Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T01:23:25.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art. XX.—Some Notes on Past and Future Archæological Explorations in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

Just thirty-five years ago, in 1860, the Government of India agreed to institute an Archæological Survey of Upper India, and thus to take an active part in the exploration of the numerous and extensive historical remains of the country, which task until then had been left to the desultory efforts (occasionally aided by grants from the public funds) of the learned societies and private individuals. Adverse circumstances, however, very soon counteracted the effects of this official recognition of the claims of antiquarian research to continued Government assistance and guidance. Already in 1866 financial pressure induced Lord Lawrence to stop the work which Sir A. Cunningham had barely begun. The Survey was abolished, and there followed a regrettable time of inaction, which lasted until 1870, when, in consequence of urgent representations from various influential quarters, and especially from eminent members of the Royal Asiatic Society, the Secretary of State and the Supreme Government of India consented to return to the principle laid down in 1860. The next result was the re-opening of the Archæological Survey for the Northern half of India, which was now organized on a larger scale, and the issue of orders by the Secretary of State for the registration and preservation of the historical monuments all over India. Soon afterwards, in 1873, the Government of Bombay was permitted to establish a survey of its own for the Western Presidency, and somewhat later the Government of Madras likewise directed its attention to the collection of notes regarding the antiquities of Southern India and to their scientific exploration.

Type
Original Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1895

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 652 note 1 Lists of Antiquities of Madras.

page 652 note 2 Architectural Monuments and Inscriptions of the North-West Provinces. I am glad to see that Dr. Führer's Progress Report for 1893–94, which reached me after the above notes were written, speaks of the preparation of such a compilation for the Panjab.

page 654 note 1 Additional unpublished documents are, however, in existence, especially in the collections of the late Dr. Bhagvānlāl, who, in the Bombay Gazetteer, mentions, or gives extracts from, various Silahāra and Sendraka inscriptions in his possession.

page 658 note 1 I am glad to see that Dr. Führer's Progress Report for 1893–94, which came into my hands after the above notes were written, holds out the prospect of an excavation ot Aśoka's palace during the next season.

page 659 note 1 Arch. Survey Rep., vol. ii, p. 111 ff.