proceedings of the European Simulation Multi-Conferencce Copenhagen, 06.Google Scholar
Greif, I, 1994. “Desktop agents in group-enabled productsCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 100105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, T, 1991. “Ontolingua: A mechanism to support portable ontologies” KSL-91–66, Stanford University Knowledge Systems Laboratory.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, C, 1995. “Vendors of agent technology” In: UNICOM Seminar on Intelligent Agents and their Business Applications, 8911 London, 135142.Google Scholar
Hayes-Roth, B, 11991. “An integrated architecture for intelligent agentsSIGART Bulletin 2 (4) 7981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Roth, B, 1995. “An architecture for adpative intelligent systemsArtificial Intelligence 72 (1–2) 329365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Roth, B, Brownston, L and van Gent, R, 1995. “Multiagent collaboration in directed improvisation” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95) San Francisco, USA, 06, 148153.Google Scholar
Hermens, L and Schlimmer, J, 1993. “A machine learning apprentice for the completion of repetitive forms” In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications IEEE Press, 164–;170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, C, 1977. “Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messagesArtificial Intelligence 8 (3) 323364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhns, MN and Singh, MP, 1994. “Distributed artificial intelligence for information systems” CKBS-94 Tutorial, 0615, University of Keele, UK.Google Scholar
Indermaur, K, 1995. “Baby steps” Byte, 03, 97104.Google Scholar
Huhns, MN, Jacobs, N, Ksieyk, T, Shen, W-M, Singh, MP and Cannata, PE, 1993. “Integrating enterprise information models in Carnot” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems (ICI-CIS) 3242.Google Scholar
Jennings, NR, 1993. “Specification and implementation of a belief desire joint-intention architecture for collaborative problem solvingJournal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2 (3) 289318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, NR, Varga, LZ, Aarnts, RP, Fuchs, J and Skarek, P, 1993. “Transforming StandAlone expert systems into a community of cooperating agentsInternational Journal of Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 6 (4) 317331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, N, Corera, JM, Laresgoiti, L, Mamdani, E, Perriollat, F, Skarek, P and Varga, L, 1995. “Using ARCHON to develop real-world DAI applications for electricity transportation and particle accelerator control” IEEE Expert Special Issue on Real World Applications of DAI systems.Google Scholar
Kaebling, LP and Rosenschein, SJ, 1990. “Action and planning in embedded agents” In: Maes, P (ed), Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back, MIT Press, 3548.Google Scholar
Kay, A, 1990. “User interface: A personal view” In: Laurel, B (ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
King, JA, 1995. “Intelligent agents: bringing good things to life” AI Expert 02, 1719.Google Scholar
Kozierok, R and Maes, P, 1993. “A learning interface agent for scheduling meetings” In: Proceedings of the ACM-SIGCHI International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces Florida, 8193.Google Scholar
Lang, K, 1995. “Newsweeder: learning to filter netnews” In: Proceedings of the Machine Learning Conference.Google Scholar
Lashkari, Y, Metral, M and Maes, P, 1994. “Collaborative interface agents” In: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1 AAAI Press, 444449.Google Scholar
Lesser, V and Corkill, D, 1981. “Functionally accurate, cooperative distributed systemsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics C-11 (1) 8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, R, Cohen, P, Kunz, J, Nass, C, Christiansen, T and Jin, Y, 1994. “The virtual design team: simulating how organisational structure and communication tools affect team performance” In: Carley, K and Prietula, M (eds.), Computational Organisation Theory Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lieberman, H, 1995. “Letizia: An agent that assists web browsing” In: Proceedings of IJCAI95 AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Maes, P (ed), 1991a. Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maes, P, 1991b. “Situated agents can have goals” In: Maes, P (ed), Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back MIT Press, 4970.Google Scholar
Maes, P, 1994. “Agents that reduce work and information overloadCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maes, P, 1995a. “Intelligent softwareScientific American 273 (3) 09.Google Scholar
Maes, P, 1995b. “Artificial intelligence meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agentsCommunications of the ACM 38 (11) 11 108114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M, 1985. The Society of Mind Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T, Caruana, R, Freitag, D, McDermott, J and Zabowski, D, 1994. “Experience with a learning personal assistantCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 8191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moukas, A, 1996. “Ainalthaea: Information discovery and filtering using a multiagent evolving ecosystem” In: Proceedings the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM '96) London, 222404 421436.Google Scholar
Muller, JP, 1994. “A conceptual model for agent interaction” In: Deen, SM (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Working Conference on Cooperative Knowledge Based Systems (CKBS–94) Keele University: Dake Centre, 213234.Google Scholar
Muller, JP, Pishel, M and Thiel, M, 1995. “Modelling reactive behaviour in vertically layered agent architectures” In: Wooldridge, M and Jennings, N (eds.), Intelligent Agents, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 890 Springer-Verlag, 261276.Google Scholar
Musliner, DH, Durfee, EH and Shin, KG, 1993. “CIRCA: A cooperative intelligent real-time control architectureIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man Cybernetics 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A, 1982. “The knowledge levelArtificial Intelligence 18 87127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D, 1994. “How might people interact with agentsCommunications of the ACM 37 (7) 6876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwana, HS, 1993. “Simulating a children's playground in ABLE” Working Report, Department of Computer Science, Keele University UK.Google Scholar
Nwana, HS, 1996. “The potential benefits of software agent technology to BT” Internal Technical Report, Project NOMADS, Intelligent Systems Research, AAandT, BT Labs, UK.Google Scholar
Nwana, HS, Lee, L and Jennings, NR, 1996. “Coordination in software agent systemsBritish Telecommunications Technology Journal 14 (4), 10.Google Scholar
Nwana, HS and Wooldridge, M, 1996, “Software Agent Technologies”, British Telecommunications Technology Journal, 14 (4), 10.Google Scholar
O'Brien, P and Wiegand, M, 1996. “Agents of change in Business Process ManagementBritish Telecommunications Technology Journal, 14 (4), 10.Google Scholar
Ovum, 1994. Ovum Report, Intelligent Agents: The New Revolution in Software.Google Scholar
Papazoglou, MP, Laufman, SC and Sellis, TK, 1992. “An organisational framework for cooperating intelligent information systemsIntelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 1 (1) 169202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plu, M, 1995. “Software agents in telecommunications network environments” UNICOM Seminar on Intelligent Agents and their Business Applications 8–9 11 London, 225243.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, ZW (ed), 1987. The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence Ablex.Google Scholar
Rao, AS and Georgeff, MP, 1995. “BDI agents: from theory to practice” In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95) San Francisco, USA, 06, 312319.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, A, 1994. “The network with smarts” Byte 10, 5164.Google Scholar
Rosenschein, JS, 1985. Rational Interaction: Cooperation Among Intelligent Agents. PhD Thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Rosenschein, JS and Zlotkin, G, 1994. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, BJ and Starner, T, 1996. “Remembrance agent: A continuously automated information retrieval system” In: Proceedings the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM '96) London, 222404, 487496.Google Scholar
Shardanand, U and Maes, P, 1995. “Social information filtering for aatomating ‘Word of Mouth’” In: Proceedings of CHI-95 Denver, CO.Google Scholar
Sheth, B and Maes, P, 1993. “Evolving agents for personalised information filtering” In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications.Google Scholar
Shoham, Y, 1993. “Agent-oriented programmingArtificial Intelligence 60 (1) 5192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RG, 1980. “The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solverIEEE Transactions on Computers C29 (12).Google Scholar
Smith, R, 1996a. “Software agent technology” In: Proceedings of The First International Conference on the Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology London, UK, 557571.Google Scholar
Smith, R, 1996b. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Steels, L, 1990. “Cooperation between distributed agents through self-organisation” In: Demazeau, Y and Muller, JP (eds.), Decentralized Al—Proceedings of the 1st MAAMAW Elsevier, 175196.Google Scholar
Suchman, LA, 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sycara, K, 1995. “Intelligent agents and the information revolution” In: UNICOM Seminar on Intelligent Agents and their Business Applications 8–9 11 London, 143159.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R, Winter, CS and Crabtree, B, 1996. “Agents, mobility and multimedia information” In: Proceedings the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM '96) London, 222404 693708. URL1: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.crnu.edu/project/theo-5/www/pleiades.html. URL2: http://www.genmagic.com. URL3: http://www.sel.sony.com. URL4: http://www.metacrawler.com. URL5: http://haas.berkeley-edu/PFOlOheilman/agents/.Google Scholar
Wavish, P and Graham, M, 1994. “Roles, skills and behaviour” In: Wooldridge, M and Jennings, N (eds.), Intelligent Agents, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 890 Springer-Verlag, 371386.Google Scholar
Wavish, P and Graham, M, 1995. “A situated action approach to implementing characters in computer games” Applied AI Journal to appear.Google Scholar
Wayner, P, 1995a. “Free agents” Byte, 03, 105114.Google Scholar
Wayner, P, 1995b. Agents Unleashed: A Public Domain Look at Agent Technology AP Professional.Google Scholar
Wayner, P and Joch, A, 1995. “Agents of change” Byte, 03 9495.Google Scholar
Wiederhold, G, 1992. “Mediators in the architecture of future information systemsIEEE Computer 25 (3) 3849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittig, T (ed), 1992. ARCHON: An Architecture for Multi-Agent Systems Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Wolfson, D, Voorhees, E and Flatley, M, 1989. “Intelligent routers” In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems DCS-9 Newport Beach, CA, 06 5–9. IEEE Press, 37 1376.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, M, 1995. “Conceptualising and developing agents” In: Proceedings of the UNICOM Seminar on Agent Software 252604, London, 4054.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, M and Jennings, N, 1995a. “Intelligent agents: theory and practiceThe Knoivledge Engineering Review 10 (2) 115152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, M and Jennings, N (eds.), 1995b. Intelligent Agents, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 890 Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, M, Mueller, JP and Tambe, M, 1996. Intelligent Agents II, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1037 Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zlotkin, G and Rosenschein, JS, 1989. “Negotiation and task sharing among autonomous agents in cooperative domains” In: Proceedings of the 11th IJCAI Detroit, MI, 912917.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 210 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-898fc554b-54xgk Total loading time: 0.848 Render date: 2021-01-27T20:19:33.982Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Software agents: an overview
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Software agents: an overview
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Software agents: an overview
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *