Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:49:59.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ovarian ultrastructure and vitellogenesis in ten species of shallow-water and bathyal sea cucumbers (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Kevin J. Eckelbarger  and
Craig M. Young
Kevin J. Eckelbarger
Affiliation:
Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine 04573, USA and Department of Animal Veterinary & Aquatic Sciences, Hitchner Hall, Orono, Maine 04469, USA
Craig M. Young
Affiliation:
Larval Ecology Program, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, 5600 Old Dixie Highway, Fort Pierce, Florida 34946, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Comparative ultrastructural features of the ovary and vitellogenesis have been described for six shallow water and four bathyal species of sea cucumbers representing four major holothuroid orders. Ovarian structure is similar in all ten species except for features of the peritoneal cells of the outer layer and the follicular inner epithelial cells surrounding the developing oocytes. The peritoneal cells vary from monociliated squamous or cuboidal cells to large columnar cells. Ultrastructural evidence suggests that these cells might be capable of incorporating materials from the perivisceral coelom. The follicular inner epithelial cells of two deep-sea species resemble podocytes, a feature previously unre-ported in holothuroid ovaries. It is suggested that these cells function to increase nutrient exchange between the genital haemal sinus and the oocyte during vitellogenesis. In all ten species, the oocytes appear to participate in yolk synthesis through the interaction of the Golgi complex and rough endoplasmic reticulum. The similarity in the ultrastructural features of vitellogenesis suggests that the process of yolk synthesis has been highly conserved in holothuroids. Endocytotic activity was detected in seven of ten species but it is uncertain if this is directly related to vitellogenesis. Cilia and intracellular structures resembling striated ciliary rootlets were observed in the oocytes of four of the ten species studied. The significance of this finding is unclear but could indicate that germ cells have a somatic cell origin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , November 1992 , pp. 759 - 781
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afzelius, B.A., 1957. Electron microscopy on the basophilic structures of the sea urchin egg. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung, 45, 660–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aisenshtadt, T.B. & Vassetzky, S.G., 1986. Fine structures of oocy tes and accessory cells of the ovary of the starfish Patiria (Asterina) pectinifera at different stages of oogenesis and after 1-methyladenine-induced maturation. Development, Growth & Differentiation, 28, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E., 1974. Comparative aspects of the ultrastructure of the female gamete. In International review of cytology, supplement 4. Aspects of nuclear structure and function (ed. G.H., Bourneet al.), pp. 1–70. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bal, A.K., 1970. Ultrastructural changes in the accessory-cells and the oocyte surface of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus dröbachiensis during vitellogenesis. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung, 111, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beams, H.W. & Kessel, R.G., 1983. Cnidaria. In Reproductive biology of invertebrates. Vol. I. Oogenesis, oviposition, and oosorption (ed. K.G., Adiyodi and R.G., Adiyodi), pp. 31–66. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Beijnink, F.B., Walker, C.W. & Voogt, P. A., 1984. An ultrastructural study of relationships between the ovarian haemal system, follicle cells, and primary oocytes in the sea star, Asterias rubens. Implications for oocyte nutrition. Cell & Tissue Research, 238, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billett, D.S.M. & Hansen, B., 1982. Abyssal aggregations of Kolga hyalina Danielssen and Koren (Echinodermata: Holothurioidea) in the northeast Atlantic Ocean: a preliminary report. DeepSea Research, 29, 799–818.Google Scholar
Bloom, W. & Fawcett, D.W., 1968. A textbook of histology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Byrne, M., 1988. Evidence for endocytotic incorporation of nutrients from the haemal sinus by the oocytes of the brittlestar Ophiolepis paucispina. In Echinoderm biology (ed. R.D., Burkeet ah), pp. 557–563. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Byrne, M., 1989. Ultrastructure of the ovary and oogenesis in the ovoviviparous ophiuroid Ophiolepis paucispina (Echinodermata). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 176, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatlynne, L.G., 1972. An ultrastructural study of oogenesis in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. PhD thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Davis, H.S., 1971. Thegonad wall of the Echinodermata: a comparative study based on electron microscopy. MSc thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Eckelbarger, K.J., 1983. Evolutionary radiation in polychaete ovaries and vitellogenic mechanisms: their possible role in life history patterns. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckelbarger, K.J., 1984. Comparative aspects of oogenesis in polychaetes. In Polychaetereproduction: progress in comparative reproductive biology (ed. A., Fischer and H.-D., Pfannenstiel), pp. 123–148. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Eckelbarger, K.J., 1988. Oogenesis and female gametes. Microfauna Marina, 4, 281–307.Google Scholar
Eckelbarger, K.J., Linley, P. A. & Grassle, J.P., 1984. Role of ovarian follicle cells in vitellogenesis and oocyte resorption in Capitella sp. I. (Polychaeta). Marine Biology, 79, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckelbarger, K.J., Young, C.M. & Cameron, J.L., 1989. Ulfrastructure and development of dimorphic sperm in the abyssal echinoid Phrissocystis multispina (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): implications for deep-sea reproductive biology. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 176, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrand, J.G., 1984. Lysosomes and yolk formation in the oocytes of Asterina gibbosa (Echinodermata, Asteroidea). International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 7, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, A.C., Pearse, J.S. & Pearse, V.B., 1991. Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Vol. VI. Lophophorates and echinoderms. Pacific Grove, California: The Boxwood Press.Google Scholar
Giga, Y. & Ikai, A., 1985a. Purification of the most abundant protein in the coelomic fluid of a sea urchin which immunologically cross reacts with 23s glycoprotein in the sea urchin eggs. Journal of Biochemistry, Tokyo, 98, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giga, Y. & Ikai, A., 1985b. Purification and physical chemical characterization of 23s glycoprotein from sea urchin (Anthocidaris crassispina) eggs. Journal of Biochemistry, Tokyo, 98, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, F.E. & Ozaki, H., 1986. The major yolk glycoprotein precursor in echinoids is secreted by coelomocytes into the coelomic plasma. Cell Differentiation, 19, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirai, S. & Kanatani, H., 1971. Site of production of meiosis-inducing substance in ovary of starfish. Experimental Cell Research, 67, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, N.D., 1971. The fine structure of the ovary of the feather star Nemaster rubiginosa (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Tissue & Cell, 3, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, N.D., Grimmer, J.C. &. Kubota, H., 1975. Gonadal development during the annual reproductive cycle of Comanthus japonica (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 148, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanatani, H. & Nagahama, Y., 1983. Echinodermata. In Reproductive biology of invertebrates. Vol. I. Oogenesis, oviposition and oosorption (ed. K.G., Adiyodi and R.G., Adiyodi), pp. 611–654. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kessel, R.G., 1964. Electron microscope studies on oocytes of an echinoderm Thyone briareus, with special reference to the origin of the annulate lamellae. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 10, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, R.G., 1968. An electron microscope study of differentiation and growth in oocytes of Ophioderma panamensis. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 22, 63–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessel, R.G., 1985. Annulate lamellae (porous cytomembranes): with particular emphasis on their possible role in differentiation of the female gamete. In Developmental biology: a comprehensive synthesis (ed. L.W., Browder), pp. 179–233. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Kille, F.R., 1942. Regeneration of the reproductive system following binary fission in the sea-cucumber, Holothuria parvula (Selenka). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 83, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, S. & Dale, T., 1975. Ultrastructural studies on the testis of Cucumaria frondosa (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata). Norwegian Journal of Zoology, 23, 1–15.Google Scholar
McEuen, F.S., 1987. Phylum Echinodermata, Class Holothuroidea. In Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific coast: data and methods for the study of eggs, embryos, and larvae (ed. M.F., Strathmann), pp. 574–596. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Merisko, E.M., 1989. Annulate lamellae: an organelle in search of a function. Tissue & Cell, 21, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millonig, G., Bosco, M. & Giambertone, L., 1968. Fine structure analysis of oogenesis in sea urchins. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 169, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nørrevang, A., 1968. Electron microscopic morphology of oogenesis. International Review of Cytology, 23, 113–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozaki, H., Moriya, O. & Harrington, F.E., 1986. A glycoprotein in the accessory cell of the echinoid ovary and its role in vitellogenesis. Wilhelm Roux's Archives of Developmental Biology, 195, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patent, D.H., 1968. The general and reproductive biology of the basket star Gorgonocephalus caryi (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea). PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pawson, D.L., 1966. Ecology of holothurians. In Physiology of Echinodermata (ed. R.A., Boolootian), pp. 63–71. New York: Interscience-Wiley.Google Scholar
Piatagorsky, J., 1975. Gametogenesis. In The sea urchin embryo: biochemistry and morphogenesis (ed. G., Czihak), pp. 42–98. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppert, E.E. & Smith, P.R., 1988. The functional organization of filtration nephridia. Biological Reviews, 63, 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenmakers, H.J.N., Colenbrander, P.H.J.M., Peute, J. & Oordt, P.G.W.J. van, 1981. Anatomy of the ovaries of the starfish Asterias rubens (Echinodermata). A histological and ultrastructural study. Cell & Tissue Research, 217, 577–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, P.C., Larsen, J.H. Jr & Waldo, A.E., 1979. Oocyte-follicle cell relationships in a starfish. Cell & Tissue Research, 203, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, M.A. & Bergquist, P.R., 1990. Variability in the reproductive cycle of Stichopus mollis (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 17, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shyu, A.-B., Raff, R.A. & Blumenthal, T., 1986. Expression of the vitellogenin gene in female and male sea urchin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83, 3865–3869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibuet, M. & Lawrence, J.M., 1981. Organic content and biomass of abyssal holothuroids (Echinodermata) from the Bay of Biscay. Marine Biology, 65, 143–147.Google Scholar
Smiley, S., 1988. The dynamics of oogenesis in Stichopus californicus and its annual ovarian cycle. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 175, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, S., 1990. A review of echinoderm oogenesis. Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique, 6, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, S. & Cloney, R.A., 1985. Ovulation and the fine structure of the Stichopus californicus (Echinodermata: Holothurioidea) fecund ovarian tubules. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 169, 342–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, S., Chafee, C., McEuen, F.S. & Krishnan, S., 1991. Holothuroidea. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Vol. VI. Lophophorates and echinoderms (ed. A.C., Gieseet al.), pp. 663–750. Pacific Grove, California: Boxwood Press.Google Scholar
Théel, H., 1901. On a singular case of hermaphrodism in holothurids. Bihang till K. Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 27, Afd. IV, no. 6.Google Scholar
Tyler, P.A., 1988. Seasonality in the deep sea. Oceanography & Marine Biology. Annual Review. London, 26, 227–258.Google Scholar
Tyler, P.A. & Billett, D.S.M. 1987. The reproductive ecology of elasipodid holothurians from the N.E. Atlantic. Biological Oceanography, 5, 273–296.Google Scholar
Tyler, P.A., Billett, D.S.M. & Gage, J.D., 1987. The ecology and reproductive biology of Cherbonniera utriculus and Molpadia blakei from the N.E. Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 67, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, P.A. & Gage, J.D., 1983. The reproductive biology of Ypsilothuria talismani (Holothuroidea: Dendrochirota) from the N.E. Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, P.A., Gage, J.D. & Billett, D.S.M., 1985. Life-history biology of Peniagone azorica and P. diaphana (Echinodermata: Holothurioidea) from the north-east Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 89, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C.W., 1982. Nutrition of gametes. In Echinoderm nutrition, (ed. M., Jangoux and J.M., Lawrence), pp. 449–468. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Wourms, J.P., 1987. Oogenesis. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Vol. IX. General aspects: seeking unity in diversity (ed. A.C., Gieseet al.), pp. 49–178. Palo Alto, California: Blackwell Scientific Publications, and Pacific Grove, California: Boxwood Press.Google Scholar