Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:27:12.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study in populations of Pylaiella littoralis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. Russell
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, Isle of Man

Extract

On British shores Pylaiella littoralis occurs in a large number of local populations which usually fall into one or other of four population groups. These populations often differ in habit, form, seasonal distribution, etc.

Two populations of P. littoralis from different environments have been studied experimentally and it seems from this that the morphological differences between the plants from the two populations are accompanied by physiological and genetical differences. Similar results have been obtained from experiments on other populations.

It is suggested that the numerous populations arise through the selective effect of all the prevailing environmental factors and are adapted to them.

The potentially large number of plant forms resulting from this process should not be described in terms of ‘orthodox’ taxonomy though they may possibly merit definition in terms of ‘experimental’ taxonomy in so far as some of the populations may constitute ecotypes as recognized in higher plants. Because it is possible for a single ecotype to be represented by more than one morphological type, however, the value of the ‘experimental’ system is regarded as doubtful.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Damman, H., 1930. Entwicklungsgeschichte und zytologische Untersuchungen an Helgolander Meeresalgen. Wiss. Meeresunters., N.F. Abt. Helgoland Bd. 18, No. 4, pp. 710.Google Scholar
Holmes, E. M., 1893. The occurence of Pylaiella varia Kjellman, in Scotland Ann. Scot. Nat. Hist., pp. 101105.Google Scholar
Kjellman, F. R., 1890. Handbok i Skandinaviens Hafsalgflora. 1. Fucoideae. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Knight, M., 1923. Studies in the Ectocarpaceae. 1. The life history and cytology of Pylaiella littoralis Kjellm. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. Vol. 53, part 2, pp. 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, M. & Parke, M. W., 1931. Manx Algae. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, No. 30. Liverpool, The University Press.Google Scholar
Kuckuck, P., 1891. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ectocarpus Arten der Kieler Fohrde. Bot. Centralbl., Bd. 48.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1933. Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Phaeophyceen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr., N.F. 2, Bd. 29, No. 7.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1937. Bemerkungen über die Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger Phaeophyceen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr., N.F. 2, Bd. 33, No. 1.Google Scholar
Levring, T., 1937. Zur Kenntnis der Algenfiora der norwegischen Westküste. Lunds Univ. Arsskr., N.F. 2, Bd. 33, No. 8.Google Scholar
Levring, T., 1940. Studien über die Algenvegetationen von Blekinge, Sudschweden. Lund: Akad. Abhandl.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1959. The marine algae of east Greenland. 1. Taxonomical Part. Medd. Granland, Bd. 156, No. 1. 247 pp.Google Scholar
Du Rietz, G. E., 1941. Scytosiphon lotnentaria vid on Jungfrau (Kalmarsand). Bot. notiser., Lund., pp. 111.Google Scholar
Rosenvinge, L. K. & Lund, S., 1941. The marine algae of Denmark. Vol. 2, Phaeophyceae. D. Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selskab, Biol. Skr., Bd. 1, No. 4. 79 pp.Google Scholar
Russell, G., 1961 a. The autecology and life-history of Pylaiella littoralis (L.) Kjellm. Rep. Challenger Soc, Vol. 3, No. 13, pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
Russell, G., 1961 b. The taxonomic status of Pylaiella rupincola. Brit. phyc. Bull., Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 101.Google Scholar
Sundene, O., 1953. The algal vegetation of Oslofjord. Norske Vidensk.-Akad. vhandl. No. 2, 244 pp.Google Scholar
Waern, M., 1952. Rocky-shore algae in the Öregrund archipelago. Ada phytogeogr. Suecica, No. 30.Google Scholar