Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:19:14.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of fish, crustacea and zooplankton at different distances from mangrove prop roots within a semi-isolated lagoon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2013

J. Jaxion-Harm ,
C. Pien ,
J. E. Saunders  and
M. R. Speight
J. Jaxion-Harm*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3JA, UK
C. Pien
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA
J. E. Saunders
Affiliation:
Coral View Research Center, Utila, Honduras
M. R. Speight
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3JA, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. Jaxion-Harm, Department of Zoology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3JA, UK(Current address: Department of Fisheries and Allied Sciences, Auburn University, 8300 State Highway 181, Fairhope, AL 36532, USA) email: jessica.jaxion.harm@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although semi-isolated mangrove lagoons are common in the Caribbean, few studies have surveyed organisms of multiple trophic levels and taxa in these lagoons, which are characterized by a lack of adjacent seagrass and coral-reef habitats. In this study, visual surveys, minnow traps and plankton tows, which were deployed at abutting mangrove prop roots and on macro-algal beds 5 and 15 m away from the prop roots, were used to study assemblages of fish and their potential prey in a semi-isolated lagoon located on Utila, Honduras during the dry season. Assemblages of fish and macro-crustacea differed between the three distances from prop roots, while zooplankton abundances were highly variable and did not follow any distinct distribution patterns. Daytime visual surveys found that large lutjanid (snapper) juveniles, tetraodontid (pufferfish), and some species of brachyurans were more abundant near prop roots. Small lutjanid juveniles were also significantly more numerous near prop roots, but their potential prey, copepods, showed no such difference in abundance. However, 24-hour minnow trap catches found that mean fish abundance (although low) did not differ between near-mangrove transects and transects located in algal beds away from prop roots. Whereas it is well known that mangrove–seagrass habitats play a vital role for fish in open systems, low abundances of organisms in algal beds, particularly in the day time, in this study indicate that algal beds may not be as important to fish in a semi-isolated mangrove lagoon.

Keywords

mangrovesalgal bedssemi-isolated lagoonzooplanktoncrustaceafishCaribbean
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 6 , September 2013 , pp. 1471 - 1479
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acosta, C.A. and Butler, M.J. (1997) Role of mangrove habitat as a nursery for juvenile spiny lobster, Panulirus argus, in Belize. Marine and Freshwater Research 48, 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, A.J., Dahlgren, C.P., Kellison, G.T., Kendall, M.S., Layman, C.A., Ley, J.A., Nagelkerken, I. and Serafy, J.E. (2006) Nursery function of tropical back-reef systems. Marine Ecology Progress Series 318, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar-Perera, A. and Appeldoorn, R.S. (2008) Spatial distribution of marine fishes along a cross-shelf gradient containing a continuum of mangrove–seagrass–coral reefs off southwestern Puerto Rico. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76, 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alheit, J. and Scheibel, W. (1982) Benthic harpacticoids as a food source for fish. Marine Biology 70, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Cadena, J.N., Ordonez-Lopez, U., Almaral-Mendivil, A.R. and Uicab-Sabido, A. (2009) Composition and abundance of zooplankton groups from a coral reef lagoon in Puerto Morelos, Quintana Roo, Mexico, during an annual cycle. Revista de Biologia Tropical 57, 647–658.Google ScholarPubMed
Beck, M.W., Heck, K.L., Able, K.W., Childers, D.L., Eggleston, D.B., Gillanders, B.M., Halpern, B., Hays, C.G., Hoshino, K., Minello, T.J., Orth, R.J., Sheridan, P.F. and Weinstein, M.R. (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukers, J.S. and Jones, G.P. (1998) Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population. Oecologia 114, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browder, J.A., Dragovich, A., Tashiro, J., Coleman-Duffie, E., Foltz, C. and Zweifel, J. (1986) A comparison of biological abundances in three adjacent Bay systems downstream from the golden estates canal system. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-185. Miami, FL: NOAA.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. (1993) Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocheret de la Moriniere, E., Pollux, B.J.A., Nagelkerken, I., Hemminga, M.A., Huiskes, A.H.L. and van der Velde, G. (2003) Ontogenetic dietary changes of coral reef fishes in the mangrove–seagrass–reef continuum: stable isotopes and gut-content analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 246, 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocheret de la Moriniere, E.C., Nagelkerken, I., van der Meij, H. and van der Velde, G. (2004) What attracts juvenile coral reef fish to mangroves: habitat complexity or shade? Marine Biology 144, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B.J. (1965) Evidence for regulation of community metabolism in a marine ecosystem. Ecology 46, 563–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, R.M., Leite, N.R. and Pereira, L.C.C. (2009) Mesozooplankton of the Curuca Estuary (Amazon Coast, Brazil). Journal of Coastal Research 1, 400–404.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R Book. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorenbosch, M., Verberk, W.C.E.P., Nagelkerken, I. and van der Veldel, G. (2007) Influence of habitat configuration on connectivity between fish assemblages of Caribbean seagrass beds, mangroves and coral reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 334, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorenbosch, M., Grol, M.G.G., de Groene, A., van der Velde, G. and Nagelkerken, I. (2009) Piscivore assemblages and predation pressure affect relative safety of some back-reef habitats for juvenile fish in a Caribbean bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 379, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauth, J.E., Bernardo, J., Camara, M., Resetarits, W.J., VanBuskirk, J. and McCollum, S.A. (1996) Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: A conceptual approach. American Naturalist 147, 282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granek, E.F. and Ruttenberg, B.I. (2007) Protective capacity of mangroves during tropical storms: a case study from ‘Wilma’ and ‘Gamma’ in Belize. Marine Ecology Progress Series 343, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwicke, B. and Speight, M.R. (2005) The relationship between fish species richness, abundance, and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. Journal of Fish Biology 66, 650–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratwicke, B., Petrovic, C. and Speight, M.R. (2006) Fish distribution and ontogenetic habitat preferences in non-estuarine lagoons and adjacent reefs. Environmental Biology of Fishes 76, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutsche, A. (2005) Distribution and habitat utilization of Ctenosaura bakeri on Utila. Iguana 12, 143–151.Google Scholar
Hall, M.O., Durako, M.J., Fourqurean, J.W. and Zieman, J.C. (1999) Decadal changes in seagrass distribution and abundance in Florida Bay. Estuaries 22, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harm, J., Kearns, E. and Speight, M.R. (2008) Differences in coral-reef fish assemblages between mangrove-rich and mangrove-poor islands of Honduras. In 11th International Coral Reef Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA vol. 1, pp. 302–306.Google Scholar
Helfman, G.S. (1981) The advantage to fishes of hovering in shade. Copeia 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaxion-Harm, J., Saunders, J. and Speight, M.R. (2012) Distribution of fish in seagrass, mangroves, and coral reefs: life-stage dependent habitat use in Honduras. Revista de Biologia Tropical 60, 683–698.Google ScholarPubMed
Jaxion-Harm, J. and Speight, M.R. (2012) Algal cover in mangroves affects distribution and predation rates by carnivorous fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 414/415, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D.L., Walter, J.F., Brooks, E.N. and Serafy, J.E. (2010) Connectivity through ontogeny: fish population linkages among mangrove and coral reef habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 401, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouffre, D., Lamhoai, T., Millet, B. and Amanieu, M. (1991) Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities and hydronamic pattern in coastal lagoons. Oceanologica Acta 14, 489–504.Google Scholar
Krumme, U. and Liang, T.H. (2004) Tidal-induced changes in a copepod-dominated zooplankton community in a macrotidal mangrove channel in northern Brazil. Zoological Studies 43, 404–414.Google Scholar
Laegdsgaard, P. and Johnson, C. (2001) Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 257, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layman, C.A. and Silliman, B.R. (2002) Preliminary survey and diet analysis of juvenile fishes of an estuarine creek on Andros Island, Bahamas. Bulletin of Marine Science 70, 199–210.Google Scholar
Luo, J.G., Serafy, J.E., Sponaugle, S., Teare, P.B. and Kieckbusch, D. (2009) Movement of gray snapper Lutjanus griseus among subtropical seagrass, mangrove, and coral reef habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 380, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T.E. and Holanov, S.H. (1995) Foraging success of largemouth bass at different light intensities: implications for time and depth of feeding. Journal of Fish Biology 46, 759–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miah, M.D., Shin, M.Y. and Koike, M. (2011) Carbon sequestration in the Forests of Bangladesh. In Mia, M.D., Shin, M.Y. and Koike, M. (eds) Forests to climate change mitigation: clean development mechanism in Bangladesh. London, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumby, P.J., Alasdair, J., Edwards, J., Arias-Gonzallez, E., Lindeman, K.C., Blackwell, P.G., Gall, A., Gorczynska, M.I., Harborne, A.R., Pescod, C.L., Renken, H., Wabnitz, C.C.C. and Llewellyn, G. (2004) Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature 427, 533–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagelkerken, I., Dorenbosch, M., Verberk, W., de la Moriniere, E.C. and van der Velde, G. (2000a) Importance of shallow-water biotopes of a Caribbean bay for juvenile coral reef fishes: patterns in biotope association, community structure and spatial distribution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 202, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagelkerken, I., Dorenbosch, M., de la Moriniere, E.C., Verberk, W. C. E. P. and van der Velde, G. (2000b) Day–night shifts of fishes between shallow-water biotopes of a Caribbean bay, with emphasis on the nocturnal feeding of Haemulidae and Lutjanidae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 194, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagelkerken, I., Blaber, S.J.M, Bouillon, S., Green, P., Haywood, M., Kirton, L.G., Meynecke, J.O., Pawlik, J., Penrose, H.M., Sasekumar, A. and Somerfield, P.J. (2008a) The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review. Aquatic Botany 89, 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagelkerken, I., Bothwell, J., Nemeth, R.S., Pitt, J.M. and van der Velde, G. (2008b) Interlinkage between Caribbean coral reefs and seagrass beds through feeding migrations by grunts (Haemulidae) depends on habitat accessibility. Marine Ecology Progress Series 368, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, C.B. and Cowen, R.K. (2004) Direct evidence of a biophysical retention mechanism for coral reef fish larvae. Limnology and Oceanography 49, 1964–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittman, S.J., Caldow, C., Hile, S.D. and Monaco, M.E. (2007) Using seascape types to explain the spatial patterns of fish in the mangroves of SW Puerto Rico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 348, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A.I. and Blaber, S.J.M. (1992) Plankton, epibenthos and fish communities. In Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. (eds) Tropical mangrove ecosystems: Coastal and Estuarine Studies 41. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, pp. 173–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rios-Jara, E. (1998) Spatial and temporal variations in the zooplankton community of Phosphorescent Bay, Puerto Rico. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 46, 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C.S. (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 62, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoffin, T.P. (1970) Trapping and binding of subtidal carbonate sediments by marine vegetation in Bimini Lagoon, Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 40, 249–273.Google Scholar
Shepherd, S.A., Watson, J.E., Womersley, H.B.S. and Carey, J.M. (2009) Long-term changes in macroalgal assemblages after increased sedimentation and turbidity in Western Port, Victoria, Australia. Botanica Marina 52, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, P.F. (1992) Comparative habitat utilization by estuarine macrofauna within the mangrove ecosystem of Rookery Bay, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 50, 21–39.Google Scholar
Tongnunui, P., Ikejima, K., Yamane, T., Horinouchi, M., Medej, T., Sano, M., Kurokura, H. and Taniuchi, T. (2002) Fish fauna of the Sikao Creek mangrove estuary, Trang, Thailand. Fisheries Science 68, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verweij, M.C., Nagelkerken, I., Hol, K.E.M.van den Beld, A. and van der Velde, G. (2007) Space use of Lutjanus apodus including movement between a putative nursery and a coral reef. Bulletin of Marine Science 81, 127–138.Google Scholar