^{page 514 note 1} The numbering has, I think, been changed since I made my request for it to the Librarian; I therefore do not quote it.

^{page 515 note 1} I hope to add the text in the original characters in a future issue of this Journal.

^{page 517 note 1} So, according to Parsi-Persian analogies.

^{page 517 note 2} D.J. om. ī; D. has stroke.

^{page 517 note 3} D. ravad.

^{page 517 note 4} D.J. om. gās, which K⁵ and M. ins.

^{page 517 note 5} D. pirīmūn; D. ins. va, or read -ŏ.

^{page 517 note 6} Diff. word from gās above: cf. gātu.

^{page 517 note 7} M. kāmistŏ D.J., K⁵ kāmīstŏ.

^{page 517 note 8} So D.J.; K⁵ shūstanŏ.

^{page 517 note 9} D. om. from ‘amatash’ to ‘srāyishnīh.’

^{page 517 note 10} D.J. om. ash.

^{page 517 note 11} So D.J. ī.

^{page 517 note 12} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 517 note 13} In this edition Spiegel's printed text without his conjectural emendations isregarded as representing approximately the celebrated MSS. “Copenhagen, No. 5.” But if M. is really a ‘copy’ of K⁵, it is difficult to see how it can differ so often as it does from Spiegel. Both may he copies with variations at times very useful; its Pahlavi should have been examined.

^{page 517 note 14} D.J. om. mūn.

^{page 517 note 15} Citation from Y. 12 (Sp. 13), fravarānē.

^{page 517 note 16} So D.J., D. valman; K⁵ anŏ.

^{page 517 note 17} D. homōnīh.

^{page 517 note 18} So D.J., D.; possibly used here in the sense of ‘I’as hōman is at times.

^{page 517 note 19} D. points ‘y’ in “yasht”; so D.J. yasht.

^{page 517 note 20} D. yehevūnēd.

^{page 517 note 21} D. slightly differs.

^{page 517 note 22} D.J. ghal.

^{page 517 note 23} D. J., D., M. om. ‘ham.’

^{page 517 note 24} D. mūn.

^{page 517 note 25} So D.J. -dŏ.

^{page 517 note 26} D.J. om. a sign, avāyaḍ.

^{page 517 note 27} Citation (origin will be discussed later).

^{page 517 note 28} So D.

^{page 517 note 29} So D.J.

^{page 517 note 30} D. om. maman.

^{page 518 note 1} D. dāman.

^{page 518 note 2} I do not think that D. means ‘veh.’

^{page 518 note 3} So D.J., M. -nād; K⁵ -nēḍ.

^{page 518 note 4} D. khshnāktar (?), Ner. prakaṭatara.

^{page 518 note 5} D.J. būḍ, K⁵ yehevūnḍ, D. yehevūnēḍ.

^{page 518 note 6} So D.J.; but D. hōmōnḍ.

^{page 518 note 7} So D.J., etc., yehevūnḍ; D. -ūnēḍ.

^{page 518 note 8} So D.J.; others avāyaḍŏ.

^{page 518 note 9} D.J., D. gūft; K⁵ yemalelūnḍ.

^{page 518 note 10} So D.J.; K⁵, etc., ghal.

^{page 518 note 11} So D. J., D.; K⁵ -tūnēḍ; D. ins. va or ŏ.

^{page 518 note 12} So D. J., etc., -ūnḍ; D. -ūnēḍ.

^{page 518 note 13} D. looks like shnākhtŏ, but is probably as above.

^{page 518 note 14} D. divides with a stroke = ŏ, a mere dividing mark (?).

^{page 518 note 15} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 518 note 16} So D.; D. J., K⁵ jān.

^{page 518 note 17} So D.

^{page 518 note 18} So D.J.

^{page 518 note 19} D.J. ins. hōmanḍ; D. adds -ŏ or va.

^{page 518 note 20} I place the beginning of the gloss here.

^{page 518 note 21} D. marks the ‘d’ here.

^{page 518 note 22} D. om. tanŏ.

^{page 518 note 23} So D.J., D. -nŏīh and D. ins. a sign not easily explained, ‘a,’ ‘h,’ or ‘kh’(?).

^{page 518 note 24} D.J., D. om. va.

^{page 518 note 25} D. seems bisrā (?).

²⁶ D.J., D., M. aīsh I; Sp.'s K⁵ (?).

^{page 518 note 27} This citation is in Zend characters; its location will be discussed elsewhere.

^{page 518 note 28} The word ‘gayehya’ has been heretofore deciphered ‘gayehē (or e) ’; but see my solution in S.B.E., xxxi, Introd. p. xxxiv, as followed by Darmesṫeter and others.

^{page 518 note 29} D.J. ins. valman.

^{page 518 note 30} D.J. -ūnd; D gūft.

^{page 519 note 1} D. om. ī.

^{page 519 note 2} M. seems to ins. avlā, but it has the signs of cancelling over it.

^{page 519 note 3} D. adds -ash.

^{page 519 note 4} D. om. ī.

^{page 519 note 5} So D.J.; K⁵ marḍūmān.

^{page 519 note 6} D.J. ins. aē.

^{page 519 note 7} Possibly ahōshash.

^{page 519 note 8} D. seems hōmanŏ (?).

^{page 519 note 9} D.J., D. ins. ī.

^{page 519 note 10} So I restore ‘hūn’ in viewof the Zend text and of Neryōsang, also in view of the following hūn.

^{page 519 note 11} So D.; others val-; no vacant space in D.J., D., or M.

^{page 519 note 12} D., K⁵, M. (and D.J. val), D.J. ins. khūrishn (or ‘khvarishn’).

^{page 519 note 13} D. ins. liturgical item.

^{page 519 note 14} D. āyaz-.

^{page 519 note 15} D.J. ins. ī; perhaps irrational.

^{page 519 note 16} So D.J., or read with others -yend.

^{page 519 note 17} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 519 note 18} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 519 note 19} D. om. avŏ.

^{page 519 note 20} D.J., D., M. om. hōm here.

^{page 519 note 21} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 519 note 22} D.J., D. as often extra stroke.

^{page 519 note 23} D. hōmōnih.

^{page 519 note 24} D.J., D. ins. va.

^{page 519 note 25} D.J., M. irrational min (accidental omission of signs).

^{page 519 note 26} So D. clearly; others -agahīh (?), or the like.

^{page 519 note 27} So D.J. ins. aīgh.

^{page 519 note 28} Did he suppose erenāvi to be a first personal like ‘aojī’ ?

^{page 519 note 29} So K⁵; D.J. yemalelūnḍ.

^{page 519 note 30} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 519 note 31} D.J. or M. ins. ī (-ūbī).

^{page 519 note 32} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 519 note 33} D. marḍūmān.

^{page 520 note 1} All.

^{page 520 note 2} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 520 note 3} So D.; we must reproduce D.J., etc., as tarsagahīh (sic) or the like. Mf. seems to add -ash.

^{page 520 note 4} D.J. ānŏ.

^{page 520 note 5} So D.J., D. or barman; cf. ; K⁵ pūs.

^{page 520 note 6} So D.J.

^{page 520 note 7} D.J., D. ins. ī.

^{page 520 note 8} So D.J., D.; M., K⁵ zerkhūniḍak.

^{page 520 note 9} So D.J.; others om. the ‘kh’ in khūrkhshēt (or ‘khvar-’).

^{page 520 note 10} Superfluous va.

^{page 520 note 11} D.J., D. aītŏ.

^{page 520 note 12} Neryōsang has ‘asti.’

^{page 520 note 13} D.J., D. ins. va.

^{page 520 note 14} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 520 note 15} D. has ham-dāḍīstān.

^{page 520 note 16} D. hōmōnd as often.

^{page 520 note 17} D.J. om., so D.

^{page 520 note 18} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 520 note 19} D. om. ī.

^{page 520 note 20} D. hōmōnd.

^{page 520 note 21} D.J., D. ins. va, or end -ŏ.

