Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:50:11.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Method to Obtain a Consensus Ranking of a Region's Vintages’ Quality*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2012

José Borges
Affiliation:
INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Portugal, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200–465 Porto, Portugal, email: jlborges@fe.up.pt
António C. Real
Affiliation:
INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Portugal, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200–465 Porto, Portugal, email: acreals@gmail.com
J. Sarsfield Cabral
Affiliation:
INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Portugal, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200–465 Porto, Portugal, email: jacabral@fe.up.pt
Gregory V. Jones
Affiliation:
Southern Oregon University, Department of Environmental Studies, 1250 Siskiyou Boulevard, Ashland, OR 97520, email: gjones@sou.edu

Abstract

An impartial assessment of the quality of the wine produced over the years in a region (vintage quality) is an essential tool for producers, consumers, investors, and wine researchers to understand factors influencing quality and make purchasing or investing decisions. However, scoring the overall wine quality over the years does not necessarily produce a consensus of which year or years are best. Several critics, magazines, and organizations publish vintage charts that assign a score to each vintage, representing the corresponding perception of the wine quality. Often, the scores given by different institutions reveal little consensus with respect to the relative quality of the vintages.

In this work, we propose the utilization of a rank aggregation method to combine a collection of vintage charts for a region into a ranking of the vintages that represents the consensus of the input vintage charts. As a result, we obtain an impartial ranking of the vintages that represents the consensus of an arbitrary number of independent vintage charts. We illustrate the method with the scores from three wine regions.

The proposed method produces a ranking of vintage-to-vintage quality that represents an impartial consensus of a collection of independent sources, each using a different rating format, scale, or classification. Such a ranking has the potential to be useful for the research community, which needs a relative measure of wine production quality over the years. Therefore, we make publicly available a software tool that implements the method (Borges, 2011). (JEL Classification: C38, C61, C88)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, L.M. (1957). A modification of Kendall's Tau for the case of arbitrary ties in both rankings. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52, 3335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, H.H., Lecocq, S. and Visser, M. (2008). The impact of gurus: Parker grades and en primeur wine prices. Journal of Wine Economics, 5, 2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K.J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 328346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. and Jones, G.V. (2012). The demand for expert opinions: Bordeaux wine. Cahier Scientifique de l'Observatoire des Conjonctures Vinicoles Européennes, Journal of Wine Economics, 7(2), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., Ashmore, D. and LaLonde, R. (1995). Bordeaux wine vintage quality and the weather. Chance, 8, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balinski, M. and Laraki, R. (2011). Majority judgment: Measuring, ranking, and electing. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, J. (2011). Wine studies links. Retrieved from http://paginas.fe.up.pt/~jlborges/wine_studies.html.Google Scholar
Broadbent, M. (2007). Pocket vintage wine companion. London: Pavilion Books (in association with Christie's).Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D.V. and Cicchetti, A.F. (2009). Wine rating scales: Assessing their utility for producers, consumers, and oenologic researchers. International Journal of Wine Research, 1, 7383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorcet, M.D. (1785). Des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité. Paris: Imprimerie royale.Google Scholar
Corsi, A. and Ashenfelter, O. (2001). Predicting Italian wine quality from weather data and expert “ratings.” Presented at the Cahier Scientifique de l'Observatoire des Conjonctures Vinicoles Européennes, (4).Google Scholar
Decanter. (2011). Vintage guide. Retrieved from www.decanter.com/wine-learning/vintage-guides/, April 2011.Google Scholar
Gergaud, O. and Ginsburgh, V. (2008). Natural endowments, production technologies, and the quality of wines in Bordeaux. Does terroir matter? Economic Journal, 118, F142F157.Google Scholar
Gokcekus, O. and Nottebaum, D. (2011, September). The buyer's dilemma—Whose rating should a wine drinker pay attention to? American Association of Wine Economists, Working Paper no. 91.Google Scholar
Hoare, C.A. (1962). Quicksort. Computer Journal, 5, 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.V. and Davis, R.E. (2000). Climate influences on grapevine phenology, grape composition, and wine production and quality for Bordeaux, France. American Journal of Viticulture and Enology, 51, 249261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.V. and Storchmann, K.-H. (2001). Wine market prices and investment under uncertainty: An econometric model for Bordeaux crus classes. Agricultural Economics, 26, 115133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.V. and Goodrich, G.B. (2008). Influence of climate variability on wine region in the western USA and on wine quality in the Napa Valley. Climate Research, 35, 241254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.V., White, M.A., Cooper, O.R. and Storchmann, K. (2005). Climate change and global wine quality. Climatic Change, 73, 319343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemeny, J.G. (1959). Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus, 88, 571591.Google Scholar
Landon, S. and Smith, C.E. (1998). Quality expectations, reputation, and price. Southern Economic Journal, 64, 628647.Google Scholar
Lin, S. (2010). Rank aggregation methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 555570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, A.B. (2011). Vintage guide. Retrieved April 2011, from www.bassins.com/resources/vin_chart.html.Google Scholar
Nemani, R.R., White, M.A., Cayan, D.R., Jones, G.V., Running, S.W. and Coughlan, J.C. (2001). Asymmetric climatic warming improves California vintages. Climate Research, 19, 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. (2011, April). Wine advocate. Retrieved April 2011, from www.erobertparker.com/newsearch/vintagechart1.aspx.Google Scholar
Quandt, R.E. (2006). Measurement and inference in wine tasting. Journal of Wine Economics, 1, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadras, V., Soar, C. and Petrie, P. (2007). Quantification of time trends in vintage scores and their variability for major wine regions of Australia.” Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 13, 117123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalekamp, F. and Zuylen, A.V. (2009). Rank aggregation: Together we're strong. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX) (pp. 3851). New York: SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, G. and Anderson, K. (2003). Wine quality and varietal, regional and winery reputations: Hedonic prices for Australia and New Zealand. Economic Record, 79, 357369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spectator, W. (2011). Vintage chart. Retrieved April 2011, from www.winespectator.com/servefile/serve/id/41618Google Scholar
Spirits, V.F. (2011). Vintage guide. Retrieved April 2011, from www.vintages.com/circular/vintage-chart.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wanhill, S.R.C. (1995). A test of claret price formulation in auction markets. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 7, 1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H. (1988). Condorcet's theory of voting. American Political Science Review, 82, 12311244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar