Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:43:24.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meiofaunal Communities in a Malaysian Mangrove Forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P.J. Somerfield ,
J.M. Gee  and
C. Aryuthaka
P.J. Somerfield
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH.
J.M. Gee
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH.
C. Aryuthaka
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The free-living benthic copepods and nematodes in samples of decaying leaves and sediment, from a Rhizophora apiculata-dominated mangrove forest bordering the Sungai Merbok Estuary in north-western peninsular Malaysia, were identified to putative species. Analyses of community structure of these taxa revealed that both are concentrated within the surface layers of the sediment; communities associated with decomposing leaves are distinct from those associated with the sediment surface; and variation between physically similar sites within the forest is relatively small. It is suggested that the meiofaunal communities in tropical soft sediment mangrove estuaries respond primarily to salinity and exposure gradients as in temperate non-vegetated estuaries. Copepod communities of the Merbok mangrove system appear to be much more diverse than those in estuarine and saltmarsh habitats in other climatic regions, and detailed faunal analysis suggests that there is a high degree of species endemism, particularly in genera which are only found on decaying plant material.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , August 1998 , pp. 717 - 732
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alongi, D.M., 1987a. Inter-estuary variation and intertidal zonation of free-living nematode communities in tropical mangrove systems. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 40, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alongi, D.M., 1987b. Intertidal zonation and seasonality of meiobenthos in tropical mangrove estuaries. Marine Biology, 95, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alongi, D.M., 1990. Community dynamics of free-living nematodes in some tropical mangrove and sandflat habitats. Bulletin of Marine Science, 46, 358–373.Google Scholar
Alongi, D.M. & Christoffersen, P., 1992. Benthic infauna and organism-sediment relations in a shallow, tropical coastal area: influence of outwelled mangrove detritus and physical disturbance. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 81, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. & Green, R.H., 1988. Statistical design and analysis of a ‘biological effects’ study. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 46, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. & Warwick, R.M., 1994. Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
Coull, B.C., Greenwood, J.G., Fielder, D.R. & Coull, B.A., 1995. Subtropical Australian juvenile fish eat meiofauna: experiments with winter whiting Sillago maculata and observations on other species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 125, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decraemer, W. & Coomans, A., 1978. Scientific report on the Belgian expedition to the Great Barrier Reef in 1967. Nematodes 13. A description of four new species and a redescription of four known species from in and around mangroves on Lizard Island. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 29, 509–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, J.W., Cefalu, R.C., Masters, I.M. & Tallman, A.S., 1975. Microbial activity in the mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) leaf detritus system. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Biology and Management of Mangroves, Honolulu, 1974, vol. II (ed. G.E., Walsh et al), pp. 661679. Gainsville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Fiers, F., 1986. New and interesting copepods (Crustacea, Copepoda) from brackish waters of Laing Island (northern Papua New Guinea) Leopold III Biological Station, Laing Island – contribution no. 96. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie, 56, 99–120.Google Scholar
Fleeger, J.W., 1985. Meiofaunal densities and copepod species composition in a Louisiana, U.S.A., estuary. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 104, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.M. & Somerfield, P.J., 1997. Do mangrove diversity and leaf litter decay promote meiofaunal diversity? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 218, 13–33.Google Scholar
Gerlach, S.A., 1958. Die Mangroveregion tropischer Kiisten als Lebensraum. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 46, 636–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heip, C., Vincx, M. & Vranken, G., 1985. The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 23, 399–489.Google Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. & Coull, B.C., 1983. The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 21, 67–175.Google Scholar
Hodda, M. & Nicholas, W.L., 1986. Temporal changes in littoral meiofauna from the Hunter River Estuary. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 37, 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, B.E., Fell, J.W. & Cefalu, R.C., 1973. Effect of temperature on life cycles of nematodes associated with the mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) detritus system. Marine Biology, 23, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondalarao, R., 1984. Distribution of meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods in Gautami Godavari estuarine system. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 13, 80–84.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, K., Sultan, Ali M.A. & Prince, Jeyaseelan M.J. 1984. Structure and dynamics of the aquatic food web community with special reference of nematodes in mangrove ecosystems. In Proceedings of the Asia Symposium on Mangrove environmental Research and Management, 1984 (ed. E., Soepadmo et al.), pp. 429–452. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaysia and UNESCO.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J.B. & Wish, M., 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, W.L., Elek, J.A., Stewart, A.C. & Marples, T.G., 1991. The nematode fauna of a temperate Australian mangrove mudflat; its population density, diversity and distribution. Hydrobiologia, 209, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ólafsson, E., 1995. Meiobenthos in mangrove areas in eastern Africa with emphasis on assemblage structure of free-living marine nematodes. Hydrobiologia, 312, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, J.-E., 1995. The ecology of mangrove conservation and management. Hydrobiology, 295, 343–352.Google Scholar
Ong, J.-E., Gong, W.-K. & Wong, C.-H., 1980. Ecological survey of the Sungei Merbok estuarine mangrove ecosystem. Penang, Malaysia: School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
Pinto, L. & Punchihewa, N.N., 1996. Utilisation of mangroves and seagrasses by fishes in the Negombo Estuary, Sri Lanka. Marine Biology, 126, 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Por, F.D., 1977. The benthic copepods of the Sinai mangrove. Rapport et Procès-verbaux des Réunions. Commission Internationale pour l'Exploration Scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée, 24, 87–89.Google Scholar
Por, F.D., 1984. Notes on the benthic copepods of the mangal ecosystem. In Hydrobiology of the mangal – the ecosystem of the mangrove forests (ed. F.D., Por and I., Dor), pp. 67–70. The Hague: W. Junk. [Developments in Hydrobiology, vol. 20.]Google Scholar
Por, F.D., Almeido Prado Por, M.S. & Oliveira, E.C., 1984. The mangal of the estuary and lagoon system of Cananeia (Brazil). In Hydrobiology of the mangal – the ecosystem of the mangrove forests (ed. F.D., Por and I., Dor), pp. 211–228. The Hague: W. Junk. [Developments in Hydrobiology, vol. 20.]Google Scholar
Reiper-Kirchner, M., 1989. Microbial degradation of North Sea macroalgae: field and laboratory studies. Botanica Marina, 32, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A.I. & Duke, N.C., 1987. Mangroves as nursery sites: comparisons of the abundance and species composition of fish and crustaceans in mangroves and other nearshore habitats in tropical Australia. Marine Biology, 96, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasekumar, A., 1994. Meiofauna of a mangrove shore on the west coast of peninsular Malaysia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 42, 901–915.Google Scholar
Shen, C.-J. & Tai, A.-Y., 1963. On five new species, a new subgenus and a new genus of freshwater Copepoda (Harpacticoida) from the delta of the Pearl River, South China. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 15, 417–432. [In Chinese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Teitjen, J.H., 1980. Microbial-meiofaunal interrelationships: a review. Microbiology, 1980, 335–338.Google Scholar
Warwick, R.M. & Gee, J.M., 1984. Community structure of estuarine meiobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 18, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.B.J. & Rao, G.C., 1987. Littoral Harpacticoida (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India, 16, 13–85.Google Scholar