Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:27:50.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and function of the fifth pair of pleopods of male Euchaeta norvegica (Copepoda: Calanoida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. C. E. Hopkins ,
J. Mauchline  and
D. S. Mclusky
C. C. E. Hopkins
Affiliation:
†Department of Biology, Universityof Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
J. Mauchline
Affiliation:
†Department of Biology, Universityof Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
D. S. Mclusky
Affiliation:
†Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The structure of the fifth pair of pleopods, modified as secondary sexual characters, in male Euchaeta norvegica is described in detail. The pleopods are biramous. The right pleopod, of relatively simple structure, is used solely to grasp the urosome of the female during transfer and placement of the spermatophore. The left pleopod is complex in form and is used to grasp the spermatophore as it is extruded from the ductus ejaculatorius. The method of grasping the spermatophore is described. The optimal mating position is deduced from the structure and functioning of the pleopods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 1978 , pp. 631 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BÀmstedt, U. & Matthews, J. B. L. 1975. Studies of the deepwater pelagic community of Korsf jorden, western Norway. The weight and biochemical composition of Euchaeta norvegica Boeck in relation to its life cycle. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, 1974 (ed. H. Barnes), pp. 311–327.Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Fahrenbach, W. H. 1962. The biology of a harpacticoid copepod. Cellule, 62, 302–376.Google Scholar
Fleminger, A. 1967. Taxonomy, distribution and polymorphism in the Labidocera jollae group, with remarks on evolution within the group (Copepoda: Calanoida). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 120 (3567), 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M. 1967. Two new species of Euchaeta (Copepoda, Calanoida). Crustaceana, 12, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauld, D. T. 1957. Copulation in calanoid copepods. Nature, London, 180, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A. M. & Frost, B. W. 1976. Chemical communication in the marine planktonic copepods Calanus pacificus and Pseudocalanus. Crustaceana, 30, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hill, L. L. & Coker, R. E. 1930. Observations on mating habits of Cyclops. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, 45, 206–220.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. C. E. 1976. The Breeding Biology of Euchaeta norvegica (Copepoda: Calanoida). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, Scotland.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. C. E. 1978. The male genital system, and spermatophore production and function, in Euchaeta norvegica (Copepoda: Calanoida). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, C. C. E. & Machin, C. 1977. Patterns of spermatophore distribution and placement in Euchaeta norvegica (Copepoda: Calanoida). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J. 1961. Laboratory cultivation of the marine copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus Williams. Limnology and Oceanography, 6, 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. W. 1948. The post-embryonic development of the copepod Pseudodiaptomus euryhalinus Johnson and its phylogenetic significance. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 67, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katona, S. K. 1973. Evidence for sex pheromones in planktonic copepods. Limnology and Oceanography, 18, 574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. 1972. Structure and function of the spermatophore and its coupling device in the Centropagidae (Copepoda: Calanoida). Bulletin of Marine Ecology, 8, 1–20.Google Scholar
Lochead, J. H. 1961. Locomotion. In The Physiology of Crustacea, vol. 2. (ed. T. H. Waterman), pp. 313–364. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mauchline, J. Aizawa, Y. Ishimaru, T. Nishida, S. Marumo, R. 1977. Integumental sensilla of pelagic decapod crustaceans. Marine Biology, 43, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemoto, T. Mauchline, J. & Kamada, K. 1976. Brood size and chemical composition of Pareuchaeta norvegica (Crustacea: Copepoda) in Loch Etive, Scotland. Marine Biology, 36, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. H. 1902. The reactions of copepods to various stimuli and the bearing of this on daily depth-migrations. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission, 21, 103–123.Google Scholar
Tanaka, O. 1958. The pelagic copepods of the Izu region, Middle Japan. Systematic account. V. Family Euchaetidae. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 6, 327–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vervoort, W. 1957. Copepods from Antarctic and sub-Antarctic plankton samples. B.A.N.Z. Antarctic Research Expedition (B), 3, 1–160.Google Scholar
Vervoort, W. 1963. Pelagic Copepoda. Part I. Copepoda Calanoida of the families Calanidae up to and including Euchaetidae. Atlantide Report, 7, 77–197.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. 1905. Die fortzpflanzungsverhaltnisse unserer einheimishen copepoden. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Abteilung Systematik), 22, 101–280.Google Scholar