Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:53:48.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The temporary adhesion of barnacle cyprids: effects of some differing surface characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. B. Yule
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Unit of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL EH
G. Walker
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Unit of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL EH

Extract

The tenacity of the barnacle cyprids of Balanus balanoides (L.) during temporary adhesion to a variety of modified Perspex surfaces was tested using a sensitive microbalance. The Perspex panels were painted on the undersides with five colours of cellulose paint. Control measurements of the magnitude of temporary adhesion to clean slate panels were of the order of 2 × 10 N m. Untreated smooth Perspex panels and panels coated with an adsorbed layer of bovine serum albumen gave low figures of tenacity of the order of 0·8 × 10 N m. Roughening the panels with carborundum or treating with an adsorbed layer of barnacle extract protein resulted in higher tenacity measurements (1·0–1·8 × 10 N M), whereas the highest measurements were obtained when roughened Perspex panels were coated by an adsorbed layer of barnacle extract protein (1·6–2·2 × 10 N M). When the surfaces were made more attractive to barnacle cyprids by roughening or coating in barnacle protein the forces measured on dark coloured panels were higher than on lighter coloured panels. The results of the temporary adhesion measurements were closely paralleled by the numbers of cyprids found exploring the various surfaces during preference settlement experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crisp, D. J. & Barnes, H. 1954. The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. Journal of Animal Ecology, 23, 142162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S. 1962. The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedes. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 156, 500520.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S. 1963. Adsorbed layers: the stimulus to settlement in barnacles. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 158, 364387.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Ritz, D. A. 1973. The responses of cirripede larvae to light. Marine Biology, 23, 227235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, C. H. & Ingram, W. M. 1939. Fouling organisms in Hawaii. Occasional Papers of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 14, 251300.Google Scholar
Gabbott, P. A. & Larman, V. N. 1971. Electrophoretic examination of partially purified extracts of Balanus balanoides containing a settlement inducing factor. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium, Bangor, 1969 (ed. Crisp, D. J.), pp. 143153. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. 1953. Laboratory experiments on gregarious settling in Balanus balanoides and other barnacles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 30, 584598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larman, V. R. & Gabbott, P. A. 1975. Settlement of cyprid larvae of Balanus balanoides and Elminius modestus induced by extracts of adult barnacles and other marine animals. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdougall, K. D. 1943. Sessile marine invertebrates at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecological Monographs, 13, 321374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nott, J. A. 1969. Settlement of barnacle larvae: surface structure of the antennular disc by scanning electron microscopy. Marine Biology, 2, 248251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nott, J. A. & Foster, B. A. 1969. On the structure of the antennular attachment organ of the cypris larvae of Balanus balanoides (L.). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B), 256, 115134.Google Scholar
Visscher, J. P. 1928a. The nature and extent of the fouling of ships’ bottoms. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, Washington, 43, 193252.Google Scholar
Visscher, J. P. 1928b. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles at the time of attachment. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 54, 327335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, J. P. & Luce, R. M. 1928. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles to light with special reference to spectral colours. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 54, 336350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G. 1981. The adhesion of barnacles. Journal of Adhesion, 12, 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, A. B. & Crisp, D. J. 1983. Adhesion of cypris larvae of the barnacle, Balanus balanoides, to clean and arthropodin treated surfaces. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar