Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:08:37.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boundaries Blurred? Folklore, Mythology, History and the Quest for an Alternative Genealogy in North-east India1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

SOHINI RAY*
Affiliation:
Santa Monica College, ray_sohini@smc.edu

Abstract

This paper analyses the use of religious folklore among the Meitei people of Manipur in northeastern India in the creation of a racial identity. After the Meiteis, who are ethnically Southeast Asian, were forced to convert to Hinduism in the early eighteenth century by the Manipuri king Garibniwaz, they were provided with a number of folklores regarding their origin that combined Hindu and indigenous Meitei deities and myths. Recently, the rise of anti-Hindu sentiment in Manipur—spurred by a movement to revive the indigenous Meitei religion and a strained political relationship with India—has led to the questioning of the validity of these stories by Meitei academics. As a result a new cannon of literature is being developed by scholars that link the origin of the community to its Southeast Asian roots. Discovering the racial identity of the Meitei people has motived this movement. This paper analyzes the multiple meanings that mythologies concerning origin hold in contemporary Meitei society and challenges the modern notion that historical consciousness is absolute truth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I dedicate this article to the memory of Professor Stanley Tambiah, who had invited me to take part in his “Thai Ethnography” seminar at Harvard University in Spring 2001, and encouraged me to pursue this project for publication. My earnest gratitude to Michael Herzfeld, Satadru Sen, Saipin Suputtomangal and Timothy Tangherlini for their incisive insights at various stages. In my 25 years of field research in Manipur, many people have braved curfews and bandhs in assisting me, and several scholars have shared their thoughts, especially K. Ruhinikumar Sharma, Kh. Ratan Kumar, B. Kulachandra Sharma, Gangumen Kamei, Ng. Kangia, R.K. Jhaljit, John Parrat and the anonymous reviewers. Sanjib Baruah cited this article when still in manuscript form. Alicia Andro and Lauren Hersch provided invaluable editorial support. However, I am solely responsible for all errors, and unless otherwise mentioned all translations are mine.

