Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:57:15.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding and gut structure of Parathemisto gaudichaudi (Guerin) (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Sheader  and
F. Evans
M. Sheader
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, North Shields, Tyne and Wear
F. Evans
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, North Shields, Tyne and Wear
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous (workers who have examined the gut contents of members of the genus Parathemisto, and who have kept and fed specimens in laboratory conditions, have concluded that they are chiefly carnivorous in habit, feeding largely on zooplankton, and to a lesser extent on phytoplankton (Conover, 1960; Baker, 1963; Kane, 1967).

The gut of P. gaudichaudi has been found to contain almost intact copepods, especially Calanus and occasionally Temora (Bigelow, 1926 – Gulf of Maine); young specimens of Euphausia superba (Hardy & Gunther, 1935 – Antarctic); and copepods (Nemoto & Yoo, 1970). Siegfried (1965 – west coast of S. Africa) found P. gaudichaudi to be a rather indiscriminate feeder, its gut contents reflecting the composition of the plankton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , August 1975 , pp. 641 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, A. De C., 1963. The problem of keeping planktonic animals alive in the laboratory. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 291–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, H. B., 1926. Plankton of the offshore waters of the Gulf of Maine. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, Washington, 40, 1–509.Google Scholar
Bowman, T. E., 1960. The pelagic amphipod genus Parathemisto (Hyperiidea: Hyperiidae) in the North Pacific and adjacent Arctic Ocean. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 112, 343–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, T. E., Meyers, C. D. & Hicks, S. D., 1963. Notes on the association between hyperiid amphipods and medusae in Chesapeake and Narragansett Bays and the Niantic River. Chesapeake Science, 4, 141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, E. T. & Catton, W. T., 1962. Resolving power of the compound eye. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 16, 73–85.Google Scholar
Conover, R. J., 1960. The feeding and respiration of some marine planktonic Crustacea. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 119, 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B., 1930. Growth and maintenance in the plaice (P. platessa L.) pt. 1. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 17, 103–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, M. J., 1946. On Themisto libellula in Baffin Island coastal waters. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 6, 419–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, F. & Sheader, M., 1972. Host species of the hyperiid amphipod Hyperoche medusarum (Kroyer) in the North Sea. Crustaceana, suppl. 3, 275–6.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1935. Histoire d'une moulière. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 69, 152–77.Google Scholar
Forster, G. R., 1953. Peritrophic membranes in the Caridea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 32, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauld, D. T., 1957. A peritrophic membrane in calanoid copepods. Nature, London 179, 325–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgi, R., 1969. Fine structure of peritrophic membranes in Crustacea. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ôkologie der Tiere, 65, 225–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Gunther, E. R., 1935. The plankton of the South Georgia whaling grounds and adjacent waters. 4 (2). The zooplankton. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 11, 194–272.Google Scholar
Jones, D. A., 1968. The functional morphology of the digestive system in the carnivorous intertidal isopod Eurydice. Journal of Zoology, 156, 363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, J. E., 1967. Observations on the moulting and feeding of a hyperiid amphipod. Crustaceana, 6, 129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemoto, T. & Yoo, K. I., 1970. The amphipod (Parathemisto gaudichaudii) as a food of the Antarctic sei whale. Scientific Reports of the Whales Research Institute, Tokyo, 22, 153–8.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1953. The medusae of the British Isles. 530 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheader, M. & Evans, F., 1974. The taxonomic relationship of Parathemisto gaudichaudi (Guerin) and P. gracilipes (Norman), with a key to the genus Parathemisto. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 915–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegfried, W. R., 1965. Observations on the amphipod Parathemisto gaudichaudii off the west coast of South Africa. Zoologica Africana, 1, 339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. G. & Bone, D. G., 1972. The interrelationship of Hyperia galba (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and Desmonema gaudichaudi (Scyphomedusae, Semaeostomae) from the Atlantic. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 27, 39–49.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., 1965. The principles of insect physiology. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1925. The digestive diverticuli in the lamellibranchs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 54, 707–17.Google Scholar