Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:22:44.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on Projects for the Improvement of Sponge-Fisheries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

George Bidder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In considering the experiments of Buccich (6) on propagation of sponges by cuttings, two main questions present themselves:—

(1) If a sponge be divided into many fragments, will the total increase of such fragments and their progeny be greater than the increase of the intact sponge and its progeny would have been in the same time; the conditions of water, &c., being identical?

(2) Are sponges, grown as recommended by Buccich, more or less favourably situated than those on the sea-bottom?

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 1896 , pp. 195 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1896

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES TO QUOTATIONS

1.Johnston, G. (1842).—“History of British Sponges and Lithophytes,” p. 92 and p. 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Carter, H. J. (1849).—Annals and Mag. Nat. Hist. pp. 95 and 96.Google Scholar
3.Lamiral, E. (1861–1863).—Bull. Soc. d'Acclim. Paris, vol. viii. p. 327; vol. ix. p. 641; vol. x. p. 8.Google Scholar
4.Bowerbank, J. S. (1874).—“Monograph of British Spongiadæ,” vol. iii. p. 339.Google Scholar
5.Hyatt, A. (1875 and 1877).—Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. vol. ii. quoted here from “U.S. Fish. Comm.,” “Fishery Industries” (4to.), Sect. i. pp. 845, 846.Google Scholar
6.Marenzeller, E. von (1878).—Verhandlung der K. K. Zool. Bot. Gesellschaft in Wien, quoted here from translation in ” U.S. Fish. Comm. Report” (8vo.), 1879, p. 771, et seqq.Google Scholar
7.Schulze, F. E. (1879).—Zeitschr. wiss Zool. vol. xxxii. p. 617 and p. 642.Google Scholar
8.Faber, G. L. (1883).—“Fisheries of the Adriatic,” p. 96.Google Scholar
9.Vosmaer, G. C. J. (1884).—Mitth. Zool. Stat. Neapel, vol. v. pp. 486 and 487.Google Scholar
10.Vosmaer, G. C. J. (1887).—“Bronn's Klass. u. Ord. d. Spongien,” p. 440.Google Scholar
11.Rathbun, R. (1887).—“U.S. Fish. Comm., Fishery Industries” (4to.), sect. v. vol. ii. p. 832.Google Scholar
12.Lee, T. (1889).—“U.S. Fish. Comm., Report of Comm. for 1886,” p. 664.Google Scholar
13.Browne, E. T. (1894).—Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc. vol. viii. p. 45.Google Scholar