Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T07:11:51.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the nematocysts of hydromedusae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

F. S. Russell
F. S. Russell
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nematocysts of twenty species of Hydromedusae occurring at Plymouth are described. Of these, twelve were Anthomedusae and seven were Leptomedusae, and one was the Siphonophore, Muggiaea atlantica. The medusae fit very well into the generally accepted classification as regards the types of nematocysts they possess.

Lar sabellarum, the hydroid of Willia stellata, has a type of nematocyst not found in the other species—a macrobasic mastigophore. This is a further justification for the formation of a separate family, the Williidae, to hold this species and its relations.

While the Anthomedusae are clearly split up into distinct groups as regards their types of nematocysts, the Leptomedusae form a single group.

It is suggested that the so-called acrophores and anacrophores recorded in siphonophores may be merely stages in the development of other nematocysts.

It is urged that much more research is required on variation in size and structure of nematocysts in individual species before they can be used as specific characters for separating doubtful species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , November 1938 , pp. 145 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allman, , George James, , 1871–1872. A monograph of the gymnoblastic or tubularian hydroids. Ray Society, pp. 1–450.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, , Emma Johnstone, , 1936. The utility of the nematocysts in the classification of certain Scyphomedusae. I. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N.F., Avd. 2, Bd. 31, Nr. 11, 26 pp. (Kungl. Fysiograf. Sdllsk. Handl., N.F., Bd. 46, Nr. 11.)Google Scholar
Ranson, G., 1937. Cnidactine et cnidothylacies chez les Anthomèduses. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, Tome LXII, pp. 318–29.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S. ' Rees, W. J., 1936. On rearing the hydroid Zanclea implexa (Alder) and its medusa Zanclea gemmosa McCrady, with a review of the genus Zanclea. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, T. A., 1929. On the nematocysts of sea anemones. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XVI, pp. 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weill, Robert, 1934. Contribution ä l'etude des cnidaires et de leurs nèmatocystes. I. Recherches sur les nèmatocystes (Morphologie—Physiologie—Dèveloppement). II. Valeur taxonomique du cnidome. Trav. Stat. Zool. Wimereux, Tome X, pp. 1–347 and Tome xi, pp. 349–701.Google Scholar
Weill, Robert, 1936 a. Au sujet de la dèfinition et de la validitè du genre Güntherella Weill 1934 (Hydrozoaires). Bull. Soc. Zool. France, Tome LXI, pp. 526–32.Google Scholar
Weill, Robert, 1936 b. Le cnidome des Cladonèmides Eleutheria dichotoma et Cladonema radiatum, son cycle et son interprètation. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Tome 203, pp. 816–18.Google Scholar