Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:32:36.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Observations on Podocyst Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

David M. Chapman
David M. Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The podocyst is a cuticular patella-shaped stage in the life-cycle of certain scyphopolyps and has been described recently (Chapman, 1968) from the standpoint of anatomy, histochemistry and development. New material has come to hand necessitating a reassessment of the views concerning the formation of this deceptively simple structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 107 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chapman, D. M., 1966. Evolution of the scyphistoma. In The Cnidaria and their Evolution. Edited by Rees, W. J.. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond., No. 16. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. M., 1968. Structure, histochemistry and formation of the podocyst and cuticle of Amelia aurita. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D. M., 1969. The nature of cnidarian desmocytes. Tissue & Cell, Vol. 1, pp. 619–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurr, E., 1960. Encyclopaedia of Microscopic Stains. 498 pp. London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Hadži, J., 1912. Über die Podozysten der Scyphopolypen. Biol. Zbl., Bd. 32, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
Hérouard, E., 1912. Histoire du kyste pédieux de Chrysaora et sa signification. Archs Zool. exp. gén., T. 10, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
Humason, G. L., 1967. Animal Tissue Techniques. 569 pp. San Francisco/London: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. G., 1910. Medusae of the World, Vol. 3. Washington: Carnegie Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1960. Notes on Microscopical Technique for Zoologists. 76 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1960. Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Puchtler, H., Sweat, F. & Doss, N. O., 1963. A one-hour phosphotungstic acidhematoxylin stain. Am. J. din. Path., Vol. 40, pp. 334–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steedman, H. F., 1960. Section Cutting in Microscopy. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Tchéou-Tai-Chuin, , 1930. Le cycle évolutif du scyphistome de Chrysaora. Trav. Stn biol. Roscoff, T. 8, pp. 1–179.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., 1959. A simple method for cutting sections in the 0.5 to I µ range, and for sections of chitin. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 100, pp. 315–20.Google Scholar