^{page 520 note 22} Otherwise vādūnyēn.

^{page 520 note 23} D.J., D. khūḍāyyih (D.J. has ānŏ for valman); K⁵ khūdāyih (or ‘khvaḍ-’)

^{page 520 note 24} D.J. om. va.

^{page 520 note 25} So; see the Zend and the Parsi-Pers. Pahl. text.ahoshhōmōnd. That was erroneous, for it was understood as ‘deathlessness’; but it may have arisen from an ‘akhōshk-.’ D.J. seems to have anavā*zhīshnīh (or -hishn); but if so, the word is over-written. I do not think ahūŏ-zāyishnīh (so) was meant here, though the characters might correspond.

D. seems to have aōshishnŏ with vir repeated; hardly nīr-aōshishnŏ. Should it be emended to read dūr-aōshishnŏ, or dūr-khōshkishnŏ, or dūr-hoshishnŏ.no (?)?

^{page 520 note 26} D.J. om. va.

^{page 520 note 27} D.J. om. ī?

^{page 520 note 28} D. avāyaḍ diff. shape.

^{page 520 note 29} K⁵ avāyast.

^{page 520 note 30} D. (?), M. ins. lā here.

^{page 520 note 31} D. om. khōshk here.

^{page 521 note 1} So D., Mf., and Ner.'s original; others -ntānŏ; D.J. places khūrishn (khvar-) in (15); K⁵, M., -mūnḍanŏ. I can only suggest this, but M. seems anavāsihīshnŏ (sic; so D.J.).

^{page 521 note 2} So D.J.

^{page 521 note 3} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 521 note 4} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 521 note 5} D. seems -dāyīh.

^{page 521 note 6} D.J. om. yehevūnḍ.

^{page 521 note 7} D.J., D. om. va.

^{page 521 note 8} D.J. might be garmāī (?).

^{page 521 note 9} D.J. om. va.

^{page 521 note 10} D.J., D. om. ē in the word.

^{page 521 note 11} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 521 note 12} D. shēdāyyān.

^{page 521 note 13} D.J. hamāī; but possibly meant for hamāk; Ner. favours the last with sarvaṁ.

^{page 521 note 14} D. extra stroke.

^{page 521 note 15} D. hōmōnd (or hōmanenḍ); M. hōmanḍ.

^{page 521 note 16} So D.J.; K⁵ shnatak.

^{page 521 note 17} Parsi-Pers. marks the ‘hu-.’

^{page 521 note 18} So D. J.; K⁵ pūs; D.J., D. om. va, or misplaces it.

^{page 521 note 19} So the Parsi-Pers. and D., and not būrzōk (sic) or būrzŏk with K⁵ (nor-zāk).

^{page 521 note 20} So D.J., D.; others pūs.

^{page 521 note 21} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 521 note 22} D J., D. om. -ŏ from abū.

^{page 521 note 23} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 521 note 24} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 521 note 25} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 521 note 26} So D.J., D.

^{page 521 note 27} D.J., D. -tāī.

^{page 521 note 28} ī supplied when reading shalītāī.

^{page 521 note 29} D.J., D., M. ins. ī in ‘yim-ī-shēt.’

^{page 521 note 30} D. ins. ī.

^{page 521 note 31} D.J., D. om. -ŏ.

^{page 521 note 32} So D.; D.J. marḍūmān.

^{page 522 note 1} D.J., D., M. insert extra stroke; can it be hūnŏ-īd, ‘ŏ’ before the verbal termination ?

^{page 522 note 2} So D. plainly; others -agahīh (?).

^{page 522 note 3} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 522 note 4} D.J., D. om. va.

^{page 522 note 5} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 522 note 6} D., M. (notice this striking difference of M. from K⁵), D.J., K5 āvāḍīh.

^{page 522 note 7} D.J. has ānŏ and om. next two ī's.

^{page 522 note 8} Or āthvīyān (so I much prefer).

^{page 522 note 9} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 522 note 10} So D.J., D.; K⁵, etc., marḍūmān.

^{page 522 note 11} D.J. again extra stroke.

^{page 522 note 12} D.J. avō, or ānŏ.

^{page 522 note 13} So D. plainly; others agahīh (sic ?).

^{page 522 note 14} So D.J. amat; K⁵ mūn.

^{page 522 note 15} D.J., D., M. pūs; K⁵ benman.

^{page 522 note 16} D.J. om. (?).

^{page 522 note 17} D.J., Mf. -ūn.

^{page 522 note 18} Does M. mean -vīsī-ash ?

^{page 522 note 19} D. seems ānŏ.

^{page 522 note 20} So D.J., D.nearly (khānō-or khānŏ-); cf. Ner.'s veçmanī; D.J., K.⁵ khadūk.

^{page 522 note 21} So D.J.; K.⁵ and others avarmānd.

^{page 522 note 22} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 522 note 23} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 522 note 24} Or ‘stahmakash’; D. stahmbŏ (sic).

^{page 522 note 25} So D. J.; K⁵ might be khūḍāī (sic) (or ‘khvaḍ-’).

^{page 522 note 26} D. J. om. va.

^{page 522 note 27} D.J. om. aē.

^{page 522 note 28} So D.J., D.; K⁵ zaḍ.

^{page 522 note 29} So D.J., D.; K⁵; azŏk (so).

^{page 522 note 30} D. seems zīfar.

^{page 522 note 31} D.J. seems to divide differently.

^{page 522 note 32} D. om. ī.

^{page 522 note 33} D.J., Mf., and D. om. ŏ and have adāḍak; K⁵ (Sp.) has adāḍŏk.

^{page 523 note 1} D. ins. ī.

^{page 523 note 2} D J. om. ī.

^{page 523 note 3} D. J. om. the ‘li’ or ‘rt’ of K⁵ (Sp.), but seems to mean sarītarān, so D.

^{page 523 note 4} Instead of avŏ, M. seems ānŏ (frum later hand).

^{page 523 note 5} D.J. seems kīrīnīḍ (sic), but the first ‘ī’ is somewhat elevated.

^{page 523 note 6} D. has gan⋯k, om. the supposed ‘r.’

^{page 523 note 7} M., D. ins. ī.

^{page 523 note 8} D.J. ins. ī; others om.

^{page 523 note 9} So D.

^{page 523 note 10} D.J. perhaps has I.

^{page 523 note 11} Citation in Zend characters, location discussed later; the words are simple.

^{page 523 note 12} D., or M. ānŏ.

^{page 523 note 13} D.J. om. barā.

^{page 523 note 14} So according; to the signs; also ‘val denman’ would be represented by them; but Ner.'s vāñcakŏ (so reading) suggests an emendation. Var-gūman is also a possible decipherment; ‘hesitating’ (?). I am not at all confident as to ‘līūman’ as = ‘us’ or in any respect (cf. Old P.P. Gl.); perhaps ‘var-hōmand’ is to be substituted.

^{page 523 note 15} D.J. tubānŏ (sic).

^{page 523 note 16} So D.J., om. ī.

^{page 523 note 17} D.J. superfluous stroke.

^{page 523 note 18} D. hōmōnih, as often.

^{page 523 note 19} So D., but with accidental ‘-shih’ for ‘sīh’; others -gahīh (?).

^{page 523 note 20} D.J., D. om. adīnŏsh.

^{page 523 note 21} So D.J.; others gūft.

^{page 523 note 22} M. om. ī.

^{page 523 note 23} I strongly hold to this decipherment.

^{page 523 note 24} Or sāhmānŏ.

^{page 523 note 25} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 523 note 26} One of the translator's rare egregious blunders, caused doubtless by the separation of the termination ‘-ishtŏ’ from ‘sēv-’ (so) in some ancient MS. In itself, however, the rendering is rational enough; ‘sūd-’ is in so far, of course, correct. The same blunder occurs, curiously enough, at Y. 28, 5, but the term of sevištō (or ‘sēv-’) at Y. 33, 11, is not mistaken, nor is the supl. -isht- again mistaken anywhere else in the Gāthas, though it is left unrendered sometimes.

^{page 524 note 1} I strongly hold to this decipherment.

^{page 524 note 2} Is it ‘barman’ ? See above.

^{page 524 note 3} D. has sūḍīhash and khvāstārīh.

^{page 524 note 4} D. om. hanā.

^{page 524 note 5} D.J. om. yehevūnḍ.

^{page 524 note 6} D.J. om. ash.

^{page 524 note 7} D. om. ī.

^{page 524 note 8} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 524 note 9} So D.J., D. (?), M. -stŏ; K⁵ -tanŏ.

^{page 524 note 10} D.J. has extra stroke, or (?) -nŏ-astŏ (sic).

^{page 524 note 11} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 524 note 12} D.J. again with the extra stroke. Ner. ‘viveda,’ reading khavītūnḍŏ am.’

^{page 524 note 13} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 524 note 14} So D.

^{page 524 note 15} So D.J. and M. ins.

^{page 524 note 16} So D.J.

^{page 524 note 17} D.J. om. zak.

^{page 524 note 18} D.J., D. om. min.

^{page 524 note 19} D.J. ānŏ.

^{page 524 note 20} D. has generally hōmōnd.

^{page 524 note 21} D.J., D., M. om. ī.

^{page 524 note 22} D. has hanā for I.

^{page 524 note 23} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 524 note 24} D.J. om. va.

^{page 524 note 25} D.J., M. seem dāḍŏ ī; D. has dāḍ, but ‘āī’ (sic) for ‘ā’ in ārāstār.

^{page 524 note 26} D.J., D. ins. ash; D. om. ī after dāḍ.

^{page 524 note 27} So D. J., D.; Sp. -nāḍ; D.J., D. om. fol. va.

^{page 524 note 28} So D. J., and om. ī.

^{page 524 note 29} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 524 note 30} D.J. om. va.

^{page 524 note 31} Some prefer to transcribe gōshanŏ (rather applied to animals); D.J. ins. va.

^{page 524 note 32} M. has the signs for ‘g.’

^{page 525 note 1} So K⁵, M.; D.J., D. have māhvindāḍ.

^{page 525 note 2} So D.J., D. aīgh.

^{page 525 note 3} D. om. hōmanḍ.

^{page 525 note 4} D. dāḍīh or dāḍash.

^{page 525 note 5} So K⁵ D.; D.J. om.

^{page 525 note 6} D.J. om.; D. gūft; K⁵, M. yemallelūnḍ; D.J. om.

^{page 525 note 7} D. shikuftīh.

^{page 525 note 8} M. om.

^{page 525 note 9} So D. pl. (tūrkŏānich, N.B.); others tūrkŏ-ch.

^{page 525 note 10} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 525 note 11} So D.J., D.; others zaḍ.

^{page 525 note 12} D.J. curiously om. azŏ ī here, but may have mūnash azŏ before makhītūnd.

^{page 525 note 13} M. seems va ī.

^{page 525 note 14} D. om. ī.

^{page 525 note 15} D. om. vish (curiously); has madam (avŏ or ānŏ).

^{page 525 note 16} D.J., D. -nāḍ.

^{page 525 note 17} So D.J., D.; K⁵ asp.

^{page 525 note 18} So D.J., D.; K⁵ zak ash.

^{page 525 note 19} D.J., M., D. khsh, etc. (in Zend characters).

^{page 525 note 20} So K⁵, M. (?); D.J. vainaya; D. vanayata.

^{page 525 note 21} So K⁵ barešna; D. J. barešna; D.J. barenuš; cf. y t. 19, 40.

^{page 525 note 20–21} All in Zend characters.

^{page 525 note 22} D. J. begins a new section here. D.J. om. second zak ī; D. om. ī.

^{page 525 note 23} So D. J., D.; K⁵ (Sp.) zak ash.

^{page 525 note 24} M. om. Sp.'s final - ŏ; D. ins. ī.

^{page 525 note 25} So D. J., M.

^{page 525 note 26} So D.J. ins. am; cf. mān, or amānŏ in 43.

^{page 525 note 27} D.J., D. om. final -ŏ; and D. ins. va.

^{page 525 note 28} D.J., D., M. mark ‘d.’

^{page 525 note 29} Mf. bālā.

^{page 525 note 30} So D. J.

^{page 525 note 31} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 525 note 32} So D. J., M.; K⁵ looks as if it meant ‘chand’ (the ‘ch’ Zend).

^{page 525 note 33} So most rationally. The Parsi-Pers. MS. has the traditional d-r-ān-ā; D. separates the final sign which I decipher ae ‘-gih’ here; cf. Old Pers. drāngā.

^{page 525 note 34} D. ins. ī.

^{page 526 note 1} Kafārīh ? or kafārash, if correct, would mean kaf = ‘froth’ + - ? The Parsi-Pers. indicates kafrī; so, not acceding to ‘ash.’

^{page 526 note 2} We are greatly indebted to D. here for giving us the intelligible pōshtŏ, or pōsht va.

^{page 526 note 3} So D.J., etc.; D. -nēd.

^{page 526 note 4} D. has extra stroke as below.

^{page 526 note 5} So D.J., M.; K⁵ -ŏ.

^{page 526 note 6} M. om. pīt (curiously): D.J. pītŏ.

^{page 526 note 7} So D. J. M.

^{page 526 note 8} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 526 note 9} So K⁵ may be deciphered; but D.J. has valman.

^{page 526 note 10} So. D.J.

^{page 526 note 11} So; D. khvāst; see Old Pahl. Pāzand gl. khāst; D.J. khvīsaḍ or khvīst (?).

^{page 526 note 12} D.J. ins. va, or has -manŏ.

^{page 526 note 13} So D.J.

^{page 526 note 14} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 526 note 15} D. has extra stroke (?).

^{page 526 note 16} So M.; D.J., D. dīgŏ or -va; D.J., D. om. ī; K⁵ has -va, or -ŏ.

^{page 526 note 17} D.J., D. have spūrd; K⁵, M. have extra irrational stroke *spūrānanaḍ* (?), or was it meant for a causative spūrān-; cf. pers. causat. -ān-.

^{page 526 note 18} D. ins. ī.

^{page 526 note 19} Cf. Pers. ashardan = ‘to bake.’

^{page 526 note 20} So D.J.

^{page 526 note 21} So D.J., D.; K⁵ curiously om. tajīdō, which might also be reproduced as tachīdŏ, or indeed tazīdŏ (?).

^{page 526 note 22} So D. J.; K⁵, M. mardum-mm-**.

^{page 526 note 23} D. om. ash.

^{page 526 note 24} D. hōmanḍ (?).

^{page 526 note 25} So D. J.; others have a superfluous ī.

^{page 526 note 26} D. J., D. continually show an extra stroke; can it be an inserted ‘ŏ’ between hūn and īḍ, hūnŏ-īḍ (?), as sometimes at the term. of a noun before a final suffix; possibly it may be hūninīḍ for hūnīnīḍ (causative); but I make the suggestion that the somewhat mysterious sign hitherto rendered as ‘ŏ’ may be after all a mere sign of division after, or between, consonants, but irregularly applied; cf. ved. .

^{page 526 note 27} D. ins. va.

^{page 526 note 28} D.J. ins. ī.

^{page 526 note 29} So D., fully and clearly as always; others must be rendered *tarsagahīh, or something like it.

^{page 526 note 30} D. J.; K⁵ va maman; D. may be va zak (?).

^{page 526 note 31} D. zak ?

^{page 527 note 1} D.J., D. om.

^{page 527 note 2} D.J. curiously om. aharūbŏ; I supply ī.

^{page 527 note 3} D. has ū in Pūrū-; others Purū-; D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 527 note 4} So D.; and D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 527 note 5} D.J., D. as usual extra stroke (for n, ū, or ŏ (?)).

^{page 527 note 6} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 527 note 7} So D. as always.

^{page 527 note 8} D. hōmōnih.

^{page 527 note 9} Or avēzak.

^{page 527 note 10} D.J. ins. i.

^{page 527 note 11} D. mihān.

^{page 527 note 12} D.J., D. have pūrū-; ins. ī.

^{page 527 note 13} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 527 note 14} So D.J.; D. shēdā.

^{page 527 note 15} D. ins. ī.

^{page 527 note 16} D. -dāḍistān.

^{page 527 note 17} D.J., D., M. om. ash.

^{page 527 note 18} So D. seems aē mānŏ for the amānŏ of the others; the Parsi-Pers. has the same; as to amānŏ, cf. the ‘am’ in 35. I have among other suggestions thought of a possible lakhvar-hōmand = ‘a repeated’ javīḍ-s-; and ‘lakhvarham- ānŏ’ (again the same, that (?)).

^{page 527 note 19} So D.

^{page 527 note 20} D.J., D. om. shapīr ī; D. has vēh.

^{page 527 note 21} So D. -īk; D.J. dāītihŏ (?), but perhaps meaning dāītīk; K⁵ -tīh (or-āih(?)).

^{page 527 note 22} D.J., D. om. ī.

^{page 527 note 23} D.J. om. va.

^{page 527 note 24} So D., also so marked in M. ‘y.’

^{page 527 note 25} Or for ‘bāj’; so D., solving, perhaps, our difficulty. Otherwise it would be a remnant of a shattered ahunaver, i.e. ‘-naver’ (so); the Parsi-Pers. has nāver (so). Ner. hasunfortunately no gloss here.

^{page 527 note 26} So D.J. Ner. has unfortunately no gloss here.

^{page 527 note 27} D. marks ‘ded-.’

^{page 527 note 28} D.J., D. om. the extra stroke.

^{page 527 note 29} D.J. om. ī.

^{page 527 note 30} D. marks ‘y’under; forms of the letters are varied in the MSS.; see Zend text. Khraozhdyehya; the Pahl. word here imitates the Zend closely. ’k’ is a common ending; see even vohūk.

^{page 527 note 31} M. might be vaj (?), om. ‘fr.’

^{page 527 note 32} D.J. curiously om. ‘k.’ I prefer tvakhsh- to tūkhsh- everywhere, but the trouble to arrange a thoroughly critical edition is so great that I postpone such matters.

^{page 528 note 1} D. nikān.

^{page 528 note 2} So D.

^{page 528 note 3} So D.

^{page 528 note 4} So D.; others levīnŏ.

^{page 528 note 5} D. as always (?), hōmōnd.

^{page 528 note 6} D. shēdā.

^{page 528 note 7} D.J.; K⁵ M. kālbut.

^{page 528 note 8} So D.J., D.; others tebrūnast.

^{page 528 note 9} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 528 note 10} Om. -ŏ.

^{page 528 note 11} So D.; D.J., etc., khōd.

^{page 528 note 12} D. skikast.

^{page 528 note 13} D. om.

^{page 528 note 14} D. shikast.

^{page 528 note 15} So D.J.; D.J., D. om. maman; and D. om. hanā.

^{page 528 note 16} D. shēdā.

^{page 528 note 17} M. tūbān.

^{page 528 note 18} So D.

^{page 528 note 19} D.J. short vowel.

^{page 528 note 20} D.J. kevanich ī.

^{page 528 note 21} D. ghal.

^{page 528 note 22} So D.J.; others vabdūnañd (so?).

^{page 528 note 23} D. -mōnd.

^{page 528 note 24} D. -mōnih.

^{page 528 note 25} D.J. ins. va.

^{page 528 note 26} D. hōmōnih. I prefer tvakhsh-, but have avoided quibbling departures from usage throughout.

^{page 528 note 27} D. hōmōnih; D.J. ins. mūn.

^{page 528 note 28} D.J. ins. mūn.

^{page 528 note 29} D.J., D. ins. mūn.

^{page 528 note 30} So D.J., D.; K⁵ dāḍo.

^{page 528 note 31} So D.J., D.; K⁵ dāmāno.

^{page 528 note 32} D.J., D. have this avŏ.