Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-t6jsk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:34:00.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Settlement of the Larvae of Spirorbis Spirorbis L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. A. Nott
J. A. Nott
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Unit of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, North Wales, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the marine invertebrates whose settlement behaviour is well studied, the polychaete tubeworm, Spirorbis spirorbis L. ( = borealis Daudin), the barnacle, Balanus balanoides, and the oyster, Ostrea edulis, are different in form whether in the free-swimming or adult stage, yet the settlement behaviour patterns are basically similar (Crisp, 1973). The larvae have a sequence of movements during exploration of the substratum, with each activity initiated by a hierarchy of stimuli. Given a positive set of responses to a suitable habitat, the distances moved on the substratum are limited progressively so that finally the larva investigates a very restrictred area. When the exact site for settlement is determined the larva ceases to move, attaches permanently and immediately commences metamorphosis into the adult form. However, if certain stimuli are lacking or obnoxious to the searching larva, it recommences the initial free-swimming activity, in order to reach alternative substrata.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , May 1973 , pp. 437 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarj, A. W., 1972. Nomenclature of scanning electron microscopes. Proceedings of the RoyalMicroscopical Society, 7, 287–9.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1969. The gregarious behaviour of the larvae of Ostrea edulis L. at settlement. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1949. The setting behaviour of larvae of the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis L., and its influence on methods of cultivation and spat collection. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Ser. 2, 17, No. 3, 1–39.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1955. The behaviour of barnacle cyprids in relation to water movements over a surface. Journal of Experimental Biology, 32, 568–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1961. Territorial behaviour in barnacle settlement. Journal of Experimental Biology, 38, 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1967. Chemical factors inducing settlement in Crassostrea virginica(Gmelin). Journal of Animal Ecology, 36, 329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1973. Factors influencing the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. InPerspectives in Chemoreception by Marine Organisms (ed. Grant, P. T). London: Academic Press.(In preparation.)Google Scholar
Crisp, D J. & Barnes, H., 1954. The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. Journal of Animal Ecology, 23, 142–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S., 1962. The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 156, 500–20.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J.. & Meadows, P. S., 1963. Adsorbed layers: the stimulus to settlement in barnacles. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 158, 364–87.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Williams, G. B., 1960. Effects of extracts of fucoids in promoting settlement of epiphytic polyzoa. Nature, London, 188, 1206–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Silva, P.H.D.H. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1962.Spirorbis corallinae n.sp. and some other Spirorbinae common on British shores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42, 601–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. M., 1965. Chemical stimulation of settlement in larvae of Spirorbis rupestris. Animal Behaviour, 13, 181–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. M. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1962. The morphology and larval behaviour of a new species of Spirorbis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42, 641–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, P. H. & Nott, J. A., 1971. Concerning the fourth antennular segment of the cypris larva of Balanus balanoides. InFourth European Marine Biology Symposium (ed. Crisp, D. J), pp. 227–36.Google Scholar
Gross, J. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1957. The settlement of Spirorbis borealis on algae. Report of the Challenger Society for the Promotion of the Study of Oceanography 3, No. 9, 18.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H., 1956 a. Studies of serpulid tube formation. I. The secretion of the calcareous and organic components of the tube by Pomatoceros triqueter. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 97, 411–19.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H., 1956 b. Studies in serpulid tube formation. II. The calcium secreting glands in the peristomium of Spirorbis, Hydroides, and Serpula. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 97, 421–7.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H., 1958. The tube formation of Pomatoceros triqueter(Polychaeta). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidu, H., 1969. Gregarious setting in the American oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Chesapeak Science, 10, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoglund, L. B., 1952. Notes on the morphology and biology of some Spirorbis larvae. Zoologiska bidrag frdn Uppsala, 29, 261–76.Google Scholar
Holborow, P. L., 1971. The fine structure of the trochophore of Harmothoe imbricata. In Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium (ed. Crisp, D. J), pp. 237–46.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1951. Gergariousness and some other aspects of the setting behaviour of spirorbis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 30, 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1953. Decreased discrimination during setting after prolonged planktonic life in larvae of Spirorbis borealis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 32, 337*–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1955. The gregarious setting reaction of barnacles as a measure of systematic affinity. Nature, London, 174, 266.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., Bailey, J. H. & Isaac, M. J., 1971. Choice of algae by larvae of Spirorbis, particularly of Spirorbis spirorbis. In Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium (ed. Crisp, D. J), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Lynch, W. F., 1947. The behaviour and metamorphosis of the larvae of Bugula neritina (Linnaeus): experimental modification of the length of the free swimming period and the responses of the Jarvae to light and gravity. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 92, 115–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J. M., 1969. Mineral regeneration by serpulid polychaete worms. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 136, 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J. M., 1971 a. Ultrastructural studies of the secretion of calcium carbonate by the serpulid polychaete worm, Pomatoceros caeruleus. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, 120, 160–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, J. M., 1971 b. Ultrastructure of calcium phosphate-containing cells in the serpulid polychaete worm Pomatoceros caeruleus. Calcified Tissue Research, 7, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nott, J. A., 1969. Settlement of barnacle larvae: surface structure of the antennular attachment disc by scanning electron microscopy. Marine Biology, 2, 248–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nott, J. A. & Foster, B. A., 1969. On the structure of the antennular attachment organ of the cypris larva of Balanus balanoides(L.). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 256, 115–34.Google Scholar
Segrove, F., 1940. The development of the serpulid Pomatoceros triqueter L. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 82, 467–540.Google Scholar
Williams, G. B., 1964. The effect of extracts of Fucus serratus in promoting the settlement of larvae of Spirorbis borealis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44 397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1968. The settlement behaviour of the larvae of Sabellaria alveolata(L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Society of the United Kingdom, 48, 387–435.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1970 a. Additional observations on larval growth and settlement of Sabellaria alveolata. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1970 b. The larvae of Sabellaria spinulosa and their settlement behaviour. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisely, B., 1960. Observations on the settling behaviour of larvae of the tubeworm Spirorbis borealis Daudin (Polychaeta). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 11, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar