Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T15:05:45.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Range extension and first record of the deep-sea brittle star Ophiactis abyssicola (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in Canadian waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Jean-François Hamel
Affiliation:
Society for the Exploration and Valuing of the Environment, Portugal Cove-St. Philips, Newfoundland, Canada
Sabine Stöhr
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
David Côté
Affiliation:
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John's, NL A1C 5X1, Canada
Kaitlin Casey
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Heather D. Penney
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Bárbara de Moura Neves
Affiliation:
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John's, NL A1C 5X1, Canada
Annie Mercier*
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Annie Mercier, E-mail: amercier@mun.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the first records of the brittle star Ophiactis abyssicola in Canadian waters and range extensions of up to 1900 km in the Northwest Atlantic from previously known locations. Samples were collected off northern Labrador and the northern portion of insular Newfoundland (eastern Canada) at 433 and 1097 m depths, respectively. This newly recorded species of brittle star from the bathyal zone off Newfoundland and Labrador adds to the marine biodiversity of Canada and to the general distribution knowledge of O. abyssicola.

Type
Marine Record
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

Brittle stars (Ophiuroidea) are among the most common echinoderms in oceans worldwide, including the deep waters of the North Atlantic and Arctic basins (e.g. Piepenburg & von Juterzenka, Reference Piepenburg and von Juterzenka1994; Mayer & Piepenburg, Reference Mayer and Piepenburg1996; Piepenburg & Schmid, Reference Piepenburg and Schmid1996; Piepenburg, Reference Piepenburg2000; Smirnov et al., Reference Smirnov, Piepenburg, Ahearn and Juterzenka2014). They are often described to dominate megafaunal assemblages (Cusson et al., Reference Cusson, Archambault and Aitken2007; MacDonald et al., Reference MacDonald, Bluhm, Iken, Gagaev and Strong2010; Piepenburg et al., Reference Piepenburg, Archambault, Ambrose, Blanchard, Bluhm, Carroll, Conlan, Cusson, Feder and Grebmeier2011; Roy et al., Reference Roy, Iken and Archambault2015; Lacharité & Metaxas, Reference Lacharité and Metaxas2017) and they play important ecological roles in both inshore and offshore habitats (Geraldi et al., Reference Geraldi, Bertolini, Emmerson, Roberts, Sigwart and Connor2017; Volage et al., Reference Volage, Hamel and Mercier2021). Despite the growing number of exploratory surveys in northern Canada, brittle stars remain incompletely inventoried and poorly described.

The brittle star Ophiactis abyssicola (M. Sars, 1861) is a morphologically variable species that has been reported from both hemispheres in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Figure 1). However, records from the South Pacific around New Zealand and Australia (Stöhr et al., Reference Stöhr, O'Hara and Thuy2021) are most likely Ophiactis cuspidata Lyman, 1879, currently accepted as a subspecies of O. abyssicola, but representing a separate genetic clade (O'Hara et al., Reference O'Hara, England, Gunasekera and Naughton2014). In the Atlantic, O. abyssicola is reported from western Greenland (Smirnov et al., Reference Smirnov, Piepenburg, Ahearn and Juterzenka2014), Iceland and in other Scandinavian waters, around northern UK, western France, northern Spain, the Azores, Canaries, Cape Verde and the Gulf of Mexico (USA) (OBIS, 2021), as well as off South Africa (Mortensen, Reference Mortensen1933; Olbers et al., Reference Olbers, Griffiths, O'Hara and Samyn2019) and Tristan da Cunha (Lyman, Reference Lyman1882). Ophiactis abyssicola is known to occur on fine sand, gravel, shells and rocks, and among sponges, corals and other sessile organisms (Farran, Reference Farran1912; Stöhr & Segonzac, Reference Stöhr and Segonzac2005). In the North Atlantic, it has been found at depths ranging between 118–2107 m (Koehler, Reference Koehler1909; Stöhr & Segonzac, Reference Stöhr and Segonzac2005; Martynov & Litvinova, Reference Martynov and Litvinova2008).

Fig. 1. World map showing existing and new records of Ophiactis abyssicola in the Atlantic and existing records attributed to O. abyssicola in the Pacific, which are likely O. abyssicola cuspidata (O'Hara et al., Reference O'Hara, England, Gunasekera and Naughton2014). Sites 1 and 2 from eastern Canada represent new records off northern Labrador and off insular Newfoundland, respectively.

Despite this relatively broad distribution, O. abyssicola was conspicuously absent from records in Canadian waters (Figure 1). Two sampling campaigns conducted in deep waters off Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed its presence there, filling a major gap in the North Atlantic distribution of the species.

Methods

Specimens were collected along the continental shelf of eastern Canada in two regions. In Newfoundland, sampling occurred opportunistically during the annual multispecies bottom-trawl surveys operated by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) with the vessel CCGS Teleost in November 2013 inside the North Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) subdivision 3K. A Campelen 1800 shrimp trawl was used following a stratified-random design towed for 15 min for ~1.4 km (gear opened and closed at depth). Details of the type of gear and net can be found in Walsh & McCallum (Reference Walsh and McCallum1997). In Labrador, eight samplings (across seven stations) were carried out with the vessel CCGS Amundsen in September 2020 inside the NAFO subdivisions 2G and 2H. A rock dredge (mesh size of 7 mm) was deployed between 123–804 m depths while the ship moved at a maximum speed of 2 knots for a duration ranging between 5 and 10 min of bottom time.

Upon collection, brittle stars were sorted and preserved in 100% ethanol. The preserved specimens were examined under a dissecting microscope (M205A, Leica Microsystems, Singapore) and photographed (DFC7000T, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with the software Leica Application Suite X, and identified morphologically using published keys and descriptions (Mortensen, Reference Mortensen1927; Paterson, Reference Paterson1985). A voucher specimen was deposited at the Canadian Museum of Nature (Ottawa) under catalog number CMNI 2021-0509.

For molecular identification, the mitochondrial cytochrome coxidase subunit I (COI) gene of one sample (September 2020) was sequenced using standard echinoderm primers (LCOech1aF1 TTTTTTCTACTAAACACAAGGATATTGG and HCO2198 TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA; Folmer et al., Reference Folmer, Black, Hoeh, Lutz and Vrijenhoek1994) and standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing protocols (Ivanova et al., Reference Ivanova, Dewaard and Hebert2006; DeWaard et al., Reference DeWaard, Ivanova, Hajibabaei and Hebert2008). The sample was processed through the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (University of Guelph) and compared with published sequences of specimens collected in the North Atlantic and around Norway on Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and GenBank. We used BOLD ID engine, which assigns unknown sequences into BINS with other known sequences to obtain an identification (see Ratnasingham & Hebert, Reference Ratnasingham and Hebert2013 for details). The partial COI sequence with all meta-data were registered on BOLD, project AMLAB, and deposited in GenBank (accession number MZ364349).

Results

Two brittle star specimens were examined. The first was collected on 30 November 2013 along the northern coast of Newfoundland (49°58′00″N 49°45′24″W) at 1097 m depth and the other was collected on 2 September 2020 off northern Labrador (60°33′32″N 61°23′42″W) at 433 m depth (Figure 1). The specimens belong to the family Ophiactidae due to their tricuspid teeth (O'Hara et al., Reference O'Hara, Hugall, Stöhr, Thuy and Martynov2018). They concur with the descriptions of Ophiactis abyssicola by Mortensen (Reference Mortensen1927) and Paterson (Reference Paterson1985), and the COI results showed 100% similarity with records of O. abyssicola available in GenBank and BOLD. Main diagnostic characters observed in these specimens (~5 mm in diameter) are pentaradial symmetry, coarse dorsal disc scales with obvious primary plates, smaller ventral disc scales, conical spines on the dorsal and ventral disc, large (longer than half the disc radius), broad and separated radial shields, fan-shaped contiguous dorsal arm plates, three to four arm spines, rhombic oral shields, tricuspid teeth, and two lateral oral papillae, distal one larger than proximal one (Figure 2). Ophiactis abyssicola is a variable species, which is evidenced by the fact that six nominal species have been synonymized with it (Stöhr et al., Reference Stöhr, O'Hara and Thuy2021). Madeira et al. (Reference Madeira, Kroh, Cordeiro, Martins and Ávila2019) remarked that Ophiactis canotia (Lyman, 1879) from about 1830 m depth in the Azores is similar to O. abyssicola except for the outline of the dorsal arm plates. That species is only known from its two type specimens and has not been reassessed taxonomically, but it is highly likely that it is conspecific with O. abyssicola. The South Pacific subspecies O. abyssicola cuspidata that is currently unaccepted, cannot at present be separated morphologically from the Atlantic specimens, but molecular data have identified them as a distinct clade (O'Hara et al., Reference O'Hara, England, Gunasekera and Naughton2014). Ophiactis balli (Thompson, 1840) in the North Atlantic bears some resemblance to O. abyssicola, but its dorsal disc is covered by small scales and inconspicuous primary plates, it has a single lateral oral papilla, radial shields shorter than 1/4 disk radius, triangular oral shields and up to five arm spines (Paterson, Reference Paterson1985).

Fig. 2. Ophiactis abyssicola (from Labrador). (A) Dorsal view showing the primary plates (pp), radial shields (rs), disc scales (sc) and disc spines (ds). (B) Ventral view showing the teeth (t). (C) Dorsal view showing the disc spines (ds), disc scales (sc), primary plates (pp) and radial shields (rs). (D) Ventral view showing the oral shields (os), teeth (t) and oral papillae (op). Scale bars: (A, B) 1.5 mm; (C, D) 1 mm.

Discussion

The morphological characters of the specimens under study were consistent with previous descriptions of Ophiactis abyssicola, and the results of the COI analysis reinforced the morphological identification. The bathymetric distribution of O. abyssicola has been characterized as upper bathyal (shallower than 1800 m) by O'Hara et al. (Reference O'Hara, England, Gunasekera and Naughton2014), which corresponds to the collection depth of our specimens. However, the present records establish O. abyssicola for the first time in Canadian waters (Figure 1). Based on the closest site where the species was previously reported from (western Greenland; Figure 1), the present records extend its distribution range by about 500 km south-west in the Labrador Sea and about 1900 km south along the coast of northern Newfoundland (Figure 1). Due to sparse collecting effort on the continental slope in the study area (Coté et al., Reference Coté, Heggland, Roul, Fifield, Wareham, Colbourne, Maillet, Pilgrim, Pretty, Devine, Corre, Lawson, Yacos-Fuentes and Mercier2019), it is impossible to determine how common O. abyssicola is along the eastern Canadian seaboard or whether these specimens reflect a long-established distribution or recent range extension.

This newly recorded species of brittle star from the bathyal zone off Newfoundland and Labrador coasts adds to the marine biodiversity of Canada and to the general distribution knowledge of O. abyssicola.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the researchers and crew aboard CCGS Amundsen and CCGS Teleost for their help during the collections. We also warmly thank C.Pretty (DFO) for assistance with the map and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Financial support

This research was partly funded by Discovery and Ship Time grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to A.M., with primary ship time on the CCGS Amundsen provided by DFO's ISECOLD program. Some of the data collected by the CCGS Amundsen were made available by Amundsen Science, which is supported through Université Laval by the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) Major Science Initiatives (MSI) Fund.

References

Coté, D, Heggland, K, Roul, S, Fifield, D, Wareham, V, Colbourne, E, Maillet, G, Pilgrim, L, Pretty, C, Devine, B, Corre, NL, Lawson, J, Yacos-Fuentes, C and Mercier, A (2019) Overview of the Biophysical and Ecological Components of the Labrador Sea Frontier Area. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2018/067, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Cusson, M, Archambault, P and Aitken, A (2007) Biodiversity of benthic assemblages on the Arctic continental shelf: historical data from Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 331, 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWaard, JR, Ivanova, NV, Hajibabaei, M and Hebert, PD (2008) Assembling DNA barcodes: analytical protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology 410, 275293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farran, GP (1912) The deep-water Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea and Echinoidea of the west coast of Ireland. Fisheries Ireland, Scientific Investigations 6, 166.Google Scholar
Folmer, O, Black, M, Hoeh, W, Lutz, R and Vrijenhoek, R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294299.Google ScholarPubMed
Geraldi, NR, Bertolini, C, Emmerson, MC, Roberts, D, Sigwart, JD and Connor, NEO (2017) Aggregations of brittle stars can perform similar ecological roles as mussel reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 563, 157167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, NV, Dewaard, JR and Hebert, PD (2006) An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 9981002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, R (1909) Echinoderms provenant des campagnes du yacht Princesse Alice. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques acccompliés par le Prince Albert 1 Monaco 34, 1317.Google Scholar
Lacharité, M and Metaxas, A (2017) Hard substrate in the deep ocean: how sediment features influence epibenthic megafauna on the eastern Canadian margin. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 126, 5061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, T (1882) Report on the Ophiuroidea dredged by HMS Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Report of the scientific results of the voyage of HMS challenger during 1873–1876. Zoology 5, 1386.Google Scholar
MacDonald, IR, Bluhm, BA, Iken, K, Gagaev, S and Strong, S (2010) Benthic macrofauna and megafauna assemblages in the Arctic deep-sea Canada Basin. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 57, 136152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madeira, P, Kroh, A, Cordeiro, R, Martins, AMDF and Ávila, SP (2019) The echinoderm fauna of the Azores (NE Atlantic Ocean). Zootaxa 4639, 1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martynov, AV and Litvinova, NM (2008) Deep-water Ophiuroidea of the northern Atlantic with descriptions of three new species and taxonomic remarks on certain genera and species. Marine Biology Research 4, 76111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M and Piepenburg, D (1996) Epibenthic community patterns on the continental slope off East Greenland at 75°N. Marine Ecology Progress Series 143, 151164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, T (1927) Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. Rotterdam: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, T (1933) Ophiuroidea. Danish Ingolf Expedition 4, 1121.Google Scholar
OBIS (2021) Ocean Biogeographic Information System. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. Available at https://obis.org/taxon/125109 (accessed 17 December 2021).Google Scholar
O'Hara, TD, England, PR, Gunasekera, RM and Naughton, KM (2014) Limited phylogeographic structure for five bathyal ophiuroids at continental scales. Deep-Sea Research Part I 84, 1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, TD, Hugall, AF, Stöhr, S, Thuy, B and Martynov, A (2018) Morphological diagnoses of higher taxa in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) in support of a new classification. European Journal of Taxonomy 2018, 135.Google Scholar
Olbers, JM, Griffiths, CL, O'Hara, TD and Samyn, Y (2019) Field Guide to the Brittle and Basket Stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of South Africa. ABCTaxa, vol. 19. Brussels: Belgian National Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative.Google Scholar
Paterson, GLJ (1985) The deep-sea Ophiuroidea of the north Atlantic Ocean. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 49, 1162.Google Scholar
Piepenburg, D (2000) Arctic brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Oceanography and Marine Biology 38, 189256.Google Scholar
Piepenburg, D, Archambault, P, Ambrose, WG, Blanchard, AL, Bluhm, BA, Carroll, ML, Conlan, KE, Cusson, M, Feder, HM and Grebmeier, JM (2011) Towards a pan-Arctic inventory of the species diversity of the macro-and megabenthic fauna of the Arctic shelf seas. Marine Biodiversity 41, 5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepenburg, D and Schmid, MK (1996) Brittle star fauna (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of the Arctic northwestern Barents Sea: composition, abundance, biomass and spatial distribution. Polar Biology 16, 383392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepenburg, D and von Juterzenka, K (1994) Abundance, biomass and spatial distribution pattern of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) on the Kolbeinsey Ridge north of Iceland. Polar Biology 14, 185194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnasingham, S and Hebert, PDN (2013) A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8, e66213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, V, Iken, K and Archambault, P (2015) Regional variability of megabenthic community structure across the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 68, 180192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnov, IS, Piepenburg, D, Ahearn, C and Juterzenka, K (2014) Deep-sea fauna of European seas: an annotated species check-list of benthic invertebrates living deeper than 2000 m in the seas bordering Europe: Ophiuroidea. Invertebrate Zoology 11, 192209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöhr, S, O'Hara, T and Thuy, B (2021) World Ophiuroidea Database. Ophiactis abyssicola (M. Sars, 1861). Available at http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=125109 (Accessed 17 December 2021).Google Scholar
Stöhr, S and Segonzac, M (2005) Deep-sea ophiuroids (Echinodermata) from reducing and non-reducing environments in the North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 383402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volage, F, Hamel, J-F and Mercier, A (2021) Population structure, habitat preferences, feeding strategies and diet of the brittle star Ophiopholis aculeata in nearshore and offshore habitats of the Northwest Atlantic. Invertebrate Biology 140, e12346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, SJ and McCallum, BR (1997) Performance of the Campelen 1800 shrimp trawl during the 1995 Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre autumn groundfish survey. NAFO Science Council Studies 29, 105116.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. World map showing existing and new records of Ophiactis abyssicola in the Atlantic and existing records attributed to O. abyssicola in the Pacific, which are likely O. abyssicola cuspidata (O'Hara et al., 2014). Sites 1 and 2 from eastern Canada represent new records off northern Labrador and off insular Newfoundland, respectively.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Ophiactis abyssicola (from Labrador). (A) Dorsal view showing the primary plates (pp), radial shields (rs), disc scales (sc) and disc spines (ds). (B) Ventral view showing the teeth (t). (C) Dorsal view showing the disc spines (ds), disc scales (sc), primary plates (pp) and radial shields (rs). (D) Ventral view showing the oral shields (os), teeth (t) and oral papillae (op). Scale bars: (A, B) 1.5 mm; (C, D) 1 mm.