Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T04:40:32.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indica - 2.Contributions to the History of the Hindu Revenue System. By U. N. GhoshalM.A., Ph.D., 9¾ × 6½, pp. xv + 313. Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1929.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

L. D. Barnett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , January 1931 , pp. 165 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 166 note 1 It may be added that the term kulyāṇadharta (pp. 245 f., 261, etc.) may on the analogy of Southern inscriptions be explained as denoting the marriage-tax. The translation of kṣāra as “ sugar “ (p. 90) also seems to be an error, while ”quid pro quid”(p. 138) is very unhappy, and “Chālukya” (p. 257 f.) ia a mistake for “Chaulukya“.

page 166 note 2 Diodorus is also misunderstood by Messrs. Monahan and Ghoshal; the true meaning of his statement is very skilfully explained by Dr. Breloer in his Grundeigentum in Indien, a work which throws some valuable light on the subject.