Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:04:50.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crab (Cancer pagurus) migrations in the English Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

D.B. Bennett
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex, CMo 8HA
C. G. Brown
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex, CMo 8HA

Abstract

The development of the persistent suture tag has permitted the study of long-term migrations of large decapods like the European edible crab (Cancer pagurus L.). A tagging study of the growth and migrations of C. pagurus was part of a research project undertaken to provide advice on the effective management of the English Channel crab fishery. During the years 1968–74 a total of 15296 suture-tagged crabs was released; the majority in the main fishery off south Devon and Cornwall, but releases were also made in the eastern half of the Channel. The early releases were mainly inshore, within 22 km (12 nautical miles), but as the fishery expanded offshore releases were made in mid-Channel.

Most of the recaptures occurred within two years of release, with the highest recapture rates being in the most intensively fished areas during the main fishing season. From the total of 2714 crabs recaptured, 2255 had reliable recapture information. In the inshore release areas 90 % of the males and 76 % of the females were recaptured within 18 km (10 nautical miles) of their release position. Offshore the corresponding proportions were considerably lower at 76 % and 59%, with 11 % of the males and 21 % of the females having moved > 90 km (49 nautical miles).

When males did move > 18 km they were mainly the larger males and their mean displacements were 14–31 km in several directions. The offshore releases of males in the middle and eastern Channel showed more extensive movements, which appeared to be directed, most of them being in a westerly direction, with mean displacements of 41–114 km. With only one exception, the female inshore releases had a mean direction of movement of between south and west, with mean displacements of 12–84 km. Overall, those females making the more extensive movements were larger than those caught in the vicinity of the release positions. The last inshore release at Portland Bill gave the first indication of extensive westerly movements from the eastern part of the English Channel.

Movements of females released on the offshore Devon and Cornwall grounds were mainly in a westwards direction, although several inshore movements and longer distance movements of up to 302 km towards the French coast were recorded. The recaptured females from the middle and eastern Channel releases showed greater mean displacements (110–158 km), all in a westerly direction. Only 10% of the mid-Channel recaptures were made within 18 km, with 73% being caught > 90 km from their release position. The highest mean velocity was 23 km/week, with an individual maximum of 183 km/week.

Most of the recaptures of male C. pagurus released inshore were made near the release position, and those movements which were observed would appear to be the result of nomadism. Offshore males seemed to be more mobile, but a nomadic existence for larger male C. pagurus seems more likely than migration. Female C. pagurus in the English Channel are more mobile than males. Large, mature, female crabs leave the eastern Channel and congregate in the autumn off south Devon. During the winter and spring there may be some nomadic movements. These migratory movements are reflected in the size composition and sex ratio. The migrations seem to be related to the breeding behaviour, ensuring a suitable sea-bed substrate for berried crabs and/or allowing distribution of the larval phase on the easterly residual currents in the English Channel.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, D. B., 1974. Growth of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus L.) off south-west England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 803823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. G. & Bennett, D. B., 1980. Population and catch structure of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus) in the English Channel. Journal du Conseil, 39, 88100.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., 1965. Observations on the growth of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus). Rapport et procès-verbaux des réunions. Conseil permanent international pour l'exploration de la mer, 156, 6270.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., 1967. The Yorkshire crab stocks. Laboratory Leaflets. Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex, no. 17, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., 1971. A Contribution to the Bionomics of the Edible Crab (Cancer pagurus L.) in English and Irish Waters. Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., 1979. The Edible Crab and its Fishery in British Waters. 142 pp. Farnham, Surrey: Fishing News Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Gundersen, K. R., 1977. Migrations of crabs ( Cancer pagurus L.) in Norwegian waters. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C.M. Papers and Reports), K: 39, 18 pp. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Hallbäck, H., 1969. Swedish crab investigations. Some preliminary results. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C.M. Papers and Reports), K: 27, 10 pp. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A. & Edwards, E., 1967. Estimation of annual growth in the edible crab ( Cancer pagurus L.). Journal du Conseil, 31, 246264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnkind, W. F., 1980. Spiny lobsters: patterns of movement. In The Biology and Management of Lobsters, vol. I: Physiology and Behaviour (ed. Cobb, J. S. and Phillips, B. F.), pp. 349407. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A. E., 1980. Substrate and tidal limitations on the distribution and behaviour of the lobster and edible crab. Underwater Association Report, 5, 165169.Google Scholar
Howard, A. E., 1982. The distribution anf behaviour of ovigerous edible crabs (Cancer pagurus) and consequent sampling bias. Journal du Conseil, 40, 259261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R., 1976. The use of marking data in fish population analysis. F.A.O. Fisheries Technical Paper, no. 153, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Kinnear, J. A. M. & Chapman, C. J., 1976. The use of ultrasonic transmitters to monitor movements of large decapod curstaceans. Internal Report, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, no. 12, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Lee, A. J. & Ramster, J. W., 1979. Atlas of the seas around the British Isles. Fisheries Research Technical Report, Lowestoft, no. 20, 57 pp.Google Scholar
Mason, J., 1965. The Scottish crab-tagging experiments, 1960–61. Rapport et procès-verbaux des réunions. Conseil permanent international pour l'exploration de la mer, 156, 7180.Google Scholar
Meek, A., 1913. The migrations of crabs. Report of the Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, Northumberland, 2, 1320.Google Scholar
Mistakidis, M. N., 1960. Movements of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus) in English waters. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C. M. Papers and Reports), K: 88, 11 pp.[Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Pingree, R. D., 1980. Physical oceanography of the Celtic Sea and English Channel. In The North- West European Shelf Seas: The Sea Bed and the Sea in Motion. II. Physical and Chemical Oceanography and Physical Resources (ed. Banner, F. T., Collins, M. B., and Massie, K. S.), pp. 415465. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pratje, O. 1950. Die Bodenbedeckung des englischen Kanals und die maximalen Gezeitenstrom-geschwindigkeiten. Deutsche hydrographische Zeitschrift, 3, 201205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H. C., 1900. Contributions to the life-history of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus, Linn.). Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland 18, 77143.Google Scholar