References

Aggarwal, K., “Script and ethnolinguistic identity: the Meiteilon quagmire”, Languages of Tribal and Indigenous Peoples of India, (ed.) Anvita, Abbi. (Delhi, 1997), p. 196.Google Scholar
Augstein, H. F., Race: The Origins of an Idea 1760–1850 (Bristol, 1996), p. x.Google Scholar
Ballhatchet, K., “The language of historians and the morphology of history”, in The Concept of Race in South Asia, (ed.) Robb, Peter (New Delhi, 1995), p. 77.Google Scholar
Baruah, S, India Against Itself: Assam and the Politics of Nationality (Philadelphia, 1999), p. 69.Google Scholar
Baruah, S, “A new politics of race: India and its north-east”, in Where the Sun Rises When Shadow Falls, (ed.) Sen, Geeti (New Delhi, 2006), p. 166.Google Scholar
Bates, C., Race,”Caste and tribe in central India: the early origins of Anthropometry”, in Concept of Race in South Asia, (ed.) Robb, Peter (New Delhi, 1995), p. 257.Google Scholar
Bayly, S., “Caste and ‘race’ in the colonial ethnography of India”, in The Concept of Race in South Asia, (ed.) Peter, Robb. (New Delhi, 2006), p. 216.Google Scholar
Bendix, R., In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies (Madison, 1997), p. 20.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, D., “Left in the lurch: the demise of the world's longest elected regime?”, Economic and Political Weekly, XLV, 3 (2010).Google Scholar
Brara, N. V., Politics, Society and Cosmology in India's Northeast (New Delhi, 1998).Google Scholar
Chaki-Sircar, M., Feminism in a Traditional Society: Women of the Manipur Valley (New Delhi, 1984).Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P., The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton, 1993), p. 6.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P., The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. (New York, 2004), p. 159.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. K., Kirata-Jana-Kriti: The indo-Mongoloids: Their Contribution to the History and Culture of India (Calcutta, 1951), p. 150.Google Scholar
Devi, W. I., “Meetei Revivalism”, Phil, M. Thesis Manipur University, Canchipur, (Manipur, 1991), p.82.Google Scholar
Goshwami, H., History of the People of Manipur (Imphal, 2004), p. 86.Google Scholar
Guha, R., History at the Limit of World History (New York, 2002), p. 59.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J., “Beyond “culture”: space, identity and the politics of difference”, Cultural Anthropology VII (1992), p. 6.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M., Ours Once More: Folklore, Ideology and the Making of Modern Greece (Austin, 1982), p. 7.Google Scholar
Hodson, T. C., The Meitheis (London, 1908), p. 6.Google Scholar
Joshi, S., “Re-Publicizing Religiosity: Modernity, Religion and the Middle Class”, in Peterson, Derek and Walhof, Darren (eds.) The Invention of Religion: Rethinking Belief and Politics in History (New Brunswick, 2002), p. 80.Google Scholar
Kangia, Ng., Adungeigi Kangleipak Manipur Natte (Imphal, 1972), p. 63.Google Scholar
Kabui, G., History of Manipur: Pre-Colonial Period, Volume I (New Delhi, 1991), p. 27.Google Scholar
Kabui, G., Philosophy of History and Historiography of Manipur (Imphal, 1997), p. 21.Google Scholar
Klein, B., “Folklore”, in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 8 (New York, 2001), p. 5711.Google Scholar
LaCapra, D., “Introduction”, in The Bounds of Race: Perspectives on Hegemony and Resistance, (ed.) LaCapra, Dominick (Ithaca, 1991), p. 1.Google Scholar
McLeod, J., Sovereignty, Power, Control: Politics in the States of Western India, 1916–1947’ (Leiden, 1999), p. 37.Google Scholar
Mumtaza, I. S., “A Note on Soraren [god of heaven] Macha [son] Khukumba [descending for settlement] Ahom-Shan-Manipuri Diaspora in the Thirteenth Century: In Commemoration of the 770th Anniversary of Chao-Lung-Siu-Ka-Pha”, Unpublished papers. (1998)Google Scholar
Nandy, A., “History's Forgotten Doubles”, History and Theory, Theme Issue (1995) XXXIV, p. 45, 46.Google Scholar
Naorem, S. (ed.), Manipur: Past and Present, Volume I (New Delhi, 1988), p. 276.Google Scholar
Pai, H.I., Constructing “Korean” Origins: A Critical Review of Archeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State Formation Theories (Cambridge, MA, 2000).Google Scholar
Parratt, J., Wounded Land: Politics and Identity in Modern Manipur (New Delhi, 2005), p. 22.Google Scholar
Paratt, S. N., The Religion of Manipur: Beliefs, Rituals and Historical Development (Calcutta, 1980), p. 101.Google Scholar
Parratt, S. N., The Court Chronicles of Kings of Manipur: The Cheitharol Kumpapa (London, 2005), p. 6.Google Scholar
Parratt, S. N. and Parratt, J., The Pleasing of the Gods: Meitei Lai-haraoba (New Delhi, 1994), p. xiv.Google Scholar
Parratt, S. N. and Parratt, J., The, History and Culture of Manipur (Cumbria, UK, 2011).Google Scholar
Pemberton, R. B., The Eastern Frontier of India. (New Delhi, 1835, 2005), p. 36.Google Scholar
Phullo, N., Eigi wareng (Luwangshambam, 1947), p. 10.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P., The Foucault Reader (New York, 1982), p. 82.Google Scholar
Rai, V. S., The Last Phase of the Transfer of Power in India (New Delhi, 1990), p. 140.Google Scholar
Ray, S., “The Sacred Alphabet and the Divine Body: the Case of Meitei Mayek from North-Eastern India”, PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California (Los Angeles, 2000a), p. 171.Google Scholar
Ray, S., “Meetei Revivalism and Manipuri Dance”, Masters Thesis, Department of Dance, University of California (Los Angeles, 1994), p. 50.Google Scholar
Ray, S., “Meitei Puyas: Myth and Reality” Unpublished manuscript presented in Archeology and Text series. Co-sponsored by Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies and Archeology Wing, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University. (Cambridge, 2000b), p. 2.Google Scholar
Richman, P., “E. V. Ramasami's reading of the Ramayana” in Many Ramayanas: The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia, (ed.) Paula, Richman. (Berkeley, 1991), p. 175.Google Scholar
Roy, J., History of Manipur (Calcutta, 1958).Google Scholar
Saikia, Y., Fragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai-Ahom in India (Durham and London, 2004), p. 220.Google Scholar
Saikia, Y., “Religion, nostalgia, memory: making an ancient and recent Tai-Ahom identity in Assam and Thailand”, Journal of Asian Studies, I (February) (2006), p. 53.Google Scholar
Sen, S., Migrant Races: Empire, Identity and K.S. Ranjitsinghji (Manchester, 2004), p. 130.Google Scholar
Shryock, A., Nationalism and Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan (Berkeley, 1997), p. 311.Google Scholar
Bhuban Singh, H., Merger of Manipur (Imphal, 1988), p. 92.Google Scholar
Kirti Singh, M., Religious Development in Manipur in the 18th and 19th Centuries (Imphal, 1980), p. 1.Google Scholar
Kirti Singh, M., Religion and Culture of Manipur (Delhi, 1988), p. 130.Google Scholar
Kirti Singh, M., Recent Researches in Oriental and Indological Studies (New Delhi, 1998), p. 294.Google Scholar
Lokendra Singh, N., The Unquiet Valley: Society, Economy and Politics in Manipur (1891–1950) (New Delhi, 1998), p. 226.Google Scholar
Sanajaoba, N., “The Genesis of Insurgency” in Manipur: past and present Vol. I. (New Delhi 1988), pp. 260, 276.Google Scholar
Sanajaoba, N., Manipur: Treaties and Documents Vol. I (1110–1971) (New Delhi, 1993), p. 1.Google Scholar
Tensuba, K.C., The Genesis of Indian Tribes: An Approach to the Study of Meiteis and Thais (New Delhi, 1993).Google Scholar
Thapar, R., Cultural Pasts: Essays in Early Indian History (New Delhi, 1999), p. 1075.Google Scholar