Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T10:53:41.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The immobilised elephant at Dhauli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Doris Meth Srinivasan
Doris Meth Srinivasan*
Affiliation:
Center of India Studies, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
*
Email: doris.srinivasan@stonybrook.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The elephant at Dhauli, site of Aśoka Maurya's inscriptions, is the earliest Indian monumental sculpture. Aśoka reigned between 270–235 BC and the Dhauli elephant is dated c. 257 BC. Only the elephant's forefront is sculpted; about half of the animal's bulk remains within the rock (Figure 1). One art historian claims that Emperor Aśoka is in the vanguard presenting himself to the people of Kaliṅga. Usually, however, the Dhauli elephant is considered symbolic of the Buddha. The well-known story that Māyā dreamt that Siddhārtha entered her womb as a white elephant motivates this view; to wit śeto (i.e. śveta), ʻthe white one’, is inscribed at the end of the 6th Rock Edict.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 201 - 202
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Asiatic Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Niharranjan Ray, in Age of the Nandas and Mauryas, (ed.) K.A. Nilakanta Sastri, 2nd edition (Delhi, 1967), p. 371.

2 Hinüber, Oskar von, ‘The Buddha as a Historical Person’, Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 42 (2019), pp. 231–64Google Scholar; in particular, pp. 239–40.

3 Giovanni Verardi, ‘The Buddha-Elephant’, in Silk Road Art and Archaeology 6 (Papers in Honour of Francine Tissot), (eds.) E. Errington and O. Bopearachchi (Kamakura, 1999/2000), p. 69, fns. 5 and 8.

4 Reference kindly supplied by Oskar von Hinüber: mā kuñjaro nāgaṃ āsado dukkhaṃ hi kuñjata nāgamāsado, Vin II 195, 28*: “You must not, elephant, attack the elephant (i.e. the Buddha) for attacking the elephant means suffering” (H. Hendriksen).

5 Trautmann, Thomas R., Elephants and Kings. An Environmental History (Chicago, 2015), pp. 128, 196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar.