Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T02:26:54.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opsanus beta (Goode & Bean, 1880) (Acanthopterygii: Batrachoididae), a non-indigenous toadfish in Sepetiba Bay, south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Magda F. Andrade-Tubino
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, km 7, 23897-030Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Fernando Luiz K. Salgado
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, km 7, 23897-030Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Wagner Uehara
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, km 7, 23897-030Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Ricardo Utsunomia
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, 23897-900Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Francisco Gerson Araújo*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, km 7, 23897-030Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Francisco Gerson Araújo, E-mail: gersonufrrj@gmail.com

Abstract

The introduction of non-native predator fish is thought to have important negative effects on native prey populations. Opsanus beta is a non-native toadfish that was originally described in the Gulf of Mexico, between the west coast of Florida and Belize. In the present study, we describe, for the first time, the occurrence of O. beta in Sepetiba Bay (22°55′S), south-eastern Brazil, probably brought into the bay through ships' ballast water. Thirteen specimens were recorded in this area near to Sepetiba Port. Similarly, three other records of this species in the Brazilian coast were also reported near to port areas at Rio de Janeiro (22°49′S), Santos (23°59′S) and Paranaguá (25°33′S) ports. To confirm the species identity, we employed DNA barcoding and compared our samples with sequences deposited on public databases, which indicated that our samples are highly similar (>99.9% of genetic similarity) to O. beta samples collected near its type locality. Several individuals were found in the capable spawning phase, according to histological analysis of the reproductive cell stages. The environmental plasticity of this species and the favourable local environmental conditions probably enabled the establishment of O. beta in this region. This raises concerns of potential high invasion impact due to this species' diet and reproductive capacity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araújo, FG, Teixeira, TP, Guedes, APP, Azevedo, MCC and Pessanha, ALM (2018) Shifts in the abundance and distribution of shallow water fish fauna on the southeastern Brazilian coast: a response to climate change. Hydrobiologia 814, 205218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barimo, JF, Serafy, JE, Frezza, PE and Walsh, P (2007) Habitat use, urea production and spawning in the gulf toadfish Opsanus beta. Marine Biology 150, 497508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, NB and Wells, RS (1998) Prey and feeding patterns of resident bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Journal of Mammalogy 79, 10451059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bax, N, Carlton, JT, Mathews-Amos, A, Haedrich, RL, Howarth, FG, Purcell, JE, Rieser, A and Gray, A (2001) The control of biological invasions in the world's oceans. Conservation Biology 15, 12341246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, JR, Gozlan, RE and Copp, GH (2010) Managing non-native fish in the environment. Fish and Fisheries 12, 256274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Peterson, NJ, Wyanski, DM, Saborido-Rey, F, Macewicz, BJ and Lowerre-Barbieri, SK (2011) A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 3, 5270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caires, RA, Pichler, HA, Spach, HL and Ignácio, JM (2007) Opsanus brasiliensis Rotundo, Spinelli & Zavalla-Camin, 2005 (Teleostei: Batrachoidiformes: Batrachoididae), junior synonym of Opsanus beta (Goode & Bean, 1880), with notes on the occurrence of the species off the Brazilian coast. Biota Neotropica 7, 135139. (In Portuguese.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, JT (1996) Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation 78, 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, BM, Júnior, ALF, Fávaro, LF, Artoni, RF and Vitule, J (2020) Human-facilitated dispersal of the Gulf toadfish Opsanus beta (Goode & Bean, 1880) in the Guaratuba Bay, south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Fish Biology 97, 686690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, C, Hilliard, R, Junqueira, AOR, Leal Neto, AC, Polglaze, J and Raaymakers, S (2004) Ballast Water Risk Assessment, Port of Sepetiba, Federal Republic of Brazil. Final Report. Globallast Monograph Series No. 14. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
Collette, BB (1974) A review of the coral toadfishes of the genus Sanopus with descriptions of two new species from Cozumel Island, Mexico. Proceedings of Biological Society of Washington 87, 185204.Google Scholar
Collette, BB (2001) Opsanus dichrostomus, a new toadfish (Teleostei: Batrachoididae) from the Western Caribbean Sea and southern Gulf of Mexico. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of the University of Michigan 731, 116.Google Scholar
Collette, BB (2002) Batrachoididae. In Carpenter, KE (ed.), The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Atlantic. Vol 2. Bony Fishes Part 1 (Acipenseridae to Grammatidae). FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes and American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Special Publication No. 5. Kent E. Carpenter. Rome: FAO, pp. 10261042.Google Scholar
Cordeiro, BD, Bertoncini, AA, Abrunhosa, FE, Corona, LS, Araújo, FG and dos Santos, LN (2020) First report of the nonnative gulf toadfish Opsanus beta (Goode & Bean, 1880) on the coast of Rio de Janeiro – Brazil. BioInvasions Records 9, 279286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darrigan, G and Damborenea, C (2005) A South American bioinvasion case history: Limnoperma fortune (Dunker, 1857), the golden mussel. American Malacological Bulletin 20, 105112.Google Scholar
Davidson, I and Simkanin, C (2012) The biology of ballast water 25 years later. Biological Invasions 14, 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, MR and Brunner, PC (2002). Biodiversity of central alpine Coregonus (Salmoniformes): impact of one-hundred years of management. Ecological Applications 12, 154172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 17921797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, CEL, Junqueira, AOR, Villac, MC and Lopes, RM (2009) Marine bioinvasions in the Brazilian coast: brief report on history of events, vectors, ecology, impacts and management of nonindigenous species. In Rilov, G and Crooks, JA (eds), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems: Ecological, Management, and Geographic Perspectives. Berlin: Springer, pp. 459477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R and Pauly, D (2020) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version.Google Scholar
Gangan, SS, Pavan-Kumar, A and Jaiswar, AK (2019) Multigene barcoding and phylogeny of selected Engraulidae species. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 30, 548555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasby, TM, Connell, SD, Holloway, MG and Hewitt, CL (2007) Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? Marine Biology 151, 887895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, GB and Bean, TH (1880) Catalogue of a collection of fishes obtained in the Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of US National Museum 2, 333345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, GA and Winn, HE (1961) Reproductive ecology and sound production of scarecrow toadfish, Opsanus tau. Ecology 42, 274282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, DW, Winterbottom, R and Collette, BB (2008) Review of the toadfish genera (Teleostei: Batrachoididae). Proceedings of the California Academy of Science 4, 665710.Google Scholar
Hewitt, CL, Gollasch, S and Minchin, D (2009) The vessel as a vector – biofouling, ballast water and sediments. In Rilov, G and Crooks, JA (eds), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis). Berlin: Springer, 204, pp. 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2018) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-1. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org.Google Scholar
Krahforst, CS, Sprague, MW and Luczkovich, JJ (2016) The impact of vessel noise on oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) communication. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 4ENAL. Acoustical Society of America, 27, 010031.Google Scholar
Lacarella, JC, Davidson, IC and Dunham, A (2019) Biotic exchange from movement of ‘static’ maritime structures. Biological Invasions 21, 11311141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal Neto, AC, Legey, LFL, Gonzalez-Araya, MC and Jablonski, S (2006) A system dynamics model for the environmental management of the Sepetiba Bay watershed, Brazil. Environmental Management 38, 879888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, PS, Achord, S, Feist, BE and Zabel, RW (2002) Non-indigenous brook trout and the demise of Pacific salmon: a forgotten threat? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences 269, 16631670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, RM and Villac, MC (2009) Métodos. In Lopes, RM, Coradin, L, Pombo, VB and Cunha, DR (eds), Informe sobre as espécies exóticas invasoras marinhas no Brasil. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente – Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, pp. 1928. (In Portuguese.)Google Scholar
Lopes, RM, Coradin, L, Pombo, VB and Cunha, DR (2009) Informe sobre as espécies exóticas invasoras marinhas no Brasil. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente – Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas. (In Portuguese.)Google Scholar
López, JF, González, AGS, Arenas, LGA, Sánchez, CB, Escorcia, HB, Pérez, JAM, Rodríguez, EP and Legorreta, JLV (2017) Ecología y reproducción de Opsanus beta (Actinopterygii: Batrachoididae) en la Laguna de Alvarado, Veracruz, México. Revista de Biología Tropical 65, 13811396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luypaert, T, Hagan, JG, McCarthy, ML and Poti, M (2020) Status of marine biodiversity in the Anthropocene. In Jungblut, S, Wegener, A, Liebich, V and Bode-Dalby, M (eds), YOUMARES 9 – The Oceans: our research, our future. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for young marine researcher in Oldenburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20389-4_4.Google Scholar
Møhl, B, Wahlberg, M, Madsen, PT, Miller, LA and Surlykke, A (2000) Sperm whale clicks: directionality and source level revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107, 638648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, JS, Grande, TC and Wilson, MVH (2016) Fishes of the World, 5th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahel, FJ (2000) Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science (New York, N.Y.) 288, 854856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, AO, Caires, RA, Mariguela, TC, Pereira, LHG, Hanner, R and Oliveira, C (2012) DNA barcodes identify marine fishes of São Paulo State, Brazil. Molecular Ecology Resources 12, 10121020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, CR and Ray, GC (1986) A Field Guide to Atlantic Coast Fishes of North America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rotundo, MM, Spinelli, M and Zavala-Camin, LA (2005) Description of a new species of Opsanus (Teleostei – Batrachoididae) in the coast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Revista Ceciliana 16, 9399. (In Portuguese.)Google Scholar
Seebens, H, Schwartz, N, Schupp, PJ and Blasius, B (2016) Predicting the spread of marine species introduced by global shipping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113, 56465651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serafy, JE, Hopkins, TE and Walsh, PJ (1997) Field studies on the ureogenic gulf toadfish in a subtropical bay. I. Patterns of abundance, size composition and growth. Journal of Fish Biology 50, 12581270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, DJ and Vik, SF (2010) The role of constructed reefs in non-indigenous species introductions and range expansions. Ecological Engineering 36, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D, Martin, JL, Genovesi, P, Maris, V, Wardle, DA, Aronson, J, Courchamp, F, Galil, B, García-Berthou, E, Pascal, M, Pyšek, P, Sousa, R, Tabacchi, E and Vilà, V (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28, 5866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, DL and Goldman, RD (2006) Basic Methods in Microscopy. Chicago, IL: University Medical School.Google Scholar
Stecher, G, Tamura, K and Kumar, S (2020) Molecular Evolution Genetic Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37, 12371239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira, LMP and Creed, JC (2020) A decade on: an updated assessment of the status of marine non-indigenous species in Brazil. Aquatic Invasions 15, 3043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomás, ARG, Tutui, SLS, Fagundes, L and Souza, MR (2012) Opsanus beta: an invasive fish species in the Santos Estuary, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 38, 349355.Google Scholar
Townsend, CR (1996). Invasion biology and ecological impacts of brown trout Salmo trutta in New Zealand. Biological Conservation 78, 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, RD, Zemlak, TS, Innes, BW, Last, PR and Hebert, PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 18471857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yáñez-Arancibia, A, Lara-Domínguez, AL and Day, JW Jr. (1993) Interactions between mangrove and seagrass habitats mediated by estuarine nekton assemblages: coupling of primary and secondary production. Hydrobiologia 264, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar