Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:34:22.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sublittoral fauna of two sandy bays on the Isle of Cumbrae, Firth of Clyde

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. B. Clark  and
A. Milne
R. B. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Glasgow University
A. Milne
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, King's College, Newcastle on Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a considerable literature on the ecology of intertidal animals and a growing one on the sublittoral fauna. Largely because of the difficulty of taking samples in very shallow water, little attention has been paid to the continuation of the intertidal zonation below the low-water mark. Although incomplete in some respects, the results of the present survey are published, partly to help bridge the gap between studies of sublittoral and intertidal faunas, partly because it is unlikely that this survey will ever be completed and partly because the intertidal fauna of one of the bays is particularly well known. The work was begun in 1938 by one of the authors (A.M.) but was discontinued at the outbreak of the late war. Since 1949 further collections have been made and the identity of most of the species taken in the earlier sampling has been checked. The collections of animals and a full account of the results have been deposited in the Marine Laboratory at Millport.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1955 , pp. 161 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allee, W. C., 1927. Studies in animal aggregations: some physiological effects of aggregations in the brittle starfish Ophioderma brevispina. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 48, pp. 475–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Marshall, S. M., 1951. On the variability of replicate plankton samples and some applications of ‘contagious’ series to the statistical distribution of catches over restricted periods. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 233–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, G. I., 1950. The power of the x2 index of dispersion test when Neyman's contagious distribution is the alternate hypothesis. Biometrika, Vol. 37, pp. 59–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Blackman, G. E., 1942. Statistical and ecological studies in the distribution of species in plant communities. I. Dispersion as a factor in the study of changes in plant populations. Ann. Bot., Lond., N.S., Vol. 6, pp. 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, A. R., 1936. Over-dispersion in grassland communities and the use of statistical methods in plant ecology. J. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 232–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. B., 1952. Speciation of polychaetes in the Clyde Sea Area. Nature, Lond., Vol. 169, p. 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1931. Studies in the Scottish marine fauna. The Crustacea of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 51, pp. 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, F. C., 1952. The influence of size of quadrat on the distributional patterns of plant populations. Contr. Lab. Vertebr. Biol. Univ. Mich., No. 54, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1950. Population-dispersion in Tellina tenuis da Costa. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. & Hollick, F. S. J., 1946. Studies in wireworm populations. II. Spatial distribution. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 23, pp. 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1928. Notes on the quantitative distribution of molluscs and polychaetes in certain intertidal areas on the Scottish coast. Proc. R. phys. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 21, pp. 205–16.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C. 1929. Studies in the Scottish marine fauna: the fauna of sandy and muddy areas in the tidal zone. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 56, pp. 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C. 1930. Studies in the Scottish marine fauna: additional observations on the fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 56, pp. 521–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. W., 1952. Measures of plant aggregation based on contagious distribution. Contr. Lab. Vertebr. Biol., Univ. Mich., No. 53, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Vevers, H. G., 1951. Photography of the sea floor. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vevers, H. G., 1952. A photographic survey of certain areas of sea floor near Plymouth. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 31, pp. 215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1941. Observations on the night tidal migrant Crustacea of Kames Bay. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 25, pp. 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1942. The macrofauna of the intertidal sand of Kames Bay, Millport, Buteshire. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 60, pp. 543–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar