Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:51:48.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the distribution of major nutrients and phytoplankton in the Tamar estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. P. Mommaerts
J. P. Mommaerts
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Botanique Systématique et d'Ecologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles Holding a U.N.E.S.C.O. Fellowship at the Plymouth Laboratory.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The estuary of the Tamar has been surveyed from March to September 1968. Salinity distributions and variations have been measured with the object of providing a preliminary picture of the general circulation. Tidal flows appear to have most effect on water movement in the estuary.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , August 1969 , pp. 749 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, F. A. J. & Butler, E. I., 1968. Chemical changes in sea water off Plymouth during the years 1962 to 1965. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, M., Rampi, L. & Zattera, A., 1967. A phytoplankton component not considered by the Utermohl method. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, Vol. 35, pp. 170–214.Google Scholar
Berthois, L., 1962. Essai de corrélation entre le gradient de salinité dans l'estuaire de la Loire et les volumes d'eau océanique et fluviale à Saint-Nazaire. Rev. Géogr. phys. Geol. dyn., Sér. 2, T. 5, Fasc. 1, pp. 61–6.Google Scholar
Braarud, T. & Føyn, B., 1958. Phytoplankton observations in a brackish water locality of South-East Norway. Nytt Mag. Bot., Vol. 6, pp. 47–73.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N. & Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. II. Under water illumination. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 509–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N. & Milne, A., 1939. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. V. Under water illumination. Revision of data for red light. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 13, pp. 391–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S. & Williams, C. B., 1943. The relation between the number of individuals and the number of species in a random sample of animal population. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 12, pp. 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T. & Spooner, G. M., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. I. Introduction. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 501–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, C. Den, 1960. Comments on the Venice-System for the classification of brackish waters. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Bd. 45, 4, pp. 481–5.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1963. The Chemistry and Fertility of Sea Waters. 240 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1951. Littoral diatoms of Chichester Harbour with special reference to fouling. Jl R. microsc. Soc., Vol. 71, pp. 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendey, N. I., 1954. A preliminary check-list of British marine diatoms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hustedt, F. & Aleem, A. A., 1951. Littoral diatoms from the Salstone near Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchum, B., 1954. Relations between circulation and phytoplanktonic populations in estuaries. Ecology, Vol. 35, pp. 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. B. & Lackey, E. W., 1963. Microscopic algae and protozoa in the waters near Plymouth in August, 1962. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. B., 1967. The microbiota of estuaries and their roles. In Estuaries (ed. Lauff, G. H.), pp. 291–302.Google Scholar
Lauff, G. H. (Ed.), 1967. Estuaries. Publs Am. Ass. Advmt Sci., No. 83, 757 pp. Washington.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, T., 1960. An improved form of sedimentation apparatus for use with an inverted microscope. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 25, pp. 279–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R., 1960. Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In Perspectives in Marine Biology (ed. Buzzati-Traverso, A. A.), pp. 323–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R., 1961. Distribución ecológica y geográfica de las especies del fitoplancton marino. Investigación pesq., T. 19, pp. 81–101.Google Scholar
Maucha, R., 1932. Die Binnengewässer Hydrochemische Methoden in der Limnologie, Vol. 12. Ed. E., Schweitzerbart. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. III. Salinity and temperature conditions in the lower estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, J. B. & Riley, J. P., 1955. The colorimetric determination of silicate with special reference to sea and natural waters. Analytica chim. Acta, Vol. 12, pp. 162–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P., 1962. Modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica chim. Acta, Vol. 27, pp. 31–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S., 1968. Check-list of British marine algae—second revision. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 783–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. W., 1952. Salinity distribution and circulation in the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system. J. mar. Res., Vol. 11, pp. 106–23.Google Scholar
Schulz, H., 1961. Qualitative und quantitative Plankton—Untersuchungen im Elbe-Aestuar. Arch. Hydrobiol., Bd. 26 (Suppl. Bd. 1), pp. 5–105.Google Scholar
Smayda, T. J., 1958. Biogeographical studies of marine phytoplankton. Oikos, Vol. 11, pp. 158–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. D., Armstrong, F. A. J. & Richards, F. A., 1967. Determination of nitrate in sea water by cadmium-copper reduction to nitrate. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47, pp. 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar