Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:00:45.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus L.) off south-west England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. B. Bennett
D. B. Bennett
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Moult increments, annual moult frequency and hence annual growth were determined from suture-tagged edible crabs (Cancer pagurus L.) released and recaptured off Devon, Cornwall, and Dorset.

The average moult increments of males and females at a premoult carapace width of 100 mm were similar; at larger sizes the average moult increment of females was considerably less than that of males. Annual moult frequency of C. pagurus in south-west England decreased with increase in size, females more so than males.

As a result of the smaller moult increments and lower moult frequency of females, their annual growth is considerably less than that of males. This appears to be the result of three aspects of sex and reproduction: (1) reduction in moult increments, probably as a result of competition for nutritive resources between egg production and body growth; (2) the interruption of the moulting cycle by successive annual spawnings from a single impregnation at the previous moult; and (3) accentuation of the larger increments in weight at moulting of male crabs due to the allometric growth of their chelae. A consequence of the higher growth rate of males is the presence of very large male crabs – a distinctive feature of the population structure of the stock off south-west England.

The growth of C. pagurus in south-west England was compared with published data for stocks off the east and north-east coast. Moult increments were similar for both areas, but there were considerable differences in the moult frequencies. In the south-west, males moult more frequently than females; the opposite is the case for the east and north-east crab stocks. A valid reason for this difference has not yet been established.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , November 1974 , pp. 803 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Bennett, D. B., 1973. The effect of limb loss and regeneration on the growth of the edible crab, Cancer pagurus, L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 13, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, D. B. & Brown, C. G., 1970. Crab investigations in South-West England: a progress report. Shellfish Information Leaflet, 18, 12 pp. Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex, England.Google Scholar
Butler, T. H., 1961. Growth and age determination of the Pacific edible crab Cancer magister Dana. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 18, 873–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1954. Some uses of probability paper in the analysis of size frequency distributions. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5, 513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, E., 1965. Observations on growth of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus). Rapport et procès – verbaux des réunions Conseil permanent international pour l'exploration de la mer, 156, 62–70.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., 1966. Further observations on the annual growth of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus) along the east coast of England. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Council Meeting, Shellfish Committee, M:17 (mimeo).Google Scholar
Ennis, G. P., 1972. Growth per moult of tagged lobsters (Homarus americanus) in Bonavista Bay, Newfoundland. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, 143–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, D. A. & Edwards, E., 1966. The length/weight relationship in the edible crab (Cancer pagurus). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Council Meeting, Shellfish Committee. M:18 (mimeo).Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A. & Edwards, E., 1967. Estimation of annual growth in the edible crab (Cancer pagurus L.). Journal du Conseil, 31, 246–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepper, B. T., 1967. On the growth at moulting of lobsters (Homarus vulgaris) in Cornwall and Yorkshire. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 47, 629–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurata, H., 1962. Studies on the age and growth of Crustacea. Bulletin of the Hokkaido Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 24, 1–115.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1927. Life history of the edible crab. The Fishing News, 20 8 1927, 32–3.Google Scholar
Mackay, D. C. G., 1943. Relative growth of the european edible crab, Cancer pagurus. III. Growth of the sternum and appendages. Growth, 7, 401–12.Google Scholar
Mackay, D. C. G. & Weymouth, F. W., 1935. The growth of the Pacific edible crab, Cancer magister Dana. Journal of the Biological Board of Canada, 1, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, P. D. M., 1969. Fortran programs for statistical estimation of distribution mixtures: some techniques for statistical analysis of length-frequency data. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Technical Report, 129, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, U.K., 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 457 pp.Google Scholar
Mason, J., 1965. The Scottish crab-tagging experiments, 1960–1961. Rapports et proces – verbaux des réunions Conseil permanent international pour I'exploration de la mer, 156, 71–80.Google Scholar
Mistakidis, M. N., 1959. Preliminary data on the increase in size on moulting of the edible crab, Cancer pagurus. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Council Meeting, Shellfish Committee, 52 (mimeo).Google Scholar
Olmsted, J. M. D. & Baumberger, J. P., 1923. Form and growth of grapsoid crabs. Journal of Morphology, 38, 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passano, L. M., 1960. Molting and its control. In: The Physiology of Crustacea (ed. Waterman, T. H.), 1, 473–536. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poole, R. L., 1967. Preliminary results of the age and growth study of the market crab (Cancer magister) in California: the age and growth of Cancer magister in Bodega Bay. Marine Biological Association of India, Symposium Series, 2., 553–67.Google Scholar
Sinoda, M., 1968. Studies on fishery of Zuwai crab in the Japan Sea. I. The growth. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries, 34, 185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeman, W., 1933. Female lobsters handicapped in growth by spawning. Progress Report of Atlantic Biological Station of the Biological Board of Canada, 6, 5–6.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. J., 1958. Observations on the increase in size at moulting in the lobster (Homarus vulgaris M-Edw.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 603–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, D. G., 1953. The growth rate of the American lobster (Homarus americanus). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 10, 371–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H. C., 1900. Contributions to the life-history of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus, Linn.). Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland for 1899, 18, Part III, 77–143.Google Scholar