Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Kantian Review
  4. Volume 21
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 21 - November 2016

Contents

Page 2 of 3

Author Meets Critics

  • Reason’s Disunity with Itself: Comments on Adrian Moore on Kant’s Dialectic of Human Reason

  • Edward Kanterian
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    25 October 2016, pp. 483-493

  • Adrian Moore develops a helpful distinction between good and bad metaphysics. Employing this distinction, I argue, first, that some contemporary metaphysical theories might be ‘bad’, insofar as they employ, unreflectively, concepts akin to Kant’s Ideas of reason. Second, I investigate the difficulty Kant himself has with explaining our craving for bad metaphysics. Third, I raise some problems for Kant’s doctrine of ‘transcendental cognition’, which rests on the difficult assumption that Ideas have objective reality. I conclude that, while Kant has given us means to combat certain bad metaphysics, his own philosophy is not entirely free of it either.

  • Relationalism about Perception vs. Relationalism about Perceptuals

  • Andrew Stephenson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 June 2016, pp. 293-302

  • There is a tension at the heart of Lucy Allais’s new account of Kant’s transcendental idealism. The problem arises from her use of two incompatible theories in contemporary philosophy – relationalism about perception, or naïve realism, and relationalism about colour, or more generally relationalism about any such perceptual property. The problem is that the former requires a more robust form of realism about the properties of the objects of perception than can be accommodated in the partially idealistic framework of the latter. On Allais’s interpretation, Kant’s notorious attempt to balance realism and idealism remains unstable.

Book Reviews

Author Meets Critics

Book Reviews

Books Received

Book Reviews

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • KRV volume 21 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 February 2016, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • KRV volume 21 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    25 October 2016, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back Cover (OBC, IBC) and matter

  • KRV volume 21 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    25 October 2016, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 2 of 3