Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:20:39.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial and Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Labor Force Participation Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Roger Beck  and
J. Dean Jansma
Roger Beck
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Rutgers University
J. Dean Jansma
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Abstract

An economically viable rural American is generally accepted as a desirable national goal, but few policy guidelines or comprehensive programs1 for attaining this goal have been developed. One reason for the current “piece-meal” approach in pursuing rural development goals is the lack of knowledge about basic economic interactions between the factors influencing the level and distribution of economic activities in rural areas. A second reason is the tendency to design rural development research and extension programs to attain quick payoffs which results in descriptive studies which emphasize what rather than why certain events are occurring in rural areas.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Fall 1982 , pp. 61 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to express their appreciation to Frank Goode and other unnamed colleagues for suggestions, comments and assistance in this research endeavor. Authorized for publication as paper number 6033 in journal series of The Pennsylvania State University. Support from the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station is also acknowledged.

References

Beck, Roger and Goode, Frank M., “The Availability of Labor in Rural Communities,” in New Approaches to Economic Development Research in Rural Areas, Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, Publication 30, July, 1981.Google Scholar
Beck, Roger J., “Measurements of Spatially Available Labor for a Rural Area of Pennsylvania,” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, The Penn. State University, 1977.Google Scholar
Committee on Government Operation, United States Senate, The Economic and Social Condition of Rural American in the 1970's: Part 3. Committee Print, 92nd Congress, 1st Session (Prepared by EDD, ERS, USDA), December, 1971.Google Scholar
Daft, Lynn M., “Public Policies for Rural America: Legacies or Leading Edges?” America Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 53, No. 2, May 1971, pp. 250–256.Google Scholar
Edwards, Clark and Depass, Rudolph, Alternative Futures for Nonmetropolitan Population, Income, Employment, and Capital, Agricultural Economic Report Number 311, Washington: Economic Research Services, U.S. Depatment of Agriculture, November, 1975.Google Scholar
Fink, James C. Jr., “An Economic Model for Estimating Work Trip Distributions Between Minor Civil Divisions in Rural Areas.” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State Unversity, 1976.Google Scholar
Hines, Fres K., et al., “Social and Economic Characteristics of the Population in Metro and Nonmetro Counties, 1970,” Agricultural Economic Report Number 272, Washington: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, March, 1975.Google Scholar
Jansma, J. Dean and Goode, Frank M., “Rural Development Research: Conceptualization and Measuring Key Concepts,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, Number 5, December 1976, pp. 922–927.Google Scholar
Martin, A. Wade, “Problems and Advantages of Rural Labor for Industrial Operations,” Rural Development: Problems and Advantages of Rural Locations for Industrial Plants. Agricultural Policy Institute, Raleigh, N. C., North Carolina State University, 1970.Google Scholar
Mueller, Eva, Wilken, Arnold, and Wood, Margaret, Location Decisions and Industrial Mobility in Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, The University of Michigan, 1961.Google Scholar
Office of the Secretary, Rural Development Goals, Second Annual Report of the Secretary of Agriculture to the Congress, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.Google Scholar
Weaver, Rob and McMillan, Melville, “Factors Influencing Manufacturing Employment Change in Small Wisconsin Cities: 1960–70,” R2776 Research Bulletin, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 1976.Google Scholar