Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-jxh9h Total loading time: 1.557 Render date: 2021-04-15T05:09:09.072Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Phenology and flowering periodicity of Neotropical dry forest species: evidence from herbarium collections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Rolf Borchert
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Haworth Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-2106, USA

Abstract

To examine the potential contribution of herbarium material to the description and analysis of tropical tree phenology, flowering times and geographical distribution were graphed for 1673 flowering collections from 18 species native to Neotropical dry forests and phenological differences between species were analysed. These include the timing and duration of flowering as well as morphological differences such as flowering on leafless twigs vs flowering on shoots bearing old or new foliage. Species-specific flowering periods of herbarium collections are similar to those observed in phenological field studies, but are often longer because of the larger geographical and temporal sampling range. Conspecific collections of different geographical origin show distinct differences in flowering periodicity, which are correlated with differences in the timing and intensity of the dry season. Interspecific differences in the timing of phenology relative to the dry season indicate differences in the control of phenology by seasonal drought. Herbaria thus represent a large potential source of phenological information which can either supplement and extend phenological field studies or provide phenological information for dry forest species not studied in the field but well represented in herbarium collections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Ashton, P. S., Givnish, T. J. & Appanah, S. 1988. Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. American Naturalist 132:4466.Google Scholar
Augspurger, C. K. 1982. A cue for synchronous flowering. Pp. 133150 in Leigh, E. H., Rand, A. S. & Windsor, D. W. (eds). The ecology of a tropical forest. Seasonal rhythms and long-term changes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Bawa, K. S. & Frankie, G. W. 1983. Cochlospermum vitifolium (Poro-poro, Cochlospermum, silk-tree, cotton tree). Pp. 215219 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Borchert, R. 1980. Phenology and ecophysiology of the tropical tree, Erythrina poeppigiana O.F. Cook. Ecology 61:10651074.Google Scholar
Borchert, R. 1986. Erythrina. Pp. 95107 in Halevy, A. H. (ed.). CRC handbook of flowering, Vol. V. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Borchert, R. 1992. Computer simulation of tree growth periodicity and climatic hydroperiodicity in tropical forests. Biotropica 24:385395.Google Scholar
Borchert, R. 1994a. Water status and development of tropical trees during seasonal drought. Trees 8:115–15.Google Scholar
Borchert, R. 1994b. Site water availability and stem water storage determine water status, phenology and distribution of trees in a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica. Ecology 75:14371449.Google Scholar
Borchert, R. 1994c. Induction of rehydration and bud break by irrigation or rain in deciduous trees of a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica. Trees 8:198204.Google Scholar
Bullock, S. H. 1986. Observations and an experiment on synchronous flowering. Madroño 33:223226.Google Scholar
Bullock, S. H. & Solis-Magallanes, J. A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22:2235.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. 1972. Phenology and other characteristics of tropical semi-deciduous forest in northwestern Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 60:147170.Google Scholar
Frankie, G. W., Baker, H. G. & Opler, P. A. 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 62:881919.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. S. 1992. Bignoniaceae Part II (Tribe Tecomae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 25. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
Haber, W. A. & Frankie, G. W. 1983. Luehea Candida (guacimo molenillo, molenillo). Pp. 269270 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. & Gentry, A. H. 1983. Anacardium exulsum (espavél, espavé, acajou). Pp. 189190 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Holbrook, N. M., Whitbeck, J. L. & Mooney, H. A. 1995. Drought responses of neotropical deciduous forest trees. In press. As Mooney, H. A., Medina, E. & Bullock, S. H. (eds). Neotropical deciduous forests. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Irwin, H. S. & Barneby, R. C. 1982. The American Cassiinae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 35:1454.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1983a. Pithecellobium soman (cenizero, genizero, raintree). Pp. 305307 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costan Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1983b. Guazuma ulmifolia (guacimo, guacima, caulote, tapulco). Pp. 246248 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. & Liesner, R. 1980. Annotated check-list of lowland Guanacaste province, Costa Rica. Brenesia 18:1590.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 1982. Seasonality and phenology in a dry tropical forest in Ghana. Journal of Ecology 70:791806.Google Scholar
Monasterio, M. & Sarmiento, G. 1976. Phenological strategies of plant species in the tropical savanna and the semi-deciduous forest of the Venezuelan llanos. Journal of Biogeography 3:325356.Google Scholar
Mooney, H. A., Medina, E. & Bullock, S. H. (eds). 1995. Neotropical deciduous forests. Academic Press, New York (in press).Google Scholar
Mori, S. A. & Prance, G. T. 1987. Phenology. Pp. 124–135 in Mori, S. A. (ed.). The Lecythidacea of a lowland neotropical forest: La Fumée mountain, French Guiana. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, Vol. 40.Google Scholar
Müller, L. E. 1967. Der Wasserhaushalt als begrenzender Faktor beim Anbau tropischer Nutzpflanzen. Berichte Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft 80:5359.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. G. & Lugo, A. E. 1986. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 17:6787.Google Scholar
Niewolt, S. 1977. Tropical climatology. John Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Opler, P. A., Frankie, G. W. & Baker, H. G. 1976. Rainfall as a factor in the release, timing and synchronization of anthesis by tropical trees and shrubs. Journal of Biogeography 3:321336.Google Scholar
Opler, P. A. & Janzen, D. H. 1983. Cordia alliodora (laurel). Pp. 219221 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Reich, P. B. & Borchert, T. 1982. Phenology and ecophysiology of the tropical tree, Tabebuia neochrysantha (Bignoniaceae). Ecology 63:294299.Google Scholar
Reich, P. B. & Borchert, R. 1984. Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 72:6174.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. 1983. Bursera simarouba (indio desnudo, jiñocuave, gumbo limbo). Pp. 201202 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Windsor, D. S. 1982. The phenology of new leaf production and flowering for selected trees, shrubs and vines on Barro Colorado Island, Republic of Panama. –A preliminary data report. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Phenology and flowering periodicity of Neotropical dry forest species: evidence from herbarium collections
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Phenology and flowering periodicity of Neotropical dry forest species: evidence from herbarium collections
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Phenology and flowering periodicity of Neotropical dry forest species: evidence from herbarium collections
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *