Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:47:10.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollination ecology of Caryocar brasiliense (Caryocaraceae) in Central Brazil cerrado vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Rogério Gribel  and
John D. Hay
Rogério Gribel
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Caixa Postal 478, 69011–970 Manaus, AM, Brazil
John D. Hay
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Fundação Universidade de Brasília, 70000 Brasília, DF, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The floral biology, breeding system and pollination of Caryocar brasiliense were studied in the cerrado vegetation of Central Brazil. The large, yellowish-cream, brush-like flowers are pollinated mainly by glossophagine bats (Glossophaga soricina and Anoura geoffroyi). Three non-glossophagine bats (Phyllostomus discolor, Vampyrops lineatus and Carollia perspicillata) and two short probosisced hawk moths (Erinyis ello and Pseudosphinx tetrio) may also act as occasional pollinators. Caryocar brasiliense is self-compatible although it sets significantly more fruits when crossed than when selfed. The natural fruit set (fruit/flower ratio) and seed set (seed/ovule ratio) are 3.1% and 1.0% respectively. Most of the fruits and seeds are formed through the action of the flower visitors, despite the fact that about 20% of the non-visited flowers receive self pollen on at least one stigma.

Keywords

bat-pollinationBrazilCaryocarCaryocaraceaecerradochiropterophilyglossophagine batspollinationsphingid-pollination
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 199 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Baker, H. G. & Harris, B. J. 1957. The pollination of Parkia by bats and its attendant evolutionary problems. Evolution 11:449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, O. M. 1966. Estudos morfológicos dos pólens em Caryocaraceae. Rodriguésia 25:351–426.Google Scholar
Bawa, K. S. 1974. Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution 28:85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beattie, A. J. 1971. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 47:82.Google Scholar
Bullock, S. H. 1985. Breeding systems in the flora of a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 17:287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruden, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eguiarte, L. & Del Rio, C. M. 1987. El néctar y el polen como recursos: el papel ecológico de los visitantes a las flores de Pseudobombax ellipticum (H.B.K.) Dugand. Biotropica 19:74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G. 1972. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Botanical Review 38:201–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G. 1984. Vegetation of Brasília. Phtyocoenologia 12:271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faegri, K. & Van Der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. (3rd. edition). Pergamon Press, New York. 244 pp.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. L. 1977. Feeding habits. Pp. 293–350 in Baker, R.J., Jones, J. K. Jr. & Carter, D. C. (eds). Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomidae. Part II. Special Publication of the Museum, Texas Tech. University 13:293–350.Google Scholar
Gottsberger, G. & Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. 1983. Dispersal and distribution in the cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Sonderbaende des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 7:315–353.Google Scholar
Gould, E. 1978. Foraging behavior of Malaysian nectar-feeding bats. Biotropica 10:184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heithaus, E. R., Opler, P. A. & Baker, H. G. 1974. Bat activity and pollination of Bauhinia pauletia: plant-pollinator coevolution. Ecology 55:412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helversen, O. V. & Reyer, H. U. 1984. Nectar intake and energy expenditure in a flower visiting bat. Oecologia 63:178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, H. C. 1984. Floral biology and pollination ecology of the neotropical species of Parkia. Journal of Ecology 72:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. J. 1977. Time sharing and body partitioning in bat-plant pollination systems. Nature 270:509–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, A. 1978. The ecology of the flowers of the savanna tree Maranthes polyandra and their visitors, with particular reference to bats. Journal of Ecology 66:287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, T. O. 1984. Foraging ecology of the long-nosed bat Glossophaga soricina, with respect to resource availability. Ecology 65:538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, T. O. 1985. Pollen carrying by the nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina in a suburban environment. Biotropica 17:107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, A. M. 1920. Sphingidae of Para, Brazil. Early stages, food-plants, habits, etc. Novitates Zoologicae 27:333–415.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1975. Underexploited tropical plants with promising economic value. National Academy of Sciences, ix + 189p.Google Scholar
Prance, G. T. & Freitas Da Silva, M. F. 1973. Caryocaraceae. Flora Neotropica 12:1–75.Google Scholar
Ramirez, N., Sobrevila, C., Enrech, N. X. & Ruiz-Zapata, T. 1984. Floral biology and breeding system of Bauhinia ungulata L. (Leguminosae), a bat-pollinated tree in Venezuelan ‘Llanos’. American Journal of Botany 71:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, T. Z. & Arroyo, M. T. K. 1978. Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest. Biotropica 10:221–230.Google Scholar
Sazima, M. & Sazima, I. 1975. Quiropterofilia em Lafoensia pacari St. Hill. (Lythraceae), na Serra do Cipió, Minas Gerais. Ciência e Cultura 27:405–416.Google Scholar
Sazima, M. & Sazima, I. 1978. Bat pollination of the passion flower, Passiflora mucronata, in southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 10:100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazima, I., Vogel, S. & Sazima, M. 1989. Bat pollination of Encholirium glaziovii, a terrestrial bromeliad. Plant Systematics and Evolution 168:167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. (2nd edition). W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco. 859p.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1962. Duftdrusen im dienste der bestäubung. Uber bau und funktion der osmophoren. Akademie der Wissenschaftenund der Literatur Abhandlungen der Mathematisch, Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 10:599–763.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1968. Chiropterophilie in der neoktropischen Flora. Neue Mitteilungen I. Flora Abteilung B 1578:562–602.Google Scholar
Voss, R. M., Turner, M., Inouye, R., Fisher, M. & Cort, R. 1980. Floral biology of Markea neurantha Hemsley (Solanaceae), a bat pollinated epiphyte. American Midland Naturalist 103:262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willig, M. R. 1983. Composition, microgeographic variation, and dimorphism in caatingas and cerrado bat communities from northeast Brazil. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 23:1–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar