Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:54:05.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food preferences of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum in Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, central-east Atlantic Ocean)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2001

F. Tuya
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Marine Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
J.A. Martín
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Marine Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
G.M. Reuss
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Marine Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
A. Luque
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Marine Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain

Abstract

Preferences of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) feeding on five species of brown macroalgae (Padina pavonica, Dyctiota dychotoma, Cystoseira abies-marina, Lobophora variegata and Halopteris filicina) have been studied using caging field experiments on Gran Canaria Island during August to October 2000. Results of three assays of both single and multiple diet experiments rejected the null hypothesis that Diadema does not feed selectively on the five selected algal species. In the multiple diet assays, Diadema consumed an average of 68–98 mg algae urchin−1 h−1 and 4–120 mg algae urchin−1 h−1 in the single diet experiments. On the basis of consumption, the five species of algae eaten can be divided into three groups. Thus Halopteris, Lobophora and Dyctiota were considered preferred algae, while Padina was considered an intermediate alga. Finally Cystoseira was significantly the less preferred and consumed seaweed in all sets of assays.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)