Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T12:20:17.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Growth Kinetics of Isochrysis Galbana in Cultures Containing Sublethal Concentrations Of Mercuric Chloride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Anthony G. Davies
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association, Plymouth

Extract

There is increasing evidence that the specific growth rates of phytoplankton are hyperbolically related to the intracellular concentrations of rate-determining nutrients by expressions of the Michaelis-Menten type used in the study of enzyme reaction kinetics (see, for example, Caperon, 1968; Droop, 1968; Davies, 1970; Paasche, 1973). This has led us to inquire whether there might also be relationships, analogous to those which describe the effect of inhibitors upon the rates of enzyme reactions (Dixon & Webb, 1958) which can be applied to the growth of phytoplankton in the presence of sublethal levels of toxic substances.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, M. S., 1949. Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics, 5, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Bassat, D., Shelef, G., Gruner, N. & Shuval, H. I., 1972. Growth of Chlamydomonas in a medium containing mercury. Nature, London, 240, 43–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caperon, J., 1968. Population growth response of Isochrysisgalbana to nitrate variation at limiting concentrations. Ecology, 49, 866–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. D. S. & Rigler, F. H., 1957. The loss of mercury from stored sea water solutions of mercuric chloride. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 449–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagley, S. & Hinshelwood, C. N., 1938. Physicochemical aspects of bacterial growth. Part III. Influence of alcohols on the growth of Bad. Lactis aerogenes. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1942–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G., 1970. Iron, chelation and the growth of marine phytoplankton. I. Growth kinetics and chlorophyll production in cultures of the euryhaline flagellate Dunaliella tertiolecta under iron-limiting conditions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 6586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G., 1973. The kinetics of and a preliminary model for the uptake of radio-zinc by Phaeodactylum tricornutum in culture. In Radioactive Contamination of the Marine Environment.Proceedings of a Symposium on the Interaction of Radioactive Contaminants with the Constituents of the Marine Environment held by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Seattle, U.S.A., 10–14 July 1972, pp. 403–20. Vienna: I.A.E.A.Google Scholar
Dixon, M. & Webb, E. C, 1958. Enzymes, 782 pp. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.Google ScholarPubMed
Droop, M. R., 1968. Vitamin B12 and marine ecology. IV The kinetics of uptake, growth and inhibition in Monochrysis lutheri. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 689733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, S. J., 1972. Toxicity of copper to Thalassiosira pseudonana in unenriched inshore sea-water. Journal of Phycology, 8, 318–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glooschenko, W. A., 1969. Accumulation of203Hg by the marine diatom Chaetoceros costatum. Journal of Phycology, 5, 224–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannan, P. J.& Patouillet, C, 1972. Effect of mercury on algal growth rates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 14, 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harriss, R. C., White, D. B. & Macfarlane, R. B., 1970. Mercury compounds reduce photo-synthesis by plankton. Science, 170, 736–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hase, E., 1962. Cell division. In Physiology and Biochemistry of Algae (ed. Lewin, R. A.), pp. 617–24. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Magos, L., 1971. Selective atomic-absorption determination of inorganic mercury and methyl-mercury in undigested biological samples. Analyst, 96, 847–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magos, L., Tuffery, A. A. & Clarkson, T. W., 1964. Volatilization of mercury by bacteria. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 21, 294–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Nuzzi, R., 1972. Toxicity of mercury to phytoplankton. Nature, London, 237, 3840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paasche, E., 1973. Silicon and the ecology of marine plankton diatoms. I. Thalassiosira pseudonana (Cyclotella nana) grown in a chemostat with silicate as limiting nutrient. Marine Biology, 18, 117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passow, H. & Rothstein, A., 1959. The binding of mercury by the yeast cell in relation to changes in permeability. Journal of General Physiology, 43, 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, A., 1959. Cell membrane as site of action of heavy metals. Federation Proceedings. Federation of American societies for experimental Biology, 18, 10261038.Google ScholarPubMed
Topping, G. & Pirie, J. M., 1972. Determination of inorganic mercury in natural waters. Analytica chimica acta, 62, 200–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toribara, T. Y., Shields, C. P. & Koval, L., 1970. Behaviour of dilute solutions of mercury. Talanta, 17, 1025–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uthe, J. F., Armstrong, F. A. J. & Stainton, M. P., 1970. Mercury determination in fish samples by wet digestion and flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 27, 805–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar