Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:52:46.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Summer vertical distribution of appendicularians in the central Cantabrian Sea (Bay of Biscay)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

José Luis Acuña
José Luis Acuña
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Facultad de Biologia, C/Jesús Arias de Velasco (s/n), Oviedo 33005, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The summer vertical distribution of appendicularian species was analysed at 22 stations in the central Cantabrian Sea by means of vertical tows covering the surface, thermocline and deep layers. According to their preference for shallower waters, the appendicularian species could be arranged on the series Oikopleura longicauda (Vogt), Oikopleura fusiformis (Fol), Fritillaria pellucida (Quoy & Gaimard) and Oikopleura rufescens (Fol), with Oikopleura dioica (Miiller) in an uncertain position, probably closer to the end of this series. Principal components and correlation analyses suggest that a temperature gradient causes this pattern, which agrees with previous findings made at very different temporal and spatial scales. By means of particle-size spectra, it is shown that those oikopleurids that prefer cold, deep waters, O. fusiformis and O. rufescens, co-vary with a coefficient of particle-size quality. The lower the temperature, the lower the proportion of small, ingestible particles to large inlet-filter-clogging particles. This is proposed as an important reason for the presence of inlet filters in oikopleurids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , August 1994 , pp. 585 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, J.L., 1992. Comunidades de apendicularias y su relacion con el ambiente. PhD thesis, University of Oviedo.Google Scholar
Acuña, J.L. & Anadón, R., 1992. Appendicularian assemblages in a shelf area and their relationship with temperature. Journal of Plankton Research, 14, 1233–1250.Google Scholar
Alldredge, A.L., 1977. House morphology and mechanisms of feeding in the Oikopleuridae (Tunicata, Appendicularia). Journal of Zoology, 181, 175–188.Google Scholar
Azam, R., Fenchel, T., Field, J.G., Gray, J.S., Meyer-Reil, L.A. & Thingstad, R., 1983. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedo, A.W., Acuña, J.L., Robins, D. & Harris, R., 1993. Grazing in the micron and submicron particle size range: the case of Oikopleura dioica (Appendicularia). Bulletin of Marine Science, 53, 2–14.Google Scholar
Bode, A., 1990. Distributión y dinámica de la materia particulada en suspensión en las aguas sobre la plataforma continental en la costa central asturiana. PhD thesis, University of Oviedo.Google Scholar
Botas, J.A., Fernández, E., Bode, A., Anadón, R. & Anadón, E., 1989. Biodatos básicos. Vol. I. Hidrografía, nutrientes, fitoplancton y seston en el Cantábrico central. In Suplemento revista biología de la Universidad de Oviedo, pp. 1–80. Oviedo, Spain: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Botas, J.A., Fernández, E., Bode, A. & Anadón, R., 1990. A persistent upwelling off the central Cantabrian coast (Bay of Biscay). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 30, 185–199.Google Scholar
Cabal, J., Acuña, J.L., Menéndez, P., Pérez, C., Villegas, M.L., Alvarez-Marques, F. & Anadón, E., 1990. Biodatos básicos. Vol. II. Zooplancton de la costa central del Cantábrico. In Suplemento revista de biología de la Universidad de Oviedo, pp. 1–62. Oviedo, Spain: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Cushing, D.H., 1989. A difference in structure between ecosystems in strongly stratified waters and in those that are only weakly stratified. Journal of Plankton Research, 11, 1–13.Google Scholar
Deibel, D., 1986. Feeding mechanism and house of the appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni. Marine Biology, 93, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibel, D. & Lee, S.H., 1992. Retention efficiency of sub-micrometer particles by the pharyngeal filter of the pelagic tunicate Oikopleura vanhoeffeni. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 81, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibel, D. & Powell, C.V.L., 1987. Ultrastructure of the pharyngeal filter of the appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni: implications for particle size selection and fluid mechanics. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 35, 243–250.Google Scholar
Esnal, G.B. & Castro, R.J., 1977. Distributional and biometrical study of appendicularians from the west South Atlantic Ocean. Hydrobiologia, 56, 241–246.Google Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1967. Les appendiculaires des mers d'Europe et du bassin Méditerranée. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1968a. Distribution verticale de la fréquence chez quelques appendiculaires. Rapports et Procés-verbaux des Réunions. Conseil Permanent Internationale pour l'Exploration de la Mer Méditerranée, 19, 513–515.Google Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1968b. Quelques aspects de la distribution verticale chez les appendiculaires en Méditerranée. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 9, 23–29.Google Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1972. Variations saisonnières des appendiculaires de la région nord Adriatique. Marine Biology, 16, 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1986. The house of Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Appendicularia): structure and functions. Zoomorphology, 106, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenaux, R. & Dallot, S., 1980. Répartition des appendiculaires au large des côtes de Californie. Journal of Plankton Research, 2, 145–167.Google Scholar
Fernández, E. & Bode, A., 1991. Seasonal patterns of primary production in the central Cantabrian Sea (Bay of Biscay). Scientia Marina, 55, 629–636.Google Scholar
Fernández, E.M., 1990. Composición, distribución y producción del fitoplancton en el Cantábrico central. PhD thesis, University of Oviedo.Google Scholar
Flood, P.R., Deibel, D. & Morris, C.C., 1992. Filtration of colloidal melanin from sea water by planktonic tunicates. Nature, London, 355, 630–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gait, C.P., 1972. Development of Oikopleura dioica (Urochordata: Larvacea). PhD thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Hickel, W., 1984. Seston retention by Whatman GF/C glass-fibre filters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 16, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, L. & Legendre, P., 1984a. Ecologie numérique. 1. Le traitement des données écologiques. Quebec: Masson.Google Scholar
Legendre, L. & Legendre, P., 1984b. Ecologie numérique. 2. La structure des données écologiques. Quebec: Masson.Google Scholar
Longhurst, A.R. & Harrison, W.G., 1989. The biological pump: profiles of plankton production and consumption in the upper ocean. Progress in Oceanography, 22, 47–123.Google Scholar
Shiga, N., 1985. Seasonal and vertical distributions of Appendicularia in Volcano Bay, Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of Marine Science, 37, 425–439.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., 1959. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.S., 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Taggart, C.T. & Frank, K.T., 1987. Coastal upwelling and Oikopleura occurrence (‘slub’): a model and potential application to inshore fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44, 1729–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J.T. & Dagg, M.J., 1983. Vertical distributions of continental shelf zooplankton in stratified and isothermal waters. Biological Oceanography, 3, 1–40.Google Scholar
Williams, R., 1985. Vertical distribution of Calanus finmarchicus and C. helgolandicus in relation to the development of the seasonal thermocline in the Celtic Sea. Marine Biology, 86, 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar