Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:57:57.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new nemertean species: what are the useful characters for ribbon worm descriptions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2013

Malin Strand*
Affiliation:
Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sven Lovén Centre for Marine Sciences, Tjärnö, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden
Alfonso Herrera-Bachiller
Affiliation:
EU–US Marine Biodiversity Research Group, Instituto Franklin, Universidad de Alcalá & Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
Arne Nygren
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 463, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
Tobias Kånneby
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Strand, Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sven Lovén centre for Marine Sciences, Tjärnö, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden email: malin.strand@slu.se

Abstract

In recent years the Norwegian Taxonomy Initiative started thorough investigations of poorly known organism groups. In this context, several marine inventories have rendered a number of marine invertebrate species new to science. Within the phylum Nemertea (ribbon worms) a characteristic hoplonemertean was encountered on two different occasions. We describe the new species Amphiporus rectangulus sp. nov. with a combination of histology and DNA data (COI). For the morphological description we use a previously proposed character matrix and, in a context given by the results, also provide a brief discussion on benefits and drawbacks with both methods. We argue that for small animals with soft bodies external characters can be more informative than hitherto expected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. and Telford, M.J. (2010) TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Research 38, W7W13.Google Scholar
Andrade, S.C.S., Strand, M., Schwartz, M., Chen, H.-X., Kajihara, H., Von Döhren, J., Sun, S.-C., Junoy, J., Thiel, M., Norenburg, J.L., Turbeville, J.M., Giribet, G. and Sundberg, P. (2012) Disentangling ribbon worm relationships: multi-locus analysis supports traditional classification of the phylum Nemertea. Cladistics 28, 141159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinkmann, A. (1917) Die pelagischen Nemertinen. Bergens Museums Skrifter 3, 1194.Google Scholar
Bürger, O. (1904) Nemertini. Das Tierreich 20, 1151.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1831) Phytozoa turbellaria Africana et Asiatica in Phytozoorum Tabula IV et V delineata. In Hemprich, F.G. and Ehrenberg, C.G. (eds) Symbolae physicae, seu icones et descriptiones corporum naturalium novorum aut minus cognitorum quae ex itineribus per Libyam, Aegyptium, Nubiam, Dongalam, Syriam, Arabim et Habessiniam, pars zoologica II, animalia evertebrata exclusis insectis. Berolina: Officina Academica, pp. 5367, pls IV – V (plates published in 1828).Google Scholar
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. and Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294299.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (1985) The need for a standard approach to taxonomic descriptions of nemerteans. American Zoologist 25, 514.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (1995) Nemertean genera and species of the world: an annotated checklist of original names and description citations, synonyms, current taxonomic status, habitats and recorded zoogeographic distribution. Journal of Natural History 29, 271561.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Crandall, F.B. (1989) The genus Amphiporus Ehrenberg (Nemertea, Enopla, Monostiliferoidea). Zoologica Scripta 18, 453470.Google Scholar
Guindon, S. and Gascuel, O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52, 696704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huelsenbeck, J.P. and Ronquist, F. (2005) Bayesian analysis of molecular evolution using MrBayes. In Nielsen, R. (ed.) Statistical methods in molecular evolution. New York: Springer, pp. 183232.Google Scholar
Johnston, G. (1828) Contributions to the British fauna. Zoological Journal 3, 486491.Google Scholar
Junoy, J., Andrade, S.C.S. and Giribet, G. (2011) Phylogenetic placement of a new hoplonemertean species commensal on ascidians. Invertebrate Systematics 24, 616629.Google Scholar
Kajihara, H., Chernyshev, A.V., Sun, S.-C., Sundberg, P. and Crandall, F.B. (2008) Checklist of nemertean genera and species published between 1995 and 2007. Species Diversity 13, 245274.Google Scholar
Kajihara, H., Olympia, M., Kobayashi, N., Katoh, T., Chen, H.-X., Strand, M. and Sundberg, P. (2011) Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 695722.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Skjæveland, Å., Orr, R.J.S., Enger, P., Ruden, T., Mevik, B.-H., Burki, F., Botnen, A. and Shalchian-Tabrizi, K. (2009) AIR: a batch-oriented web program package for construction of supermatrices ready for phylogenomic analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 357.Google Scholar
Maslakova, S.A., Thiel, M., Vásquez, N. and Norenburg, J.L. (2005) The smile of Amphiporus nelsoni Sanchez, 1973 (Nemertea: Hoplonemertea: Monostilifera: Amphiporidae) leads to a redescription and a change in family. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 118, 483498.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W.C. (1874) A Monograph of the British Annelids. Part I. The Nemerteans. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Norenburg, J.L. (1986) Redescription of a brooding nemertean, Cyanophthalma obscura (Schultze) gen. et comb. n., with observations on its biology and discussion of the species of Prostomatella and related taxa. Zoologica Scripta 15, 275293.Google Scholar
Posada, D. (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 12531256.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 15721574.Google Scholar
Schultze, M.S. (1851) Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Turbellarien. Greifswald: C.A. Koch.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22(21), 26882690.Google Scholar
Strand, M. and Sundberg, P. (2011) A DNA-based description of a new nemertean (phylum Nemertea) species. Marine Biology Research 7, 6370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, P. (1979) Statistical analysis of variation in characters in Tetrastemma laminariae (Nemertini), with a redescription of the species. Journal of Zoology 189, 3956.Google Scholar
Sundberg, P. and Strand, M. (2010) Nemertean taxonomy—time to change lane?. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48, 283284.Google Scholar
Sundberg, P., Chernyshev, A.V., Kajihara, H., Kånneby, T. and Strand, M. (2009) Character-matrix based descriptions of two new nemertean (Nemertea) species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 157, 264294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, P., Vodoti, E.T. and Strand, M. (2010) DNA barcoding should accompany taxonomy–the case of Cerebratulus spp. (Nemertea). Molecular Ecology Resources 10, 274281.Google Scholar
Thollesson, M. and Norenburg, J.L. (2003) Ribbon worm relationships: a phylogeny of the phylum Nemertea. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270, 407415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed