Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-xl52z Total loading time: 24 Render date: 2021-04-14T12:18:27.644Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Allometry and life history of tropical trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

David A. King
Affiliation:
School of Biological Science, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033, Australia

Abstract

The scaling of crown size and trunk diameter with tree height (allometry) was determined for 14 common species of the tropical wet lowland forest at La Selva, Costa Rica. The study showed that allometric differences between species are related to adult size, regeneration niche (gap vs. non-gap) and longevity, as follows: (1) adults of understorey species are larger crowned than similar statured (6–15 m) saplings of canopy trees; (2) species commonly found in gaps as saplings are somewhat larger crowned than shade-tolerant species over the 1–6 m height range; and (3) long-lived canopy species show greater increases in crown breadth with increasing height thandoshort-livedspecies.Trunkallometryisrelated to mechanical requirements for support, including the need to withstand greater wind forces in the upper canopy. The common canopy species, Pentaclethra macroloba, which comprises 40% of the basal area at La Selva, is particularly wide-crowned and thick-trunked at its maximum height. On the other hand, the comparatively narrower crowns and trunks of the other canopy species allow them to reach a given height with less biomass. These differences in allometry may influence tree density and forest structure at La Selva.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aide, T. M. 1987. Limbfalls: a major cause of sapling mortality for tropical forest plants. Biotropica 19:284285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandani, A., Hartshorn, G. S. & Orians, G. H. 1988. Internal heterogeneity of gaps and species richness in Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Businger, J. A. 1975. Aerodynamics of vegetated surfaces. Pp. 139165 in de Vries, D. A. & Afgan, N. G. (eds). Heat and mass transfer in the biosphere. Part I: Transfer processes in the plant environment. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Canham, C. D. 1985. Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Acer saccharum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 112:134145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R. 1982. World forest biomass and primary production data. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. & Clark, D. B. 1987a. Análisis de la regeneración de árboles del dosel en bosque muy húmedo tropical: aspectos teóricos y prácticos. Revista de Biologia Tropical 35(Suplemento 1 ):4154.Google Scholar
Clark, D. B. & Clark, D. A. 1987b. Population ecology and microhabitat distribution of Dipteryx panamensis, a neotropical rain forest emergent tree. Biotropica 19:235244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. A. & Clark, D. B. 1992. Life history diversity of canopy and emergent trees in a neotropical rain forest. Ecological Monographs 62:315344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ek, A. R. 1974. Dimensional relationships of forest and open grown trees in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Forestry Research Note 181.Google Scholar
Gere, J. M. & Carter, W. O. 1963. Critical buckling loads for tapered columns. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 128:736754.Google Scholar
Givnish, T. J. 1986. Biomechanical constraints on self-thinning in plant populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 119:139146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, F., Oldeman, R. A. A. & Tomlinson, P. B. 1978. Tropical trees and forests: an architectural analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1983a. Plants. Pp. 118157 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, G. S. 1983b. Pentaclethra macroloba (Gavilan.). Pp. 301303 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
King, D. A. 1981. Tree dimensions: maximizing the rate of height growth in dense stands. Oecologia (Berlin) 51:351356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, D. A. 1986. Tree form, height growth, and susceptibility to wind damage in Acer saccharum. Ecology 67:980990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. A. 1990. Allometry of saplings and understorey trees of a Panamanian forest. Functional Ecology 4:2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. A. 1991a. Tree allometry, leaf size and adult tree size in old-growth forests of western Oregon. Tree Physiology 9:369381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, D. A. 1991b. Tree size: the allometry of trees in temperate and tropical forests National Geographic Research and Exploration 7:342351.Google Scholar
King, D. A. 1993. Growth history of a Neotropical tree inferred from the spacing of leaf scars. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:525532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. & Loucks, O. L. 1978. The theory of tree bole and branch form. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 15:141165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohyama, T. 1987. Significance of architecture and allometry in saplings. Functional Ecology 1:399404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, R. O. 1982. Wind stress and elfin stature in a montane rain forest tree: an adaptive explanation. American Journal of Botany 69:12241230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, D., Lieberman, M., Hartshorn, G. & Peralta, R. 1985. Growth rates and age-size relationships of tropical wet forest trees in Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 1:97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M., Lieberman, D. & Peralta, R. 1989. Forests are not just Swiss cheese: canopy stereogeometry of non-gaps in tropical forests. Ecology 70:550552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T. A. 1973. Size and shape in biology. Science 179:12011204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, T. A. & Kronauer, R. E. 1976. Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. Journal of Theoretical Biology 59:443466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, J. A. & Worrell, R. 1981. Stability of coniferous trees in relation to damage by snow. Forestry 54:115128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, P. M., Helenurm, K., Kearns, D., Morse, S. R., Palmer, M. W. & Short, L. 1986. Height and stem diameter relationships for dicotyledonous trees and arborescent palms of Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113:241246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, W. E. 1984. Computation and uses of central trend lines. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62:18971905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. & Sokal, R. R. 1969. Statistical tables. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Shugart, H. H. 1984. A theory of forest dynamics: the ecological implications of forest succession models. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. H. & Bailey, G. R. 1964. Influence of stocking and stand density on crown widths of Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine. Commonwealth Forestry Review 43:243246.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 1974. Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. Agriculture Handbook 72. U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1990. An introduction to tropical rainforests. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiemann, M. C. & Williamson, G. B. 1989. Radial gradients in the specific gravity of wood in some tropical and temperate trees. Forest Science 35:197210.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 78 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Allometry and life history of tropical trees
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Allometry and life history of tropical trees
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Allometry and life history of tropical trees
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *