Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:52:40.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of the amphipod genus Bathyporeia Lindström

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. Emrys Watkin
E. Emrys Watkin
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The genus Bathyporeia was established by Lindström (1855, p. 59) on specimens collected in the Baltic at Wisby and Landskrona. His description is based, apart from a reference to the epimera as small and beset with hairs, on the form of the appendages. He assigned to the genus one species, pilosa, in which the segments of the body are described as smooth, the form generally rounded, the eyes black, small and somewhat reniform, and the length under three lines. He gives a detailed description and drawing of the appendages. From the description of the antennae and of the eyes it may be assumed that the specimens were females.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , November 1938 , pp. 211 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

, Bate, Spence, C., 1856. On the British Edriophthalma. Rep. Brit. Ass. Meet., 1855, P. 59.Google Scholar
, Bate, Spence, C., 1857 a. A synopsis of the British edriophthalmous Crustacea. Pt. I. Amphipoda. Ann. Nat. Hist., Vol. XIX, Series 2, p. 146Google Scholar
, Bate, Spence, C., 1857 b. British Amphipoda. Ann. Nat. Hist., Vol. XIX, Series 2, p. 271.Google Scholar
, Bate, Spence, C., 1862. Catalogue of Amphipodous Crustacea, British Museum, pp. 172–4.Google Scholar
, Bate, Spence, C., & Westwood, J. O., 1863. A History of British Sessile-Eyed Crustacea, Vol. I, pp. 304–10.Google Scholar
Blanc, H., 1884. Die Amphipoden der Kieler Bucht. Deutschen Akad. der Naturforscher, Band XLVII, No. 2.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1887. Catalogue des Crustacéa Amphipodes marins du Sud-Ouest de la Bretagne. Ext. de Bull. de la Soc. Zool. de France, t. XII.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L., 1925. Amphipodes. Faune de France, Vol. 9, pp. 91–5.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937 a. Notes on the distribution of burrowing Isopoda and Amphipoda in various soils on the sea bottom near Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 635–9.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937 b. The fauna of certain estuaries in west England and south Wales, with special reference to Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, p. 652.Google Scholar
Della Valle, A., 1893. Gammarini del Golfo di Napoli. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, Vol. 20, pp. 751–4.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1931. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna. The Crustacea of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. LI, Pt. 2, No. 21, pp. 169–71.Google Scholar
Lindström, G., 1855. Bidrag till kannedomen om Osterjons invertebrate-fauna. Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, Arg. 12, No. 2, p. 59.Google Scholar
Meinert, F. V. A., 1877. Crustacea, Isopoda, Amphipoda et Decapoda Daniae. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift. III. Rackkes, II. Band, p. 201.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937. Marine fauna of the Isle of Man. Proc. and Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. L, p. 118.Google Scholar
Norman, A. M., 1900. British Amphipoda, families Pontoporeidae to Ampeliscidae. Ann. Nat. Hist., Vol. v, Series 7, p. 326.Google Scholar
Norman, A. M. 1905. Revised nomenclature of Bate & Westwood's sessile-eyed Crustacea. Ann. Nat. Hist., Vol. XVI, p. 82.Google Scholar
Oldevig, H., 1933. Sveriges Amphipoder. Meddel. fran Gotebergs Musei Zool. No. 62.Google Scholar
Raitt, D. S., 1937. The benthic Amphipoda of the north-western North Sea and adjacent waters. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. LVII, p. 249.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1891. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, Vol. I, Amphipoda, pp. 127–34.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1893. Additions to the fauna of the Firth of Forth, Pt. v. Eleventh Ann. Rep. Fish. Bd. for Scotland, p. 213.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. L., 1925. The moulting and growth stages of Gammarus with descriptions of the normals and intersexes of Gammarus chevreuxi. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIII, pp. 358–60.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1875. On the genus Bathyporeia. Ann. Nat. Hist., Vol. XV, Series 4, p. 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1906. Amphipoder. I. Gammaridea. Das Tierreich., Leif. 21, pp. 119–22.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1926. Revideret Fortegnelse over Danmarks Arter af Amphipoda. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansknaturh. Foren., Bd. 82, pp. 52–5.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1928. Danmarks Fauna. Tanglopper (Amphipoder), pp. 129–32.Google Scholar
Walker, A. O., 1895 a. The Amphipoda of Bate & Westwood's British sessile-eyed Crustacea. Ann. Nat. Hist., Vol. XV, Series 6, p. 470.Google Scholar
Walker, A. O., 1895 b. Revision of the Amphipoda of the L.M.B.C. District. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. IX, p. 295.Google Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1937. The amphipod genus Bathyporeia. Note in Ann. Rep. Scot. Mar. Biol. Assoc. for 1936–37.Google Scholar