Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:56:05.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution and abundance of West Greenland humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2004

Finn Larsen
Affiliation:
Greenland Institute for Natural Resources, P.O. Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland
Philip S. Hammond
Affiliation:
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Gatty Marine Laboratory, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Photo-identification surveys of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae were conducted at West Greenland during 1988–93, the last 2 years of which were part of the internationally coordinated humpback whale research programme YoNAH, with the primary aim of estimating abundance for the West Greenland feeding aggregation. The area studied stretched from the coast out to the offshore margin of the banks, determined approximately by the 200 m depth contours, between c. 61°70′N and c. 66°N. The surveys were conducted between early July and mid-August and 993 h were expended on searching effort. A total of 670 groups of humpback whales was encountered leading to the identification of 348 individual animals. Three areas of concentration were identified: an area off Nuuk; an area at c. 63°30′N; and an area off Frederikshåb. Sequential Petersen capture–recapture estimates of abundance were calculated for five pairs of years at 357 (1988–89), 355 (1989–90), 566 (1990–91), 376 (1991–92), and 348 (1992–93). Excluding the anomalously high estimate in 1990–91, the simple mean is 359 (SE = 27.3, CV = 0.076) and the inverse CV-squared weighted mean is 356 animals (SE = 24.9, CV = 0.070). These calculations lead us to conclude that between 1988 and 1993 there were 360 humpbacks (CV = 0.07) in the West Greenland feeding aggregation. Using the Cormack–Jolly–Seber model framework non-calf survival rate was estimated at 0.957 (SE = 0.028). Our data have low power (P < 0.3) to detect a trend of 3.1%, assuming the probability of a type I error was 0.05.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)